American LiteraturePosts RSS Comments RSS

Hemingway

Out of the selections of Hemingway from In Our Time, I wanted to talk about the first eight ‘chapter’ vignettes.

Hemingway’s simplistic, short, and straightforward sentences in the first three vignettes, especially Chapter III, finely express the detachment, disillusionment, and strangeness of war. In fact, though not the exact same, the multiple vignettes of different scenes of war kind of remind me of Catch-22 which also utilized style to express the absurdity and despair of war. Again, particularly Chapter III avoids describing the narrator’s feelings, instead resorting to a journalistic-like notes. The juxtaposition of simple, factual statements in these kind of chapters to the horrible situation of war suggests a detached numbness as a way to deal with the trauma of war.

Chapter IV, noticeably, is something of a divergent as the narrator has something of a voice and personality. There’s a use of a lot of adjectives, in the phrases of “frightfully hot”, “absolutely perfect”, “simply priceless”, “absolutely topping”, “absolutely perfect”, “very fine”, “frightfully put out”, which makes it seem like a fun vacation instead of harsh war. It relates to the previous chapter in that both of them use a similar situation to display the different ways soldiers cope with war. The soldier in Chapter III copes by detaching himself and the soldier in Chapter IV copes by embracing the mindset of a glorious war.

Chapter V goes back to the relatively simple, straightforward sentences pertaining to horrors of war and death. Chapter VI gives named character(s) for the first time for the vignettes in Nick and Renaldi, thus removing some of  the detachment set as the usual precedent though still keeping with the simple sentences to keep a sense of detachment regardless. The feeling of disillusionment is further supported by the sense that these soldiers don’t really even know what they’re fighting for at this point. People are dying ‘for their country’ without a real reason.

The next chapter, however, goes back to nameless characters and narrator, but makes use of the stream of consciousness to really express the desperation and fear of the men in the trenches, in war. This is probably the most amount of emotion in the vignettes so far. There is no trauma being coped with numbness or detachment or glorifying right then; it’s a moment of raw feeling, though it’s only a moment, as when it’s over the soldier goes on to be emotionally withdrawn.

Chapter VIII is interesting, because it’s not clear if this is before, during, or after the war. The previous vignettes would insinuate it’s after since all the vignettes have been about soldiers, thus implying Drevitts and/or Boyle are veterans, but that’s questionable by the story having Boyle kill Hungarians because he thinks they’re “wops” — a derogatory slur for Italians. The fact that Hungary was on the opposite side of America during the war while Italy eventually joined the Allies, alongside America, is what makes this questionable. If it was about the aftermath of World War I, it would more likely have been Boyle killing Italians because he though they were Hungarian. That it is not so seems to imply that it’s about racism outside of that, with the irony being Boyle’s line of being able to tell “wops” a mile off. Perhaps the insinuation is  that the war’s not the only thing wrong, but that society and people outside of just the war are messed up too. That the reasons for disillusionment aren’t just caused by the war, but exist outside of it, too.

2 responses so far

2 Responses to “Hemingway”

  1. Nicole Astudilloon Mar 23rd 2018 at 11:14 am

    I absolutely love how you compared the first chapters to each other and to Catch-22 while using literary elements such as juxtaposition and style to back up your claims. You analyzed it really thoroughly including the possible connections that these chapters’ characters have with each other, whether or not they have a name or not. Another aspect of your blog that I agree with having our in class discussion is the fact that the trauma and disillusionment, like you stated, was not only experienced by the soldiers but by everyone else left behind including friends and family of those at war. When you looked further into the “wops” and the fact that it refers to Italians and the Americans were killing them while in reality, they were Hungarians is awfully strange, like everything else during war.

  2. p.marinoson Mar 23rd 2018 at 8:14 pm

    I think that you did a good job with your analysis since you thought about pretty much all of its key areas: narration, style, diction, setting, emotion, etc. I also think it was the right choice to offer a chapter to chapter analysis and compare the sections to each other. I find it interesting how the subjects are feeling so many intense emotions from their traumatic experiences in the war that their writing lacks emotion, and that the emotions are hidden in those blank spaces. I think it’s an idea that’s difficult to put into words, but hey, i guess so is war, and I think that Hemingway and Heller in Catch-22 both do a good job in their attempts to explain this to people who haven’t experienced it

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.