The assumption preceding the “Ode of Man” was that a man must’ve buried the body of Polyneikes. Kreon doesn’t assume anyone other than a man to do this deed (“What are you saying? What man would dare do this?” (line 281)). The ode then starts to praise man’s will-to-power over nature and all his other propensities that have made him successful in conquering his environment- but wait here comes a woman walking in besting a man’s authority! This ode is a satirical caricature on man’s illusion of control. It is always funny to look at a picture of man conquering his environment. Ask a Darwinist today, how did the human species survive with all this heterogeneity disturbing a sense of continuity? In other words, extinction keeps a species discontinuous, but what kept our species continuous? Your answer would end up being “luck”, or in philosophical terms, reasonless gestures. Even in the psyche, a thought or a desire occurs when it wants itself to occur and not when I want it to occur- so much for control here. Although Sophocles sort of gives us an answer to this Darwinist question here in this ode, by laconically explicating Man’s will-to-power, I don’t believe that this was the point. This underground current of spontaneity that is often buried by science is always suppressed but never extinguished. This current always leaves room for ideas of omnipotent deities, or a moral rational universe that is immanent in our empirical universe- or in this play, the will-of-the-gods. This will is what Antigone represents in this play. This will goes against the will-of-man, or in this case Kreon’s will. At first, she represents the lack of control Kreon has over his own state. She bested his totalitarian authority and transgressed his law without fear. But since she also represents the will-of-the-gods, she waivers Kreon’s control in all dimensions- including his own family. So now we have a man’s will-to-power, proceeded by a woman that represents the will-of-the-gods, a will that stands for the suppressed current of “luck”- a current that exposes man’s lack of control, or in this case his lack of totalitarianism, and the dialectic between the two proceeds throughout the play. By the end of the ode, the chorus talks of a man who has taken his creative powers to his head and has harvested for himself a choice to either follow the law of the gods or not. The chorus’ ideal man is one that becomes one with this spontaneous current (“When he follows the laws Earth teaches him- and Justice, which he’s sworn the gods he will enforce- he soars with his city…” (404-408)), and doesn’t try to overpower it or extinguish it, but it was this very latter move Kreon made against Antigone when he punished her to death and thus suffered his Fate. So while this ode talks of man’s will-to-power and might over nature, by the end of the play we have a so called great masculine power, Kreon, whimpering like a sap hoping to never see his tomorrow (lines 1483-1489). This is satirical.