My Blog

When I was reading this letter, it started off with the author, Kevin Powell, praising his idol, Tupac Shakur. When Tupac died, the author was mourning for him because he felt that him and Tupac lived very similar lives. He talked about how they both lived in Harlem when they were younger. Then he talked about when he went to watch the movie, Juice, there were metal detectors and dogs for security reasons. The reason why for this security was because of the author being black, and he talked about since him and Tupac being black, they were perceived as dangerous in society.

After watching Juice, the author started to idolize Tupac more and began studying more about his life. He studied his mom and her history in racial groups such as the Black Panther Party and the Panther 21. Then he talked about Tupac only had a single parent, his mom, and so did the author as well. He talked about what struggles Tupac and his mom went through when he was younger; how his mom was struggling off scraps to feed her son to keep him alive. Then the journey they took across the country to survive.

When Tupac became a superstar, he was involved in various criminal cases. The author justified Tupac’s actions in these cases because the author felt like he was able to relate to Tupac; they both had raging emotions inside them, and the pain of these emotions was the reason why they acted this way.

Finally, he talked about the war between Tupac and Biggie. He said these two were friends and rivals, and it was tragic that they both died together. But they started a pointless war between each other for fame and money, and the author didn’t approve of that. He felt Tupac had the opportunity to change the hip-hop ways since he was already at the top, but he gave in to the fame, drama, and celebrities for money.

Creepypasta is something that I don’t like.  When I’m on social media apps, there would sometimes be creepy stuff recommended. I would typically try to avoid these posts, and I would click the don’t show me again button.

But I was curious, so I would look up the stories. I was pretty interested in the Russian Sleep Experiment, so I looked it up online. The results I got were scary, and when i saw the pictures, I was more terrified. As I was trying to read more about the experiment, the pictures kept appearing in my head, so it was difficult as I was getting more scared by the minute. As I finished the story, I didn’t know how to react. I thought this experiment was based off a real life event, but when I searched it up, it was fake.

Another popular creepypasta is Slenderman. When I looked it up, it had its own article and showed a tall creature with another girl. I thought it was fake, but the picture looked so real, so I’m still unsure right now.

There are also other short stories that involves a little kid and their parents, and the kid would talk about a monster being in their room, but really it was the monster disguised as the parent, and then the real parent comes in the room.

Despite creepypasta being scary, the stories did catch my attention. I would always look up the stories to read more about it even though I know it would be scary. The stories seem so believable. I didn’t think it would harm anyone as people knew it was fake, but when the Disney executive killed himself over a dead mickey mouse video, I was wrong; I did see this video before, and I just thought it was weird. I guess creepypasta affects everyone differently.

In the article, “What OJ Simpson Means to Me”, it talked about how racism played a huge role in OJ’s case. During his case, it was believed that OJ killed his white wife, but he wasn’t viewed as a black man; instead people looked at him as a man. OJ was viewed as a man because of his accomplishments in society: he was drafted to play football professionally, and that changed his life. He used to his fame to experience things that only white people could experience: playing golf, being a businessmen, spokesperson, and married a white girl named Nicole Brown.

The LAPD amplified on how racism played a role in the case because of their brutality on black men. In 1982, many black people died because of “choke holds” from the police. The police chief Daryl Gates, talked about how drug dealers deserve to be shot, and that black people’s “veins or arteries do not open as fast in normal people”: he believed with this statement, killing black people was justified. More cases on black people started to happen: the beating of Rodney King and the death of Latasha Harlins. The police were recorded beating Rodney King and when they were trialed, they were found innocent and so was the grocer that killed Harlins. With all the prejudice to black people and these events, it fueled up the LA riots.

During the trial, the detective of the case, Mark Fuhrman, was revealed on talking negatively on black people, and it was suspected that he planted evidence on the case. OJ’s defense was the race card: the police were doing everything they could to imprison an innocent man because he was black. This caused the jury to feel pity for OJ because of all the events surrounding black people, and that could been the reason why the voted him innocent.

When I was reading the article, I agreed with the claim that riots can bring changes despite it being chaotic. By rioting, it brings attention to the subject the riot is about and causes the authorities to do something about it. For example, in Baltimore’s riot about the death of Freddie Gray in police custody, it helped spark an investigation on the police department. The investigation exposed the racist practices the department have been doing, and led the department to reform.

The article also explained on how many historians agree that riots aren’t just random acts; people don’t do it just for fun or to steal. They are the response to years of negligence by politicians, media, and general public; the people want to see changes and by doing nothing, they’re not going to get it. During the 1960s riots, it was primarily African-Americans protesting against the police. The African-Americans didn’t like being treated like trash,racial segregation, and police arresting non-violent protesters. They believed by rioting, they can stop the injustice, but it wasn’t effective at all.

Racism is still a thing in the modern era. In a Baltimore neighborhood, they were in poverty as half the residents weren’t working, residential buildings were abandoned or vacant, and the city owed millions of dollars in settlements to a hundred people – a majority was black. The state wasn’t providing any help to black people, but ignored them. Charlotte is also in the same scenario as Baltimore. Charlotte is richer, but this wealth didn’t apply to black neighborhoods. Instead, black neighborhoods were presented with heavy police guarding it. They would throw random people on their car to search for drugs instead of doing their job properly.

Violent,social riots have shown changes and it does work. The Kerner Commission caused local police to reform to hire more minority polices, when the police could use force, and forced them to live in the communities they guarded.

Riots do bring chaos but you can’t bring changes by staying passive sometimes.

In The Central Park Five by Ken Burns, it was about a case where a white woman got raped in 1989. She was found in Central Park and suffered many injuries that many believed that she was going to be dead. The police believed that five Latino and black males were responsible for her rape. These suspects were just teenagers, and they had nothing to do with the rape. These five were still charged and served time in prison for years until they were released.

The way the police acted in this investigation was unethical. They interrogated the kids for hours, and forced them to false confessions. They had the kids’ hopes up that by confessing, they would be released, but really, they brought themselves to prison. The police didn’t even have evidence that the kids were involved; they were just assuming because of the media pressuring them to solve the case. The kids didn’t even have a fair trial because they were going to be convicted anyways. People always assume that people of different color were seen as criminals and nothing else. It showed on how even in the late 1900s, racism was still a thing, and it played a huge role in this case.

People look up to the police as source of protection and the protection of their rights, but they didn’t apply the same ethics to these five suspects. It led the kids to rot away their childhood and adulthood by serving time for a crime they’re innocent of. When they were finally released, the court vacated the original records and wiped their records clean. But the court can’t wipe their time in prison, and when they were free, they were too old to begin a life. The five eventually sued the state, and it took years for a settlement to be agreed on.

In “Backpacks vs. Briefcases: Steps toward Rhetorical Analysis” by Laura Bolin Carroll, it was about how rhetoric was used in every day life. Every day in life,we’re always observing people and things around us and judge it- whether approve of it or not. The way people look and act causes us to think of them differently.

When we first meet someone, we act differently than  we would around our friends. The reason why is because we’re comfortable and close enough to our friends that they would understand it’s how act, but around strangers, they might consider it weird, and we’re not trying to give them that impression. Sometimes, we might also judge the person based on how they look and dress. Our conclusions might be wrong or might be right, but we never give a chance to thoroughly talk to that person to see if we’re right or not.

This article also applies to my life because when I was younger, I was so close minded. I would judge people based on their dressing and appearance, and sometimes I would be wrong. But I just didn’t care enough to meet them because I was too stubborn to realize my claim could be false. However, as I grew older, I became more open-minded and decided to stop judging people and make friends instead. For example, in middle school, I stayed away from kids that wore expensive clothing such as Jordans because my style didn’t fit them, so I thought it would be a waste of time to talk to them. It was until high school that some people that wore these clothing aren’t so self-centered. They just wear it to look good, and despite my clothes not matching them, I started talking to them, and now they just tell me where to buy these stuff.

In the Netflix series, “The Confession Tapes”, the first two episodes were about the murder of the Rafay residence, and how the investigation was conducted unethically and imprisoned two innocent people to life in person with no parole- Atif Rafay and Sebastian Burns. The Bellevue police at the time had no witnesses except Rafay and Burns, and that’s when they started to pin the case on them. However, I disagreed with their actions because they didn’t have solid evidence that Rafay and Burns were involved . For example, when they found hair in the shower that belonged to Burns, it didn’t make sense to automatically accused Burns because he was staying the household a few days before the murder even happen; so obviously, his hair count is going to stack up in the shower. There was also another hair found that didn’t match anybody, so that meant that somebody else was in the household. The police even had a reliable informant that talked about how he was with the real murderers at the time, and that they were part of an extremist organization that planned the attack on the Rafays because of the father’s statement on the True East. Despite this testimony, they ignored it and still wanted to pin it on the kids. The police didn’t have hard evidence at all, and when solid evidence was given to them, they ignored it and wanted the kids to take the blame.

Another unethical practice was the Mr.Big operation that was conducted in Canada. This operation is illegal in the United States because it violates the Fifth Amendment – a person can’t self-incriminate for a crime. The Constitution wouldn’t allow this evidence at all in court, but the court still considered it admissible. In the tape, it was believed that Burns and Gary were doing criminal braggadocio- they were making false confessions to impress the gangsters because they felt threatened and wanted to fit in. Also, the arrogance personalities the two had was a defensive mechanism: Burns stated himself that he wanted to act tough so he wouldn’t break down in front of the media, and really, he was grieving about the case.

When I was reading this, I didn’t realize how dark it would be in just the first paragraph. It started off normally where the woman was working, and then she came home and took a jog. However, when the story said she took a jog at central park late at night, I knew something bad was going to happen; and I was right. She got raped and suffered inhumane injuries that would scar anyone for life. The jogger was hospitalized and took many months to fully recover. After fifteen months, her brain was still damaged, and that prevented her from functioning normally. She couldn’t focus her eyes or walk without assistance, lost her sense of spell, and couldn’t read without experiencing double vision. Doctors believed that she lost these functions permanently.

It was believed that African-Americans were responsible for this incident, and it led to an “emotional undertow” in American black history. People used to believe that deep inside African Americans, they fantasize raping white woman. Black men were accused of raping white woman despite that they weren’t, and yet, black women were being raped by their slave master white man, and that sometimes even lead to a birth of a mixed baby. If a white woman ever says that a black man gave them a look, that black man would be hung with a white audience enjoying their view.

Prosecutors targeting minors for this case, and it was common to hide the names of minors from the public, but this time, they released the names because they believed the case to be very serious. One kid named Yusef Salaam was fifteen years old at the time, and he was being interrogated. New York state law required that kids fifteen years old and under require a parent for an interrogation, and the district attorney lied that he was sixteen years old. Then during court, the district attorney told David Nocenti, Yusef’s attorney, that Yusef had no legal standing in the case because of his age, but yet, she still interrogated him without his mom by his side.

This incident brought out unlawful, hypocrisy actions being down by authorities, and stirred the racism that was deep down in people.

 

Thank you for using Blogs@Baruch!

This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start publishing.

You are using a new WordPress theme that places widgets such as “Recent Posts,” “Recent Comments” and “Archives” in the footer, leaving you maximum space for publishing in this central area. If you prefer to have widgets on the right side of this page, these can be added by going to “Widgets” under the “Appearance” tab in your Dashboard. You can also choose from more than 100 other themes from the “Themes” menu in the Dashboard.