When you look online for the definition of bioethics you get something that says it’s “the ethics of bio research”. That might be a satisfying definition to some people but to people like me it’s not. When I ask myself “What is bioethics?” I think that it is exploring science and discovering new knowledge about life until it reaches the point that it becomes inhumane and scientists themselves should know what that point is. However, how can they? They grew up differently from each and every other person so maybe there definition of what’s humane is different from another scientists’. I think that’s where the problem arises to precisely define what bioethics really is because practically every reasoning that is given leads to a new question. UNESCO was gracious enough to make a guideline for health providers to use that thinks for them in regards to what is in the best interest of the patient. But do we have to worry about the patients when they usually decide on their own of what their fates should be? That’s why there are protests, fighting, and court cases on the issue that families and patients should be the sole decision makers of their destination of health or death. I believe that these guidelines should be applied more to research because that is most of the time a single person’s decison and actions and they might be confused on what they should do.