If we are being totally honest, The Heart Sutra was definitely a little confusing to grasp at introduction, but over time, when you stop trying so hard to digest it, it comes to you. The Heart Sutra discusses the concept of knowledge and emptiness, how one’s knowledge of emptiness is actually supposed to be extremely comforting. Excuse me if I’m wrong but I’m not exactly sure how understanding the emptiness of something is supposed to reassure me.
To me, the emptiness is almost comparative to a materialistic emptiness, that the Buddhist tradition is proving that by living in our materialist reality, we have become empty of ourselves. But who knows if that’s even right for I feel like there is a greater lesson to this Sutra that is beyond my knowledge, as if I am supposed to be empty but still full and understanding all at the same time. How paradoxical.
As for the Whitman piece, as well I was completely taken in a different direction than I assumed was intended just by the first few lines. It appeared as a love poem when he quotes that his atoms belong to him just as they belong to you, the you I assumed was his love interest. How wrong I was.
Once I read it a few times, I started to realize that this was indeed a poem about Whitman, who had decided to celebrate himself and stare at some grass while doing so. Romantic, no? He describes himself as different people, almost as if he’s reliving his maturation process. Then out of nowhere this child comes and questions the grass Whitman is clearly having a love affair with and suddenly his whole world has exploded because he has to describe everything simplistically.
Clearly both pieces were too winding and evasive to actually pinpoint their true meanings but one can guess. Yet, what really got to me is what is the point of reference between them? I’m sure there are plenty of other poems we could have placed side by side and dissected like a creature in a laboratory so why these two? Whitman clearly loves the world and is high on blades of grass we cannot begin to reach. The Heart Sutra just wants to teach everybody that they are just empty beings and once you accept that you have bitten into the apple from the Tree of Knowledge and liberated yourself.
I’m starting to believe that the only thing these two pieces have in common is that they both discuss this notion of oneself and discovering the truth behind it. I’m assuming that Whitman’s love for the world is similar to what The Heart Sutra was trying to explain but took a more twisted route in explanation. Whitman went all candlelight dinners and butterflies while The Heart Sutra embodied Poe by channeling negative energy to teach us about a lovely thing. So which is it really? Should we be celebrating ourselves or should we just agree that we are empty containers and that is the truth of all that matters?