HW#4: Quick Recap of Edits Made In 25th Street Plaza Wiki Project

Hello all!

I have made edits to three pages of our wiki project on the 25th street plaza.
The first page I worked on was Stakeholders under the Introduction folder. I added various images that correspond with the stakeholders of our project using HTML embedded code.
The second page I worked on was Current Policies under the What is there now folder. The page initially was blank, so I decided it would be nice to add an image and begin filling out the content that would relate to that page (the current rules that are in place in regards to the plaza).
The third page I worked on was Desired Uses under the What Should Be Planned folder. The page seems very well done, and there was a lot of uses that the author came up with, so instead of editing the page, I posed a question to the author in regards to uses of the plaza during the Fall and Winter semesters, as currently the uses on the page are for the warmer months.

Social media will do anything to get into our wallets!

youtube brand standard logo.jpg

Well, well!  I am not suprised, According to this article YouTube announced to Financial Times that it was “looking into creating a subscription platform that could bring even more great  content to YouTube for our users to enjoy and provide our creators with another  vehicle to generate revenue from their content, beyond the rental and  ad-supported models we offer”. Hm I love how everytime any social media site mentiones of their members to start paying for somethig, according to them it is all done for “our benefit”. YouTube was always humbling, because it was free. You can search for anything and enjoy limitless time throughout your day. They are saying that ” the subscription-only videos will include up to 50 YouTube channels”. For now it will be “only” 50 YouTube channels, in the blink of an eye it will broaden to a 1000 and before we know it the whole YouTube community will be functioning through paid subscriptions. Am I overdramatizing this situation? I personally don’t think so, but would love to hear your opinions.

 

 

INSTAGRAM UPDATES

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/instagram-gets-face-tagging-with-photos-of-you-feature/2013/05/03/8006c0d6-b34a-11e2-9fb1-62de9581c946_story.html

Usually most of my posts and comments consist of negativity towards anything and everything to do with technology but this article I was very happy with. Since I am an Instagram devotee, the new updates are very convenient and beneficial for me and my fellow Instagram addicts.  Instagram is adding face tagging! Since every other social network changes their features every other month, it is time for Instagram to add something fun and useful. Sure it is not a deal breaker for our universe, but I never realized that I actually enjoy the feeling of nostalgia towards technology updates ( well some ).

 

The Guys Behind Google Wallet Want to Personalize Your Next Shopping Trip

http://www.wired.com/business/2013/01/index-google-wallet/

Marc Freed-Finnegan and Jonathan, formal Google Wallet team launched a startup called “Index”. The main goal of Index is to help retailers to create a personalized shopping and improved customer service. It collects consumers’ spending habits and shopping preferences so that retailers can provide personalized shopping experience to their customers. Well,  up to this part, nothing is new. Whatever Index does has happened every time I shop online.

But, I started to feel little weird when I read this part. “Thanks to Index, the next time a salesperson greets you when you walk in to a store, they might be able to actually help you find the same pair of jeans you bought six months prior even if they didn’t work there when you bought them.”  If a stranger who knows my shopping history better than me comes up and say that I have to check some new products which perfectly meet my interests, I would feel really creepy and weird rather than welcomed.

I started to wonder what would happen if a web personalization involved more human to human interactions. And I realized that I actually cared less about any problem that the personalization caused when it’s done by computers. So, what if your search history is not handled by computers, but by actual people ? What if there are real people behind search engine system who decide which information will be shown to you ? Would you feel more upset or frightened when a personalization is done by a real person?

 

Quiz for Next Tuesday

Next Tuesday, we’ll take about half the class to do a quiz that is essentially a dry run for the final exam. You’ll be given a recent news article by me that you’ll have to write about in a way that connects it up with the themes and lessons in The Filter Bubble. Like the final exam, this is an open book, open notes situation. The only source of information you may not refer to or draw upon is whatever your neighbor in class is doing on the quiz or exam (your work should be your own).

Please bring your book to class on Tuesday. You’ll want to have it, I’m sure.

The Last Two Homework Assignments

In the “Homework” box on the “Assignments” tab of the course website, you’ll now find details about the last two homework assignments. Homework #4 is due Thursday, May 9, and asks you to do some work on the 25th Street Plaza project wiki and write about it on the blog. Homework #5 asks you reflect back on what you learned this semester and write about it on the blog. Please follow the assignment guidelines as they are delineated on the course website.

The Generation Gap

As children we want to rebel. We gain pleasure in disobeying our parents and getting into mischief. At least I was when I was little. We did things that we thought we could get away with. Such things as sneaking sodas, or hiding my greens etc. Children used to use Facebook as their medium to communicate when they believed that they could say whatever they wanted without their parents finding out. However, more and more parents are joining Facebook and the children no longer have a secret medium to communicate so they are shying away from the prying eyes of their parents on Facebook to other more secretive methods of communicates such as WhatsApp.

 

https://medium.com/adventures-in-consumer-technology/3d1c24176c91

A Broader Definition of ‘Journalist’

http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/12/11/are-all-bloggers-journalists/we-need-a-broader-definition-of-journalist

The filter bubble changes the way we interact with new information. Because of problems of the filter bubble is causing (confirmation bias, stereotyping, and etc.) finding the unbiased and diverse information has become more important in this information society. In other words, having good and reliable news source could be the first step to escape the filter bubble. However, in these days, anyone can publish anything, at any time, thanks to technology. And we are facing numerous information in front of us, trying to figure out which information is reliable and transparent, especially when everyone can be journalists.

The article I linked basically asks “Can anyone be considered a journalist ?”. There are a lot of fascinating and distinguished blog posts or personal websites written by people whose jobs are not “journalists”. On the other hands, we see a lot of trashy and worthless works created by “journalists”. So whom can we call journalists in these days ?

LOL ?

Laughing out loud, or lol is probably one of the most popular texted words. We all use it either to end a sentence or to simply just to sound nice. There’s no doubt that the way we text has affected the way we write, it has become such a norm that we unconsciously do it, good thing we have spell check right? But the meaning of “lol” has changed over the years, the way the majority of people use it today, wouldn’t signify amusement the way it it before. For example, you text someone “where are you?” and they text back “studying at the library lol”, how funny is that, really? That is “lol” doesn’t necessarily mean anything but it does something like convey an attitude, of all things its grammar. Of course when we text we never think of use proper grammar but if you really think about “lol” has become a period or a comma.

Like the experts say all languages evolve over time, in the modern technology world we live in do you think “lol” is going to stand or are we going to eventually discard it and another word will take it’s place.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/30/opinion/mcwhorter-lol/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_topstories+(RSS%3A+Top+Stories)

 

Addiction to Technology

As we have been discussion all semester technology has become a part of our everyday lives. We cannot escape technology here in NYC. Are we addicted? Yes, I think that many of us are. I often try to escape and take a break from technology and I find it to be impossible. The problems arise when we cannot get the adequate down time in order for our bodies to keep equilibrium  Constant stare at a computer screen will harm vision. Constant feeling of being connect will harm your ability to rest and cause extreme anxiety when it is not working properly if even for a few moments. Netflix was down several weeks/months ago and I was furious that I couldn’t watch a show that I wanted to watch.

The more addicted we become to Facebook and online games the more money they make. Their goal in this sense to cause addiction on a massive scale. Have they already succeeded? I think they are well on their way. This attached article voices the opinions of several top Internet companies. Mr. Crab of Facebook said his concern was that people should live a balanced life. However, Facebook’s profits will increase the more that we do not live well balanced lives so his job goes against his greatest concern and that concerns me.

What You Need to Know About Social Media, Passwords and Transparency

While reading this article I began to think a lot about how it connects to the Filter Bubble. Polonetsky mentions that the most important issue to consider when it comes to customer privacy is “transparency.” If the data being aggregated by companies are used to benefit the users by some sort of improvement with the service offered, then users are completely ok with that. This is fascinating because while so much of society are trapped in a filter bubble, and may want to deviate away from its adverse effects, they willingly trapped themselves in there in the first place. Also when asked what the most overlooked issue is when it comes to businesses and customer privacy Polonetsky states that it is choosing passwords. I find his notion that users choosing poor passwords (ex: 1234, ABCDEF) are extremely vulnerable to hackers. And that using the same password for every site basically invites hackers into stealing your data. As Polonetsky mentions, strong consumer relationships are the determinants of success and I highly agree with him. If our relationships with companies are transparent, and companies are using our data responsibly with full disclosure, then this enables us the consumers to feel safe, but if otherwise, how can we truly trust the services we are using? Simply telling us that collecting our data to benefit us is not good enough of a reason to make users feel secure.

Article:
http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/226519

FBI Wiretapping Proposal

We have had wiretapping laws for telephones for decades, and now a new proposal has been in place for the FBI to be able to wiretap the “Digital World.” If legislation for the FBI being able to screen and monitor the activities on certain sites such as Google and Facebook, then this could mean serious business. A wide majority of users are daily users of these two sites, and while the FBI claims that it is imperative to be able to wiretap into certain high traffic sites in order to “aid them” in solving crimes, I have to disagree with them. We have to ask ourselves, what is the point of monitoring a couple of sites and services and not all of them? If FBI wanted to catch criminals, would criminals really be using Gchat or Skype of Facebook to plan their mischief? They could be using the most rudimentary online chat programs like AIM, or Yahoo Messenger, as oppose to the major services like Gchat. I also believe if this proposal was to go through, then the meaning of the world privacy would go out the window, as all of our activity will be transparent. And while transparency of companies is a good thing, perhaps this is a bit overboard, especially since this proposal wont aim to help us solve the problem of the filter bubble or privacy, and instead will create turmoil amongst the users of the internet. What are your thoughts on this proposal?

Article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/proposal-seeks-to-fine-tech-companies-for-noncompliance-with-wiretap-orders/2013/04/28/29e7d9d8-a83c-11e2-b029-8fb7e977ef71_story_1.html

Siri v. Google Now

Remember when the iPhone 4s came out, one of its innovative attractions was Siri. According to Apple, Siri is the intelligent personal assistant that helps you get things done just by asking. It allows you to use your voice to send messages, schedule meetings, place phone calls, and more. Siri understands your natural speech, and it asks you questions if it needs more information to complete a task. Along with an extensive marketable campaign, Siri became to many an astounding piece of technology to have on your phone at the time, but after using it a few times it kind of became slow and not as accurate as they made it seem on the commercials, it was a dud. Well that was then, now the competition is giving Siri a run for its money, as of today Google is giving Iphone users the option of a new app called Google Now. Google Now would  serve as the primary service that smartphone users rely on to get everything from weather updates to traffic forecasts. Google Now aspires to play an important role by helping users with daily chores such as looking up information on the Web, handling calendar appointments and managing travel plans, pretty much what Siri does but better. According to analysts, Siri posed as a threat to the Google, the information that Siri provides on common topics like nearby restaurants, sports scores and such reduces the need to use Google as a search engine, with that in mind the people at Google created Google Now. How it works is that the technology taps into Google’s various online services, from Web search to personal Gmail email and Google Calendar entries, to deliver relevant information throughout the day in pop-up windows that Google refers to as “cards.” Maybe this will give Apple an incentive to make some changed to improve Siri and come out with something new. Whether this is better option than Siri or not, it’s up to the public to decide, I know that I barely use the Siri on my phone but maybe I’ll give this new app a try. What do you guys think?

 

Reading for Tuesday, April 30

Just a reminder that tomorrow you should have read the following for class:

Lievrouw, Leah A. “Information Society, Description of.” Encyclopedia of Communication and Information. Ed. Jorge Reina Schement. Vol. 2. New York: Macmillan Reference USA, 2002. 430-437. Gale Virtual Reference Library.Web. 25 Apr. 2013.

Google Glass backlash and smartglasses

Google Glass has been a hot topic lately and many people have shown concern over the privacy and safety issues surrounding Google’s newest product. There is already a proposed amendment  out of West Virginia to ban driver’s from wearing the Glass and many businesses have already planned to ban people from wearing the Glass inside their establishments including casinos, movie theaters, and even some restaurants. There is also a campaign called “Stop The Cyborgs” which warns against using Google Glass because they see it as the end of privacy altogether and they have called on Google to put certain measures in place to make sure some damage control is done, including getting rid of facial recognition software. Google responded to the backlash claiming that people will eventually soften up to the idea and social norms will change to allow the Glass to be better accepted into society. I also recently read this article: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=google-glass-smartglass-competition which seems to predict that most people will be wearing the Glass within the next couple of years and that many different companies will be coming out with their take on the smartglasses. The article also mentions new applications for the smartglasses not just as the new cellphone for the average consumer but as a new tool for certain occupations such as the engineering, healthcare, and law enforcement fields. It even gives an example of a surgeon wearing the smartglasses while operating on their patient, which I find pretty frightening. Do you think that smartglasses will become the next big thing and improve the way we do our jobs and live our lives or will the issues of privacy and safety become too problematic?

 

 

Google’s Transparency/Subpoenas

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/26/google-transparency-report-2013_n_3163138.html

According to this article Google has been releasing transparency reports since 2010 to show the public how many times it has been given requests for censorship and by whom. This year has seen the most requests for removal of content and Google released a statement claiming that it was mostly due to the video titled “Innocence of Muslims” which caused a lot of tension in the Muslim world leading many countries with a large Muslim population to ask Google to either remove the video or Youtube itself. I think this transparency report is great and should encourage more transparency throughout the internet as the Filter Bubble’s last chapter suggested. What do you think about Google’s transparency reports and its agreement to work with governments to censor certain things in certain countries?

Under this article was a related video on the issue of subpoenas vs. warrants when it comes to law enforcement asking Google for access to our emails and even our Facebook messages and friends, which Google of course does not have access to. As of right now law enforcement agencies do not need to show probable cause to look through our emails, which means that they do not need warrants but simply subpoenas. Google is given the chance to deny the subpoenas and not hand over any information about you that it doesn’t want to. I find this troublesome but I am glad that Google is trying to push legislation that would change this practice of subpoenas and replace it with warrants. I also think that it is pretty ridiculous that certain law enforcement agencies would be ignorant enough to ask Google for your Facebook information. How do you feel about subpoenas vs. warrants when it comes to your Google accounts?

HW #3

I think that most of Eli Pariser’s solutions to get around the “Filter Bubble” aren’t practical or effective. I found the least practical solution in the section for what individuals can do. Pariser’s suggestion that each of us become more literate in algorithms does not seem like it would work for those that do not care for technology or perhaps aren’t even aware of the filter bubble to begin with. As he states “learning the basics of programming is even more rewarding than learning a foreign language”(228). While learning both has its rewards both take time and a lot of people either don’t have the time or the will to learn a new language either computer or foreign even if it’s just the basics.

I found the best solution to getting around the problem of personalization in the section on what companies can do. I think that filters “making their filtering systems more transparent to the public”(229) is a very good start to solving the problem. “Knowing what information the personalizers have on us” and explaining how the filters use the data they have on us is a good way to keep us involved in how the system works and how we can have it work for us rather than against us(232). I also think that the government should be involved in some kind of regulation of the filter bubble. The “do not track list” seems pretty ridiculous when it comes to the internet but there will come a point when the government will need to step in and give the people control over how the internet uses our information. Nobody should own our information and data but us.

HW3: The Solution

In “the Filter Bubble,” Eli Pariser addresses how serious personalization of the internet has become by tackling many levels of the issue, in which he reveals how people implicitly and explicitly provide and receive information. People have learned to enjoy the benefits and convenience of the services that large internet giants have provided them; even Pariser himself admits that he enjoys using Pandora, Netflix, and Facebook daily (218). However, these internet companies have strategically implemented several methods that have placed a constraint on the type of information that an individual can acquire and confiscating the opportunity for that individual to diversify his or her knowledge of the world.   Sadly, the same people who are receiving these services are the ones suffering the consequences.  Fortunately, in chapter 8, Pariser introduces several solutions to the issue regarding personalization, which has crippled information society for many years. He suggests ideas of what individuals, companies, governments and citizens can do in efforts to work cohesively and repair the damage that has been done.

Although many of his solutions are sure to be effective, none of them seem realistic to me. No matter what, people will always want to access the sites that they wish to access (because that’s just human behavior), companies want to generate as much revenue as possible and increase their market share by any means, and governments want companies to make large sums of money in order to contribute to the growth of their economies. However, out of the many solutions that he mentions, I found his solution of what companies should do to be his strongest argument. Pariser suggests that “the new filterers can start by making their filter systems more transparent to the public, so that its possible to have a discussion about how their exercising their responsibilities in the first places” (229). Companies need to be more transparent about the data that they acquire from their users and what they do with that data so that people understand how the system works. On page 230 Pariser compares the number of searches conducted via Google and Bing. He says that, although Bings algorithms are highly competitive with Google’s, people still tend to use Google more because the extraordinary number of people that trust Google’s services. Because of this, Google has an obligation to it’s users, in that it should inform them of its filtering systems.

I believe Pariser’s weakest suggestion is the one that he suggests of what the individuals should do. He mentions that people should “stop being a mouse” (223), meaning that they should explore different avenues of the World Wide Web instead of constantly following the same path. This is much easier said than done. There are TOO many people out there are ill-informed of the filter bubble. Also, no matter how cautious a person is, the algorithms will always be there, in which case, it is up to the new generation of creators to change the way the internet influences information society.