metaphors woojin kim

Lakoff & Johnson summarization.

The use of metaphor is incredibly prevalent in language.  From making simple comparisons we draw in typical, everyday dialogue to hyperbolizing for comedic or argumentative effect, we couldn’t go a day in the life without metaphor.  We must understand that it, rather than strictly being a literary or rhetorical device, is also a linguistic concept.  As Lakoff and Johnson would agree, the metaphor is not only comfortably at home in poetry or prose; it naturally finds its way into our thoughts and actions.

Take for example the idea that argument is war.  In an argument, two (or more) sides are pitted against each other.  Either side must first own an argument, a stance.  Either side must possess both an offensive and defensive strategy to show their stances and protect their own positions.  Either side must have the time and necessary resources, be it empirical or anecdotal evidence, personal experience, etc… Easily forgotten as a cornerstone of argument is the willingness to cooperate — albeit the word ‘argument’ has negative connotations to bickering, fighting; ‘arguing,’ on the other hand, is generally much less productive than organized debate or proper discourse.

Of course the comparison is not to be taken seriously or literally, and most people DO understand this. Such a notion suggests that metaphorical conceptualization is built into our brains; or as Lakoff and Johnson put it, that “our ordinary conceptual system is metaphorical in nature”.

Emily Martin summarization

In fighting for political, economic, and social equality, the feminist movement now criticizes biased language found in medical research studies in sex and reproduction.  Emily Martin, postdoctoral anthropologist and feminist writes against the usage of the metaphors associated with eggs and sperm in such publications, and expresses her disappointment with the perpetuation of the stereotypical portrayals of the sex cells.

Despite debunking a few things about the sperm’s role in the penetration and fertilization of an egg, Martin could not help but notice the constant exaggeration of the male gamete’s every action.  Shooting through the abyss at speedy velocities, the sperm penetrates the egg waiting for rescuing… Never would I have assumed the male sex cell possessed such a sense of duty, such heroism; not til these great scientific studies chronicled the long and arduous journey of the brazen little sperm…

The conclusive portion of Martin’s entry dedicates itself to engendering feminists to push for equal representation of male and female gametes in scientific reports, textbooks, and other such texts.  She claims that the male-biased metaphors of the egg and the sperm aren’t dead, but are in fact dormant in scientific text, and that it is a “feminist challenge” to “wake up” these “sleeping metaphors”.

tools woojin kim

Summarize this reading in your own words (150 words).

As humans, we have an incredible capacity for absorbing information and forming thoughts and opinions from as much as a quick glance.  This is an essential trait to critically analyzing the world around us as well as the worlds found in works of fiction, art, photography, and so on… Of course nobody’s required to use the skill at all times.  One typically wouldn’t analyze the rhetoric of something as trite or mundane as a lump of coal.  But when the time does come, it’s highly recommended of us as thinking men and women — the intelligentsia — to see through certain lenses and consider certain concepts in order to pull as much information as possible from a source.  Asking questions about a text or a video or painting allows us to dig a bit deeper, facilitating the formation of strong, substantiated arguments and opinions.

What’s your response to this text? (response)

More than ever, critical analysis is an iron pillar, a cornerstone of advanced thinking.  Looking through multiple lenses allows readers to see all there is to see about virtually anything; each lens is like a kaleidoscope, bursting into a vast array of patterns, shapes, and colors… I imagine trying to understand everything about a book or a movie would look something like the scene in Marvel’s Dr. Strange, where the protagonist has his mind absolutely melted by the mystic arts of the Ancient One.

What question do you have after this reading?  (question/connect)

Has the introduction of fast-moving, fast-scrolling, post-after-post social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Snapchat, etc., had any effect on people’s ability to critically analyze and question the things they see?  Consider the politicization of these platforms and the extensive and many times biased coverage of sociopolitical events and fake news, as well as the general public’s reaction to them.

rhetoric woojin kim

Baruch’s writing center offers a variety of services that all students, no matter how adept (or inept) at writing, can benefit from.  The greatest advantage I see in utilizing the writing center is the one-on-one consulting with professionals and other faculty on one’s own writing.  There is only so much we know about effective and meaningful writing and rhetoric as undergraduate students, and learning from the best can broaden our perspectives and sharpen our arguments in the essays we write.

Rhetoric can be best generalized as the constant ebb and flow of thoughts and ideas in writing, conversation, visual and auditory spectacles… Anything and everything can be interpreted, making rhetoric universal and accessible to anyone with half a brain — not to insult anyone with half a brain.

What I find so unique about rhetoric is its diversity of definitions.  There are people that believe it is a way of embellishing thought, as we instinctively “dress down” when it comes to thoughts that don’t leave the mouth.  Others, as implied by the introduction to the text, see rhetoric as a manipulative tool, a sort of marionette’s control bar to steer people during discussion.  However mixed the opinion on rhetoric is, the general consensus seems to be that it is a technique — or tool — to enhance language.  Yet, it is so much more than that.  Rhetoric is all around us, and we connect to it through one or more of our five senses (or six, if intuition counts).  How else, then, is a picture able to say a thousand words?  How else, then, can a wordless symphony evoke emotions so profound that we are brought to tears and immense joy?  Rhetoric, friends.

 

sadvertisement woojin kim

It’s 10pm at night, and I’m waiting for the Q12 towards Little Neck when I see next to me a brightly lit advertisement as well a square of text obscuring a woman’s face.  It read “Another ugly bullsh*t ad” in all caps and large, bold Helvetica Neue typeface.  The fellow clearly wasn’t much for pleasantries.

Yet it resurfaced some memory of an ad I was quite intrigued by on my way home from school.  It was advertising a line of premium bedding and sheets from Brooklyn-based Brooklinen, a company successfully crowdfunded through a Kickstarter campaign with 1,733 backers pledging $236,888.  That’s $186,888 past the funding goal!  Mindless numbers aside, it’s clear that the company has a good product that a bunch of people want.  And with the advertisement I saw (not shown because I didn’t take any pictures), it’s clear Brooklinen wants to appeal to as many potential customers as well as passing onlookers as possible — except your average white male.

Oddly enough, each panel of the ad featured a different couple.  On the far left panel was a happy elderly couple having a pillow fight — presumably Brooklinen Plush Down  Pillows, easier on impact.  To its right was a gay couple cuddling, and to the right of that a shot of three pairs of feet under some soft Brooklinen sheets.  Another panel to the right were two young women in bed with a dog, and finally a panel with a black family enjoying more Brooklinen products.  It wasn’t long before I started asking myself “where’s the young, straight white couple?”

I’m a bit skeptic of the advertisement, but in the end it’s harmless.  More sheets for everyone!

nothing bad happens woojin kim

We are told to internalize pain, whether it is emotional pain from a devastating breakup, or maybe physical pain from breaking both your legs in a fall. While containing whatever slew of sensations following such events may help you to temporarily regain your footing, it can come back much stronger than before.  But what happens when the pain becomes too much to simply stifle using sheer will? It explodes.

I speak, of course, of my extremely irritated bowels.

As a healthy young man, I seldom succumb to such immense physical pain.  My father, who had grown up on traditional Korean values, is quite a severe man.  I aspired to be as thick-skinned and stoic as he, even to the point of mimicking his impossibly perpetual brow-furrow.  Like then, I only come up with a silly, pained yet confused expression as I tighten my grip, knuckles white, on the reigns of my rectum.

Unsurprisingly, it is not the first time I have felt this way, and I have spicy food to thank for all the wonderful memories.  Quite the forbidden fruit, spicy food is.  For the man who desires something more from his food, capsaicinized comestibles ought to do the trick: you bite, they bite back.  I, for having bitten out of the forbidden fruit, suffer a horrible and prolonged lower-abdominal discomfort.  Another one for the books, I guess.

[As a writer]

Kids never truly know how to use writing as a form of self-expression — at least not until they see how it’s done.  Ironically, I wrote up an instructional series aptly titled the “How To” series, containing acclaimed works such as “how to make a peanut butter and jelly sandwich”, and “how to plant a pumpkin seed”.

At some point I abandoned the monotonous and formulaic how-to series; it was around the time I began reading non-picture books.  A painful severance it was, having to let go of the colorful illustrations and lively visuals for pages upon pages of bland, mindless text.  What was even more sobering was having to later read non-fiction books, which eventually became the norm in all classes outside of ELA, as it was called in grade and middle school.

Writing, however, was something I never noticed myself growing in: it was something like not realizing how you grew a foot over the summer, or how your voice dropped a few semitones while you were all-too focused on how much the 13-year-old life sucked.  Much worse than life in communist Russia or Nazi Germany, really.

Maybe it was all those books?  Was I perhaps imitating my favorite authors, comedians, and/or internet personalities?  There is no wrong answer.

Having been in school for most of my life, I can say confidently most academic writing is not creative.  It sounds obvious, as academic writing, on paper (ha ha), is quite the opposite of creative writing.  We sometimes wind up in this pitfall of always writing scholarly (at times flat-out snobbish) pieces that might earn an A, but are devoid of character or personality.  Writing doesn’t have to be a chore, and I encourage more people to have fun with it wherever and whenever possible.  Though, I wouldn’t recommend cracking penis jokes on a company business report — someone would certainly have a bone to pick with you on the matter.