Paragraph:

“That which withers in the age of mechanical reproduction is the aura of the work of art. This is a symptomatic process whose significance points beyond the realm of art. One might generalize by saying: the technique of reproduction detaches the reproduced object from the domain of tradition. By making many reproductions it substitutes a plurality of copies for a unique existence. And in permitting the reproduction to meet the beholder or listener in his own particular situation, it reactivates the object reproduced. These two processes lead to a tremendous shattering of tradition which is the obverse of the contemporary crisis and renewal of mankind.”

I picked this paragraph because this is something I’ve noticed before, and it relates to my personal definition of art. I feel like one of the main objectives of life is remaining unique, remaining true to yourself, to your aura, your morals, and your values. This way of approach applies to art as well. I feel like to be considered unique, you need to have that unique existence. This unique existence is what sets great artists apart from the rest. It’s about expressing your individuality and perspective in a way that resonates with others while still remaining unique. When you create art that is truly authentic to who you are, it has the power to connect with people on a deeper level and leave a lasting impact. I feel like in today’s world, conformity is too encouraged, and I’m not against conformity like at all, but I’m a huge believer that we humans are so creative and have the capability to create wonderful things, and that can be done by embracing our uniqueness, whether through art, music, or whatever it may be. For this paragraph, I liked the author’s main idea, because I get it: the whole idea of the decaying of “aura” in replicated art pieces defeating its whole uniqueness. It makes sense. In a world where art, music, and even personalities are often filtered through algorithms and trends, it can be hard to hold onto that original spark, that aura that makes us irreplaceable. When we go back to art, I feel like the art piece loses that intimacy and distinctiveness that gave it its soul. In a world that’s filled with replicated aesthetics and ideas, it’s the artist who digs deep, who tells their truth in a way that no one else can, that cuts through the noise and leaves an impact. It just hits different. People feel it.