About Alyssa D'Angelo

5081190214849473

Blog HW #1

Not until reading the article did I realize how broad the term “Graphic Design” is and how it can really be applied to everything. When first taking the course, I thought of graphic design as solely a computer-based thing and mostly designing web pages and logos. I never thought about things such as the labels inside our clothing or on gum wrappers, movie credits, TV ads, etc.

Considering there are so many different directions that a graphic designer can go, one question I have is does a professional graphic designer usually stick to one category for most of their career? Like does a graphic designer usually find one, I guess “sub-category” to focus on and become an “expert” in? Like say, billboards? Or are a majority of graphic designers very versatile and work on a bunch of different kinds of projects from magazines, to billboards, to labels? Also, when you’re a graphic designer do you get hired as the graphic designer for one company and you’re their graphic designer for good? Or are you more independent and get hired by a variety of companies/businesses just for one of their projects/requests? My guess would be that I’m sure both are options in this career field, and it depends on what company it is you’re designing for. I’m sure big, established companies such as Google, Target, etc. have an established team of graphic designers who work on all types of their graphic design needs, and I’m sure small, independent businesses just hire a graphic designer for one task.

Another question I have is regarding restrictions when it comes to certain labels. For example- warning labels on products, warning/caution signs on the street, nutrition facts, etc. Are there specific fonts you must stick to? Is there a minimum size or maximum size? When it comes to labels on boxes or bottles of mediation (over the counter and prescription) is there like a law or something that says the must be a certain size to ensure the customer sees it and doesn’t skim over it? I would have to guess no when it comes to over the counter medication considering all the warnings like “may cause a heart attack or stroke” usually are microscopic and you have to squint to see. But with prescription medication I feel like all the labels are usually the same size, so maybe there is an established size that you have to print the name of the medication, dosages and patients name in?

Blog #3 Unsuccessful/Successful designs

spartan_m

This logo for Spartan Golf is great. It’s very sophisticated, but at the same time very clean cut and sharp. The motion of the golf club swing and man swinging it himself make the shape of the side profile a spartan soldier. It’s a double image and people are always intrigued by those so I feel like it’s one people will easily remember. I love the use of the white space, and how it’s all black. I think the spaced out lettering works great underneath because it gives the head somewhat of a platform to rest on, and overall I think it’s a very well thought out  and clever design.

photo
Here is a spread from a page in Nylon magazine. I think it’s a very successful design because it’s very unique, creative and fun. I love how the pictures look as though they’re cut out and placed on as a collage. I feel like collages are hard to create and be successful at looking good, but here I love it and think the designer did a great job. I think it’s important to pay attention to the overall shape the images collaged together will make, especially regarding the border. I think what plays a big role in making it successful is the bit of collage/photos on the bottom because it balances it out with the top, and brings the whole piece together. I also love the two little captions, word, and texas illustration are thrown in random places but consistent in color and font. I also think the text works well at the size it is, it’s tiny and allowing the images to dominant the page but it’s still readable. Something that caught my attention was how the paragraphs all start at different heights, and this inconsistency works here because it goes along with this messy, thrown on there vibe you get from looking at the piece.

photoHere is an ad for Baby-G watches, and I think it’s a successful design. It’s very colorful, but the white background and three white watches stop it from being too colorful and balance it out. I think that the text bordering around the image works well and gives the ad movement.

 

qiru2jftx1a378eq8ad0s4ik4
Next is this Rays. This isn’t a horrible design, but it’s far from clever. Also, the little golden sparkle just doesn’t seem to fit for what a sports team should want to represent. I feel like it’s very dainty and feminine, and it just reminds of something you would see on a jeweler logo. And plotting the team name “Rays” on top of a baseball field? It just seems unoriginal. When you’re representing a specific sports team, I feel like the logo should be unique and personal to that particular team. Not contain something that any team could have used.

photo-1

Here I feel like there’s too much going on next to the photograph. I think there’s too much illustration, and the photograph itself is very strong and all that’s next to it isn’t necessarily needed. I also think it looks funny how the text next to the photo lines up with the head, then lines up with the ear.

Yahoo_Logo

Here is the new Yahoo design which was just reviled a couple of months ago and I really dislike it. I think the 3D effect looks too cheesy. While reading peoples’ comments on the new design, somebody pointed out that with their older logo, the Y had such distinct details that you knew it was the yahoo y. With this, you can’t do that. Overall it does nothing for me. Yahoo is obviously a well established company and for a company that big and well known to change their logo I think it should have been… better? “The new logo doesn’t communicate any sort of new vision, purpose, or meaning to the brand. So: Why bother in the first place?”

Punchcutting

It seems as though punchingcutting is a very time consuming craft. One which requires lots of patience, skill, and precision. Not only do you have to spend time carefully creating and cutting a punch and filing a matrix for each letter, but you must have a design thoroughly planned out before executing it. It’s mind boggling to think that so much time was put into creating one single letter. My guess is that when working with punchcutting there isn’t any room for mistakes or error unless you plan on recreating your design from scratch. Punchcutting would most likely get extremely frustrating to me after not much time at all. I feel like we are all so privileged to have the ability to experiment and constantly change things around in our work, that the thought of going into a design without the option of effortlessly being able to go back would scare me! I’m curious to see designs made from punchcutting back then and how they vary, because I wonder if all the hard work that went behind creating a deisgn constrained designers to always play it safe with same, familar, basic designs. I feel like this method would restrict my creativity because I would always play it “more safe than sorry.” But that could just be because this craft is sort of absurd to me, and I’m sure that back then people weren’t so lazy considering this was the norm and also the only way. One reason I wouldn’t mind punchcutting is because throughout the process you sort of have no choice but to be extremely observant of all the detailing in each specific letter, and because of that you are bound to grow a stronger appreciation for letters and fonts. Anyway, I certainly give those who worked and still work with punchcutting a lot of credit.