Maybe its just me, but does anybody else think that a 35 year old learning morals and proper behavior from a 5 year old sound really wrong? From reading the chapter, I dont understand how they could come to the conclusion that kindergarten helps provide morals for all families because the 4 year old who learns the morals from his teacher is going to go home and teach his family. The idea of kindergarten should provide kids with a basic preparation period for the next level of their education, not teach their families what is a moral activity and what is not. Another problem that I have with this idea is that if these kids are going to school without morals and living in homes where their parents have no morals, what are the chances that the morals being taught to the kids has a chance of staying with the child and not just being disregarded? It seems to me that if the child is not given morals from the parents, then the chances of the child maintaining the morals in a home like this are very slim.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Meta
Categories
Links