From Unhappiness to Depression

In this talk of the nation on NPR, there is a discussion between Gary Greenberg, author of “Manufacturing Depression: The Secret History of a Modern Disease” and Peter Kramer, MD, author of “Against Depression” about the increase in diagnosis of depression. Mr. Greenberg believes the disease is overdiagnosed. He says the move from unhappiness to depression was a long and gradual process. He said it all started in the 1960’s when Merck created an antidepressant drug called elavil and needed to sell it. Merck’s marketing campaign said in order to sell the drug you must associate it with a disease. At this time, Frank Ayd wrote a book for doctors called, “Recognizing the depressed patient” to provide doctors with a script to look for patients who fit into that diagnosis of depression.

Mr. Greenberg also states that Merck was not only advertising the drug but they were also advertising the idea of depression, they were advertising the “disease”. He also points out that doctors still don’t know much about the biochemistry of depression but that one wouldn’t know that when they go to see their doctor. In the discussion they also mention the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) which is a questionnaire that rates the severity of symptoms observed in depression such as low mood, insomnia, agitation, anxiety and weight loss and the fact that this scale is the most commonly used for rating depression and it doesn’t always give a depressed person the correct diagnosis and/or treatment.

Peter Kramer states that “it is hard to measure depression with the Hamilton scale and it cannot assign the right medication”. Both Kramer and Greenberg agree that those depressed don’t always get the correct treatment. Mr. Greenberg says, antidepressants don’t do much better than a placebo if one isn’t majorly depressed. He also believes that there are social issues of depression like one losing their job, working too much and not having enough time for family, etc. but says that the country doesn’t care much about that, they would rather treat it with medication.

I thought this discussion was very interesting because it shows what Conrad and Schneider wrote about in the article “From Badness to Sickness” about the power of the medical profession and how drug companies with a profit motive can create diseases such as depression to make money and get away with it. In the article by Conrad and Schneider, they state, “The medical profession dominates the organization of health and has a virtual monopoly over anything that is defined as an illness a “medical” treatment. All the medical profession has to do is make a claim and turn something like unhappiness into depression, so that they can medically treat it with a pill.

Posted in Assignment 4 | Tagged , , , | 15 Comments

Photo Evidence in Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal

In the beginning of 2004 instances of prisoners abuse in Abu Ghraib prison came to the public attention.  Many of 30.000 Iraqi prisoners were tortured by US military officials, CIA interrogators and independent contractors during interrogations or “for fun”.

United States Army Criminal Investigation Command started criminal investigation and some evidences were revealed to media. In April 2004 television news-magazine 60 minutes II aired a story on the abuse, including picture evidences. Harsh’s article in The New Yorker followed with detailed report on this case. (wikipedia )

Some picture you can find easily online, the link I post here is to the “wired” magazine’s webpage that came not from government officials, but from psychologist who had access to them.

Only fraction of photo evidences were released to public, the rest were presented in court behind the shut doors. Even though the case took place in 2008, there are still debates about whether or not the rest of pictures should be published.

I found it interesting to bring up this case for our class for a few reasons. First, as we see from the fact that picture evidences for this case are still a hotly debated topic, they played a major role in the case itself and in attracting public attention to it. It serves as a proof of how powerful photo evidence can be in law. Secondly, even though in some court cases picture evidences may be arguable evidence as picture only depicts a moment in time and can give a false presentation of what was happening at that time, in this case pictures were backed up by testimonies and video tapes. It also serves as an example of how much easier it is to get public attention and sentiment when case is supplied with vivid images.

Finally, Abu Ghraib prison scandal connects us with last weeks discussion of Foucault reading. Foucault argues that prisons are products of the switch from punishment to discipline, whether in Abu Ghraib prison detainees were clearly punished, not disciplined, often without a cause or reason.

Posted in Assignment 4 | Tagged , , , | 25 Comments

Medication overload!!!

I have come across this very interesting article and it spoke about our generation being overpopulated with people taking medication for literally everything. I have to agree that we are a generation that can not deal with the simplest of things and situations. We tend to always want to find the easy way out. Looking for a bandaid or a quick fix to make everything okay. This is very scary to me because it has started with the adults and is progressing to children as young as a couple of months old.

People take medicine for depression, sleep disorders, and attention deficit disorder. Although there are people who truly do suffer immensely from these disorders and cant help it but take medication for it, but when the majority of the population thinks they have these disorders; thats where the problem starts. The article said that drug companies have pushed the selling of drugs through ads and commercials and have influenced people to believe they have some sort of disorder and thats how they sell their drugs.

My opinion on this topic is that we live in a country where we want to do everything and accomplish so much at one time that we will medicate ourselves just to get through the day. It has gotten so bad that we give medication to our hyper-active children to calm them down so that we dont have to deal with them while trying to accomplish our own personal tasks either at home or at work. Whatever happened to kids just being kids? Maybe these kids are over active because they seek attention from their parents. Instead of medicating these children and putting a medical label on them, why not try talking and spending time with them and find out the true problem. It might not be a disorder afterall.

My point in all of this is that we need to take time for ourselves and relax because Rome wasnt built in a day and we need to face that. For ourselves, our children, and future generations, we need to stop this over medication of society now because if we dont, we will become a country full of robots. We will keep taking medicine for every little thing we dont like about ourselves or cant deal with and we will be controlled by these pills and drugs. We will become a generation full of drug addicts.

Posted in Assignment 4 | Tagged , , | 17 Comments

Hannibal the Cannibal

As I mentioned on a response to one of the blogs psycopathy has always been of my interest. Unlike the picture on the left and the Sex Offender Registry for instance, psycopaths don’t wear a tag nor do they list themselves anywhere as such.

According to Psycopathic Behavior, by Charles Montaldo, psychopaths are “generally cunning, manipulative and know the difference between right and wrong but dismiss it as applying to them, [they are also] incapable of normal emotions such as love.” On a more simplistic level psychopaths are characterized as charming, intelligent (at different levels of course), appear to be rational however egocentric, either antisocial or very outgoing, etc.

If there’s one person I automatically think about when I hear the word “psychopath” is Anthony Hopkins in the Hannibal Lecter series, specifically in The Silence of the Lambs. In this brilliant work Anthony Hopkins plays a “cannibalistic serial killer” who is taken into custody to help find another murderer; Buffalo Bill. Lecter is seen as pleasant, courteous, educated, incredibly patient not to mention intelligent, among other traits that are very hard to link with the image we get when we think of a mentally imbalanced person.

As I mentioned Lecter’s purpose is to help find Buffalo Bill. Clarice, an FBI agent that’s assigned to the case, is to get all the information she can from Lecter that would direct her to the murderer. As it turns out Lecter agrees to tell her about Bill if she shares information about her childhood with him, which she does although she’s previosly warned no to do so. Eventually, Clarice gets what she’s looking for thanks to Lecter, goes after the killer and the rest is history.

If you’d like to see Lecter in action Click Here.

**Warning: Brilliant but Bloody**

Nothing New Yokers can’t stomach tho (enter sarcasm here LOL). Enjoy!

 

Posted in Assignment 3 | Tagged , , , , | 29 Comments

Psychopaths. A successful adaptation?

Psychopathic behavior is hard to think about in any other way but deviant. If we forget about the socially constructed ideas which Psychopaths deviate from, we can see that this difference in behavior may be beneficial to the individuals themselves.  This article highlights the idea that Psychopaths may have physically adapted In order to survive in a world where manipulation and lack of loyalty can give them an advantage.  A lack of devotion to one’s partner will allow a psychopath to have many mates in one lifetime, thus carrying on their traits.  The lack of empathy and an extremely narcissistic attitude can also allow psychopaths to become successful.

The article also points out that a disorder is defined as something which inhibits the ability for a human to adhere to its most basic nature, which, at its heart, is the ability to reproduce. Therefore, psychopathy should not be defined as a disorder, but a reproductive advantage.  It’s interesting to think of psychopathy from this standpoint because if we look at how psychopaths function, it seems beneficial to them. In reality, the forces which inhibit a psychopath’s success are social norms and more importantly, laws. But, without these laws, a psychopath would truly thrive.

This psychopathic behavior is beneficial for the individual rather than the group and can only exist if the majority of people are empathetic and trusting of others.  Therefore, it begs the question, would a society where only psychopaths (or what we define as psychopaths) exist be functional?

Posted in Assignment 3 | Tagged , , , , | 14 Comments

Rosenhan Experiment

A couple of says ago I mentioned an experiment that was done in the 70’s (1973 to be exact) in which a small group of people was coached to act “crazy” in order to gain admittance into an insane asylum. Psychologist David Rosenhan published On Being Sane in Insane Places, in which he described his and eight other participants’ experiences in respective psych wards. None of these participants had a history of mental illness. Among those taking part in the experiment were psychologists, a grad student, and a pediatrician.

Once the patients were admitted into the ward (they all went into different types of hospitals with different types of funding), they no longer gave any sign of being mentally ill. There are several things about this article that are interesting.  Most of the participants were diagnosed with schizophrenia (at the public hospitals) and one with manic-depressive psychosis (at the private, better funded hospital, no less), a diagnosis which has a far more optimistic diagnosis, with better outcomes than schizophrenia, according to this article.

Once the participants were labeled as mentally ill, everything they did was attributed to their diagnosis. Rosenhan himself points out that “the perception of his circumstances was shaped entirely on his diagnosis” (on a particular patient’s normal family history, which was manipulated to aid in his diagnosis as schizophrenic.)  One bored participant was though to be nervous, simply because he was pacing the corridor. In a comical anecdote, Rosenhan describes a situation in which, “One psychiatrist pointed to a group of patients who were sitting outside the cafeteria entrance half an hour before lunchtime.  To a group of young residents he indicated that such behavior was characteristic of the oral-acquisitive nature of the syndrome.  It seemed not to occur to him that there were very few things to anticipate in a psychiatric hospital besides eating.” Although it’s easy to assume that this particular psychiatrist, who I’m sure was a learned and esteemed member of the psychiatric community, lacks any and all common sense, it’s easy to see how enshrouded a mental patient can become in his or her label. Rosenhan calls this section The Stickiness of Psychodiagnostic Labels, a title which is all too appropriate. Ironically enough, the only ones who were able to detect the patients as far from crazy, were other patients in the ward. Some of these voiced their suspicions from the get go, accusing the participants of being journalists or professors because of the constant note-taking. They weren’t far off.

Crazy?

On a side note, the study also brought attention to some very unorthodox practices, such as orderlies using excessive force with patients, patients regularly not taking their medication, and the incredible depersonalization that the patients went through on a daily basis. Such treatment would make anyone feel crazy.

Posted in Assignment 3 | Tagged , , , , | 12 Comments

Sidewalk Rage is real!

Hey guys. After we left class on monday I was thinking deeper into the social construction of illnesses and the first connection I made was to something I remembered seeing on the news a couple weeks ago. Well with alittle online-searching I found an article (actually a few!) reporting it.

I chose this article out of all the others mainly because it appeared on The Wall Street Journal, a pretty reputable, popular and wide spread publication that reaches millions of people. To summarize, the important parts of the article pretty much say that we now have developed the concept of “sidewalk rage” and defined it as something that, in extreme cases, can signal a psychiatric condition known as “intermittent explosive disorder”. Sidewalk rage is “real” and one scientist has even gone to the extent to develop a “Pedestrian Aggressiveness Syndrome Scale” to help classify the levels of rage people experience. The article mentions how scientists are trying to figure out what it is that really makes people angry so that when it becomes a personal problem it can be helped. “When your emotionally upset, your impared,” says Dr. Leon James from the article (which is perhaps why scientists and doctors are exploring this concept more). The article then goes on to give symptoms, scenarios, and suggestive tips for you to keep your cool on the sidewalk and help prevent sidewalk rage.

OK, to me, this is ridiculous. This is New York City, the streets are crowded, its summertime and hot out, if your in a rush and getting slowed down by a mob of tourists I’m sure EVERYONE has felt frustrated! I believe these are normal, natural feelings given our location and lifestyle! For society to minimize something all the way down to “sidewalk rage” and even associate it at all with a medical condition really seems stupid. Millions of men and women are getting brainwashed with this and can then perhaps use it as an excuse to justify their behavior they do something rash; especially if their reasoning has medical associations! Dont get me wrong if someone is getting mad at people on the sidewalk non stop/everyday I definitely think it could be abnormal (because honestly, its not THAT big of a deal!) but to me, “sidewalk rage” is fake and if its that much of an issue its just plain old rage and will most likely be exhibited in other scenarios throughout life and should be treated for those reasons of its own.

Posted in Assignment 3, Assignment 4 | Tagged | 5 Comments

Little people, lots of pills…

After watching “The Medicated Child” I felt dumbfounded and confused on how any of this drug abuse is possible. I noticed the word “nutrients” wasn’t used at all through out the program. In my experience, when I go to the doctor, they ask me what my diet is and what hobbies I enjoy. In the movie, I never heard the doctor’s ask what the diet was of the kids or what activities they took part of. I find this peculiar.

After class I went ahead and looked up some articles on this topic. The most interesting article I found is here at http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/05/23/kids.overmedicated/index.html

In this article CNN goes into detail regarding the life of Gavin Gorski and debate weather its right or wrong to medicate kids. Gavin Gorski suffers from many learning disabilities and impulses he can’t control. His father goes ahead to say, “We couldn’t exist without him being medicated.”

Later in the article, one of the doctors says, “Pharmaceuticals should be the last resort after therapies and behavioral interventions.” I couldn’t agree with this more. As a child growing up my mother always thought I depressed because I would like to take naps after school. I was constantly taking different tests and asked to take different mood changing medications. After saying no for most of my life I decided to try Adderol and see how my life was affected. I started taking Adderol every day and I received the best grades in a semester I ever got. I was happy about the grades but felt like a total zombie with no emotions. for that reason I stopped taking the pills and never took another one again. It really made me feel like a different person.

Posted in Assignment 1 | Tagged , , , | 70 Comments

Surveillance ! (Zhanna Onishchuk)

“The Outsiders” has made the point that certain people set the rules, and others are forced to abide by them.  Although we tend to rebel in our minds against the police and the government, we often just accept rules because they seem credible. There’s this new “Smart Meter” technology, an electricity meter to be installed by major electric companies in homes, that is advertised to reduce green house emissions and reduce electric bills. I heard about it from “Lionel’s” Commentary on the WB 11 news. Here’s the video :

Lionel Commentary

Can you believe it ? Now the government is not only surveillance criminals through unethical methods, as per our classmate (@Antonio,) but it is surveillance regular people.  If you do any research about the smart meter, which homeowners probably wont, it is difficult to find out out about the surveillance characteristics that the meter has, all that is advertised is its beneficial bill-reducing capabilities.

How are we supposed to follow rules when they are not justified at all ? We are blinded by everything that the government wants us to hear – and we have done nothing wrong. The government applied bad stigmas to regular people just as much as they do to criminals.   Otherwise, such deception and surveillance would not exist. This is proven over and over again with intrusive privacy legislation that applies to everyone. So are we all really criminals that need to be controlled ? If we look at aourselves as criminals, we can justify breaking laws. Which comes back to the government’s need to surveillance us. This loop will never end !

Zhanna Onishchuk

 

Posted in Assignment 3 | Tagged , , , | 18 Comments

Racism in America

According to the article by CNN, America still tends to struggle with the issue of racism. Although in the past century several human rights and struggles for equality among classes and races have occurred, it still tends to be in the early developing ages when it comes to racism. White supremacists, still tend to invest their time on hate and plenty of propaganda on white (Aryan) power that dominates the majority of U.S. Unfortunately, as seen in this article, many lives (innocent) tend to be sacrificed for an expired belief (Nazism) that has left it dark spot on history 7 decades ago. I belief that stronger legislation on these hate crimes will lower the level of racism across U.S., but that seems a long way ahead.

Posted in Assignment 3 | Tagged , , | 16 Comments