I found the rhetorical triangle to be quite interesting. Why is the speaker mainly associated with ethos, audience with pathos, and subject with logos? I feel like the speaker should be mostly associated with pathos because the speaker can use his/her emotion to persuade the audience. However, I do admit that if you use the three as a combination, then the writing will be better. I did not know what warrants were in terms of rhetorical analyses, but the example given clearly describes it. Warrants are underlying assumptions. One thing that bombards me is that “rhetorical context always shifts… we must also be prepared to seize the right moment to say the right thing” (44). This sounds difficult because it needs me to be flexible since every situation is different.