So last week Baruch college sigma alpha delta society held a oxford debate on gun control. The two debaters were Shaina Harrison from New Yorkers Against Gun Violence (NYAGV) and Darin Goens fron National Rifle Association (NRA). The debate was not intense, but Mr Goens from the NRA clearly won the debate. Shaina Harrison was very unprofessional did not have counter arguments and was very rude and mean. This is not the way professional guest acts. Darin Goens on the other hand quality in formation where h stated 2.5 million guns in the US have saved other people from being killed also how Chicago has gun laws for ten years and after they were taken away gun violence had stopped in the city.
Shaina Hirrison stated a good point a gun makes you feel more powerful. If some one is coming to rob your house and you have gun most likly you will use the gun and not call the police. She also stated we shoud do back round checks. DarinGoens ended up winning the debate. After this debate my thoughts have changed and I feel it is alright for peopel to have guns.
Wow. That sounds like it was very convincing for you, Rahad. So where does this leave your research?
I thought about what both speaker said and I think I jumped to conclusion at the moment. I have to do more research on both sides.