-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Macbeth, the victim or the villain? – Arron's Blog on Macbeth: Victim of Fate?
- Professor Berggren on The Curse of Macbeth aka The Scottish Play
- Ronie Sharma on Scene Study-Troilus and Cressida Act 3 Scene 1
- Ronie Sharma on Does the end justify the means?
- Ronie Sharma on “The poison of that lies in you to temper.”
Archives
Categories
Meta
Historical sources
Imagery
Links
Macbeth
Pastoral themes
The Taming of the Shrew
Tags
- Achilles
- agamemnon
- appearance
- Beatrice
- Chorus
- Claudio
- Cressida
- deceit
- disguise
- disguises
- dogberry
- dupe
- fair
- foul
- free will
- group 5
- Helen
- Helen-Paris
- Henry V
- Hero
- induction
- irony
- lies
- love
- Lucentio
- Lust
- Macbeth
- Margaret
- Much Ado About Nothing
- music
- Paris
- predestination
- prejudice
- reality
- scene study
- Shakepeare
- shakespeare
- shrew
- taming
- The Winter's Tale
- the witches
- Troilus
- Troilus and Cressida
- Troy
- Ulysses
Tag Archives: deceit
“The poison of that lies in you to temper.”
In reading the first three acts of Much Ado About Nothing, the audience is introduced to a whirlwind of lies and deceit created by many of the characters. Of course, some of these lies are brought about in good nature, such as the trickery devised by Don Pedro, Claudio, and Leonato to bring Benedick to love Beatrice. Also in good form are Hero’s attempts to make Beatrice love Benedick in return. However, the evil Don John and his servant Borachio have ruined Claudio’s perception of Hero by tricking him into believing she is a whore. In doing so, the audience learns many things about the characters. While Don John initially seemed to desire despair only for Don Pedro (out of jealousy as the “Bastard son”), we now learn that his true nature lies in a deeper, darker place. He is pleased by the unrest and trouble facing his comrades, and feeds on them. Perhaps the audience can conclude that Don John, due to his poor reputation as a bastard brother to Don Pedro and resulting lower social status, truly holds only evil in his heart. We can also conclude that the servants of Don John, namely Borachio, have learned this habit and are therefore willing to act out against the other characters to please their master.
Another conclusion we can draw from these first few scenes is the ease with which lies are bought in this play. As the men are disguised at the masquerade, trickery flies about the room. There, Beatrice reveals to Benedick her true feelings about him, unknowingly so (or perhaps she insults him knowingly, but with strong pretense…thoughts?). Also, Don John addresses the masked Claudio, as if he were in fact Benedick, to falsely inform him that Don Pedro plans to court Hero instead himself of winning him for Claudio. Thirdly, in Act 3 we see Borachio and Don John scheme against Claudio, and Borachio’s performance with Margaret leads Claudio to believe that his fiancee is engaging in premarital affairs with another man. Claudio is so quick to believe that Hero would do such a thing, which allows the audience to see how trusting he is of Don John, and that he is unable to see the evil nature of the man. It can also be said that Claudio does not know Hero well enough to marry, for even though marriage was more of a transaction of familial affairs than a matter of love, the two are young and possibly not ready for such a major endeavor.
We must begin questioning why these characters are so easily deceived, and how this will play out in the last acts of the play. From Hero’s strong sense of foreboding disaster, we can definitely expect some very interesting action in Acts 4 and 5.
Role/Significance of Induction
I was absent from class on Wednesday, so I’m not sure if this was touched upon during the discussion, but I was very intrigued by the induction; though I’m curious as to the reasoning behind the whole “play within a play” premise. When I began reading the play, I found the plot of the induction to be very humorous and captivating at the same time – I wanted to know how long the Lord would maintain the ruse and if Sly would ever discover the truth, however the actual play starts so abruptly that it is impossible to discover definitive answers to my curiosities. I am making the argument that maybe the induction serves as a parallel to the story of Petruchio and Kate. Like the Lord, Petruchio must change his natural appearance/actions for his own personal gain. Instead of seeking humorous relief from drastic role changes, Petruchio changes his attitude and overall demanor in order to marry “weathily in Padua” (27). Petruchio deprives Kate of food, becomes increasingly nasty and to his servants, and intentionally utters outlandish contradictions in order to achieve his personal gain. Grumio confirms Petruchio’s true desire for riches from Kate: “Why, give him gold enough and marry him to a puppet…or an old trot with ne’er a tooth in her head” (27). All of this being said, I was very surprised when The Taming of the Shrew ended without returning to the original plot of the induction. Perhaps there is a purpose for this as well…?