As we all know, handheld cameras are being replaced by smartphones and tablets that are convenient. They are convenient since we are already have them on us we can easily use them to get a quick picture. What makes it even worse for camera developers is that these smartphones and tablets are getting higher and higher in quality as time goes on. In a recent article in the NY times, A Camera Takes On the Phones, journalist David Pogue shows us how camera developer Canon has made innovative pushes to make pocket camera relevant once again by coming out with the PowerShot N that is valued at $300. According to Pogue, there are three major differences that makes the Canon N standout from smartphones. First, it emphasizes the features that a smartphone can’t match, like a zoom lens. Second, it imitates the workings and design features of a smartphone. Third, it can transmit new photos to your phone for immediate sending or posting online.
Do you think people would try this new style camera or will they just ignore it and keep using their smartphones and tablets? Would you buy this camera?
I think this is a great attempt by Canon to save themselves from the sinking pocket camera industry. This camera is a really innovative piece of technology. Unfortunately, it may be a piece of technology with no market. I think there are two huge problems. First, who wants to pay $300 for marginally better photographs? Somehow Canon really needs to get the price down so that young people can easily afford them. Another problem is having this pocket camera means having to carry another item around. One of the best benefits of the phone camera is that it is with you all the time without having to carry another device. Considering these two problems, and the fact that smart phone cameras get better by the minute, Canon may want to jump ship and stick with the professional photography equipment.
I would personally not buy that camera. I have two cameras at home, and they were both bought before I owned an iPhone or an iPad. Now they are lying there collecting dust. Whenever I go somewhere I never question myself whether or not should I even bother taking one of them because they are disadvantageous. Considering how phones and tablets are convenient, and their quality improves with every year, it would make no sense for me like Mike said to carry an extra item. The only camera, in my opinion that stands out, is the professional camera. They are unbelievably expensive but I guess you get the results of the price you pay.
I actually have a Canon camera which I never use. I have friends, who use cameras instead of smart phones, but their cameras are worth more than thousand dollars and they can take pictures like professionals. Honestly, I would not buy the camera just because I don’t want to carry more gadgets with me. I carry an Ipad, a phone, an Ipod touch, and they are heavy enough. I already have enough distractions.