Concert Review – Music of Philips Glass at New York Public Library

I went to a concert at the New York Public Library, the performing art branch at Lincoln Center. This concert is a tribute to Phillips Glass’s 75 years birthday. Mr. Glass is a contemporary composer who writes music in classical style, as well as music for movies. Some of the music played at the concert was originally written for orchestra or opera. Pianist Paul Barnes transposed them into piano music and performed at the concert. He and Glass have a lot of collaborations before.

The first pieces is “Trilogy Sonata”, a piano arrangement of Phillips Glass’s opera. The style is very different from a classical sonata such as Mozart’s, however, its progression between movements follows the same pattern. It starts with energetic opening in minor key, with left hand playing melody in chords and right hand playing arpeggiated chord. The chord brings out the theme melody, and is repeated several times. As the chord keeps the same motion, the right hands’ accompaniment changes. Then the second theme comes in as left hand’s melody changes, another line of music is added and the right hand’s accompaniment also creates another line of melody. Some variation of this melody is played and each phase within the variation ends with the same single note in high pitch. In the end, the music returns to the beginning theme.

The Second movement has a slow, lyrical start and keep the slow motion through the whole movement. The same chord progression is repeated for several times before the main melody finally comes in right hand. Same as the first movement, theme in the second movement is also very easy to catch. And the whole piece can be generalized as theme and variations.

The third movement is a dance movement in compound meter.  It starts with loud chord that has nothing to do with the theme, but just to catch people’s attention. Then left hand plays melody, and right hand repeats two notes very rapidly. The beat and rhythmic is very steady through out the whole piece.

The last movement returns to similar motion of its first movement just with different theme, but I feel the melody is not as beautiful but sadder.

The second piece is called “The Orphée Suite” with 6 movements. The first one, The Café, is in ragtime style, and gives you the feeling of a crowded café. Followed by Orphée’s Bedroom which is a very touching quite piece in slow speed. Journey to the Underworld sounds more mysterious, with minor chords and occasional dissonances. Orphée and the Princess has a very obvious chord progression, which I feel is usually used in movie music and is associated with love scene. And this kind of recognizable melody is called the Leitmotiv: brief musical idea connected to some person, event, or idea in a music drama. Returns to Orphée’s House sounds like people are running. While it’s in a minor key and chromatic, it gives a feeling that people are running from disasters. Although the whole piece is in the same tempo, the later half feels slower as the leading melody is in a slower rhythm. Orphée’s Return is also theme and variation, and these variations are in a pattern in which it gradually build up the climax is which both melody and accompaniment are played in very loud chore. with louder chord, however you still can easily recognize the main theme. Then comes the coda, and slowly notes drop down. It also shows the chromatic scale before it finally returns to tonic, the tonic note repeated several time.

The last movement, Orphée’s Bedroom –reprise: is in a lament mood, with the love Leitmotiv that you can still hear, and finally the whole piece ends in a quietly.

I really love this concert and enjoyed it a lot. Different from other classical music concert, this one is very easy to enjoy and you don’t have much knowledge to know what’s going on in the music. Anyone can recognize the theme easily, and the melody is similar to what you usually hear in movie background, so it’s very easily to let your imagination goes with the music.

Posted in Concert, Student Post | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Concert Review: Shaham and Lacombe

Last Saturday April 28, I went to see the New Jersey Symphony Orchestra conducted by Lacombe and featuring violinist Gil Shaham at the State Theatre in New Brunswick. The venue was built 90 years ago, and it was designed for both movies and live performances (vaudeville).  In spite of being seated at the gallery section, I was able to hear the music clearly just as those sitting at the front section.

Before the start of the program, the audience was given the theme of that night’s performance. The conductor mentioned the theme as the feeling of death and mourning for and by a loved one.  The featured program named lasted for two hours and included several musical pieces.

Conductor Lacombe got things going with Mozart’s Masonic Funeral Music which Wolfgang composed for two of his deceased Freemason colleagues.  The opus began with a funeral dirge, out of which emerged stringent chorale melodies that are interrupted by convulsive stabs of brass and jarring harmonic shifts, culminating in a relatively soothing finale.

Alban Berg’s violin concerto To the Memory of an Angel followed. The composer wrote this as a tribute to the life and death of a teenager named Manon Gropius, daughter of Alma Mahler, who died of polio at the young age of 18. The piece follows Schoenberg’s 12-tone system with a two-part movement: the Andante-Allegretto and Allegro-Adagio. Listening to the opus was very challenging.

Danielpour’s Kaddish for Violin and Orchestra  came out melodious sounding by comparison. The piece is a tribute to the composer’s father. The title refers to the Jewish prayer for the dead. It was written for violin and string orchestra, which came out as a surprise because there were no brass and percussion instruments to be heard. But the music came out as an extremely moving melody that captured the feeling of sadness.

Lastly, we listened to Prokofiev’s Symphony No. 3 in C Minor, Op. 44. It was written when the composer’s audacious opera “The Fiery Angel” ran into difficulties in production. It was based on a novel about demonic possession. Maitre Lacombe, being a ballet conductor, conducted this complex piece without using score sheets. On cue, the orchestra delivered a rousing performance.

It was a night to remember.

 

Posted in Concert, Student Post | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Concert Review: Shaham and Lacombe

Bargemusic: A Unique Experience on Water

I visited Bargemusic on May 5. It is a venue that I have known about since the fall of last year, but this was the first time that I went there. It is located right below the Brooklyn Bridge, on the Brooklyn side, by the Fulton Ferry Landing. Bargemusic offer concerts all year round, and it is conducted on a barge. Being on the water, it moved every once in a while, but according to the performers, it does move even more sometimes. Could you imagine a concert there on a windy and stormy night? I wonder if any concerts of their concerts are ever cancelled because of bad weather conditions.

Bargemusic offers free concerts every Saturday at 3pm, and the program is announced at the performance. The President and Executive & Artistic Director of Bargemusic, Mark Peskanov, opened with a story about Bargemusic’s history and its founder Olga Bloom, as well as other interesting details about the venue. Mr. Peskanov is also an award-winning violinist, and he kicked off the concert solo, playing one movement of a Bach prelude. The rest of the concert was performed by a combination of Peskanov, pianist Marie Wall, and singer Jane Libel. The pieces ranged from Bach to Debussy, along with a few French pieces, a few comical pieces in German and English performed by Libel and Wall only, as well as an aria from Mozart’s Il Re Pastore performed by the three of them, among other pieces.

I decided to review Claude Debussy’s “Clair de Lune,” which was performed by Marie Wall on piano. “Clair de Lune” by French composer Debussy (1862 – 1918) is one of his most popular pieces. However, it is not a separate piece by itself; it is one of the four movements in his Suite Bergamasque. The four movements of this suite are:

  1. “Prélude”
  2. “Menuet”
  3. “Clair de Lune”
  4. “Passepied”

According to Wikipedia, Debussy started composing parts of the suite in 1890, and he revised it until 1905 when it was published. The International Music Score Library Project (IMSLP) confirms the above information. Here is a nice YouTube clip of “Clair de Lune”:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlvUepMa31o

Marie Wall performed this piece excellently at Bargemusic. Her solo performance was very emotional, dynamic, and soft. The background behind her – the water and the Manhattan skyline – allowed the audience to daydream away to this peaceful music, like a beautiful sound-track to our daydreams.

On Youtube I also found guitarist James Edwards’ own version of “Clair de Lune”:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTJbLei7A2c

First of all, I love the visual representation of this version. It emphasizes the calmness of the piece. Both the music and the visuals are very calm and soothing. I picture this music as a part of a commercial, or a soundtrack to a movie. It makes me think of someone being confused, troubled, lost in life, or just in deep thoughts. As time goes on, and we move through the song, this imagined person finds peace with their situation, figures out a solution to their problem, and smiles.

Musically, this is also an excellently played version of “Clair de Lune.” I would love to see and hear the guitar version live as well, but one thing that really captured me when it comes to this video is the animation and how it emphasized the calmness of the piece. Overall, all three versions of this piece were well-executed and unique at the same time.

Bargemusic is a great venue; I recommend going to their Saturday free performances. You never know what to expect, since the program is not announced beforehand, but this could be exciting and spontaneous. Take a stroll by the water, check out the views, have some ice cream before or after the concert; it is a nice day-trip out there.

Finally, I’d like to end my blog by presenting another animated music piece, also by Debussy, in another both visually and aurally captivating presentation:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6s49OKp6aE

 

 

Posted in Concert, Student Post | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Concert Review: Quatuor Mosaiques

As I was searching for a performance to attend for my concert review under The New York Times classical concert list, what stood out to me was a string quartet performance by a group called Quator Mosaiques at the 92nd Street Y. Since I am currently taking Harmony 2, I thought this particular concert would be very helpful for me to observe for the very reason that I was working on composing my own string quartet.

Formed in 1985, Quator Mosaiques is formed by four talented individuals: from Austria, violinists Erich Hobarth & Andrea Bischof, violist Anita and from France, and Christophe Coin on the cello. As noted on the program and on various online resources, The Quatuor Mosaiques is known as “the most prominent period-instrumental quartet performing today.” This particular string quartet ensemble uses gut-stringed instruments, for which it receives many praises towards the group’s “unique sound”. What I found to be extremely interesting was finding out this performance was the return of this ensemble to North America after 10 years.

The performance took place in the Kaufman Concert Hall at the 92nd Street Y. The concert hall was fairly full, about 95% of the seats were filled. I couldn’t help but notice that I was probably one of the very few younger audiences attending this performance. The program consisted of 3 string quartet works. Starting with Franz Joseph Haydn, String Quartet in B-flat major, Op.76, No.4, “Sunrise” followed by Felix Mendelssohn, String Quartet in A minor, Op.13 and to wrap it up, Franz Schubert, String Quartet in A minor, D.804, “Rosamunde”.

From the three performances, my favorite was Felix Mendelssohn, String Quartet in A minor, Op.13. Already knowing that Mendelssohn created this String Quartet at such a young age was the main reason why I looked forward to listening to this piece the most. Mendelssohn created this amazing composition at the mere age of 18. To be so young and have this amazing talent to create music that went down in history is unbelievable. I have my uncertainties in possibly creating such a wonderful string quartet, but it was indeed very inspiring and motivated me to have fun with crafting my own string quartet.

Personally, I’ve found every string quartet that I have thus far attended absolutely amazing, especially this one. Translated, the name of the group means, Quartet Mosaic—a more than fitting name for a group that was truly colorful and beautiful to watch and listen to.

Posted in Concert, Student Post | Comments Off on Concert Review: Quatuor Mosaiques

Concert Review: Max Bruch is No Mozart

Attending this concert expecting to hear Mozart, I walked in with high expectations.  However, the show which was held at Brooklyn College’s Conservatory of Music with Conductor George Rothman featured performances of works from Mikhail Glinka (1804-1857), Max Bruch (1838-1920) and, going back a few years, G.F. Handel (1685-1759), in other words, no Mozart, due to some confusion.

The piece that I chose to focus on reviewing is Max Bruch’s (German composer) Violin Concerto No.1 in G minor where movements modulate from allegro moderato to adagio and finally to allegro energico.  During the performance, I remember this piece made me miss Mozart as I kept envisioning this work to be in the soundtrack to some Disney animated movie, maybe a pastoral scene – beautiful and pleasant to listen to, but predictable and uncomplicated.  In fact, having atonality in my mind from previous classes, I can honestly say that I wanted some atonality in my life after hearing Bruch’s Violin Concerto.  The texture was not dense enough for my liking and though it was in the key of G minor which I happen to be a fan of, it was still no substitute for Mozart.  On second (and third, fourth, etc.) listen though, the minor mode stands out to me much more than it did during the performance.  Maybe this is due to the instrumentalists themselves and how they portrayed the piece or maybe my surroundings sitting in the Walt Whitman Theatre but for whatever reason, listening to this piece after having seen it perform live, it’s less Disney, and I am grateful for that.  The third movement in it’s speedier tempo and brighter sound do still lend itself to Disney more than the first two movements.

I learned from the program notes that this Violin Concerto of Bruch’s was partially composed when he was a young man.  Though he began this composition as early as his teenage years, he didn’t complete it until he was 28 and by then resented it.  However, he was the only one it seemed, as the program notes also explain that Bruch had complained to his publisher Simrock that he was only receiving requests to play this first concerto when he had composed four.  “Every fortnight another one <German violinist> comes to me wanting to play the First Concerto; I have now become rude and have told them: ‘I cannot listen to this Concerto any more – did I perhaps write just this one?'”  A little touchy, no doubt, but everyone has their favorites and apparently people then, and now for that matter, are drawn to this first concerto of his.  Another reason why Bruch might be a bit aggravated by the several requests is because he made the not-so-savvy business decision to sell this piece for a one-time fee of $250, therefore not profiting from any royalties that would be due him which would be a hefty amount considering its quick rise to popularity among virtuoso violinists.  A shame for Bruch but if not the fortune, at least he got some fame.

 

Posted in Concert | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

To Be in an Orchestra…

This past Monday, I had attended a concert that was a part of the InterSchool Orchestras of New York Spring Concerts series. It was at the Peter Jay Sharp Theatre and the concert was performed by a few different orchestras.

I chose to go this concert because I wanted to see how the concert compared to the concerts that I had performed in when I was part of the chamber orchestra in my high school. It felt like since I had been a part of an orchestra, I was focusing on the orchestra a little bit more and on the music a little bit less. From the beginning when the concertmaster stood up to play the A string so that everyone else could tune their instruments so that they all resonated to the same pitches until the conductor and the orchestra took their final bows, I felt nostalgic from remembering the many times that I had been a part of that process.

Then one of the orchestras proceeded to play a piece that I had played when I was in my old orchestra. It was Mozart’s 1st movement of his Symphony No.25 in G Minor. Mozart’s reputation as a composer of many genres has been profound and everlasting and I finally realized it because of how I vividly remember how the piece sounded.

I remembered the first note being the most important of the piece because of how its accented trait sets the tone for the rest of the piece and the orchestra played it with a passion that satisfied my expectations. As the song went on, I turned my attention more to the orchestra on things such as how responsive the members were to their conductor, how they communicated between each section, and how the players in the back compared to the players in the front. I also remembered how the dynamics were vital in how the piece should be played. When the conductor gestured to the orchestra members to play in piano, they played as soft as possible and when the conductor wanted them to play in forte, they played with such ferocity that the hair on their bows would have fallen off. The finale was strong in that it ended the piece in a manner that was characteristic of the powerful playing of the movement.

The whole concert was pleasing from listening to live orchestras and reminding me of how much enjoyment there is in being part of an orchestra. I never had the chance to listen to another orchestra before so it was  an interesting feeling to see how I might have conducted myself when I used to perform in concerts.

Posted in Concert, Student Post | Comments Off on To Be in an Orchestra…

Review of Philip Glass’ Work

With the recent talk of Philip Glass and phase music, I had to find a review to read and see if I could understand what was so great about him and his work. I found a review written by Alex Ross titled “Number Nine.” It discusses the newest symphony Glass had composed as well as a look at his other notable works like “Einstein On The Beach,” Satyagraha,’ and “Music In Twelve Parts.”

Glass first starts to explain the genius behind “Einstein On The Beach.” He said, “It was a feeling of abstract intellectual delight, a pure interplay of musical and physical motion.” He also stated that some of his friends had told him that the opera had changed their lives. This certainly sparked my interest with what has already been discussed in class. I finally found some clips on youtube for the first act and I’m not too sure I get it. I do appreciate Glass wanting to do something different in the opera world. The main characters are dancers rather than a typical opera singer. The music is very repetitive and things move at a very slow pace. That part I get, but watching 30 minutes on youtube was a bear and the entire opera is about five hours and you do not get an intermission. That I do not get! The drones that are underneath the repeating three-note loop are as if someone is scratching their fingernails on a blackboard. They are incredibly annoying and made it difficult to focus on anything that may or may not be happening at a tortoise’s pace. Even Alex Ross said his first hour or so was difficult saying, “I felt a bit detached, as if watching a reenactment of lost culture.” For Ross, there was an “ah ha” moment that I couldn’t sit around listening and waiting to see if it would come. To me Glass is pushing the envelope of the listener’s tolerance and threshold of acceptance. Repetition and prolonging movement I think would bore the people that don’t really understand what Glass is doing musically, limiting your audience. I was very impressed at the dancers on stage having so much control over their bodies as they moved along the stage in slow and weird ways.

The title and the point of this article however was to honor Glass’ 75th birthday and mentioned Carnegie Hall recently played his 9th symphony for the first time on American soil. Alex Ross starts this section of the review stating, “Like many symphonists before him, Glass felt a twinge of unease as he approached the allegedly cursed No. 9—where Beethoven, Schubert, Dvorák, Bruckner, Mahler, and Vaughan Williams, among others, faltered….” I obviously don’t know music as well as Alex Ross but this was a weird statement to make based on the little I have learned about Beethoven and his 9th. Beethoven’s 9th was revolutionary and every composer after felt to, especially Wagner. Wagner felt that Beethoven ended symphony because there can be nothing better. But that is a moot point. I feel like Glass’ 9th is easier to take in and listen to. I found it somewhat interesting that repetition is still prevalent but there is much more movement and a faster tempo than “Einstein.” I agree with Alex Ross in that the structure is unpredictable and the harmonies a little hazy.

Overall the article made me want to explore Philip Glass so in that regard the press did its job. I did disagree with some statements as well as agree with others. Not a bad read and it will certainly expand your musical knowledge should you further investigate.

Read more http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/musical/2012/02/13/120213crmu_music_ross#ixzz1uOYcMiGx

Posted in Criticism, Student Post | 1 Comment

Music Review- NY Philharmonic, With Jaap van Zweden Conducting Yuja Wang, by Anthony Tommasini

I read an article by Anthony Tommasini in NY Times, regarding a concert held in April 12th by the New York Philharmonic. I was curious to see the comment about the Amsterdamborn conductor, Jaap van Zwedan, who was named the music director designate for the Hong Kong Philharmonic Orchestra, a local orchestra in my hometown. The concert program included Sergei Prokofiev’s Piano Concerto No. 3, by piano soloist, Yuja Wang, and Mahler’s Symphony No 1, which is one of my favourite symphonies.

In the review, Anthony Tommasini mentioned that it was a pretty impressive concert. Mr. Zweden, the music conductor of Dollas Symphony Orchestra since 2008, is a fast-rising conductor in recent years. He is an accomplished violinist, who later became a conductor.  Before Mahler’s symphony, pianlist Yuja Wang also did a great job on Prokofiev’s Piano Concerto No. 3, a neo-classical work. Yuja Wang showed extra-ordinary talent. She played this Prokofiev’s piece in swift mode and established the tempo of the piece. She punched the chord in steely sounds. Mr. Zweden gave her good backing, but rhythm details were little rushed. Tommasini preferred the version when Yuja Wang played with conducter of Claudio Abbado, because Abbado reined her speed such that her playing has a little more grance. In the Mahler, Mr. Zweden’s performance was emphati, especially the 3rd and 4th movement.

 Mahler composed his Symphony  No. 1 between 1884 until 1906. It was unsuccessful in the premiere. He was under a great stress due to that disastrous reception. The work played at that time, around 1889, was originally a five movement “Symphonic Poem”. It was later on edited to this four movement symphony. Anthony Tommasini mentioned that he associated the first movement with autumnal cast. I don’t agree with this because the first movement gave me a spring feeling, like a new beginning of the world. I listened to the Bernstein’s performance in YouTube video. I like the 3rd movement, which is a funeral march. It opened with the double bass solo, followed by bassoon and tuba. I like the alternation between the two themes and mood, the alternation of extreme sad and happy. Firstly, it was sad and slow, and then the mood changed to full of life, like in a circus.

 

Comment on this conductor is good. I would go to any of his concert in the future. Tommasini’s article: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/14/arts/music/philharmonic-with-jaap-van-zweden-conducting-yuja-wang.html?_r=1.

Posted in Criticism, Student Post | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Ab.So.Loot.Mus.ic

In Rich Atkinson’s criticism blog entitled “Finding Concrete Meaning in Absolute Music: Why?”, he discusses how some people are never content with just listening to a piece of music.  Many people want an explanation and want to believe that there is a driving force or emotion behind the music, even when that is not the case.

When dealing with absolute music, there is no meaning.  There is no specific program that the music is based off of.  It is solely music for music’s sake.  It is nonrepresentational of any one thing.  It’s purpose is for the listeners to take from the piece whatever they desire.  It is open ended and entirely subjective.  And this is where the problem lies for most people.  People are lazy by nature.  People like to be told what they are listening to and what they should be listening for.  People want to believe in something solid and concrete.  When things, in this case music, are left open for interpretation, it doesn’t sit well with listeners.

Another reason that absolute music is difficult for people to understand is because it is a relativly new concept.  Since the birth of music, there has always been a reason for it.  Whether it be for celebratory purposes or religious worship, music had a distinct purpose.  To go from music having purpose for hundreds and hundreds of years to then telling listeners that it can be whatever you want it to be is quite a shock to them.  Although I disagree with their desire to have meaning behind the music, I do sympathize with their closed minds and understand where they are coming from.

One piece of music he refers to is Tchaikovsky’s Symphony No. 6.  He says that this is a piece which can be considered highly emotional for the composer, but that that is not always the case.  When listening to the piece, one can certainly hear the emotion and the precision.  It starts off slow, as if he is reflecting on something, then builds to a brief outburst of brass and strings before returning back to slow strings.  It is a beautiful piece and makes me understand why people like to know that there is a reason behind the music.

However, in contrast to that, he refers to another piece, Carl Nielsen’s Symphony No. 1.  This is an entirely absolute music piece, but I would never know that.  It is composed lavishly and is extremely decadent.  Half way through, his use of strings, percussion, and brass give off a swirling sensation as if he were on a wild ride that slows down as all instruments fade and leave only strings, but picks back up again with more brass.  Just because Nielsen doesn’t provide a program for the piece doesn’t make it any less valuable or less credible than other works that do provide programs.  It is certainly one of the best compositions that I have heard and I believe it fairs right up their with Tchaikovsky’s Symphony No. 6.

No matter what, everyone is going to have their opinion, especially when it comes to music.  All we can really do is speak our piece, but not be close minded.  People should listen to and consider other people’s opinions before discarding them.  I believe we’ve come a long way as a society and an appreciation for absolute music should be much more common now than it was in the late 1800s.

 

Criticism

http://richatkinson.blogspot.com/2008/02/finding-concrete-meaning-in-absolute.html

Tchaikovksy’s Symphony No. 6

Nielsen’s Symphony No. 1

Posted in Criticism, Student Post | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Ab.So.Loot.Mus.ic

NY Philharmonic review

When I first entered Avery Fisher Hall to hear three works from the NY Philharmonic, I wanted to come in with a blank slate. I did not want to hear any of the works ahead of time because I wanted to be in the moment because it was my first time hearing the orchestra perform. The three works performed were Carnival, by Dvorak, Piano Concerto No 2 by Magnus Lindberg and Tchaikovsky’s symphony No 4 which was conducted by Alan Gilbert. Dvorak’s piece was the shortest at an estimated 10 minutes; Magnus Lindberg’s piece estimated around 33 minutes and finally Tchaikovsky’s piece estimated at 42 minutes. For my first time hearing the NY Philharmonic, I felt like a little kid in a candy store. I was glued to every moment. Interestingly, there was a composition by a composer who is still living to describe the piece he composed, but I will not discuss that piece although I thoroughly enjoyed it. There was one piece that spoke to me the most, and that was Tchaikovsky’s Symphony No. 4 movement 2.

Before I focus on the movement, I will give a brief biography of the work. Symphony No. 4 was composed from 1877-1878. It was written around the time he was involved with his patron Nedezhda von Meck. This symphony was dedicated to von Meck because Tchaikovsky used her as an inspiration for this symphony. The piece took him almost a year to compose because he stated he had trouble composing the first movement because it was “long and complicated.” He called the rest of the movements “very simple” and “pleasant to orchestrate.” The instrumentation of the work is two flutes, piccolo, two oboes, two clarinets, two bassoons, four horns, four trumpets, three trombones, tuba, timpani, triangle, cymbals, bass drum, and strings.

While composing the piece Tchaikovsky married someone then abandoned her. This caused the piece to be, as the program stated “put on hold”, yet Tchaikovsky still maintained his relationship with von Meck stating, “our symphony progresses.” What is unique about this piece is the fact that Tchaikovsky revealed the intent of his piece because von Meck asked what the piece meant. Since I am focusing on the second movement, I will explain the text that explains the movement. Tchaikovsky considered the piece to be “another phase of depression.” He also explained it’s the moment when a person “weary from labor, you sit alone, and take a book-but it fall from your hand.” This is very specific.

The Second movement is Andantino in moda di canzona and the key is b-flat minor. The oboe has a solo in the movement. The movement to me sounded like a conflict of emotions. In some parts of the movement is seemed to portray joy in other moments there seemed to be pain. It felt like a roller coaster ride. This to me shows how Tchaikovsky felt being with von Meck. The movement sounded like a journey. This piece is a prime example of a romantic work. It told a story that can be taken in many directions. Even though Tchaikovsky gave text, he still left some room for the imagination.

All in all my experience with the NY Philharmonic was the most pleasant experience I have ever had in a while. I would love to hear them perform other works.

Posted in Concert, Student Post | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment