-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Macbeth, the victim or the villain? – Arron's Blog on Macbeth: Victim of Fate?
- Professor Berggren on The Curse of Macbeth aka The Scottish Play
- Ronie Sharma on Scene Study-Troilus and Cressida Act 3 Scene 1
- Ronie Sharma on Does the end justify the means?
- Ronie Sharma on “The poison of that lies in you to temper.”
Archives
Categories
Meta
Historical sources
Imagery
Links
Macbeth
Pastoral themes
The Taming of the Shrew
Tags
- Achilles
- agamemnon
- appearance
- Beatrice
- Chorus
- Claudio
- Cressida
- deceit
- disguise
- disguises
- dogberry
- dupe
- fair
- foul
- free will
- group 5
- Helen
- Helen-Paris
- Henry V
- Hero
- induction
- irony
- lies
- love
- Lucentio
- Lust
- Macbeth
- Margaret
- Much Ado About Nothing
- music
- Paris
- predestination
- prejudice
- reality
- scene study
- Shakepeare
- shakespeare
- shrew
- taming
- The Winter's Tale
- the witches
- Troilus
- Troilus and Cressida
- Troy
- Ulysses
Category Archives: Uncategorized
Dear Cressida, Your Actions Speak Louder Than Your Words!!
In our class discusions we have throughly discussed Cressida. Cressida’s relationship with Troilus. Cressida’s relationship with Diomedes. And every other relationship she has in the story. Still today, I don’t quite know where stand with her. I wonder if she was evil and conniving from the start or whether her actions were shoved upon her upon the Trojan and Greek exchange. One thing I do know if that she is most definitely deceitful and manipulative. She too, is unsure of what she might become someday. She says, ” I have a kind of self resides with you;/ But an unkind self, that itself will leave to be another’s fool. / I would be gone. Where is my wit? I know not what I speak” (3.2 149-152). In today’s urban society one would classfiy Cressida as a “trick,” someone who deceives, lies, and is untrustworthy. You can look it up in at Urbandictionary.com if you need further connotation. 🙂
Cressida’s relationship with Troilus is rather interesting because neither of them pledged any vows to be with each other for the rest of their lives. We can furthermore classify their relationship as a lustful one, lasting as long as a 3rd grade romance. And by the end we see what love or lust as one can call it has done to Troilus. One thing I know I am definitely in Troilus’s side.
A love as false as Cressid…
I found the oaths Troilus and Cressida very interesting. They were speaking as if they knew they were a story and that their tale would become an “epic.” The ironic thing is that Panderus’s extra added sentence was the only one to transcend the play and actually become a integral part of the English language. Troilus and Cressida may not be like Romeo and Juliet, who are madly in love and willing to sacrifice everything for each other. Nor are they like cunning Antony and Cleopatra, but they do try in their own way to become something of legend. We also discussed how self-conscious the characters in this play were and that may also be a reason that is holding them back from being true lovers. They seem only to care for their “image” of love than rather the love itself: you can’t love wholly and be self-conscious about it. Another thing is, this relationship does seem rather one-sided. Seems as if Troilus is the one who loves Cressida and Cressida is like, ‘well if this is the best I can do, I’ll take what I can get (a prince of Troy)’ and she doesn’t really have a passionate love for him which is why their bonds and promises and oaths are so easily broken: their love is not true.
Troilus and Cressida, Troilus’ self-speech
Among the numerous back and forth dialogues, this one stroke me as quite dramatic so I will briefly talk about it. It occurs on page 8, lines 92-108, I won’t retype it here because it can easily be found within the book.
Anyway, there are a lot of things packed into this harangued uttering which are quite notable to mention:
After calling them some names, he starts with saying “Fools on both sides!” This goes hand-in-hand with what our teacher said in class about the meaningless war – well from our point of view. Back then Helen was considered a major prize and represented a whole country, a symbol, so all the valiant soldiers were up in arms to rescue her, not only for her patriotic representative beauty but also for their country’s emblem.
Furthermore, the character here uses some dramatic metaphorical imagery such as the line, “When with your blood you daily paint her thus.” This means she is painted in blood, because well, war is bloody and this will be no exception, even though technically they are fighting over one woman hehe.. well also their pride as well.
I mean there are many lines here of discussion here, also when he says “It is too starved a subject for my sword,” which was another mentioned line in class. I remember our teacher paralleled-compared this line with recent warfare events – something that societies have been looking into justifying war acts.
These are just some of the briefly worthwhile things to mention in this speech which seems to be directed at one self.
Well any comments, discussions, questions .. feel free to contribute.
-Thanks.
Posted in Troilus and Cressida, Uncategorized
1 Comment
taming of the shrew
I really enjoyed taming of the shrew for several reasons, one being I enjoyed Shakespeare’s view of men and women together, relationships, courtships. Petruccio’s courtship of Katherine is very telling of men interacting with women. I find it amazing that Shakespeare understood women so well and writes them even better. You see this in the courtship between the two. Their witty back and forth banter is very interesting to read. You can tell between the back and forth of all the sexual tension between the two. It was great to be able to read about this and I thought it was revolutionary for Shakespeare to be almost perfect at relating to women. I always thought in modern times if there was a man to be able to write about women and be dead on accuracy concerning women’s thoughts. This gentleman would have a lot of money. Turns out this guy was here but we missed him by a few hundred years. Perhaps the greatest author of all time, Shakespeare will never be forgotten.
Another interesting part of the play is Petrucchio’s domestication of Katherine. Hence in the title of the play, “taming of the shrew”. Petrucchio uses manipulation and determination to tame Katherine’s wild side. This proves to be a very daunting task, but Petrucchio’s love for his wife pushes forth his determination. This determination proves to be successful.
Stubborn Love
This play had struck my interest for a few reasons. For one, I enjoyed reading the play and noticing how relaxed the text was to read and understand. I did enjoy reading how characters like Benedick spoke in way that was translucent and simply understandable. The prose of the text made for a more enjoyable reading. However, I most enjoyed seeing two tough and obstinate characters like Benedick and Beatrice (two people of whom) rejected any facet of true love fall completely in love. Through the beginning of the play, we can see how Benedick proclaims his declaration of a bachelor he says,
Those women conceived me. I thank her;
that she brought me up, I likewise give her most
humble thank. But that I will have a rechate
winded in my forehead, or hang my bugle in an
invisible baldrick,all women shall pardon me.
Because I will not do them the wrong to mistrust any
I will do myself the right to trust none…
I will live a bachelor. (1.1 229-236)
We can see that Benedick has no intentions of falling in love and will not have anything to do with women and truly believes that his relationship to a man is much closer to that of a women. In Benedick’s eyes all men are considered bachelors, and therefore unmarried. As stated above Benedick makes a reference to being taken by the horns, and it seem as if he does not want to be taken control of especially by a women. Benedick holds this philosophy of love true until the end of the play when his feelings are confronted and challenged by Beatrice, who is just as persistent as Benedick.
Beatrice’s’ mind-set seems to correspond exactly to Benedick’s. For one, she does not believe in love. This is because she truly thinks no man is going to suit her, in other words, no man will ever live up to her standards. Beatrice and Benedick develop feelings for each other. Thus, they cannot resist one another and cannot avoid falling in love.
Anonymous Movie Trailer
Went to the movies last night and this was one of the previews. Although I’ve heard of this theory before, I’m not speculating or agreeing that Shakespeare was, in fact, a fraud—I just think the movie looks interesting, and is certainly relevant to our course.
For some reason, I couldn’t embed the video directly in the post, so here is the link:
Anonymous Movie Trailer
“The poison of that lies in you to temper.”
In reading the first three acts of Much Ado About Nothing, the audience is introduced to a whirlwind of lies and deceit created by many of the characters. Of course, some of these lies are brought about in good nature, such as the trickery devised by Don Pedro, Claudio, and Leonato to bring Benedick to love Beatrice. Also in good form are Hero’s attempts to make Beatrice love Benedick in return. However, the evil Don John and his servant Borachio have ruined Claudio’s perception of Hero by tricking him into believing she is a whore. In doing so, the audience learns many things about the characters. While Don John initially seemed to desire despair only for Don Pedro (out of jealousy as the “Bastard son”), we now learn that his true nature lies in a deeper, darker place. He is pleased by the unrest and trouble facing his comrades, and feeds on them. Perhaps the audience can conclude that Don John, due to his poor reputation as a bastard brother to Don Pedro and resulting lower social status, truly holds only evil in his heart. We can also conclude that the servants of Don John, namely Borachio, have learned this habit and are therefore willing to act out against the other characters to please their master.
Another conclusion we can draw from these first few scenes is the ease with which lies are bought in this play. As the men are disguised at the masquerade, trickery flies about the room. There, Beatrice reveals to Benedick her true feelings about him, unknowingly so (or perhaps she insults him knowingly, but with strong pretense…thoughts?). Also, Don John addresses the masked Claudio, as if he were in fact Benedick, to falsely inform him that Don Pedro plans to court Hero instead himself of winning him for Claudio. Thirdly, in Act 3 we see Borachio and Don John scheme against Claudio, and Borachio’s performance with Margaret leads Claudio to believe that his fiancee is engaging in premarital affairs with another man. Claudio is so quick to believe that Hero would do such a thing, which allows the audience to see how trusting he is of Don John, and that he is unable to see the evil nature of the man. It can also be said that Claudio does not know Hero well enough to marry, for even though marriage was more of a transaction of familial affairs than a matter of love, the two are young and possibly not ready for such a major endeavor.
We must begin questioning why these characters are so easily deceived, and how this will play out in the last acts of the play. From Hero’s strong sense of foreboding disaster, we can definitely expect some very interesting action in Acts 4 and 5.
Just for fun:
10 Things I Hate About You was an adorable 90’s film based on Taming of the Shrew. Often as I was reading the play, I pictured Heath Ledger and Julia Stiles in Elizabethan costumes.
[kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/AWmjzCZr0Jw" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]
Posted in The Taming of the Shrew, Uncategorized
Comments Off on Just for fun: