Author Archives: nancy.murphy

Posts: 5 (archived below)
Comments: 3

Can new technology predict and prevent crimes?

New technology, seen here, is allowing police precincts to use computers in order to predict, where and when crime will occur in certain neighborhoods. The Santa Cruz police department recently invested in software that uses a complicated algorithm that has all the data of crime from the last eight years. This technology is able to pinpoint crime hotspots, since it also takes into account the time of year, the time of day and even the weather.  The program was created by a mathematician and an anthropologist (not a criminologist interestingly) and based it on earthquake shock waves. According to the article “A specific crime is broken down to the two most likely chunks of time it will probably occur, say noon to 1 p.m. or 4 to 5 p.m., so if an officer is working during that time, he or she knows to check that area” . This new piece of equipment may be very helpful for precincts that are strapped for cash and lacking policing staff. Apparently, the crime tracking data seems to be working and the algorithm has already correctly predicted 40 percent of crimes and had led to five arrests. Furthermore, Police said burglaries were down 27 percent in July compared to the same month last year. The technology also has led to officers questioning people merely for being in a hot spot. While I think this is a good idea, it definitely seems to have its flaws. No technology can truly predict what a person is going to do. I also would question if these statistics were manipulated to justify the cost of inputting the system.

Posted in Assignment 5 | Tagged , | 137 Comments

Medicating Kids for the Wrong Reasons and Selfish Mothers

In this article from Today, researchers send out questionnaires to 26,000 mothers in an attempt to better understand parenting behavior. They found the following answers:

– 45% of moms would rather weigh 15 pounds less than add 15 points to their child’s IQ.

– 42% of moms would prefer a 50% raise at work than spend 50% more time with their kids.

– 23% of moms would choose a different spouse to raise a family with.

– 1 in 5 moms medicate their child with Benadryl or Tylenol before a long car or flight.

I think these statistics show us that children really are not always the problem. Parents just often want to think of themselves before their children, and often will not admit that. The need to medicate children just to cope really shows that there are very deep underlying issues involved in the practice of medicating children for the right reasons. The topic of losing weight instead of raising your child’s IQ is really a sad reality, since working out can easily cause any mother lose weight. These mothers just seem lazy, self centered and have their priorities mixed up. In regards to these statistics and the documentary about medicating children, I think there needs to be less of a focus on the problems caused by children, and more of a focus on dealing with parenting. Medication should never be the quick fix that it’s being used as. Tylenol and Benadryl might not cause that much harm, as opposed to anti-depressants, but they are being used as sedatives instead of their intended purpose. If a parent does not want to spend time with their children, and deal with the hardships of raising an active kid, they should seek therapy or an alternative to these medications.

Posted in Assignment 4 | Tagged , | 17 Comments

Body Integrity Disorders and Desired Stigmas

The concept of having Body Integrity Disorder (BIID) is rather fascinating and somewhat scary. A person with BIID is not satisfied with their god given body and has the desire to become an amputee. For them having say, a right hand, just never felt right and caused intense anxiety. For this person, not having their right hand makes their body the way “it should have been”. This article is a very fascinating interview with “Jason”, a middle aged man who underwent a self amputation in order to rid himself of his right hand. Jason had to stage an accident involving massive power tools in order for his wife, insurance, and everyone in his life to believe that  losing his hand was not intentional (and also done in a way that was non-repairable). To this day, nobody knows the truth about Jason’s “accident” and people have even gone as far as raising money for him, which causes him immense guilt. This whole idea and BIID plays into the idea of stigma as a desire and choice. Generally, most people do not want to be stigmatized, especially the way people with missing limbs are. However, this man has taken his desire for what he deems normalcy (missing a hand) to a whole new level that is hard for me to comprehend. While I understand there is some type of mental disorder behind this action, I still think the entire idea of wanting to be stigmatized and wanting to be part of a sub-group in society bizarre. I almost feel bad for “Jason” who must live a double life, but then I realize this was his doing, and that this is what he wanted overall.

Posted in Assignment 3 | 3 Comments

Is your tattoo a good or bad stigma?

 Here is an interesting article that is somewhat of a critique of Goffman’s “Stigma and Social Identity” which ties into Lombroso’s ideas about tattoos. Tattoos seem to be a very popular topic amongst young people and on this blog. Many say that tattoo’s are a sign of deviance and show a lack of intelligence. Tattoo’s generally give a person a stigma, but is it a good or bad thing? Stigmas occur when something is different, whether it is a good, bad or neutral occurrence. People with physical disabilities are a common stigmatized group because we are always curious and fascinated by something that seems off. If you have ever seen someone who is blind, or with a limp and had to stare at them in fascination then you contribute to stigmatization, even if that was not your intent. Some stigmas are harder to define because they are things that can be hidden, such as homosexuality or sexual deviance. Today, some stigma’s can be ‘fixed’ with plastic surgery, such as rhinoplasty for those feeling stigmatized for having a big nose.

But what about a self inflicted stigma of a tattoo? Can something that is self inflicted be considered a negative stigma? Tattoos were generally used to brand people of deviance or to set them apart from the rest, such as slaves, criminals and the Jews during the Holocaust. Tattoo’s now can be considered a positive stigma since they are generally socially accepted and give you a sense of pride, make you part of a certain subculture or  show the world what you are about. Since so many people are tattooed today, I don’t feel there is much of a stigma at all just due to its commonality. A tattooed individual would be stigmatized if they had an offensive tattoo (swastika), face tattoo, or just too many tattoos. Lizard man is the perfect example of a stigmatized individual due to tattoo choices.

Posted in Assignment 2 | Tagged , , | 27 Comments

A Modern Twist on Lombroso’s Ideas

While in class we talked extensively about how Lombroso tried to catalog similar physical features in order to find out which features would make one more apt to be a criminal. He believed that features that were more reminiscent of apes or uncivilized cultures such as facial asymmetry were hints that someone could be distinguished from a non-criminal. While this theory is generally discredited today, new research seen here has given rise to find out the facial features that makes a black man more apt to be a CEO. A stunning 95% of CEO’s in America are white males. Researchers tried to figure out what physical characteristics alone (leaving out obvious other necessary traits such as dedication, hard work and education) black males usually attain in order to become CEO’s. In a sense this research is the exact opposite of Lombroso, instead of looking for physical characteristics that make one more apt to be a criminal, they are looking for characteristics that make one apt to be a successful business man. The study found that many of the black CEO’s possessed what they call “babyfaceness” or having attributes such as “a round face with a larger forehead, a small chin, full cheeks and other characteristics that are exaggerated in infants”. These traits made the black men appear less threatening to white people by bringing out emotions like warmth and tolerance. This finding is interesting in comparison to white CEO’s with similar babyfaceness who are perceived as being weak and incompetent. This study is relevant because it shows that tactics used by Lombroso are still being used and applied, but for different reasons. People indeed still make assumptions based on looks alone.

Posted in Assignment 1 | 1 Comment