The power of blogging
I completely agree with Jay Rosen’s blog and how the once audience now has so many different powers of media at their hands. The media giants no longer have the power of putting out media that people are forced to settle on. The horizontal citizen-to-citizen transfer of media described in the blog is much more effective because it allows for a flow of subjective comments that lead to a widespread of factual opinions instead of the conventional objective reporting that the audience is used to. People now have the ability to relate to other bloggers about their opinions of the controversial media. In fact, there have been many instances where people completely disagree with the media’s projection of certain events and create their own reports of the stories.
A perfect example of this change in control is when Baruch students protested last Fall about the tuition increases. They used public demonstrations to educate New Yorkers about what was going on in the CUNY system and there were videos being uploaded everyday of students giving their opinions of tuition increases.
While reading this blog I couldn’t help but to disagree and think that Rosen was wrong and how the audience would always exist. The reason I felt this way is because people will always listen to the radio, watch breaking news on TV, and follow other sources of mass media because individuals don’t have access to the same information that media giants do. Then towards the end of the blog, Rosen made a connection to what I was thinking about and how people will always use mass media. He ended this connection by saying something that I believe sums up his entire argument. Rosen’s comment was, “But were not on your clock anymore.” This statement shows that people want the media to realize that they are not the only source of information, and as a result, the information they’re putting out there better be good.