Monthly Archives: July 2011

Socially Acceptable Tattoos

Some people would say that this phrase is an oxymoron, that any tattoo or bodily ink is an indication of some sort of deviant behavior, may it be criminal or something out of the norm.  Lambroso believed that the more tattoos a person had, the less sensitive to pain that person was, which in turn made them less developed and more inclined to the criminal lifestyle and the more tattoos a person had the more correlation to crime they also had,

“tattooing is practiced by them to a far larger extent than by normal persons….whether thieves or murderers, show the highest percentage of tattooing…another fact worth mentioning is the extent to which criminals are tattooed” (Lambroso, pg 244).

This discussion of tattoos reminded me of this clip from one of my favorite shows MSNBC LOCKUP which is a documentary about Americas Prisons.  Lockup Tattoo Clip.
This clip shows two prisoners with had their eyeballs filled with color ink. I believe that certain places on a body to get tattoos on are more socially acceptable then others. If you see somebody with a tattoo on their forearm for example you are going to assume that they were/are a sailor or had some sort of affiliation with the Navy. If you see a tattoo of someones name on a persons upper arm, its generally their parents, someone who was close to them that passed away, maybe even a significant others name. My point is that certain tattoos most people will see and will barely have a reaction to, because they are socially acceptable to an extent. Me personally if I see a person with a tattoo above their neckline I automatically have preconceived notions about that person, usually with negative connotations, mainly because a person with a big skull on his forehead is not going to be working a nice corporate job but will probably be selling drugs on the corner, now although that is not always the case, that is the impression that they project.

 

Posted in Assignment 1 | Tagged , , | 18 Comments

Is the Scale Really Balanced?

When I was looking for articles about women criminals I stumbled upon one which states how judges were ordered to show more mercy on women criminals when deciding sentences. According to the article,  women criminals are poorly educated, have not committed violence and have children to look after. However, in a society where we look at men and women as equal, I ask myself is this possible? I guess that men and women are held to a different standard. To tie Lombroso into this he has said that women are the inferior sex and their main goal is to achieve maternity, their sole purpose of living and a women’s greatest achievement, however why is this consideration constantly should be taken into account with all these cases. We must consider that there are outliers in all cases against women criminals, not all women have that nurturing, maternal instinct about them. Shouldn’t courts look at the other side of this; what about the men who have children at home to take care of, who have more nurturing instincts than some women, why don’t the court take this into consideration as well the way they do with women. Are women truly at a disadvantage, are they the inferior sex, as stated by Lombroso. It looks as women are getting more of the benefit of the doubt and getting off easier. So I ask you to think about are women truly the inferior sex in society today, maybe if Lombroso was part of today’s society where supposedly men and women are supposed to be treated as equals, he might think different, he might think perhaps men are the inferior sex ?

http://http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1311004/Judges-ordered-mercy-women-criminals-deciding-sentences.html

Posted in Assignment 1 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Is the Scale Really Balanced?

COPYCAT CRIMES ! (Zhanna Onishchuk)

 

Click the image to watch the beginning of Natural Born Killers !

 

While most of Lombroso’s theories of why homicide has increased in America are manifestations of racism and pseudoscience, I was pleased with his recognition of criminal activity among people who were exposed to criminal activity by the media.  Lombroso suggests that some people will only commit copycat crimes. I think that he is correct; exposure to violence is encouragement of violence.  The movie Natural Born Killers has been credited with spurring many shootings throughout the country.  Because it made the criminals celebrities, and because it presented violence in such an alluring manner, it attracted easily influenced people to commit random acts of violence. Random is the keyword, since most of the crimes associated withe the movie were without motive, just like Mickey & Mallory’s crimes.  Lombroso would have used the the copycat crimes inspired by the movie as hard evidence of a critical cause of crime in the US. Yet it is ironic that while Lombroso is looking for the biological reason of why people commit crime, a trait that would have been found by him if he examined the main characters of the movie, it initiates replica murders by other people who wouldn’t have committed such crimes, and therefore don’t have the violent biological factor, without watching the film.  I wish Lombroso spent more time developing his theories about such criminals.  While the debate around the extent of influence violence in music and film have on reality is always hot, I think that without movies such as Natural Born Killers, contemporary society would have much less natural born criminals.

 

Zhanna Onishchuk

Posted in Assignment 1 | Tagged , , | 143 Comments

Perp Walks and Rogue Galleries

Earlier this month, I heard the following story on NPR regarding the famous “perp walk.” The now former head of the IMF, Dominique Strauss-Kahn had recently been arrested for allegedly raping a hotel worker. He, like many others involved in notorious/ high-profile was practically paraded down the street in handcuffs for all (via the media) to see. When subsequently, the case against him pretty much collapsed, people began questioning the use of the perp walk and whether or not it does more harm than good. According to Mr. David Krajicek, who has studied the use of perp walks in law enforcement, this form of public humiliation is used to both shame the accused as well as make the law enforcement agencies appear victorious, as if they are doing their job.

The use and prominence of perp walks (especially in New York City) reminded me very much of the rogue galleries we read about and discussed in class. The biggest problem that I see with them is that, much like in Mr. Strauss-Kahn’s case, the accused is publicly humiliated before he is found guilty. The image of someone in chains and handcuffs can tarnish their reputation indefinitely. Perp walks and rogue galleries are ways of permanently marking someone as a criminal, which can make their transition back to civil society very difficult. Even if they are innocent, a perp walk can make them look guilty. This can influence the outcome of the person’s trial. While Mr. Krajicek stated that perp walks seem to be fading in use, he also said that this was mostly because police departments are getting much better at collecting digitized mug shots and getting them out through the media. It seems that despite the passing of much time since Lombroso, we are still typecasting people we deem as criminals.

Posted in Assignment 1 | Comments Off on Perp Walks and Rogue Galleries

Protected: Typecasting

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Posted in Assignment 1 | Tagged , | Comments Off on Protected: Typecasting

A Modern Twist on Lombroso’s Ideas

While in class we talked extensively about how Lombroso tried to catalog similar physical features in order to find out which features would make one more apt to be a criminal. He believed that features that were more reminiscent of apes or uncivilized cultures such as facial asymmetry were hints that someone could be distinguished from a non-criminal. While this theory is generally discredited today, new research seen here has given rise to find out the facial features that makes a black man more apt to be a CEO. A stunning 95% of CEO’s in America are white males. Researchers tried to figure out what physical characteristics alone (leaving out obvious other necessary traits such as dedication, hard work and education) black males usually attain in order to become CEO’s. In a sense this research is the exact opposite of Lombroso, instead of looking for physical characteristics that make one more apt to be a criminal, they are looking for characteristics that make one apt to be a successful business man. The study found that many of the black CEO’s possessed what they call “babyfaceness” or having attributes such as “a round face with a larger forehead, a small chin, full cheeks and other characteristics that are exaggerated in infants”. These traits made the black men appear less threatening to white people by bringing out emotions like warmth and tolerance. This finding is interesting in comparison to white CEO’s with similar babyfaceness who are perceived as being weak and incompetent. This study is relevant because it shows that tactics used by Lombroso are still being used and applied, but for different reasons. People indeed still make assumptions based on looks alone.

Posted in Assignment 1 | 1 Comment

Modern Day Physiognomy: Article from the Economist

Here is an interesting article I stumbled upon when I was reading the Economist:

http://www.economist.com/node/18925759

This article discusses how one’s facial features can trigger two very different actions: The first is one’s propensity towards lying. The second is whether or not a male’s level of attractiveness could induce more orgasms from their female partners.

The results of the article were both surprising and expected, in my opinion. In regards to one’s tendency to lie, the researchers discovered that the wider one’s face is in comparison to its length, the more likely they are to lie about their intentions. The researchers (Dr Haselhuhn and Dr Wong) linked this facial feature to a male’s level of aggressiveness. Apparently, many studies have shown that the wider a male’s face is in relation to its length, the more aggressive they act in a given situation. The two researches then went on to see if there was any correlation between this facial feature and a tendency to lie…which there was!

I was somewhat stunned to notice that Cesare Lombroso’s name did not once appear in this article, especially since he is considered to be one of the founders of modern day criminology, with respects to links between criminal behavior and one’s  physical anomalie.

I decided to post this article because I feel like in the past decade or so, there has been a growing emphasis on how one’s environment can influence their behavior, especially in terms of crime. When Giuliani was mayor of New York, he was hailed for his work on cleaning up Times Square, the general NYC subways and drastically reducing the crime rate. One theory that he was apparently fond of was the “broken window” theory. This theory posits that the more degenerated one’s environment is, the more likely someone is to add to the level of decrepitness. On the other hand, if someone’s environment was very pristine, they were much less likely to make it messy. This theory was applied to the NYC subways to clean out the graffiti, which it claims to have successfully done.

I think its good to still revert back to older theories on criminology and to not get caught in any ideological dogma, with respects to broken window theory. My view may be naive, but I believe that there isn’t one universal solution to crime. Rather, there are probably various solutions for a problem, many of which have not been tried and tested yet. But its a start to at least test and scrutinize theories, like this Economist article claims the researchers did.

 

-Nikhil

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Modern Day Physiognomy: Article from the Economist

Could Lombroso be right? Do looks matter?

Hi Guys.. I found this article when reading alittle bit about Lombroso and I think it may have some kind of merrit, although it may be kind of minimum. The article is called Criminal Facial Features. It talks about Lombroso and his beliefs that criminals share similar physical attributes, (those of which resemble the more primitive stages of human development) and whether or not something like this is worth considering.

Living in 2011, we are taught that it is wrong to “judge a book by its cover” and that its discriminatory, but lets explore if there is even a reason why we even do it in the first place… In the article there is a short passage discussing that in 2005, there was data that suggests that “better looking people” are less likely to be involved in crime. Well, if “better looking people” are the lesser of the criminal population, then is it wrong imagine that the greater may all share similar attributes that society may recognize & consider “ugly”?  I know in life I’ve noticed the popular crowd in school, all who which seem to be good-looking, and seem to have become successful over the years. But what about those who were considered “ugly”? For example, imagine a group of kids in school who may have not been born with ideal genes, who dont have many friends, who lack confidence and who subsequently may lack ambition to go out and work hard. It may be easier for people of this nature who lack self confidence to fall into a life of crime, to do things that others may regard as anti-social. It would be foolish and naive to say that ones looks are sheerly a determinant of whether or not they will be a criminal in life, but hey who says we cant explore if there may be a correlation between the two?

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

The Norwegian Massacre

Unfortunately, this weekend we have experienced a branch in crime, which we have been coping with for the past decade in U.S. and around the world. This crime is know as terrorism. Sadly, terrorism has no mercy on innocent lives. Either you’re a child, black or white, blue or white collar, rich or poor, it digs deeply in the souls of humanity. The article related to this discussion, involves reasons to why the global society has to pay the ultimate price for governmental actions. Anders Behring Breivik, the suspect in the Norwegian terrorist attacks in Oslo on Friday, had criticized the so called “cultural Marxists” , in order to spark a war against growing Muslims across Europe. 93 lives have been lost due to one belief, opening new theories of understanding why the human mind is acting is such way. The criminal mind is not born with the human body, but it is a belief taught by other individuals in society which disagree with governmental philosophies. Terrorism has several meanings and definitions, but the universal meaning of it it simply to induce fear within a society, just like injecting a virus in a healthy body. It degrades the stability of the societal structure, dissatisfaction of political & social policy, tension creation, confusion among its members and concluding with conflicts. The solution to such a problem like terrorism does exist, and it has been proven successful with  society through a “network” of eyes. Fear is a human instinct and can be overcome through the right steps of avoiding a disaster. Know the risks involved with a catastrophe, the risks can’t be always be eliminated completely, and know that not always there will be a happy ending. In the end everyone fights for liberty and a safer world, trying to survive as long as possible with little incursions through the path of life.

Posted in Assignment 1 | Comments Off on The Norwegian Massacre

Bertillon and Lombroso still at work today

Hello all! I stumbled upon this interesting article while searching for something to post.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/murder-solved-after-cops-find-crime-scene-tattooed-on-gang-members-chest/

Anthony Garcia committed the murder of John Juarez in 2008 and tattooed the murder scene on his chest. This story amazes me because if it wasn’t for the tattoo on Mr. Garcia’s chest he probably would have never been caught. The case had been closed for four years until Mr. Garcia was arrested for driving without a license. Linking all the way back to Lombroso, the police took photos of Mr. Garcia’s tattoos as part of procedure and entered it into their database. Also, linking back to Bonneville the police are keeping photo’s of tattoos to find the recidivist or the habitual offender. A police officer was viewing the photos one day and noticed the similarities of the tattoo on his chest and the murder scene of John Juarez. In the 21st century it’s stunning that a murder case was cracked from 19th century ideologies and procedures. Anthony Garcia would have been a justification to Lombroso’s ideology that whomever has a tattoo is a criminal. However, we know in today’s society that tattoos are a popular trend among young individuals, sports players, business people and so on. I wonder what Lombroso would have to say about tattoos in the 21st century. In a world of about 7 billion people, many get tattoos to set themselves apart, express themselves or to tell ones own life story. Anthony Garcia told his story on his chest and it got him convicted. The mugshot created by Bertillon is still an essential part in the police force and it was the only thing that cracked this murder case. I’m sure there is so much more to say about this. I would love to hear others thoughts on this. Feel free to comment.

 

Posted in Assignment 1 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Bertillon and Lombroso still at work today