Category Archives: Uncategorized

China’s Interwoven World

The “Textile with Elephants, Crowned Double-Headed Eagles, and Flowers ” is dated back to the “second half of the 16th century.” This exquisitely patterned “silk damask” was woven by the Chinese and sold in the Iberian market. The Portuguese who were the first voyagers to set up European ports in Asia through the Indian Ocean Basin, could operate only at the port of Macau. Though foreign trade opened China to new forms of wealth, successors of the Ming empire forbade foreign interaction in China and ended maritime trade so that China could revert back to traditional standards of living which involved strictly following Confucian values. However, thousands of Chinese merchants managed to trade with, for example, Spanish forces in Manila, as well as the Dutch VOC at their “colonial capital of Batavia.” Consequently, Chinese merchants were of the lowest class according to Confucian “social hierarchy” because moralists saw them as avaricious and “unscrupulous social parasites.” Still, China developed elegant silks also among other decorative, traditional fabrics to the point where Europeans copied Chinese techniques and thus made artificial products to sell within the European markets. This silk damask is darkly colored in blue and gold where the consistent pattern of floral, double-headed eagles, and short-eared elephants give it a sense of genius and power, but Europeans would find it harder to understand the deeper meaning behind this textiles and so could only admire the piece aesthetically.

Textile with elephants, crowned double headed eagles, and flowers

Ramanpreet Chand

Romanticism’s Affairs

“Two Men Contemplating the Moon,” by Casper David Friedrich is a German, oil on canvas from 1825 to 1830. The most prominent component of this painting is its diagonal landscape, where it seems an uprooted tree is falling not forward out of the picture and into our space compared to paintings of Romanticism’s predecessors, but backwards, almost into its own. This parallels the disengagement of the two male figures, in the middle ground, as they both do not interact with the viewer. Its a painting focusing on its own world. Its a painting that works to emphasize contemplation. Usually the act of contemplating focuses on a single aspect of life rather than many, where engaging an audience would force one to think about or show many other things in comparison. In fact, the era of Romanticism is in part characterized by imagination and emotion, and an appreciation of external nature which Friedrich portrays both as the two frozen, but relaxed figures look interestedly and diagonally at parts of the landscape.Two Men Contemplating the Moon

Ramanpreet Chand

Metropolitan Museum of Art Assignment 1 and 2

DP275184
Bedcover
England, late 17th century
cotton embroidered with silk

This bedcover was made by an English man with Indian cotton, using the “typical Indian palette of golden yellow thread on white.” This was sold by GCE or the English East India Company. The design on the bedcover is intricate and throughout, repeating patterns that are floral. The market for Indian cotton and Indian style embroideries in England were not that great until the late 17th century when this was made. From then, embroideries made for the European market flourished, and “Indian embroidery influenced domestic design.” These bedcovers were meant to be sold in Europe, or wherever demand was greatest. These designs which were from a different country had became desired in their own countries of Europe. Showing changing tastes due to the influx of trade showed a cultural shift. Manufactorers in the English East India Company realized that they could jump into this market and started to make such goods using foreign styles.
For further information http://metmuseum.org/exhibitions/view?exhibitionId={063A1AA2-5A4E-439A-A332-046E00E8BD73}&oid=223005&pg=1&rpp=10&pos=8&ft=*

DT505
Eugene Delacroix
The Natchez 1835

Normally Indians are shown as savages, naked, wild, beasts or even barbarians. In this painting by Delacroix, you see a tender, almost effeminate qualities coming from a man. Wearing earrings, and having a feather in his hair he seems to don more jewelry than his female companion. He tenderly caresses the newborn baby and looks on with love. From the woman you can see masculine features in her face. She does not reach out to her newborn but instead looks at both the man and her child with serenity. Though these depictions of the Natchez show them in a different light, they still seem to be primitive. Both are wearing little to no clothing on some parts of their body, and seem to have no shoes. The painting though, instead of showing a warring scene or one with anger, shows a soft, sweet moment typical of Romanticism style painting. They seem at peace and free, being surrounded by nothing but land and water.
For further information http://metmuseum.org/Collections/search-the-collections/436180

Kelly Ip

“A Gramsci Apple a Day Keeps Consumption Away”

Yaniv Cohen

The Gramsci Monument

While walking through this new type of art called presence and production, I realized that every single item there, from the big studio to the duck tape all over- was placed for a reason and had a purpose behind it. The Gramsci Monument is no simple statue of art, it is designed to be an art with a purpose behind it, an art to effect inspire, and most definitely appreciate.
One of the most interesting items in the Gramsci Monument which contained much depth was this basket of apples and a sign above stating “A Gramsci Apple a Day Keeps Consumption Away”. This struck me at first as a simple joke, with very little meaning. But this is actually exactly the opposite of what I thought it had been. One of the biggest problems in that era was Consumption, how this new generation was overtaken by the need to consume, this radically capitalist need an endless amount of money money in order to consume, and consume even when not necessary. The clear message through this sign is that we consumption in that generation was a problem. After speaking with Professor Pence about this sign, she also showed me the irony in this little joke. EATING THE APPLE IS CONSUMING! But what the difference is, is that we are seeing a seperation of consumption, a “healthy” way of consuming too. The underlying message in this is that consumption is a necessity, but there is a line drawn at what is considered to be necessary or a “healthy” consumption and this new type of capitslist consumption. This message also relates to one of Gramsci’s quotes where he says “The Crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new can not be born” again he is stating how the new generation does not know what things are really necessary in life and can not see what their corruption is-Consumption.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=ad88d0470f&view=att&th=14112a4614de772e&attid=0.0&disp=inline&safe=1&zw

Quote 14

“One equals one is an abstraction, but nobody is led to think that one fly equals one elephant.”

Many people have viewed art as something we may see as expensive and luxerious, such as paintings and sculptures. Growing up, we also believed that art was what we saw in museums and in public as statues and memorials. But, Gramsci had demonstrated that that was not the case. He believed that art should not just be for the wealthy but as well for the middle and lower class. He brought art to the Bronx, which is infamously known for their poor neighborhoods and crimes. He did what no other artists did and showed that art was a way to bring a community together and a way for artists to work together. He brought hope to artists in the Bronx that art was not just for the wealthy but that everybody had an opportunity to express themselves through paintings and drawings. The well known belief that art was just percieved as paintings and sculptures, thus that “one equals one is an abstraction”, was changed by Gramsci. He created art in a whole different way, such as painting on wood and having couches wrapped in duck tape. His creation led to a whole new idea of what art actually is. Now that we are in such a modern time, our perception of what the meaning of art is actually changes. Why can’t we believe that, “one fly equals one elephant?” Gramsci’s idea of art has helped brought the community together and led to special way for the community and artists to bond in the Bronx.

Emily Chiu

“All men are intellectuals, but not all men have in society the function of intellectuals.”

Take a second to look at the men and women featured prominently in the picture I’ve posted below. While I cannot pretend to know with utmost certainty, if I was a betting man, I would wager these men and women have never been considered nor considered themselves to be artists in the conventional sense of the word. These are people that live in the housing projects of the South Bronx, a generally low-income area where most residents are working class or even unemployed. And yet somehow when these residents enter the alternate reality that is Thomas Hirschhorn’s ‘Gramsci Monument’, they transform into highly lauded “Residents of the Day”, complete with an accompanying photograph of them standing proudly next to whatever it is they contributed to the monument personally. And make no mistake about it, as whatever the conventional sense of the word may be is irrelevant, for these people are undoubtedly artists. They may have never put a brush to a canvas, nor written a line of philosophy, but they’ve helped add life to the living, breathing piece of art that is the Gramsci Monument. IMG_2520

 

Josh Kurman

Quote #36

alex photo II
“The content of art is art itself?” (Notebook 8)
 This quote relates to the picture in that to many, the two hoops would not appear to be art. Yet to some like myself, this may seem like art. Similar to what Thomas Hirschhorn said, he merely used that for the play and it had a meaning in the play itself. He wouldn’t expect everyone to see it as a life changing pice of art, simply as what it is. Being as how the monument was made of plywood, tape, and screws and nails, many art critics would proclaim it as not art, due to lacking in a grandiose aura. It is not a typical monument, as you can walk on it, and it doesn’t use the more well known materials to make it last for decades, merely for months.
 These two hoops are a common, everyday staple for many children and adults who play sports or go to playgrounds. They could be considered art pieces when talking of their shape, features, as they haven’t changed for decades. They are reproduced and are the norm for basketball players. However, even someone who has never played a sport in their life, would immediately recognize them as basketball hoops. Is that not what an artist strives for? To express his idea so most people would understand it?
 The two hoops each have one of the words, love or politics on them, as a symbol that you can’t have both. In a game, you are attacking on one hoop, and defending the other. I think the message here would be that in a profession, you would have to make sacrifices from one or the other, to advance in the other one.
Athanasios Alexiou

Quote 17

“It is necessary to establish what is meant by “interesting” when talking about art.” This quote means that there is no set definition of the concept of the word interesting when it comes to art. Different people find different pieces of art to be interesting to them and they each have different definitions of the word interesting. The Gramsci Monument embodies this quotation as many would find the monument itself to be weird and obscure. Some might find it to be interestingly fascinating while others might find it to be an interesting attempt at art. The monument itself is interesting as it uses raw materials such as wood and duct tape to produce art as opposed to museum exhibits which have pretentious sculptures and paintings. Interesting can have both a positive and a negative connotation and it is important to establish what is meant by the word interesting when discussing art. The Gramsci Monument tries to break all limits and preconception that only specific people can create art and that only specific pieces can be considered as art. Overall I think that the the Gramsci Monument is interestingly fascinating as it attempts to create art with wood and duct tape and it tries to show that there are no boundaries in art.
Daniel Ahn

Quote #6

If I had to insert a picture, I would put a picture of the Gramsci monument and people working inside.
The whole monument relates to the quote by Gramsci ” The dry twigs are indispensibile for making the log burn, but not in and of themselves. Only the log, by burning, changes the surrounding from cold to warm” in the sense that without action nothing changes. The quote relates to the start of a movement and the people who help, as the most important factors. Those people are the ones who can change things. The Gramsci monument, a collaboration of plywood, duct tape and other things, show how the artist, Thomas Hirschhorn, starts something and the residents nearby help finish or collaborate with him on the monument; either by helping out (volunteering/working) or by adding their own artwork. I would relate Thomas Hirschhorn as “dry twigs”, the residents as “the log”, and the whole monument as “burning”.
Kelly Ip

Art itself

“Art itself is interesting: it is interesting in itself, in that it satisfies on of the necessities of life” (Notebook 5)

I found the Gramsci monument quite interesting, in the sense that it challenged the conventional idea of what a monument or what art is. It’s not everyday that you would witness a living monument. The Gramsci monument provided the people of Forest housing a place to interact and enjoy themselves. Some programs include art classes, poetry sessions, and Gramsci seminars. This monument satisfies the necessities of life for residents, both aesthetically and literally. The beautiful mural of Gramsci and graffiti fulfill the aesthetic part, and services like internet access and music playing cover the literal part.

Bell Chen