• Home
  • About the Course
  • Requirements
  • Schedule
  • Assignments

Psychology of Childhood and Adolescence in an Urban Context

Spring 2011

Feed on
Posts
comments

Nature/Nurture: Genes and Culture

March 9, 2011 by Jocin

The topic of genetics always reminds me of the movie Gattaca, featuring Jude Law and Uma Thurman. The movie is a satirical projection of a society that classifies humans based on genetic make up, segregating individuals with a better genetic make up from those of a ‘lower’ class of genetics. Ultimately in the film people with the better genetic coding are individuals that have better jobs, and people with a lesser quality of genes are used for menial occupations.

Although the Human Genome Project (HGP), (defined as is an international scientific research project with a goal of determining the sequence of chemical base pairs which make up DNA and to identify and map the approximately 20,000–25,000 genes of the human genome from both a physical and functional standpoint), is something that seems virtually harmless in terms of research, there is always the possibility of something harmless becoming dangerous. I think the true issue arises when there are no genetic information gathering guidelines for individuals to follow. Therefore, something as awesome and informational as knowing what each sequence of DNA contributes to what, becomes tricky. The concern spills over to the topic of “designer” babies which although may seem logical for parents to circumvent specific diseases in their children, contributes to the idea of an individual playing God. I think a great deal of knowledge can come from the information on genes mentioned by LCC. The idea of dominant and recessive genes can gage the possible traits an individual may have, and information can probably be acquired without a blood test of any sort.

It gets confusing really, I mean it’s okay in once sense to figure out genes a child may have to prepare for the child itself, but when it comes to customizing the genes things get a little tricky. How far is too far? Is there an ethical guideline? Does this coincide with an individual’s rights for freedom? Most of the nation still has an issue with abortion saying it is murder, but what would something so advanced as knowing the traits of your child and customizing them be summed up as?

Posted in Nature/Nurture: Genes and Culture | No Comments



Comments are closed.

  • EDU 1101 Calendar

    March 2011
    S M T W T F S
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
    « Feb   Apr »
  • Comments

    • Kim Rybacki on Shortcomings of Education System in U.S.
    • Kim Rybacki on “Designer” Babies
    • Kim Rybacki on
  • Categories

  • RSS NYT > Psychology and Psychologists

    • Are Millennials ‘Childless’ or ‘Child Free’? June 8, 2025
      Readers respond to a guest essay by Michal Leibowitz. Also: Is America no longer a beacon?
    • The 100-Year-Old Psychologist Is Still Listening June 8, 2025
      But with her memory suddenly starting to fail, she faces a difficult decision.
      Julie Besonen and Sarah Blesener
    • ‘The Protocol’: The Story Behind Medical Care for Transgender Kids June 6, 2025
      A new six-part podcast explores the story of medical treatment for transgender young people — how the care began, the lives it changed, and the legal and political fights that could end it in the U.S.
      Azeen Ghorayshi and Austin Mitchell
    • My Friend Lied About Her Income. Can I Still Trust Her? June 5, 2025
      She doesn’t think she did anything wrong.
      Lori Gottlieb

Theme: MistyLook by Sadish. Powered by WordPress MU.