Category Archives: Macbeth

Macbeth – Act 3 Scene 1 Study Scene Critique

This was a very difficult project.  First of all, we only had two members (Teshia and I) to act several parts of the scene such as Lady Macbeth, Banquo, Macbeth, the servant, and the two murderers.  Secondly, trying to manage the camera while acting is much harder than it sounds!  But overall, it was a challenging assignment that I benefited from.

I was actually able to memorize my lines (well, only the first part before Macbeth and the others came in).  We did cue cards because we were trying to live up to Group 5’s standards but that was hard as well!   But before we acted out the scene, Teshia and I read it together out loud and it helped me understand everything better.  Reading out loud does indeed makes a difference and because of that, I read all the other plays out loud to comprehend it better.

Posted in Macbeth, Macbeth and the Murderers -- Group 6 | 2 Comments

Macbeth vs.Leontes

It’s no secret that I dislike Macbeth. However, after reading the first few acts of The  Winter’s Tale I’ve learned to have a little more patience for him. See, Leontes is at a huge advantage. Macbeth’s insanity and irrational judgement was influenced by his wife and excused by his court. He was being enabled. With Leontes the opposite is true. His most trusted subject alerts the other king of his plot and aids him in escaping. As we discussed in class, Leontes’ court isn’t afraid to stand up to him, something that may have changed Macbeth’s dive into complete insanity. While I’m not sure how Leontes’ story will end, already steps are being taken to protect him from himself. Hopefully he’ll fare better than Macbeth.

Posted in Macbeth, The Winter's Tale | 2 Comments

Prophecies in tragedies

I was certain I was not the only one who had realized that the first prophecy was a set up for the entire plot. The storyline in Macbeth would not have moved pass act 1 scene 2 if Macbeth and Banquo had not eavesdropped on the three witches’ gathering. Unlike the other prophecies in act 4, the very first one is a self fulfilling prophecy. Macbeth did not sit back and wait to name King, he took charge of the matter. Similar to Oedipus the King, he meddled with his fate and that probably caused his downfall. I can’t help but wonder if the prophecy caused the actions or the actions were to be predicted. In both Macbeth and Oedipus the King the revelations seem to provoke the actions especially in Macbeth where the witches appear to be maleficent and may have orchestrated his despair. Prophecies in tragedies are ambiguous which would also explain why our tragic heroes have falling to their death so ironically. Macbeth was not told how he would be King? Nor was he to know that MacDuff “was from his mother’s womb/untimely ripped” (5.8.19-20). No wonder Macbeth thought he was invincible. One thing for sure, knowing what the future has in store for us can be very dangerous.

Posted in Macbeth | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Macbeth’s Downfall

This last act of Macbeth is a particularly devastating one, considering the type of person he was at the very beginning of the play, and what kind of person he turns into after the pressures of being in power overtake him. One particular scene in this act I found to be quite striking was when in scene five, Macbeth seems to become immune to human feelings and emotions. At line 9, he states, “I have almost forgot the taste of fears: The time has been my senses would have cooled to hear a night-shriek and my fell of hair would at a dismal treatise rouse and stir.” He even cannot feel fear as he realizes they are about to be invaded.

He further shows how he is immune to human emotion in the following moment, when he is told that Lady Macbeth has died. Macbeth reacts coldly, by saying “She should have died hereafter,” and continues to say how life itself seems to have no meaning. This is especially seen when he says “It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” I think these brief, yet profound moments shows how Macbeth has been dehumanized. He no longer has any room to feel, and react to anything around him, and only holds disdain for life, a view that seems to be irreversible for him

Posted in Macbeth | 1 Comment

“Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow…”

Taking my own look at this highly scrutinized and famous speech – Macbeth’s response to hearing that Lady Macbeth is dead – I think that Macbeth’s level of despair at this point is beyond words (figuratively speaking). Regardless of whether or not we can point to his villainous nature and or “monster-like” behavior, what we see Macbeth experiencing hear is raw human suffering. Yes, he has killed his way to the throne and killed to keep himself there, but at this point I think Macbeth truly realizes the level of failure of all his actions. His effort hasn’t gotten him anything but pain and misery. His wife dead, his enemies advancing, his brief rule about to end – the realization of it all is simply too much for Macbeth to bear. I would argue that it’s not PTSD, per se, that causes Macbeth’s descent into madness, but rather his own realization of his systematic failure.

These lines contain some very nihilistic musings on the part of Macbeth, and while they’re interesting to analyze (with regard to what they say about the nature of a play, among other things), I’m not entirely sure whether or not they’re meant to be taken seriously. After all, even now when we’re driven to despair about something or another, I wouldn’t be surprised to hear something along the lines of “life sucks” and “what’s the point” – not because it’s true, but because we feel that much despair at that one point. For us, it usually gets better; for Macbeth, obviously not. The words he says, then, bring up a quite worrisome philosophical debate.

 

Posted in Macbeth | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

Macbeth vs. Macduff

I know I’ve made quite a few arguments against Macbeth in class and I hope to use another character to further drive home my point as to why I see Macbeth as such a villain.

We know that he has some issues regarding his sanity, but we see this even from the beginning. In 1.3 towards the end of the Act we begin to see Macbeth has a tendency to drift off into his own head. Banquo comments, “Look, how our partner’s rapt” (1.3.142). And Macbeth continues on throughout the play to slip in and out of fits of insanity. I would argue that this is simply Macbeth’s true character, and not a misfortune of war.

I solidify this opinion by bringing in the contrasting character of Macduff. His family is brutally murdered by Macbeth’s command and when he finds out he has to take a few moments. He is affected, even in unfamiliar company. The previous son’s king commands him, “Dispute it like a man.” (4.3.219) To which Macduff says, “I shall do so; But I must also feel it as a man” (4.3.220-221).

Granted, Macbeth has begun to delve further into his delusions (ones I believe he has always had, just presented in different ways), but that is no excuse for how he responds to his wife’s death. He says, “She should have died hereafter; There would have been a time for such a word” (5.517-18). The fact that he shows no emotion is one thing, but saying his wife should have died anyway shows, to me, that Macbeth’s true villainous character has come out. I don’t believe any character is fully evil, they all have some sort of heart at one point in their lives. I believe that after the murder of the King, Macbeth came in to the fullness of his instability. I believe the contrast of Macduff and Macbeth proves that Macbeth became a true villain by the end of the play.

Posted in Macbeth | 1 Comment

Malcolm: Fit to rule?

We discussed the strange scene between Malcolm and Macduff in which Malcolm says he is full of vices that would make him an unfit king.  After Macduff laments for Scotland, saying that Malcolm will not be much better than Macbeth is, Malcolm reverses his words, saying that he was just testing Macduff to see if he is loyal and true.

But for me, there was a second way of reading this scene.  When Malcolm backtracks and says he was making this up, he says “here abjure the blames and taints I laid upon myself.”  This can definitely read as something I’m sure we’ve all seen before – someone laughing and scoffing at what was just said “Haha, I can’t believe you fell for that, I was totally joking” – just to save face. 

So is Malcolm really going to be all that much better than Macbeth?  Even if he was lying about his vices, what he says afterwards is still a bit of a concern – he says he’s never been with a woman, these words were his first ever lies, and I could never go behind someone’s back and do anything devilish.  But when one assumes power, they have to have the backbone to stand up to those who will be against them – there is no ruler that is universally loved.  So either this new King of Scotland is actually a vice-ridden, greedy sex addict who is now going to hide all of those vices until he inevitably can no longer, or he is a naive, easily manipulated child.

Posted in Macbeth, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

The beginning of the end for the era of Macbeth

Although Macbeth’s downfall becomes somewhat evident in Act III (when he is being taunted by Banquo’s ghost), I think Act IV represents the breaking point for Macbeth, as well as his rule over Scotland.  Scene I opens up with the witches concocting an elaborate recipe and later telling Macbeth of his future – they give him news that (at the time) seems to be positive, as usual, for the King.  However in Scene II, it is clear that Macbeth, as well as the entire world around him has been brought to total devastation.  Out of fear, Macduff has left his wife and children without notice just to get away from the “abhorred tyrant.”  It seems that Macduff and Malcolm have some hostility between them (I actually thought they were going to fight in Act IV, Scene III), yet they team up in order to overtake the diminishing Macbeth.

Unrelated observation: In Scene II, Macduff’s son seems extremely thoughtful and well-versed for a child.  He participates in a very peculiar exchange with his mother.

Posted in Macbeth | 1 Comment

The comparisons can go on forever…

I thought it’s only fitting to fill my blog post with material that I couldn’t cover in the presentation in class. I think the comparisons between Macbeth and Lady Macbeth can go on forever. Their echoes of each other’s words ring throughout the entire play. The audience really does get an in depth look at their relationship and how they play off each other. In 1.7.33, Macbeth says “If it were done when ’tis done, then ’twere well/ It were done quickly.” Here, he’s referring to the killing of Duncan right before his wife persuades him to carry out the evil deed. Then in 3.1.13, Lady Macbeth says to her husband about all the deeds that have been committed already, “what’s done, is done” (probably the most famous line is all of Shakespearean literature). Here, she echoes her husband’s words in 1.7, which continues to portray the influence they have on each other.

Shakespeare’s diction is also very well chosen in this play to set the tone of the entire plot. In 1.5.64, Lady Macbeth says “Look like th’innocent flower,/ But be the serpent under’t” when speaking to her husband about killing Duncan. In 3.2.14, Macbeth says, “We have scorched the snake, not killed it” when speaking to his wife about killing Banquo and Fleance. Shakespeare uses words with very wicked connotations like “serpent” and “snake” to add to the ambience of the plot. His words emphasize the dark, dangerous and almost poisonous path Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are on and later we’ll come to see that the only way they can get off is if they themselves are killed.

Posted in Gender matters, Macbeth | 3 Comments

The witches in “Macbeth”

“Macbeth” is a very intriguing play that brings tension between predestination and free will, appearance and reality. The action starts with a storm what introduces dark, ominous atmosphere that will continue through the play. The first characters we meet are three witches – “the weird sisters.” Shakespeare uses these figures to open the play and lead us into this complicated, mysterious world.

The witches, as was observed in the class, replace the chorus, but instead of clarifying things for the audience, they add to the overall confusion and mystery in the play. The witches represent supernatural forces, they come and go and at times we are not sure if they are even real. They speak in riddles and rhymes. As they exit the scene the witches chant: “Fair is foul, and foul is fair” (1.1. 12). It is a paradox, one word contradicts another. These words reflect the perversion of values throughout the play. Things are not always
clear and easy, not always black and white, but sometimes complex and not immediately
visible. It is very interesting to note that the first words that Macbeth speaks in the play are: “So foul and fair a day I have not seen” (1.3. 37). We can interpret his words literally; he calls the day foul because of the bad weather and it is also fair for him because he won the battle. However, these simple words carry a lot of deeper meaning and reinforce the message that things are not always the way they seem. The fact that Macbeth and the witches use the same words suggests that they have some sort of spiritual connection. The witches awake Macbeth’s ambition and create the suspense in the play. Their prophecy leads to a series of tragic events and to Macbeth’s demise. Or maybe it isn’t what it seems and the witches are projections of Macbeth’s imagination; they are personification of
his inner thoughts and desires.

Posted in Macbeth | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment