-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Macbeth, the victim or the villain? – Arron's Blog on Macbeth: Victim of Fate?
- Professor Berggren on The Curse of Macbeth aka The Scottish Play
- Ronie Sharma on Scene Study-Troilus and Cressida Act 3 Scene 1
- Ronie Sharma on Does the end justify the means?
- Ronie Sharma on “The poison of that lies in you to temper.”
Archives
Categories
Meta
Historical sources
Imagery
Links
Macbeth
Pastoral themes
The Taming of the Shrew
Tags
- Achilles
- agamemnon
- appearance
- Beatrice
- Chorus
- Claudio
- Cressida
- deceit
- disguise
- disguises
- dogberry
- dupe
- fair
- foul
- free will
- group 5
- Helen
- Helen-Paris
- Henry V
- Hero
- induction
- irony
- lies
- love
- Lucentio
- Lust
- Macbeth
- Margaret
- Much Ado About Nothing
- music
- Paris
- predestination
- prejudice
- reality
- scene study
- Shakepeare
- shakespeare
- shrew
- taming
- The Winter's Tale
- the witches
- Troilus
- Troilus and Cressida
- Troy
- Ulysses
Monthly Archives: October 2011
Henry V vs. earlier plays
I couldn’t help but get some similarities between the characters of Henry V and those of The Taming of the Shrew and Much Ado About Nothing. Just as Beatrice in Much Ado echoed some of Kate in Taming, I think some of the characters in Henry V echo some of the previous characters as well.
For instance, the Dauphin reminds me somewhat of Claudio in Much Ado. Claudio was very naive and quick to believe everything he heard. The Dauphin has similar qualities. He refers to Henry V as a “vain, giddy, shallow humorous youth” which undoubtedly he was once, but as we’ve seen in earlier acts, is no longer. Earlier characters have spoke of Henry V with almost reverence, praising how well he’s slipped into the role of King despite his reckless past. But the Dauphin refuses to listen to the newest information and latches onto only the info that gives him a right to talk badly about Henry. Similarly, Claudio only had to listen to a tiny bit of information about Hero’s alleged infidelity to believe everything bad about her.
Even a minor character, the hostess, reminds me of previous characters. Though she is married to Pistol, she has had a romantic past with Nim. This arguing over a woman brings a strong reminder to everyone’s fascination with Bianca in The Taming of the Shrew. And in her speech in Act 2, Scene 3, when she is speaking of Falstaff dying, she makes many malapropisms that remind me of Dogberry in Much Ado.
These reminders may be unintentional, but I think it shows how Shakespeare had recurring themes in his plays, despite how differently themed they are. While Henry V reads more like an epic play, the fact that it can call up reminders of his earlier comedies differs Shakespeare’s writing from anyone else’s.
King’s Dilemma
The Chorus apologize the audience because of the limitations of the stage what makes it difficult to present the events as they really are. It encourages the viewer to imagine the reality and see things that are only mentioned by name. It makes me think how often in real life we skew the facts to work according to our needs or to excuse certain decisions we make.
King Henry a noble man is expected to be a soldier. He knows that English man do not accept his rights to the throne and one of the best ways to keep the people on his side is to go to war and gain the recognition and power. Henry spent his young years in the tavern befriending lowlifes and drunks. When he became King he changed his life style as well as priorities and abandoned his old friends. He presents himself as a responsible, good king, who thinks carefully weather to invade France. Because of his background Henry understands the people and recognizes the devastation of the war to the country and the citizens. I think that despite of his dilemma Henry wants to invade. He knows the benefits that the successful war can bring for him, at the same time he is reluctant to take the responsibility for his decisions. In act I scene I and II we see that Henry welcomes all the arguments that encourage him to proceed with the war. The King asks the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Bishop of Ely for the honest and truthful advice concerning his rights to the French throne. The conversation between the Ely and Canterbury in Act I, scene I reveal what is going on behind the scenes. The clergy is corrupt and has little regard for the good of the country. Canterbury and Ely manipulate the King in order to keep their wealth. The advisors with sole intent of guarding their own interests recommend the King to go to war. Once the King gets blessing from the clergy, he passes the responsibility of his decision onto the Church. In act I scene II Henry gets insulted by the French ambassador and he once again finds the reason to excuse his actions.
Just as the audience cannot see the events as they are because of the limited capabilities of the scene, the same way Henry cannot see true motives of his advisors because he follows his own interest. However, Henry recognizes that it is wrong that’s why he delegates the responsibility to others. He thinks that he has the support and dedication of all English man but in fact everybody follows they own needs clergy want to prevent the passing of the bill that will lead to confiscate of its land. Cambridge, Scrope, and Grey conspire against Henry in order to get money from the French, even Pistol, Bardolph, Nim are going to war to steal and rob. The reality is far from what chorus is promoting and what King bases his decision on.
The Chorus
To build on what we already discussed in class, I’d like to take the Chorus of Henry V into consideration. It is both unique and brilliant in which the way Shakespeare initially uses the Chorus in this play—having the members apologize to the audience for any inaccuracies that will occur while attempting to recreate authentic settings/plots within the confined area of the stage. By doing this, Shakespeare uses a transition into the play itself, while simultaneously giving the audience additional responsibility and immedietely captivating their attention. Before Act 2, the Chorus again offers apologies for innacuracy and serves a transition, however I am still not entirely sure as to why they claim the play will shift to Southampton, when it actually shifts to London…exact purpose; intention? I know we spoke about this in class but it is still unclear to me. Moving on, the Chorus in Act 3 seems rather different than the aforementioned appearances. There is the use of alarm and cannon sounds in the background—I thought that this was noteworthy as it clearly defines a difference in the Chorus and would be extremely effective to further captivate the audience, though I wonder how it was done during that time period. Also, the Chorus in Act 3 actually tells the truth (in rather great detail) of the upcoming scene, rightfully depicting the King and his men arriving at Harfleur and using cannons.
taming of the shrew
I really enjoyed taming of the shrew for several reasons, one being I enjoyed Shakespeare’s view of men and women together, relationships, courtships. Petruccio’s courtship of Katherine is very telling of men interacting with women. I find it amazing that Shakespeare understood women so well and writes them even better. You see this in the courtship between the two. Their witty back and forth banter is very interesting to read. You can tell between the back and forth of all the sexual tension between the two. It was great to be able to read about this and I thought it was revolutionary for Shakespeare to be almost perfect at relating to women. I always thought in modern times if there was a man to be able to write about women and be dead on accuracy concerning women’s thoughts. This gentleman would have a lot of money. Turns out this guy was here but we missed him by a few hundred years. Perhaps the greatest author of all time, Shakespeare will never be forgotten.
Another interesting part of the play is Petrucchio’s domestication of Katherine. Hence in the title of the play, “taming of the shrew”. Petrucchio uses manipulation and determination to tame Katherine’s wild side. This proves to be a very daunting task, but Petrucchio’s love for his wife pushes forth his determination. This determination proves to be successful.