https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1794/1028/dicharry.pdf?sequence=6
The above source involves digital art and what is lost or gained from it compared to art by hand. I skimmed the pages, and it seems like there is a mixed opinion on the issue. It is from 2005, which may be too old, but it relates a lot to digitization and my topic. My topic is still general, and digital art can be one topic to elaborate on.
This source talks about the impact of digitization on the arts and the humanities, from 2007. This helps reveal some of the negatives of digitization and things to consider when something is digitized. Technology may be better now, but I can build on the idea of how digitization of something produces a different feeling when it is digitized, and how the medium, or surroundings, matter.
From my sources, I hope to show that the effects of digitization are drastic enough such that everything should not be digitized or that people should be encouraged to do more with digitization. For example, pictures are digitized and can be edited, but it helps for them to be developed. I think it gives the picture more value and cannot be lost digitally. People should print and edit on paper instead of on the computer. Art can be looked at the computer, but people should be encouraged to go to the physical places (if interested and possible). Digitization is acceptable in some areas more than others, but they should not rush to it.
Other helpful links:
http://www.treehugger.com/clean-technology/7-major-ways-were-digitizing-our-world-and-3-reasons-we-still-want-hardcopies.html
http://www.kpmg.com/US/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/impact-of-digitization.pdf
http://web.ebscohost.com.remote.baruch.cuny.edu/ehost/detail?sid=46ed98ac-ebb4-4858-bbca-385a082fa4f7%40sessionmgr15&vid=1&hid=12&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=aax&AN=505676099 (I was going to use this, but it’s from 1997, so I dunno)