-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Misery White on Real Life Superheroes
- ylukovsky on Crying Wolf – False Rape Accusations
- ylukovsky on Crying Wolf – False Rape Accusations
- proffessor on Crying Wolf – False Rape Accusations
- Rob McGoldrick on SEC reviewing S&P handling on downgrade
Frequent Topics
- ADHD
- Becker
- Britain
- Broken Windows Theory
- Conrad and Schneider
- control
- crime
- criminals
- criminal surveillance
- criminal youth
- delinquency
- Depression
- Deviance
- deviant behavior
- Deviants
- DNA profiling
- escape
- FBI
- female murderer
- film
- flash mobs
- Graffiti
- justice
- Lombroso
- medicalization of deviance
- Moral Panic
- Outsiders
- Philadelphis
- police
- Poweres that be
- prison
- privacy
- profiling
- racism
- riots
- serial killer
- social construction of illness
- social network
- society
- Stereotyping
- Stigma
- tattoos
- traceable
- Typecasting
- Women
Archives
Categories
Meta
Category Archives: Assignment 2
Murders in Retreat in the US
According to this article of the New York Times, murders have decreased in the United States from 24,000 in 1991, to 15,000 this past year. But then again we would have not known that because of so many crime shows that we watch on an everyday routine. The article talks about how crime shows are very popular now a days. It has its own channel, Investigation Discovery (i love this channel by the way) where they show, shows such as 48 hours and dateline. These shows are actually based on real life murders, or murders that happen in other shows or books, and they just add their little twist to them. These type of shows have become very popular within the last few years, maybe because it gives you that suspense, as to who was it really that committed the murder and why.
I now think if these type of shows is the reason why murders have gone down. If you really think about it, these shows for the most part, at the end of the day the culprit is found at the end, and technically in the perfect murder they are not. Maybe after watching these shows people are starting to think that there is no such thing as a perfect murder.
-Armenis P.
Gender Roles Influence Punishment
“Murder in the Feminine” by Lisa Downing is important because it shows us how 19th century perceptions of the female murderer have carried on into modern times. Then and now, accepted social behaviors for men are very different than for women. Debates over what is acceptable for female behavior are generated from popular cases of female murderers, such as the Casey Anthony trial. In the reading, the Casey Anthony of 19th century France was Marie Lafarge, who was demonized for poisoning her husband. In Lafarge’s time, passivity, submissiveness, and maternal instinct were considered to be highly feminine virtues. Naturally, some found it difficult to reconcile society’s perceptions of feminine nature with Lafarge’s cold-blooded and calculated act. In fact, Edith Saunders’s “The Mystery of Marie Lafarge” contained the following:
” ‘I was, at first, very much predisposed to believe her innocent. The cold-blooded murder seemed so impossible an act for the charming, cultured girl to have performed…’ ” (Downing, 124).
Therefore, female murderers such as Lafarge posed a threat to society’s gender expectations and the social order. The social order was particularly threatened by female child- and husband-killers. Note that the following quote could also apply to women who kill their children:
“The husband-killer in particular occupied a special place in such taxonomies of aberration. The woman who killed her husband from the very seat of the prescribed feminine domain of domesticity threatened the social order from within” (Downing, 125).
Because of the contradictions they inflicted upon male dominated societal gender roles, female murders were portrayed as the most deviant of human monsters by 19th century criminologists.
In 2009, Rekha Kumari-Baker was sentenced to a minimum of 33 years for the premeditated murder of her two children, one of the longest prison sentences ever handed to a woman in England! And, the jury only took 35 minutes to reach the verdict! The judge’s words on the case also clearly displayed sexism and society’s expectations for women’s behavior. Note his singling out of mothers. Shouldn’t the judge find it inexcusable that a PARENT could kill their child, not just mothers?
In sentencing, the judge said: “Most people will find it inexplicable that a mother (my emphasis on mother, not the article’s) could kill her own children, and you have given no explanation for it.” He is right, but does it not also seem that we unconsciously accept crimes of this nature that men commit but reserve a special sort of hatred for women?
The article cites previous cases of paternal filicide where the sentences for the father child-killers were either reduced or prosecution was abandoned altogether in lieu of psychiatric treatment! What is amazing is that Kumari-Baker had been treated for depression, yet this was rejected by the jury to be a defense to diminished responsibility.
The article states one way in which society may view a man killing his children:
“As in this case, where men kill their children, no thought for the children as humans is given whatsoever – they are mere cannon fodder in a scheme to extract revenge. Some men kill their children and then themselves if they are depressed and feel hopeless, usually if the mother of the children has left him. Whatever the reasons, entitlement and control are generally at the forefront, along with rage, jealousy, revenge and hatred.”
Then the author juxtaposes this to how mothers who murder their children are viewed:
“The general view on these matters seems to be that men can’t help themselves, but women can. Women are expected to love and care for their children above all else, whereas men can be distant and even cruel but still considered “good enough” fathers.”
While the author and I feel no sympathy for this woman who murdered her innocent children, we would both like to see fathers and mothers who kill their children get similar sentences, and not reserve the lengthier sentences for females due to society’s perceptions of what gender roles should be.
– Kelly Reznick
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/sep/24/rekha-kumari-baker-sentencing
Report a crime on Facebook…
So I came across this article on the internet and found it fascinating. Lothian and Borders police have started a new system that allows civilians to snitch on suspected criminals based on what they see on Facebook. The Scottish force claims this is the first of it’s kind in the country. The article goes on to say that people support the effort and are happy to anonymously report the illegal gains of another.
What I don’t understand is how you can identify a criminal just by looking on facebook. It’s one thing if you know someone who is a criminal and then you find supporting facts and pictures on the internet that reinforce the fact. This article gives me the feeling that cops expect to charge people with criminal acts based only on the story their Facebook tells. That sounds ridiculous as I can’t imagine much success in catching and charging criminals based on pictures and interests. This also sounds like criminals are being stereo typed and put into a specific box of description which is totally wrong. I can think of a few of my friends who are not criminals but their Facebook may tell another story based on the jewelry and cars they have pictures with.
Posted in Assignment 2
Comments Off on Report a crime on Facebook…
I survived…beyond and back
I caught this show on the Biography channel Sunday night. It got me really interested, since i realized this show is about people who have died and come back to life. At first I didn’t really think this was real, i mean i still have my doubts, but after watching this episode it seems pretty realistic to me. This particular episode was about two people, Sandy and Matthew.
Sandy’s story was that she drowned in a white water rafting accident. She was dead for 5 minutes and was resuscitated through CPR. During the 5 minutes that her heart has stopped, she witness death, and what it means to be dead. She says she firsts sees a flash show of her sons in the future, when she is losing consciousness. When she actually dies, she describes herself as seeing her lifeless body in the water. She watches her rag doll body, while she is being saved by the main leader in her excursion group. He pulls her out of the water and drops her onto the boat. When her lifeless body hits the bottom of the boat, it shocks her body enough to get her heart beating again. That is when she says, she suddenly remembers being back in her body and gasping for air.
The second story involves Matthew, another individual that died and came back. However, his story was a bit more horrific. He was shot in the head by a random drive by shooting, and was dead instantly by the shot. He was rushed into the ER and for 5 minutes the paramedic performed everything they could to get his heart beating. For those 5 minutes, he describes himself being changed in a dark abyss..which he says is hell. Believer it or not, but it seemed like a real story, and he is not the only one with such crazy stories.
The Anonymity of African American Serial Killers
http://www.crimeculture.com/Contents/Articles-Winter10/branson.html
This article illuminates the divergence in cultural assumptions of African American’s predisposition towards violent crimes and the lack of association and detection of this type of crime ( Serial predation) by authorities. According to the article, some of the sources stem from deeply held racial bias, reinforcing stereotypical imagery and the perpetuation of “static ethnocentric criminal profiling methodology” Ala the FBI. One of the examples they use are John Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, the DC snipers and the media and law enforcement’s response to the racial identities of these serial murderers. Though the article focuses mostly on African Americans and their relation to serial murders, it also makes the case that it may illuminate the participation of serial predation in other races unassociated with that form of crime. And finally the article also presents a link towards the portrayal of Serial killers in fiction and its contribution in constricting and impeding viable models that can effectively counter this threat.
I am drawing a similarity in the approaches of and the danger that assumptions play in rendering certain crimes invisible to the public at whole. The readings on Lafarge and the poet killer illuminated gendered and occupational assumptions held by authorities and the people on the projected innocence of those accused. Both articles warn of the very danger of assuming one’s criminality to deeply held biases rather then the universal problem it exhibits in reality (in terms of murder); Criminality such as Serial Murder cannot be contained within haphazard and simple cultural notions, which can be in turn problematic in forming an accurate picture of the issue.
Passing a Polygraph

A future for all potential suitors?
I was somewhat disturbed with the ambivalent tone in The Brain on the Stand article regarding the legal implications of using brain-scanning technology in the future. Rosen seems excited at the prospect of such a technology revolutionizing social, scientific, and legal frontiers. This is despite the fact that Jones, one of the envelope-pushing neuroscience proponents, has a skull and calipers set and that hearkens back to the phrenology brains. If this isn’t a red flag I don’t know what is.
In “Putting the Unconscious on Trial,” the possibility of admitting this mind reading technology in trial, is mentioned. Because of the incredible disregard for the 5th Amendment in doing such a thing, and with the violation of privacy it could involve, I started wondering about the legal weight that the polygraph has in this current day and age. I knew that it’s inadmissible in court, but I wasn’t informed with the legal weight (if any) that polygraphs may have in the work place.
I found the site of a risk management company, which takes the liberty of advising employers who may be flirting with the idea of using the technology within their own company. The article stresses that it is possible to pass the test even when not being truthful, as the machine can only read physiological signs of activity or discomfort. It turns out that polygraph admissions are “often retracted and closely scrutinized” when reviewed by a third party. Furthermore, on December 27, 1988, the EPPA was passed. It states the businesses cannot require, or even suggest, that an applicant or employee take the polygraph. There also cannot be any disciplinary action if the employee refuses to take the test.
This possible mind reading technology is one of those instances where I’m glad the law is always the slowest to change.
Outsiders & Deviance
After reading Outsiders by Becker what I got from it was that Becker defined a deviant as someone who strays away from the rules and norms of some social group, so subsequently they then become an outside of that group. Also, that the deviant behavior is more of a certain group having a question of judgement about ones behavior or norms rather than just one person having a set of characteristics that makes them “deviant”. So ultimately, in order to label someone deviant, really means that you are accepting the norms and values of that social group who had the question the judgement about the person in the first place. Since we all don’t accept and practice the same values and norms, whether or not certain behavior is deviant really becomes reliant upon who your asking.
To find something that would better represent this, I googled “Deviant Article” – pretty basic right? Well I found an interesting and relevant article to help us consider and understand this theory. The article is called “Deviant Chrismas” by Su Epstein and basically it just supports what Becker is saying. To someone who celebrates Christmas, its the norm to be happy and joyful during this time of year. Becker uses the example of the reaction people get who celebrate Christmas and don’t partially like this time of year – they get called Scrooge or Grinch. These terms dont exactly hold the best associations attached to them, and these people can be considered deviant by others who celebrate and fit into the norm of having a joyful spirit around Christmas. However, if you ask someone who isn’t part of that group and doesn’t share those same values they could care less! Your not deviant to them! So again, when defining behavior as deviant, it really depends on WHO your asking.
Are Athletes Untouchable?
Being a big sports fan and with the Jets’ recent signing of Plaxico Burress, I couldn’t help but to think about our discussion in class of how everyone is to follow the law but others who make the law are held to a different standard and might get off easier based on class in society and who you know. Well in this case you would think because of his status of a super star receiver that he would get off; however it was just the opposite. Plaxico shot himself in the leg and spent 21 months in prison, he indeed was deviant by carrying a gun into a night club, however he did not harm or intend to harm anyone, sure you can argue differently depending on your opinion, but this is a case which you would think he would of got off easy because of his status. I couldn’t help but to make the link to Becker’s Outsiders, on how the differences in class and social status apply to power, which it accounts to the degree to which group can make rules for others. The point I am trying to make is you would think he would get off easy, however the city prosecuted him to the full extent of the law, so next time you think you may be above the law or have the attitude, I know this one or that one that can get me out of this situation, I would rethink that or at least that is what the city wants us to think because of the way they made an example of the star receiver.
http://articles.nydailynews.com/2008-11-29/sports/29435442_1_plaxico-burress-sources-antonio-pierce
Social outsiders may be perceived as less than human.
The authors of this study (Full Article), found that people may “dehumanize” social outsiders. The study used fMRI scans to research the brain’s reaction to pictures of different social groups including business professionals, Olympic athletes, and drug attics. The medial prefrontal cortex, which is used for social cognition, is not active when people are shown pictures of people labeled as “extreme out-groups.” This study is somewhat disturbing since it shows that social outsiders can be viewed as less human or possibly, not human at all.
If we look at social outsiders as non-human, there can be a certain amount of subconscious justification for their improper treatment. The previous article mentions how three Florida teens went on a homeless person beating rampage. It would be interesting to see if these teenagers justified their actions through the dehumanizing of the homeless individuals. This study also helps us understand why people can turn a blind eye to these social outsiders so easily.
“Extreme out-groups” were the focus of the study or, people who were extremely far from societal norms. In my opinion, the participants of the study, who happened to be college undergraduates, simply could not relate to the people in these social out-groups. By having so little in common, participants could more easily disassociate themselves.
At its core, this study focused on the brain’s reaction to images of social outsiders. Therefore, it is easy to see a relationship between people’s image, and their treatment by others. The findings of this study could be reason enough to set up programs which focus on bettering the physical appearance of social outsiders, at the very least, to give them equal treatment by others.
Are women more guilty then we’d like to believe?
I believe that in our society women are held to different more lenient standards then men, mainly because they are viewed as nurturers, caretakers and the thought of them being violent and evil is not something that society is ready to accept. Women have been killing their husbands for centuries, as we see in Lisa Downing’s, Murder in the Feminine article, where she talks about several women who committed murder such as, Marie Lafarge and Marie Fortune. I believe there are gender biases in the judicial system, when a man kills someone or commits some sort of violent, heinous crime he is made out to be a monster, a person who must be removed from society immediately, sometimes even by execution. If a women were to commit the same crime, she would not be labeled a monster by all right away, people would begin to examine the reasons why she committed the crime. No one wants to come out and flat out say she’s a violent murdered who should be executed for her crimes! People start to attribute her acts to her childhood, various forms of abuse she suffered, and things like that, while trying to circumvent the fact that she in fact did commit this crime. In the clip that I am going to show, How likely are women to commit violent acts an expert criminal intelligence analyst goes to say, what I already believe, which is that there are plenty of women out there who can kill, steal, shoot, gang bang, sell drugs, and commit any violent and brutal act as well if not better then any man could and I feel they should be prosecuted equally and accordingly.