Author Archives: Anna

Posts: 8 (archived below)
Comments: 4

‘Good Mirrors Are Not Cheap’

[kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/pur0PZvFq0U" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]

 

“Good Mirrors Are Not Cheap” by Audre Lorde is about people often don’t see what they like in the mirror, and can and will ignore it. But whether or not they try to change what they see, there will always be new standards set by society for people to follow. My video talks about how the actions of people is a reason why people aren’t happy with the person they see in the mirror, and the repercussions of those actions.’

Posted in DG13E, JM13D | Leave a comment

Paper 3/Digital Essay!

When I initially heard the term “digital essay” last semester, I was so confused. Do we write an essay (one in hardcopy), make a video, AND write an essay (typed)? Upon being informed that I misinterpreted the term, I was relieved, and I came to like the assignment very much, especially because I was able to pick a topic I had true, strong interest in. (I also really enjoyed watching other people’s videos; they were so well-done!) This semester, picking a poem as a basis for the digital essay/paper #3 doesn’t appeal to me the way last semester’s topic did. In general, I don’t really enjoy poems. I love song lyrics and maybe sometimes a poem might capture my interest, but I wouldn’t purposely read a poem, you know what I mean?  However, the poem that I intended to base my digital essay and paper#3 is “Good Mirrors Are Not Cheap” by Audre Lourde. Out of the poems we read in class, the lines of this one caught my attention the most:  “And the fault in a mirror slaps back, becoming what you think is the shape of your error. And if I am beside that self, you destroy me. Or if you can see the mirror is lying, you shatter the glass.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ambiguity

When I think of the word ambiguity, I often find it to have a negative connotation, simply because to me, it connects itself to the idea of confusion. But another part of the definition can be “unclear”, which is an entirely differently. As applied to the story “Forgiveness”, ambiguity isn’t necessarily a bad thing. Ambiguity gives leeway to different interpretations, opinions, and ideas. Based on each different person’s prior knowledge and experiences, we each come to our conclusions when reading the story. Some of us can come to the same conclusions, and some of us won’t. I didn’t realize the story would possibly be about two women rather than a man and a woman. And I’m glad we talked about how the gift of the arm didn’t have to be literal, and that it could have been a representation for something else, because that honestly freaked me out quite a bit. The meaning behind the gift of the arm was very profound though, and it really did make me think. Would I give up my arm for someone? I don’t want to say, and I’d probably have to wait until it actually happens to know the answer to that question. But another question that was asked: How much would you be willing to change for someone else? My answer: As much as they needed me to while still being happy with myself. Everyone’s answer to this question was different, which just makes the idea of ambiguity that much more appealing, that everyone could have such different ideas, just because there is no set point to understand.

Posted in JM13D, ResponsePaper | Leave a comment

Where I’m Calling From – Raymond Carver

In this short story, “Where I’m Calling From”, Raymond Carver definitely practices what he preaches. His use of having “some feeling of threat or a sense of menace” adds more appeal the story for readers, because speaking for myself, the feeling of threat/menace was the idea that the narrator’s wife was cheating on the narrator with the blind man. Additional to this, the blind man would now be staying at the narrator’s home! To me, this is as horrible as it can get. To think, that if the blind man was actually the third person in their relationship, that the narrator would be housing and feeding the one person that was betraying him, with his own wife, in his own house. And another thing is the fact that Carver does not explicitly state this. He says all these little things, like how his wife has kept in touch with this man for such a long time, and how they were childhood lovers. The tension is apparent when they first meet, from the narrator’s point of view at least, as well as when they sit down to talk afterwards, especially because the wife seems so infatuated by the blind man, and in turn, turned off by the narrative, her husband. It sort of augments until the point where they finally connect over something randomly, which ends the tension between them. The tension never really fades until then. I think Raymond Carver is quite skilled at incorporating the feeling of tension and menace, because I was feeling it throughout the entire story. If that’s what he was going for, props to him!
Posted in JM13D, ResponsePaper | Leave a comment

“Best in Show”

The movie “Best in Show” is a seemingly simple and straightforward film, with a surprisingly profound meaning. Initially, the characters are depicted as having mundane, as well as a bit peculiar, lives as owners of dogs. To myself, this prospect seems unfamiliar and even a bit ridiculous, but perhaps that’s because I’m a New Yorker, and deathly afraid of dogs as well. To myself, I ask the question: Who in the world would spend so much time and effort to groom and cater to a domestic pet to bring it a competition? And even so, why would they do such a thing? But when you apply the concept of each individual having their own idea of happiness to this movie, that’s where things begin to fall into place and to make sense. The characters in the film are chasing happiness, and they are doing so through their dogs. For every single one of the owners, they are alike in that their dogs are their pride and joy, regardless of how different each of the owners is. Attending a dog show would be a nightmare for some, but for these characters make it their top priority to compete in it. And then at the end of the film, when there is one winner, the rest of the dog owners and their dogs go on to do things that they find thoroughly enjoyable. This ending can be interpreted as a way of showing that happiness isn’t always what you think it is, and that again, happiness is not the same for everyone. A humorous but sometimes disconcerting film, “Best in Show” is a film you might want to watch with a particular group of people, maybe ones that have an odd sense of humor. Like I said, you won’t find me at a dog competition anytime within the next decade. Pictures of cute dogs are okay with me, though. 🙂

Pupppue

Posted in JM13D, ResponsePaper | Leave a comment

I want this!

Came across this when writing my manifesto earlier today… ^^

Posted in JM13D, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Response Paper #2!

Gilbert and Freud both believed that everyone innately seeks pleasure. They both believed in the reality principle, that for people to actually experience pleasure, they would have to experience pain and suffering first. Freud, coining the phrase “reality principle, thought that for one to obtain even a basic level of satisfaction, they must endure or go through some type of hardship.  This makes satisfaction inevitable and motivates a person to continue through the pain. He notes that “…the ‘ reality-principle’, which without giving up the intention of ultimately attaining pleasure yet demands and enforces the postponement of satisfaction, the renun- ciation of manifold possibilities of it, and the temporary endurance of ‘pain’ on the long and circuitous road to pleasure.” (5) Gilbert, coincidently, although probably through studying Freud’s theories, also thought that pleasure, even though it is different for each individual, is something that everyone associates with experiences they go through. He gives an example of a fruit fly and they, like humans, use situations to learn pleasure and pain. He states “To maximize pleasures and minimize our pains, we must be able to associate our experiences with the circumstances that produced them…” and also “they associate their best and worst experiences with the circumstances that accompanied and preceded them, which allows them to seek or avoid those circumstances in the future.” (204). Given my own experiences, I can testify to this theory. If I ate something I don’t like, I will be sure to avoid that food no matter the circumstances, even if someone tries to pressure me into eating it. However, if I taste something once and I enjoy it, I will definitely be craving it and wanting more of it!

Posted in JM13D | Leave a comment

HAPPY HAPPY JOY JOY.

Wow. First of all, I’ve never seen or heard of this cartoon, and maybe I live under a rock, but okay. Second of all, I was completely shocked. If I was watching this as a kid, I’d have grabbed the remote and changed the channel within 5 seconds. As I was watching it in class, I thought to myself, woah, this is for kids? Even now, the cartoon itself, the graphics, scared me, especially Ren. It was amusing in a slightly disturbing way, especially the Happy Happy Joy Joy song. 🙂 I guess the song would have been good for a kid, because it’s so repetitive and sort of catchy? Anyways, the concept, I think, behind the video was that you can’t create happiness for someone else: Stumpy helped Ren realize how much he appreciated being grumpy and unhappy, a thought that made Ren happy. So twisted. I’d probably be mind boggled realizing this now if I had ever watched this cartoon as a kid.

Posted in JM13D | Leave a comment