“Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert…Near them, on the sand”
…..
“Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.”
The sublime is described by Burke in terms of vastness, terror, and beauty. He defines it as something that evokes emotions and passion, the greatest being astonishment. He is careful to makes a distinction between beauty and the sublime. In Burke’s writings he makes it clear that terror and vastness are the primary qualities of the sublime and that beauty is different. In making the comparison between the sublime and beauty he notes that the sublime is something great, powerful, or vast. On the other hand, Burke sees beauty as something denoted by things that are comparatively smaller.
Shelley’s Ozymandias contains the notion of the sublime which is depicted through a strong use of imagery and a careful choice of words. Upon reading the first two lines, I immediately picture an endless desert occupied solely by an immense, broken statue. While initially it may appear to be a simple scene, these lines evoke a sense of awe. If you think about it, how would you respond if you were in an empty desert, surrounded by nothing but sand, sky, and an enormous statue that is broken from the legs up? This poem particularly stood out to me after reading Burke’s ideas regarding the sublime because of his comparison between length, height, and depth. Shelley chose to present two things together: the desert and a huge statue. The desert would correspond to Burke’s mention of length, whereas the statue would represent height. Burke explains that even ground (like the desert: “lone and level sands stretch far away”) is not strong enough alone to evoke a strong sense of the sublime. He supports this notion by explaining that height is much more successful in the depiction of the sublime. Shelley combines both length and height and successfully fulfills Burke’s idea of a perpendicular. In the case of this poem, the perpendicular is between the flat desert and the legs of the statue. Additionally, the broken façade of the statue is, by Burke’s standards, a much more powerful image than presenting something that is intact. The words “colossal wreck” add even more to the poem. When one thinks about a wreck or mess of some kind, it makes sense to assume its not pleasant; however, it can be much more powerful than something that IS pleasant. Being given a sense of fear, anxiety, or astonishment is exactly what Burke mentions is necessary when finding the sublime in literature. While Burke’s standards of the sublime may differ slightly from that of other writers, I have to say I am in agreement with his statements. If the poem had instead described a massive statue that was perfectly polished without any type of flaw, I know I wouldn’t be satisfied; it would feel like something was missing. Shelley’s combination of a perpendicular image, the broken façade, and her strong use of words work together to form a poem that I feel evokes the real meaning of the sublime.