Heart

Is Human life worth more than that of any other creature on the earth? To be honest before reading this commentary I would say no, that killing one species to save us was completely wrong. But in the second commentary by Willard Gaylin I find myself questioning what i once believed. When he says “Would you sacrifice a chimpanzee for a child’s life?” It made me think. I definitely would sacrifice one chimpanzee for another child’s life. But when does that ratio get out of hand? Would it be ok to sacrifice a hundred chimpanzee’s for a hundred children lives? What about a hundred chimpanzee’s for 50 children lives. After reading and thinking about it, I have no idea. On paper it seems horrible to sacrifice another species for humans, but practically speaking if it were my child I would make the sacrifice.

In this specific case I think there is a couple of more factors that come into play when making the decision of whats right and wrong. I think the fact that the chimps are on the verge of being extinct plays a huge role in that humans should look to perserve the species. Another important point of information is how well this procedure has been perfected, has it been modified enough to work properly or is it still in the testing stage. In order for this to be in affect it must be perfected or close to it. When it comes down to it I dont think this procedure should be allowed unless they find a way to use a species thats not endangered and they perfect the procedure.

The Heart of the Matter

This reading had my mind all over the place. I thought about “if a humans life is more important than an animals?” then I thought about animal cruelty. Then I thought about cruetly free products. Then I thought about vegans and vegetarians. Then I thought about vegan shoes. What makes them vegan? Why make vegan shoes? What are they made out of?

Vegans not only avoid meat but they also avoid animal by products(products made by or from animals). Vegan shoes are footwear made without using leather or animal by products, for example, glue. Some of my favorite shoe companies like Sauk and Toms make vegan shoes. They’re like regular sanuks or toms buy made vegan friendly. I’m not a vegan but if I was a hardcore vegan I would be buying these shoes.

Toms

Planet of the…

“We’re talking about huge potential for millions of people…” That’s how the trailer for the recent Rise of the Planet of the Apes. This tiny hook raises the seemingly omnipresent question of–why are humans so much more important than any other species? Or, why do we think of ourselves as so superior?

I didn’t really intend to post this time around, but after doing the reading I found myself full of thoughts surrounding anthropomorphism and companion species philosophy. Shouldn’t we all be learning from animals like the “uberpooch”–a dog with a vocabulary of over 200 words?

The Heart of the Matter

What is the worth of a human life? Would saving a human life be worth ending another? What about an animal, such as a chimpanzee? Are we worth more then them? If we are then who is it that determines that worth? There are about 100,000 chimpanzee’s left in the world and they are considered an endangered species, there are slightly over 7 billion humans, thats 7,000,000,000 and 7000 humans for every chimpanzee left alive. Ethics tries to improve and protect the human lifestyle but what about animals such as chimpanzee’s that are so similar to us? Humans are the cause of the worlds 6th’ mass extinction because ethics does not encourage us to protect anything except ourselves. Would sacrificing the life of a chimpanzee just to enhance the odds of survival of a person be ethical? I believe it wouldn’t. I believe that protecting other species, especially endangered ones such as chimpanzee’s is not only ethically correct but also necessary for the survival of the human race.

“The Heart of the Matter”

Throughout history people have used animals as a means for their survival. We as a species have run horses into the ground to get from place to place, we’ve slaughtered countless cows, pigs and chickens for food, and we’ve hunted animals such as beavers for their pelts, and those are only the most basic examples of humans using animals for their own basic needs. I don’t believe that this situation involving chimpanzee hearts is any different; it is using an animal to benefit a human being. I don’t really believe that there is an ethical issue here but I don’t believe that the use of chimpanzee hearts is the best way to do things because they are an endangered species and it would only be a temporary solution at best.

I don’t believe that taking the chimps heart is wrong when it is absolutely necessary, I don’t believe that this procedure should be used in order to make someone more comfortable while waiting for a transplant, I believe it should be used when the person will not survive otherwise. This is simply due to the lack of hearts available, both human and chimp. I’ll go even further than that to say that I believe it is wrong to put an animal’s life over a human’s. Now don’t get me wrong I love animals as much as the next person and animals dying is sad, but letting a human being die because you don’t want to harm an animal is not an idea I am comfortable with.

The Heart of the Matter

Wow. Transplanting the hearts of endangered chimpanzees for the benefits of humans is crazy. I was very confused by this last passage. Are the animals already deceased or are they killing the chimps in the name of the well being of humans. Im kind of torn with this subject of organ transplants and the protection of animals. I love all animals and I’m a very strong believer of not using animals for science and other things that will harm them. But I strongly believe in transplants and promoting organ donations. My dad received a kidney transplant this past April and has been getting better ever since, we have been waiting for about six years for him to get a kidney.

When it comes to this, I like to think of who is going to benefit more. The chimpanzee (who it is not discussed if they are dying or going to be killed) or the human who has a family to take care of. If people are purposely killing the chimps to take their organs for humans, then 1: that is the most disgusting thing i have ever heard of and 2: you better have a plan B. Besides, doesn’t the heart have to be immediately removed from the body after death? So that might mean they are murdering chimps for the well-being of humans. Humans are apart of the animal kingdom and I do believe in the Theory of Social Darwinism by Charles Darwin but this passage needs to be more clear. How are they collecting the organs???

The Heart of the Matter: Insensitivity towards other Species

Is a human life considered more valuable than every other type of life on the planet? This is the type of question that ethics presents to situations in the scientific world for proposed “advancements” by using animals as mere tools. The action introduced in the article “The Heart of the Matter” is to use Chimpanzee hearts to “build a ‘bridge'” for heart transplant patients so they can live a bit longer until they are able to obtain a human heart of their own for permanent use. The problem that I have with this and most people would is the fact that the heart of the chimpanzee is just being used for the ends of humans; this procedure isn’t something necessary especially since it is most likely not to work, as stated in the article. I am all for the betterment of mankind and helping people survive, but I have a problem when animals, especially one such as a chimpanzee that is so similar to us, are used when the end factor may not justify the means.

In the commentary section of the article, Strachan Donnelley devises an argument in which I agree with. He focuses on the ethical questions presented when not going to an extreme side. He goes on to say this use of chimpanzee hearts its not ethically right nor is it morally right because it will result in the eventual extinction of the animal species. This is my same sentiment on this subject. The people that may receive these hearts will live longer for only a few more days while the chimpanzees giving the hearts will die. This factor added to the fact that these animals are already endangered will result in the complete annihilation of the species. I felt Willard Gaylin made a very good argument, but did not convince me. He focuses on the pathos of the argument to try and take in account the emotions of the readers to seeing and agreeing with him on this issue. There are, however, more factors that apply besides the ones he presents. Homo sapiens are the most intelligent beings on the planet, but that gives us the most responsibility to ensure that we do not take advantage of this power. As one of the most popular saying goes from the infamous spiderman comics, “With great power comes great responsibility”. This applies to humans in various ways especially with our animal counterparts and how we treat them.

I end with a simple cartoon that I found to be a good representation of what we should do for animals before using them for whatever advancement we want.

Bioethics and it’s importance….

“A field of study concerned with the ethics and philosophical implications of certain biological and medical procedures, technologies, and treatments…” This dictionary definition of bioethics has helped me to understand what is being discussed in class, the ethical concern of the advancements in biology and medicine has been the topic of many heated debates over the past few years and until now, I had no clue what was being said. Discussions on stem-cell research and cloning are a few generic topics discussed when mentioning the idea of bioethics. The main focus is whether these practices are right or wrong. Where do we as humans of the 21st century draw the line? There are many things that persuade a person to think something is right or wrong like religious preference and morality. But when these practices, take stem-cell research for instance, can save lives, is there a general right or a general wrong?

The Declaration made by UNESCO addresses the ethical issues “related to medicine, life sciences and associated technologies as applied to human beings, taking into account their social, legal and enviornmental dimensions.” UNESCO suggests to “provide a universal framework of principles and procedures,” “guide the actions of individuals, groups, communities…etc,” “promote respect for human dignity and protect human right,” and “recognize the importance of freedom of scientific research and the benefits derived from scientific and technological developments…” My question is, how can we make a “universal framework of principles” if we all have different beliefs, some centered around strong bonds to religion? In America, we have freedom of religion and speech and if we have a “universal framework of principles” then our freedoms are being taken away.

Since this is a nation of ‘freedom’, everyone has their own preferences, beliefs and ideas. We can, but we should not judge others on what they believe or prefer. The first amendment protects our freedom of speech and freedom of religion and if ones religion is against the topics that are brought up when discussing bioethics, we should not judge them for their religious opinions. It defeats the aspect of freedom.

Bioethics?

The definition of Bioethics in a straight and more commonly manner would be the study and research of biology and medicine through human morals and ethics. However, what is the significance of bioethics to our society? The levels and standards of technology continue to rise and advance, therefore its influence and  effect towards the human society cannot be ignored. The whole purpose of establishing the field of bioethics in my eyes is of course to benefit the human race, but the question is: is it really benefiting us?

The UNESCO had the same concern when they adopted the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. I agree on the points on “reflecting on the rapid developments in science Continue reading

Bioethics, a definition.

Hello Fellow Bioethics Students,

As we progress through the semester, Bioethics is a term that we will hear numerous times, as that is the main topic of the class. What does that mean? Well we can break down the word for simplicity. Bio- as in Biology, and the studies of the human body, ethics-as in human morals and understanding of how to treat each other, simply deals with  how should we deal with morals in terms of biological experimentation on humans. Things like stem-cell research and abortion to using people as experiments for highly-dangerous clinical trials, and even down to psychological experimentations. These things become hot topic for controversial debate, and flare up the hottest arguments of todays time. With this we discuss humanity,its ability to experiment and its limitations towards experimentation. Should there be moral boundaries infringing on the our research? Or are human rights not to be impeded on? Only we can decide this ourselves.