Chapters 3 and 4

Chapter 3, in a nutshell, revises everything we have so far discussed regarding standardized testing. The pros and cons of such measurements are clear cut and so far the system has failed to put it to adequate use. One thing that this chapter discusses in further detail is AYPs. This Adequate Yearly Progress shows the student’s progression throughout the year by means of standardized tests. Meier emphasizes the disparity found with these tests especially for special needs students and English Language learners. Most of these tests aren’t adequately designed for the individual preferences, strengths and needs of each student and it inevitably causes categorization and stratification.
On the other hand, Chapter 4 addresses the role that public education should play as a public institution. Meier argues that the educational system should be a truly democratic organization where its constituents play an active role in decision making. Parents should be given the right to directly influence the functioning of the schools, since, after all, it is their children who will be directly impacted by the strengths and failures of the system. Although Meier makes a valid point, can this really happen since the fundamental structure of the institution is extremely bureaucratic and political? The networks that exist within the system does not disclose enough information to the public and somewhats parent involvement. One prime example of this is the functioning of PTAs. Many PTAs in New York City have limited resources and power because of the hierarchical operations within the schools. Often times they are also restricted to voice their opinions to higher authorities from fear of retribution and discontent from their principals who will, again, further limit their activities. Certain Parent Teacher Associations go so far as to play back door politics along with the Department of Education just to get what they need or want. Although PTAs are just one small example of the “democratic” workings that take place within the educational system. It is ideal for EVERYONE to be involved in every public institution,because after all we are all affected by it, however the system places restrictions. Restrictions naturally caused by the structure and designed to limit outside involvement, this is the nature of politics. However, the main question that one has to address prior to acknowledging the benefits of public participation is, should the educational field even be within political spheres?