Category Archives: Gender matters

The comparisons can go on forever…

I thought it’s only fitting to fill my blog post with material that I couldn’t cover in the presentation in class. I think the comparisons between Macbeth and Lady Macbeth can go on forever. Their echoes of each other’s words ring throughout the entire play. The audience really does get an in depth look at their relationship and how they play off each other. In 1.7.33, Macbeth says “If it were done when ’tis done, then ’twere well/ It were done quickly.” Here, he’s referring to the killing of Duncan right before his wife persuades him to carry out the evil deed. Then in 3.1.13, Lady Macbeth says to her husband about all the deeds that have been committed already, “what’s done, is done” (probably the most famous line is all of Shakespearean literature). Here, she echoes her husband’s words in 1.7, which continues to portray the influence they have on each other.

Shakespeare’s diction is also very well chosen in this play to set the tone of the entire plot. In 1.5.64, Lady Macbeth says “Look like th’innocent flower,/ But be the serpent under’t” when speaking to her husband about killing Duncan. In 3.2.14, Macbeth says, “We have scorched the snake, not killed it” when speaking to his wife about killing Banquo and Fleance. Shakespeare uses words with very wicked connotations like “serpent” and “snake” to add to the ambience of the plot. His words emphasize the dark, dangerous and almost poisonous path Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are on and later we’ll come to see that the only way they can get off is if they themselves are killed.

Posted in Gender matters, Macbeth | 3 Comments

You Can Get Away With Murder

I do realize that women aren’t treated respectfully in
Shakespeare’s plays, but they also aren’t exactly model citizens. We’ve seen
that the women act out in anger (hey there, Beatrice) and strike their sisters
(oh, Kate), and also have interesting ways of interacting with many of the men
in the plays. I think what allows these characters, specifically Cressida and
Helen, to get away with their very informal, and suggestive, behavior is that
they are known to be beautiful.

In an exchange with Pandarus, Cressida replies to his remark
about what position she defends herself by saying, “Upon my back, to defend my
belly” (1.2.273). One can imagine that she is alluding to a sexual position. It
would seem that because she is pretty and charming and very witty, that she is
able to get away with such candid talk, even if it is to a relative. I suppose them
being related does give a bit of an allowance of how she conducts her behavior.
If that is the case, what is her excuse with Troilus. When confessing her love
(somewhat contrived) she says, “And yet, good faith, I wished myself a man, Or
that we women had men’s privilege Of speaking first. Sweet, bid me hold my
tongue” (3.2.129-131). Again Cressida speaks her mind without any
consequences. In fact, because she spoke her mind freely she was able to get
what she wanted: Troilus.

In Act 3 Scene 1, Helen keeps up with Pandarus’ underlying vulgar
insinuations and flirts openly. Pandarus says, “What says my sweet queen? My
cousin will fall out with you” (3.1.81-81). Yet she is never chided by Paris
for her behavior. We don’t just see vulgar conversation from Helen; we also see
that she does not take direction well. When Pandarus asks her to leave he and
Paris alone she says, “Nay, this shall not hedge us out. We’ll hear you sing,
certainly” (3.1.62-63). Not once do we see her take direction from anyone in
this play.

My argument is that these women get away with it because of
their looks. In the same way that the deformed citizens like Thersites can say
what they want so are these women allowed to speak their mind. Sexism may be
alive and well in Shakespeare’s plays, but at least our beautiful female
characters get to have a little fun.

Posted in Gender matters, Troilus and Cressida | 1 Comment

I apologize for posting this late however, my assignment was to analyze Act 5 of Taming of The Shrew and I believe in “better late than never!” I would like to particularly discuss Act 5, Scene 2, lines 179-188; These are the last several lines of Katherine’s speech to the wives.

But first, I can’t say that I’m particularly surprised by Katherine’s extreme role reversal, after all love makes us do crazy things. We never really discussed the idea of love being a factor towards Katherine’s transformation and I do believe that it was love that changed her.  My argument isn’t necessarily that it was healthy love or even true love, but I find it to be the best explanation. I believe she had found a companion within Petruchio, initiated by their witty conversations, someone she felt a sense of loyalty to and a sense of security with. We all can easily say that you should never change who you are for someone else, they should like you for you, blah blah blah but sometimes your heart gets in the way of your mind.  I think Katherine sacrificed apart of herself in order to feel loved.

“My mind hath been as big as one of yours,
My heart as great, my reason haply more,
To bandy word for word and frown for frown.
But now I see our lances are but straws,
Our strength as weak, our weakness past compare,
That seeming to be most which we indeed least are.
Then vail your stomachs, for it is no boot,
And place your hands below your husband’s foot:
In token of which duty, if he please,
My hand is ready, may it do him ease.”

Katherine loses her sense of self clearly and rejects the strength she once had for the sake of her husband. As a romantic, this is the saddest token of affection. It’s admirable her reverence for her husband but at the price she pays, I’m torn. I can’t imagine trading my beliefs for love, at best, I hope I wouldn’t. Is this perhaps an ideal of their time? As a woman of the Elizabethan Era is there much more to look forward to than succumbing to a man? If love makes you weak, love broke Katherine.

Posted in Gender matters, Ideas of governance, The Taming of the Shrew | 2 Comments

Claudio and Hero’s Marriage

When Don John informs Claudio and Don Pedro about Hero’s infidelity, they do not hesitate to believe him. Don John has created a plan with Borachio, where Claudio
and Don Pedro quickly fall into the trap.  Through Borachio’s conclusion, we know that
Claudio and Don Pedro confused Margaret with Hero. It is very surprising and at
the same time disturbing how neither man took a moment to approach Hero that
same night at her balcony. The men must have been at a great distance to not
have noticed the differences in the women, in regards to their voice, language
and features. The men only wanted to believe what they had already been told.

Claudio seems to only care about what he can do to get back at Hero.  It is astonishing to note how quickly his love to her has become mere hatred.  It is difficult to understand his change of feelings after he publicly humiliates her at the altar. His actions symbolize his youth. Another individual, one that is mature and experienced would have probably handled the situation differently. The best way to have handled a similar situation would have been to approach Hero or her father Leonato in private. Hero deserved to have the
opportunity to defend herself.

Unfortunately for Hero, she has to go through a representation of death and rebirth to erase way the sin she was wrongly accused of.  The sin of adultery ruins her reputation and
that of her family. This process of death will allow Hero to be valued for the good qualities she should be remembered by. Her rebirth is a symbol for a new beginning. After all that has happened Hero marries Claudio because she truly loves him and realizes that their love was tested by a misunderstanding.

The ending of this play has a fairytale ending of happily ever after. In a discussion
from another English class, the majority of readers know how the ending of a text will end. However, recent studies show that readers are more intrigued to know how the characters and their drama get to that ending. It is more interesting for some people to read about finding the solution to the conflict rather than to read how happy everybody becomes.

Posted in Gender matters, Much Ado About Nothing | 1 Comment

The Don Pedro Analysis

Shakespeare creates a parallel between the two couples that dominate this play, and he makes the events surrounding their romances so exciting that it’s easy to forget about a bunch of anomalies that tend to appear. As Claudio despairs at Hero’s supposed unfaithfulness and Benedick admits to loving Beatrice, it seems natural for Don Pedro’s character to take a step back in the plot. After all, it’s not as though he has any sort of love connection in this play.

I think that Don Pedro is homosexual.

Hear me out. The heir of Aragon is unmarried, a most peculiar circumstance even when disregarding everything else. The continuation of noble lineage is essential during this time period for nobles, particularly in light of the fact that everyone has just finished a war. What if Don Pedro had died? Who would have succeeded him? Such questions are addressed and immediately resolved in noble families through arranged marriages. Of course, since we have no idea how old Don Pedro is, his status as an eligible bachelor is far from sufficient to support my suggestion. Perhaps he simply hasn’t had the chance to marry yet. However, other cues from the play allude to this as well.

For example, the play suggests that the young men who have returned from war have a hard time communicating with women. Claudio, despite his apparent fearlessness in battle, cannot summon the courage to admit to Hero how he feels. Benedick, afraid to be made into a cuckold, initially refuses to ever entertain the notion of marriage. Fear, in one way or another, explains why these two young men haven’t gotten married.  It should also be observed that despite this fear, both of these men end up overcoming their misgivings, whether through their own actions or through an indirect agent (like how Don Pedro sets up Claudio’s marriage). However, there is no such explanation for why Don Pedro is single, and the play’s silence on this matter is deafening.

There are only two instances where Don Pedro acts like he is interested in women: during the dance (where he pretends to be Claudio, so he can woo Hero) and during a brief interaction with Beatrice (where he offers himself as a husband). While the mask obviously hides his identity from Hero, I don’t think it’s hard to think of the mask as Don Pedro’s heterosexuality. The interaction with Beatrice is strange, to say the least. No matter how you look at it, you can’t help but wonder: how can the Prince of Aragon be so casual about marriage? I mean, has he forgotten that he’s the heir? Beatrice, for all of her beauty, is too lowborn for Don Pedro (something she admits to through her refusal). You can argue that he was just being courteous, and that she recognized his offer as such, but something about the offer is just strange. Perhaps, because he is homosexual, he is only offering so that he can be seen making an offer to a woman, or perhaps he simply does not care which woman will be his wife . You can argue that Beatrice’s beauty implies he’s being quite picky,  but he seems to be the only male in the play who doesn’t realize that how Beatrice is. Benedick, for all of his verbal sparring with her, admits to her beauty, and Claudio alludes to it indirectly by saying how Hero is the most beautiful in his eyes. Don Pedro’s lack of comment strikes me as a lack of…interest.

 

Posted in Gender matters, Much Ado About Nothing | 2 Comments

Cruel Intentions…

While reading The Taming of the Shrew, the Induction is interesting. The lord notices that Christopher Sly is extremely drunk, to say the least, and attempts to make a mockery of the beggar. He orders his servants to take him inside and treat him as a lord by putting him in a bed, putting rings on his fingers, and even setting a banquet for him. The lord even has his pageboy, Bartholomew, dress up to play the part as Sly’s wife.

Once Sly arises from his deep slumber, he is confused. After the men convince him of his hierarchy, he is focused on spending a night with his wife. The lord’s cruelty and deception for pure entertainment is astonishing.

Posted in Gender matters, The Taming of the Shrew | 4 Comments