What I like in the artist’s work is the camera perspective and the frames. The proportions of the frames were visually pleasing me. For example, in “Continuity” in one scene, the son and the father was walking towards the garage but you could also see the wall behind the corner and the door which was a bit further away. I mean the artist could shoot them together while working but he included other details around. Another thing he uses is to shoot from the behind of the people. He did that in the car from the backseat and that helps audience to involve in the video. Another scene that was shot from the behind and had a suitable angle was when the parents climbed the hill. Audience doesn’t see anything at first and starts to wonder. I can say that the artist has a unique style that I could tell by looking at his different works. I also think the part were the son was telling a story had a different approach. The people from the story suddenly appeared at the background and they were like still images. As the boy keeps telling the story they kept moving. I wasn’t expecting that kind of technique.
I like experimental and unordinary presentations. Therefore I really liked the installation of the “Spring”. It has more action compared to the other works of the artist therefore I think shifting from screens and showing different perspectives really worked there. This one was my favorite. The changing angles in the frames were like playing with time.
The artist’s works were based on the strains that families have due to the psychological issues and he gives that with different perspectives, the uncertainties between real and the unreal and he uses repetition. For example in the “5000 feet is the best” there is a shifting between the reality and non-reality so that the family keeps walking after the explosion like nothing happen.