A New Way to Pay Old Debts
Endymion
Historical Background Links
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- PBerggren on Comparison of Prodigal Sons
- PBerggren on A Very Modern Character
- PBerggren on Madness – the sign of villainy without the cover of rationality/humanity
- PBerggren on Judgement of Females in Literature
- peter d'antonio on Madness – the sign of villainy without the cover of rationality/humanity
Archives
Categories
Meta
Tags
- betrayal
- bosola
- Coercion
- conflicted
- cynthia
- damned but with a bit of saving grace
- dedication
- De Flores
- desire
- Doctor Faustus
- Dr faustas
- endymion
- eumenides
- Evil
- female characters
- gender differences
- good and evil
- Greed
- Helen
- human condition
- humanity
- judgement
- lawyers
- Lorenzo
- loyalty
- madness
- Madoff
- master/servant
- mephistopheles
- mirror characters
- Mosca
- Pedringano
- Power and Fear
- pragmatism
- queen elizabeth
- satire
- scene study
- survival
- symbolism
- the lesser bad
- The Spanish Tragedy
- too late for salvation
- video
- villains
- Volpone
Monthly Archives: May 2013
The Changeling: Falling victim to your own plans
Before writing this blog I was troubled about whether to elaborate on the class discussion on innocence and women or start a new thought. However after rereading today’s discussed schemes I found a small sub-theme inside the bigger theme of innocence. This theme comes out when De Flores says that Beatrice has lost her own innocence and is the slave of the deed rather than the mastermind behind the deed. I realized that De Flores highlight the sub-theme of victimization. In this case I found it interesting because Beatrice becomes the victim of her own plan.
Although many may argue that others are the victim to Beatrice’s plans, she is rarely alone in making decisions. Along her side is De Flores who comes up with the idea to burn a part of the house. She tries to save herself to prove her virtue; however, one of her lies leads to another which eventually leads to her death. De Flores mentions that she must think about her reputation above all else,but while thinking about her reputation she becomes lost in the things she does to save herself. She murders and lies and cheats; yet when push comes to shove she cannot take the weight of her own plans. An example of this is when she says she commits murder and deceit because of Alsemero’s love for her.
All her lies leads to her own death. She all along probably felt that she can control and tell people what to do, for example how she made Diaphanta go into bed with Alsemero. However she could not control the actual truth.
Two Characters–Similar in Situation but Different in Decisions
The subplot plays a significant role in dramas, particularly Elizabethan and Jacobean dramas. The subplot reinforces the theme/main idea of the play by presenting characters that are in situations parallel to those of the main characters, yet have contrasting personalities. For example, Isabella and Beatrice are both young women with prospective men in their lives. Three men are vying for Isabella’s attention and affection (Francisco, Antonia, and Lollio) and three men are also interested in Beatrice (Alonso, Alsemero, and De Flores). Isabella’s placed in a situation that limits her freedom and makes her an object of her husband’s authority, while Beatrice also initially lacks the freedom to choose whom she wants to marry.
These characters dramatically differ, however, in that Isabella remains virtuous and chaste, and does not succumb to the pursuits of the men attempting to win her over. In fact, she ironically beats them at their own game and wittily exposes their true intentions. Beatrice, on the other hand, takes a very different approach and loses her innocence in every way possible. The consequence of her actions is a serious one–death. Although she temporarily gets what she wants, the ends certainly do not justify the means.
Isabella and Beatrice are foils of each other, and the inclusion of Isabella in the plot of the play makes the audience see even more clearly how the selfish, immoral acts of a woman lead to a snowball effect of destruction.
Posted in Power struggles, Psychological detail, The Changeling
1 Comment
What price goes murder?
On the surface, The Changeling isn’t all that different from some of the other plays that we’ve read in that by the end, justice (in some fashion) has been meted out to those deserving of it. Bodies strew the stage, dramatic final words are spoken (“‘Tis time to die when ’tis a shame to live.”), and things seem somewhat right by the close of the final curtain (perhaps because the two principal villainous characters are dead). Yet this play is far from just another Renaissance tragedy.
When compared with some other of our readings, the play’s conclusion seems rather tame; the deaths are numbered, and De Flores and Beatrice depart seemingly on their own volition. Yet by the time Joanna breathes her final breaths, she has already lost something perhaps more valuable than her life, her reputation. And what’s more the loss of this intangible is not merely the result of a one time occurrence, but rather a repeated and consistent set of choices that she makes throughout the play’s five acts. In many ways, The Changeling signifies the vast difference in female characterization that we’ve encountered since the start of our readings this semester. From the start of the play, Joanna is neither the passive nor genteel character we might’ve expected out of a female character. Her degrading treatment of De Flores from the onset foreshadows in many respects the downward moral spiral that her character will undergo.
As a character whose status is of less than noble standing, Joanna is able to hold herself on her virginal purity and (dare I say) innocence. She sullies both of these beyond repair. So to return to the question that Alsemero originally posed to De Flores in the final scene, What price goes murder? The answer for Joanna is not merely her life, but her reputation, honor and purity, and by 5.3, she pays up.
Posted in Power struggles, Psychological detail, The Changeling
1 Comment
The Changeling Scene Study
In preparing to shoot this scene, our team knew that the focus would be to find a solemn place where the sounds of the mad could be heard. Given that Baruch and the surrounding area are full of life, we chose to do our study in the library to utilize a quiet place where background sound effect could be clearly heard (mad house occupants moaning). The characters constant personality change in this scene was challenging to capture, but it made the parts of Isabella and Antonio even more fulfilling to play. One thing that would have definitely helped our study would have been if we could have located a better mad house, but that is not something that is easy to come by. I hope everyone enjoys the movie!
Posted in Uncategorized
1 Comment
The question of Beatrice’s modesty.
A woman’s modesty can be questioned when she falls in love with a man while engaged to a different one. In a period where divorce was non-existent, this notion of separation from your fiance was not acceptable. In order to keep her honor and reputation in good terms she decides to pay De Flores, her father’s servant, to kill her fiance to have the opportunity to be with the man she currently loves. Of course De Flores, as his name suggests, doesn’t want to be repaid in money but with Beatrice’s “honor” or virginity. In Act 3.4 De Flores questions Beatrice’s defense of denying him her virginity.
Towards the end of this scene where De Flores makes clear his recompense for his “service,” he argues that a woman that is willing to kill cannot use the excuse of wanting to keep her modesty as a reason to not want to repay him. He states in line 27, ” A woman dipped in blood, and talk of modesty?” He also negates her excuse of wanting to keep her reputation in a good standing because “though thou writ’st maid, thou whore in thy affection!” The reason he considers her a whore is because she “changed from thy first love, and that’s a kind of whoredom in thy heart, and he’s changed now, to bring thy second on.” In other words, her love and devotion was first with one man, then she loves another, her affection is unreliable and lacks any sense of modesty.
As De Flores criticizes Beatrice for her immodest behavior the reader is left to question whether De Flores has any right to question it. This is mainly due to the fact that it is also immodest for a man to murder another simply for a reward, then blackmail the person paying for set service. What he was really looking after, as discussed in class, was a way to achieving an equal if not higher hierarchy than his “master.” Even though both of these characters show signs of immodesty as the saying goes, “it takes one to know one” and De Flores, displaying all these characteristics of a immodest man definitely can pin point and criticize Beatrice’s modesty because he is also an immodest character, even though Beatrice is the worst out of the two.
Posted in The Changeling
2 Comments