-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Misery White on Real Life Superheroes
- ylukovsky on Crying Wolf – False Rape Accusations
- ylukovsky on Crying Wolf – False Rape Accusations
- proffessor on Crying Wolf – False Rape Accusations
- Rob McGoldrick on SEC reviewing S&P handling on downgrade
Frequent Topics
- ADHD
- Becker
- Britain
- Broken Windows Theory
- Conrad and Schneider
- control
- crime
- criminals
- criminal surveillance
- criminal youth
- delinquency
- Depression
- Deviance
- deviant behavior
- Deviants
- DNA profiling
- escape
- FBI
- female murderer
- film
- flash mobs
- Graffiti
- justice
- Lombroso
- medicalization of deviance
- Moral Panic
- Outsiders
- Philadelphis
- police
- Poweres that be
- prison
- privacy
- profiling
- racism
- riots
- serial killer
- social construction of illness
- social network
- society
- Stereotyping
- Stigma
- tattoos
- traceable
- Typecasting
- Women
Archives
Categories
Meta
Category Archives: Assignment 1
COPYCAT CRIMES ! (Zhanna Onishchuk)
While most of Lombroso’s theories of why homicide has increased in America are manifestations of racism and pseudoscience, I was pleased with his recognition of criminal activity among people who were exposed to criminal activity by the media. Lombroso suggests that some people will only commit copycat crimes. I think that he is correct; exposure to violence is encouragement of violence. The movie Natural Born Killers has been credited with spurring many shootings throughout the country. Because it made the criminals celebrities, and because it presented violence in such an alluring manner, it attracted easily influenced people to commit random acts of violence. Random is the keyword, since most of the crimes associated withe the movie were without motive, just like Mickey & Mallory’s crimes. Lombroso would have used the the copycat crimes inspired by the movie as hard evidence of a critical cause of crime in the US. Yet it is ironic that while Lombroso is looking for the biological reason of why people commit crime, a trait that would have been found by him if he examined the main characters of the movie, it initiates replica murders by other people who wouldn’t have committed such crimes, and therefore don’t have the violent biological factor, without watching the film. I wish Lombroso spent more time developing his theories about such criminals. While the debate around the extent of influence violence in music and film have on reality is always hot, I think that without movies such as Natural Born Killers, contemporary society would have much less natural born criminals.
Zhanna Onishchuk
Perp Walks and Rogue Galleries
Earlier this month, I heard the following story on NPR regarding the famous “perp walk.” The now former head of the IMF, Dominique Strauss-Kahn had recently been arrested for allegedly raping a hotel worker. He, like many others involved in notorious/ high-profile was practically paraded down the street in handcuffs for all (via the media) to see. When subsequently, the case against him pretty much collapsed, people began questioning the use of the perp walk and whether or not it does more harm than good. According to Mr. David Krajicek, who has studied the use of perp walks in law enforcement, this form of public humiliation is used to both shame the accused as well as make the law enforcement agencies appear victorious, as if they are doing their job.
The use and prominence of perp walks (especially in New York City) reminded me very much of the rogue galleries we read about and discussed in class. The biggest problem that I see with them is that, much like in Mr. Strauss-Kahn’s case, the accused is publicly humiliated before he is found guilty. The image of someone in chains and handcuffs can tarnish their reputation indefinitely. Perp walks and rogue galleries are ways of permanently marking someone as a criminal, which can make their transition back to civil society very difficult. Even if they are innocent, a perp walk can make them look guilty. This can influence the outcome of the person’s trial. While Mr. Krajicek stated that perp walks seem to be fading in use, he also said that this was mostly because police departments are getting much better at collecting digitized mug shots and getting them out through the media. It seems that despite the passing of much time since Lombroso, we are still typecasting people we deem as criminals.
Posted in Assignment 1
Comments Off on Perp Walks and Rogue Galleries
A Modern Twist on Lombroso’s Ideas
While in class we talked extensively about how Lombroso tried to catalog similar physical features in order to find out which features would make one more apt to be a criminal. He believed that features that were more reminiscent of apes or uncivilized cultures such as facial asymmetry were hints that someone could be distinguished from a non-criminal. While this theory is generally discredited today, new research seen here has given rise to find out the facial features that makes a black man more apt to be a CEO. A stunning 95% of CEO’s in America are white males. Researchers tried to figure out what physical characteristics alone (leaving out obvious other necessary traits such as dedication, hard work and education) black males usually attain in order to become CEO’s. In a sense this research is the exact opposite of Lombroso, instead of looking for physical characteristics that make one more apt to be a criminal, they are looking for characteristics that make one apt to be a successful business man. The study found that many of the black CEO’s possessed what they call “babyfaceness” or having attributes such as “a round face with a larger forehead, a small chin, full cheeks and other characteristics that are exaggerated in infants”. These traits made the black men appear less threatening to white people by bringing out emotions like warmth and tolerance. This finding is interesting in comparison to white CEO’s with similar babyfaceness who are perceived as being weak and incompetent. This study is relevant because it shows that tactics used by Lombroso are still being used and applied, but for different reasons. People indeed still make assumptions based on looks alone.
Posted in Assignment 1
1 Comment
The Norwegian Massacre
Unfortunately, this weekend we have experienced a branch in crime, which we have been coping with for the past decade in U.S. and around the world. This crime is know as terrorism. Sadly, terrorism has no mercy on innocent lives. Either you’re a child, black or white, blue or white collar, rich or poor, it digs deeply in the souls of humanity. The article related to this discussion, involves reasons to why the global society has to pay the ultimate price for governmental actions. Anders Behring Breivik, the suspect in the Norwegian terrorist attacks in Oslo on Friday, had criticized the so called “cultural Marxists” , in order to spark a war against growing Muslims across Europe. 93 lives have been lost due to one belief, opening new theories of understanding why the human mind is acting is such way. The criminal mind is not born with the human body, but it is a belief taught by other individuals in society which disagree with governmental philosophies. Terrorism has several meanings and definitions, but the universal meaning of it it simply to induce fear within a society, just like injecting a virus in a healthy body. It degrades the stability of the societal structure, dissatisfaction of political & social policy, tension creation, confusion among its members and concluding with conflicts. The solution to such a problem like terrorism does exist, and it has been proven successful with society through a “network” of eyes. Fear is a human instinct and can be overcome through the right steps of avoiding a disaster. Know the risks involved with a catastrophe, the risks can’t be always be eliminated completely, and know that not always there will be a happy ending. In the end everyone fights for liberty and a safer world, trying to survive as long as possible with little incursions through the path of life.
Posted in Assignment 1
Comments Off on The Norwegian Massacre
Bertillon and Lombroso still at work today
Hello all! I stumbled upon this interesting article while searching for something to post.
Anthony Garcia committed the murder of John Juarez in 2008 and tattooed the murder scene on his chest. This story amazes me because if it wasn’t for the tattoo on Mr. Garcia’s chest he probably would have never been caught. The case had been closed for four years until Mr. Garcia was arrested for driving without a license. Linking all the way back to Lombroso, the police took photos of Mr. Garcia’s tattoos as part of procedure and entered it into their database. Also, linking back to Bonneville the police are keeping photo’s of tattoos to find the recidivist or the habitual offender. A police officer was viewing the photos one day and noticed the similarities of the tattoo on his chest and the murder scene of John Juarez. In the 21st century it’s stunning that a murder case was cracked from 19th century ideologies and procedures. Anthony Garcia would have been a justification to Lombroso’s ideology that whomever has a tattoo is a criminal. However, we know in today’s society that tattoos are a popular trend among young individuals, sports players, business people and so on. I wonder what Lombroso would have to say about tattoos in the 21st century. In a world of about 7 billion people, many get tattoos to set themselves apart, express themselves or to tell ones own life story. Anthony Garcia told his story on his chest and it got him convicted. The mugshot created by Bertillon is still an essential part in the police force and it was the only thing that cracked this murder case. I’m sure there is so much more to say about this. I would love to hear others thoughts on this. Feel free to comment.
Posted in Assignment 1
Tagged crime, mugshot, tattoos
Comments Off on Bertillon and Lombroso still at work today
Criminal Surveillance? Gone too far?
While searching for a video of interest to post, I came across this video(Click for video). In the video, it reports how the U.S. wants to pass a bill in which FBI agents dont need a motive or any evidence in investigating a crime. Everyone can be investigated without a reason. I think this is getting a little out of hand. The government already has too much control on individuals as it is. We have cameras installed in every possible area, street, and block in most of the country. I think this is categorizing every single person in the U.S. as a criminal. The message that U.S. citizens will get from this is that everyone is a criminal unless proven innocent. From what I understand from growing up, I thought that the correct motto was ” everyone is innocent unless proven guilty”. This is one of those moments in a nations history where the times are truly changing. I was born in 1985 and even though crimes did happen, I remember being able to leave the front door of my house open and unlocked and we werent so cautious about who our neighbors were and what they did. We werent so closely monitored and crimes were less than today. Nowadays, with the street cameras and surveillance, it seems that crime has risen. We basically are like animals stuck in a cage and the government is in control of us. I think people will get fed up with this new law and feel that since we are all categorized as criminals as a nation, why not act like a criminal anyway. I really hope that this bill does not pass because criminals are supposed to be the minority not the majority.
DNA profiling in US
On popular science and technology website Singularity Hub i found interesting article. It shows that as of July2011 13 states in US collect DNA samples from anyone who gets arrested. It highlightens the usefulness of this practice and even gives example of the case when murderer was found because police had his DNA after he was arrested for felony. Of course DNA profiling can serve many good causes, but the fact that it gets so widespread and used on virtually anyone, makes me personally, very uncomfortable.
Lets say you get arrested because you happened to be out late at night and crime was committed nearby. You will be released from police department within couple hours, but your DNA sample will be stored in their system. Of course, as a law obeying citizen you have nothing to worry about. That’s from the side of law enforcement agencies, but in the age of computer hacking there may be criminals who can use your precious information. If Wiki Leaks could access information from top secret government websites, where is guarantee that your DNA code won’t be stolen from police databases and used for anything from fraud to faking of your criminal records. Article hints on the problem by saying that widespread DNA screening practice “raises serious concerns about who has access to potentially incriminating DNA information stored in databases”.
Another thing with databases is that there may be mistakes. Article mentions that society and courts put a lot of weight on DNA identification. Therefore, given the level of trust that courts are putting into DNA identification, one may be convicted wrongfully because of the faulty entry in DNA police database.
Now whether the fact that so many states use DNA profiling on anyone who is arrested serves for public good or not is up to you to decide.