
Project #2

. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ .My Blog. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ . ݁
A Blogs@Baruch site
What I like that Russolo did is the noise that was bolded in the reading, but I what found interesting and never really considered that noises and any noises can be composed into music or into anything that would be considered a form of art. I also like and in connection to, for the type of silence like there is nature silence, but compare to a room silence it so different. I’m never used to silence because i’m use to noises.
————-
I found a interesting guy, Takayuki Nakano, and one of his sound is called comes sabotag. This audio is interesting because it is 40 mins long and it is just him playing the drums while he tells some kind of story, saying random things that don’t make sense maybe a poetry and even making random noises. Not sure if I like it, but it is indeed a interesting way of combining someone speaking and having music or beats from the drums to go with his dramatic effects.
The sound i’ve never heard before and ever get use to is just the silence. I’m so use to white noises like the air purifier running 24/7 in my room and when it stops, I get this most uncomfortable feeling and it feels like my ears just I don’t know how to describe it, but my ears start to hear ringing noises or have wind noises. It feels like the silence is putting pressure into my ears. It’s so awkward to everytime I hear it, so I always automatically block those uncomfortable noises with my airpods and music.
The remixes that were made in the documentary were interesting and I never really heard of them before. It is also interesting how copyright was back then and even then copyright is still a thing for how songs should be in videos on YouTube. However, it brings questions on how DJing works and even EDM because they make beats with lyrics from songs to make their remixes to promote to others. I agree that “the past always tries to control the future,” but only through how the company reacts to how music is being downloaded and reused for copyright. Even then, it’s more of how the person is using the music. Some reuse music and name it their own, even though it is from another artist. Which is why it is hard to give freedom in this case. For example, if you put yourself in their shoes, you made a song and someone else just took it and remixed it, but put their name and gave you no credit, then I would sue. I guess with credit, it would be best to know that at least you had some acknowledgment. However, I wouldn’t stop someone from using songs to create their own remixes too. I think it’s pretty unique as well and it even adds a touch to the music made and have it to be heard and many different ways for many other people to enjoy it. I still feel unsure of how to feel about it, it’s a mixture of how something is considered “copyright”.