Author Archives: J.Davila

Summary of Activity on this Site


Number of Posts: 11
Number of Comments: 11

About J.Davila

NO-CARD

Homework #5

Looking back at the activities we did this semester, there are a couple things I will definitely take with me and use throughout my Baruch experience. I really didn’t know what to expect from this class when we first started, but it soon enough we started covering interesting topics that dealt with everyday life especially in regards to technology.

Starting with the reading material, “The Filter Bubble” by Eli Pariser was a big eye opener. Before reading this, I would say like many I was an avid technology user, from smartphones to social networking i just used it without really questioning how it really worked, it never even crossed my mind what these big corporations were doing with all the information we put out there. Now, after reading this book I was made aware of how easy is to obtain personal information on the net, I learned that we are being monitored without really knowing it. Not only has this changed my whole outlook on technology but it really has changed the way I use it. I’m more careful about the stuff I put out there and before I put my personal information I look at their privacy policies and what other third parties might be able to see or use my information, like Pariser suggested I’m trying to stay as far away from the filter bubble. Overall, I thought this book was very interesting and an easy read, it didn’t drag on and offered interesting points and revelations.

Another activity that I found very useful was the database lesson. I liked this lesson because it gave us an alternative other than Google to find sources for research projects and information we might need for a paper. Not only was it fairly easy to use, but the information was well organized and to the point. Google can only give you so much and sometimes it may lack certain information that can easily be obtained from a database. I recently used the database for a paper in my history class, and it was a huge help, many if not all my sources were from the database. This really saved my behind, because my go-to search engine, Google, wasn’t really helping me out and thankfully I got all the information I needed from the database. Other activities we did like using mindmeister, making wikis and even learning how to use Google Drive which was something I had no idea was available, and now use it for pretty much everything are helpful not only for this class but for others as well. I had not heard of these things before taking this class and Im sure Im going to utilize them in the future.

One thing that I wish was covered in class is how to fight the filter bubble. Pariser gave suggestions of how to do this at the end of the book, but it would’ve been cool to follow up and actually see how we can actually avoid it or see what companies are paying more to collect our information and what companies let their customers see what they are doing with their information.

Homework 4

Wiki changes:

  • Desired Amenities: Added a few pictures and suggestions
  • Planned Amenities: Added suggestions and changes
  • Planned Uses: Added pictures and bullets about the Spring Fling.
  • Edited, “What Plazas Are Page” and added picture.

Obama, Privacy and Twitter

Reading “The Filter Bubble” made me realize how overexposed we are when we are looking at a certain website and how our information can be so easily obtained by third parties. I came across an interesting article, talking about a new privacy protection law President Obama plans to pitch to Congress. He’s urged Congress to consider privacy protections when debating cybersecurity legislation. What caught my eye was that he was recruiting the help of Twitter legal director Nicole Wong, to join the administration as a top privacy advisor. That news has advocates examining Wong’s record, which includes a stint at Google. Wong has been working at Twitter for less than seven months. She moved there from Google, where she worked with that company’s engineers to review new products for copyright and privacy considerations. I think this is a great recruit to help bring a law that is very much needed and that many American are probably not aware about. Privacy is something that we should all be entitled to even in the world wide web. Thoughts?

http://www.technewsworld.com/story/77986.html

LOL ?

Laughing out loud, or lol is probably one of the most popular texted words. We all use it either to end a sentence or to simply just to sound nice. There’s no doubt that the way we text has affected the way we write, it has become such a norm that we unconsciously do it, good thing we have spell check right? But the meaning of “lol” has changed over the years, the way the majority of people use it today, wouldn’t signify amusement the way it it before. For example, you text someone “where are you?” and they text back “studying at the library lol”, how funny is that, really? That is “lol” doesn’t necessarily mean anything but it does something like convey an attitude, of all things its grammar. Of course when we text we never think of use proper grammar but if you really think about “lol” has become a period or a comma.

Like the experts say all languages evolve over time, in the modern technology world we live in do you think “lol” is going to stand or are we going to eventually discard it and another word will take it’s place.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/30/opinion/mcwhorter-lol/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_topstories+(RSS%3A+Top+Stories)

 

Siri v. Google Now

Remember when the iPhone 4s came out, one of its innovative attractions was Siri. According to Apple, Siri is the intelligent personal assistant that helps you get things done just by asking. It allows you to use your voice to send messages, schedule meetings, place phone calls, and more. Siri understands your natural speech, and it asks you questions if it needs more information to complete a task. Along with an extensive marketable campaign, Siri became to many an astounding piece of technology to have on your phone at the time, but after using it a few times it kind of became slow and not as accurate as they made it seem on the commercials, it was a dud. Well that was then, now the competition is giving Siri a run for its money, as of today Google is giving Iphone users the option of a new app called Google Now. Google Now would  serve as the primary service that smartphone users rely on to get everything from weather updates to traffic forecasts. Google Now aspires to play an important role by helping users with daily chores such as looking up information on the Web, handling calendar appointments and managing travel plans, pretty much what Siri does but better. According to analysts, Siri posed as a threat to the Google, the information that Siri provides on common topics like nearby restaurants, sports scores and such reduces the need to use Google as a search engine, with that in mind the people at Google created Google Now. How it works is that the technology taps into Google’s various online services, from Web search to personal Gmail email and Google Calendar entries, to deliver relevant information throughout the day in pop-up windows that Google refers to as “cards.” Maybe this will give Apple an incentive to make some changed to improve Siri and come out with something new. Whether this is better option than Siri or not, it’s up to the public to decide, I know that I barely use the Siri on my phone but maybe I’ll give this new app a try. What do you guys think?

 

Can you hear me now? Cellphone turns 40.

Did you know that the first cell phone call was made 40 years ago.  The first cell phone ever made was in 1984 and it cost about $4,000, it had an LED display and took 10 hours to charge. If you want to try a more vintage look get rid of your iPhone or Android and buy one here.  After people became tired of holding a brick, the next big cellphone invention was the flip phone, described by Motorola as “about as thick as a fat wallet at the earpiece while tapering down to half the thickness of a deck of cards at the mouthpiece.” And who can forget the Nokia ringtone, very well progressed during the years (listen here) a dub step version really? The next big thing after the flip phone was the camera phone, they weren’t sold until the year 2002 in the United States, Sony Ericsson’s T68i with its clip-on camera being amongst the first. Before the IPhone and Blackberry were top sellers, there was another phone that everyone had, I remember I got it as my first phone in pink, the Razr. Motorola’s slender, square Razr series, first launched in 2004, was such a runaway hit and sold 50 million phones in the first two years. After the average cell phone era had its run, the smartphone era took over, BlackBerry’s 5810, was the very first Blackberry device to get a cellular connection. The Palm TreoW, also a pocket assistant, was the first phone to run a Windows mobile operating system. These phones started to smudge the line between computer and phone. Last but not least, in 2007 came something that would reinvent a simple phone, the IPhone, an iPod, phone and internet communicator in one device.  Since then, flat, skinny smartphones from Nokia and Samsung and HTC  have reconfigured our expectations of a smartphone, and they are far from what was the first phone. So what do you think the next phone innovation is going to be? Assuming most of you have smartphones, how has it made your life easier/harder ? Could you live without it?

 

 

Google Glass Problems

by Group #3

  • Privacy
  • Dependency
  • Filters – may discriminate smaller businesses
  • Technical – rain/eye problems
  • Fashion
  • Easily breakable
  • Distraction

Like Pariser described in chapter 7, the google glasses are an example of augmented reality. With the help of modern technology everyday tasks are much easier to do. It may also infringe in privacy issues, if and when it may record us without any consent.

The New Social Network

Facebook was in it prime when most of us were in middle school or highscool, and many of us left MySpace for the newer fad that was Facebook at the time. When talking to younger people I realize how “old” Facebook is becoming much like what MySpace was at our time. They seem to choose Instagram as their social network of choice, which makes sense because if you go to Instagram’s Popular page you’ll see teenage related pictures such as Spongebob “memes” or One Direction pictures. While checking Twitter I saw that many people and some celebrities were posting things on a new social network site called Pheed. Curious to learn more, I googled it and found this article about it. Pheed provides users with a platform for sharing all forms content which includes text, pictures, audio,voice notes, video, and live broadcast. Users can subscribe to other users’ channels and view their subscribed channels’ almost like what you would do in Youtube. Also, they can “love” or “heartache” specific pheeds, hashtag, pheedback as well as share content from other channels to their own via a feature called “remix” similar to a retweet. The app became #1 on the app store and it seems like it’s caught the attention of the demographic that Facebook is losing. It easy to see why people are so attracted to this new site, it has an edgier modern contemporary look and in a way it’s like all top social netwroking sites combined into one. So if you’re sick of the same old Facebook, consider giving Pheed a try.

Do you think this site has potential to have the same popularity as the top dogs of social networking? (ie. Facebook, Twitter)

 

 

NY Times Article

The steps I took to find the article were to search for specific keywords about the article that I knew such as the date, facebook and new york times. With the help of Google being my go-to search engine, I entered in the following “article facebook search tool jan 28”, although it was not the first option they gave me it was close to second.

topics-sengupta-pic-articleInline

The author is Somini Sengupta, who is based in San Francisco, covers technology issues. She was previously The Times’s bureau chief in New Delhi and Dakar and was the recipient of the 2004 George Polk Award for foreign reporting. She was born in Calcutta and grew up in Canada and California. She graduated with honors from the University of California, Berkeley.

People mentioned in the article:

Kathryn Hymes – left a masters linguistics program in Standford to join this team, her goal was to create a natural, intuitive language.

Clifford I. Nass – a professor of communication at Stanford who specializes in human-computer interaction

Loren Cheng – led the natural language processing part of the project, said the search engine had to adjust to the demands of users.

 Keywords/Ideas

It explains why there is a “like” button but not a “dislike” button; negative emotions turn people away.

Teach Facebook’s computers how to communicate better with people.

Facebook constantly tests and tweaks its features for its diverse, global audience, paying close attention to the responses.

 



Comments:

"I think face recognition would be a great tool to use to solve crimes. If it helps to catch a criminal faster and in an accurate manner I don't see why it shouldn't be used. We live in an unstable world, where anything can happen and in this case technology is making us more secure. Im opposed to it be used by the public, because not only can it fall into the wrong hands but using it for another purpose besides solving a crime would be too invasive into people's lives. Overall, I think it's great for the police to use it but not for the public."
posted on May 16, 2013, on the post FACE RECOGNITION USED TO SOLVE CRIME

"At this rate Google is going to take over the world! As an avid music fan of all genres, I found this article pretty interesting, especially the one tied to YouTube. It's nice to see something big being created to stand against iTunes, which in my opinion is not that great. Yes their music library is extensive but is not that extensive. Since this new "Google Play" is linked with YouTube, that means that they will have a wider range of genres and songs that you wouldn't have found on iTunes. The only thing I would be iffy about is the privacy part, from taking this class Ive become more cautious about what I put on the net, so I might be a little hesitant to try this one out."
posted on May 16, 2013, on the post Google Streaming Music

"I agree with my fellow classmates, we put out so much information out there without even realizing it. As much as technology may evolve and consequently make my life easier, there's no doubt in my mind that I would give up my privacy just for that. I think it's sad how dependent we've become of technology that we have to give up many things in order to be able to use it. I wouldn't trust any company with my personal data because I know theres nothing beneficial for me in it, besides getting bombarded with promotional e-mails and such. There needs to be a barrier between technology and our personal lives."
posted on May 16, 2013, on the post More convenience, less privacy

"The fact that older family members (parents included) were joining Facebook and amongst other things, I decided to deactivate my Facebook page. I could've simply ignored their friend requests but then I would have to deal with them friend-ing me again or seeing them somewhere and asking me why I didn't answer their request, so I decided to avoid an awkward situation and just delete it once and for all. Although I relapsed a couple of times, after a couple of weeks I was fine without it. Facebook who? I do have to admit that submerged myself into Twitter and Instagram even more but I enjoy those types of social networks far better than Facebook, they're simple and much less invasive and above all no older family members."
posted on May 2, 2013, on the post The Generation Gap

"Personalization is good depending on what werbsite you are on. For example whenever I'm on Youtube listening to a song or watching a music video, they'll usually get it right with suggesting what kind of music I like or sometimes they'll suggest a song or video that I haven't heard since I was in middle school, and there's nothing wrong with a good throwback. But taking this class, has made me realize how invasive personalization could be and wether they get it right or wrong it could be kind of annoying."
posted on Mar 21, 2013, on the post Is Personalization Good or Bad?

"Personally I would not use this tool, Netflix already recommends Tv/movies based on what I have previously watched so I don't find it necessary for them to recommend what my friends on Facebook are watching. Also, like many people on Facebook, some of the "friends" that I have I havent seen in years or barely even know, so I wouldnt be that interested in knowing their viewing preferences."
posted on Mar 20, 2013, on the post Netflix Begins to “Swim” in Social Network Pool

"Writing a paper using the internet is obviously an easier and less time consuming way than using books and doing research. I think that people have different ways of learning wether is opening a book or reading an article online, to do a good job on a paper you have to have substantial information that will help the reader understand the point you are trying to prove - you can do that with or without the internet. So in my opinion people are not becoming less intelligent, lazier would be more like it."
posted on Mar 20, 2013, on the post How we do research

"I dont think that a your personal facebook page should be put into consideration when you apply for a job or not. Your skills and what you can bring to the table should be put into consideration instead of what you "like" or what you post. In my opinion facebook has become way too invasive in tracking your everyday life and it even became too complex to use, it just became too much overall, one of the main reasons I deleted mine (and i dont miss it). Overall I dont think employers should be looking at ones own personal page to decide whether you get a job or not."
posted on Mar 5, 2013, on the post What Is Your Facebook Identity?

"This is something that it's going to create alot of buzz if they actually make it mandaroty to verify your identity before you post a comment. Although we have seen countless kids being bullied and harming themselves because of what anonymous people post on facebook or youtube, others are going to argue this with the freedom of speech card. It is a very complex topic that comes in hand with the new technology driven world we live in."
posted on Mar 5, 2013, on the post Anonymity Online

"This idea was bound to happen, many people cant sit in front of a computer screen for more than a couple minutes until their eyes began to hurt from squinting. Although it is controversial because of the aspect of "tracking" facial expressions, I see no harm if the reader is asked before hand."
posted on Mar 5, 2013, on the post SCREEN RESIZING FONTS

"funny title!"
posted on Jan 31, 2013, on the post It is 2:40, do you know where your children are?