Here’s the text of the recently passed New York Marriage Equality Act.
Author: rormsby
Envelope for Karen Brown at ref desk
As I will be out tomorrow, heading to the SLA conference that has some meetings on Saturday, I’ve left an inter-department mail envelope for Karen Brown in the spot at the reference desk where we leave envelopes to be picked up by others. I have emailed Karen about the envelope. Have a good weekend and week. Rita
BPL 5100 team building exercise
Several students in a BPL 5100 class came by the reference desk tonight. As part of a team building exercise, they have numerous items to locate, including a magazine with a page 36. It didn’t seem that a print out would be acceptable, although I didn’t inquire directly. I had a supply of old magazines in my office that satisfied the need. Some students had expected to be able to take a magazine out of the library. One inquired about ripping out the needed page, which was of course strongly discouraged. There may be other requests for a page 36 so I thought I would post this information.
New database: Mergent Bondviewer for Corporate and Municipals
Today, Mike Waldman has added Mergent Bondviewer to the Newman Library databases.
This database includes both U.S. corporate and municipal bonds. This is the first time we have had access to extensive municipal bond information online in the library. Bonds and notes are promises to repay money that has been borrowed with interest, at specific time periods. They do not convey ownership in a company or in a municipality. Active issues are those in which some debt is still outstanding. Inactive issues have been repaid.
There is very good help available on the database. I have learned the following from the help, and asking our vendor representative for details:
Corporate or Municipal Portfolios can be created to save search results. A maximum of three portfolio per email address can be saved at one time. Maximum number of issues in any portfolio is 200. Use Baruch email address to create portfolio.
Here’s a description for the library’s web page.
Includes active and inactive U.S. corporate bonds, municipal bonds, and retail notes, and offers ratings, historical pricing, summary of issue’s covenants and provisions, and portfolio tracking. Limited coverage through 1950; extensive coverage begins in 1993. To access, click on Enter Bondviewer. Use Baruch email address to set up maximum of three portfolios per email address. For individual companies, long term debt information also included in Company Details through Mergent Online database.
This information was provided by Mergent:
Right now there are roughly 273,846 securities going out to customers in the corporate database. There are about 2,659,445 maturities (around 278,352 total issues containing those maturities) for the muni side.
Corporate Issue Inclusion Criteria: the database includes publicly underwritten corporate securities issued in the United States: Yankees (U.S. dollar-denominated securities issued by foreign issuers), U.S. agencies, supranational securities, convertible bonds, Short, Medium and General Term Notes (Notes began in September 1993); high yield, adjustable rate securities, ESOP securities, underwritten exchange offer securities, equipment leased-back securities, strips (not secondary market derivatives); and mortgage-backed agency securities. In addition, Rule 144A issues (including non-U.S. dollar denominated securities) are included in the data base on a best-efforts basis.
The database does not track publicly traded bonds that are issued outside of the United States, including Canadian, foreign bonds or Eurobonds (securities registered in Europe, but issued by U.S. firms). At this time the database also does not include secondary insured remarketed bonds nor certificates of deposit; municipal securities, REMICs, CMOs, PASS-THRUs, PAY-THRUs or other Asset Backed securities.
Although the database does have some publicly traded bonds issued outside of the United States, we do not have a provider for this information. If we come across an issue of this type, and are able get the information, the security may be added to the database.
There are a handful of securities in the database from the late 1800’s through 1950. Limited coverage starts in 1950 with the number of securities representing each year thereafter growing almost exponentially. Extensive coverage begins in 1993.
Municipal bond coverage—which has not previously been available in any of our databases:
Municipal Bonds (Coverage of 2,659,445 bonds)
The following types of bonds are in Mergent’s coverage for Municipal Bonds:
All General Obligation Bonds including short and long term notes including taxable bonds
- All Revenue Bonds including short and long term notes including taxable bonds
- All Variable Rate Bonds including bonds which have a daily, weekly, monthly…etc reset. As well as Auction Rate, Floating Rate, Adjustable Rate and Index Linked Bonds. Coupons are not reported on Index Linked Bonds or Variable Bonds in the daily, weekly, monthly or adjustable modes.
- All Derivative Bonds on a best effort basis
- All Zero Coupon Bonds including Capital Appreciation, Deferred Interest, Compound Interest, Stripped Principal
- All Build America Bonds and Recovery Zone Economic Bonds (except for tax-credit bonds) including make-whole calls. (only for 2009 & 2010)
- Qualified School Construction Bonds (If not a Tax-Credit)
- Others – Certificates of Participation, Certificates of Obligation, Tax Anticipation Notes, and Bond Anticipation Notes…etc.
- Remarketed Bonds including Tender Data
- Hospital, Industrial, Serial, Term, Housing, Education, and Healthcare Bonds are in coverage
- New Issue Bond Program Bonds
- All Prerefunded, Unrefunded and Secondary Insurance CUSIPs.
The following types bonds are not in Mergent’s coverage for Municipal Bonds:
- 144A’s of any type
- Commercial Paper (unless there is a valid CUSIP)
- Qualified Zone Academy Bonds (QZAB).
- Any type of Bond which is only paid out as a Tax-Credit
- Bank Bonds
- Some Private Type Deals
Before I became a librarian I worked as legal assistant in a public finance department of a Minneapolis law firm so if you have any questions about municipal bonds, or other offerings, please let me know.
Audit Analytics as Source for Info on Company Executives, Board Members, Compensation
For a number of student projects, they are looking for compensation of executives and members of the board of directors. This information can be found on a number of our databases–historically on the Corporate Library, and searching proxies on Mergent, Edgar Online I-Metrix. Thomson Research, and the SEC site.
Audit Analytics is also a very good source for this information. You can search by public company name or ticker symbol. Under the Governance and Compensation tabs, you can locate the names, ages, positions of executives and board members, committees on which they serve, any other board(s) they serve on, and their compensation for attending board meetings (as well as their attendance record at such meetings). The source of the information is provided, such as the proxy filing, or an 8-K filing.
Changes in executives and board members are also indicated, with the source of the information, and the reason for the change. For example, this week I did a workshop in which I showed the students AEO, whose ceo recently announced his retirement and the head of the audit committee had submitted his resignation citing “too many commitments.”
Factiva’s Changes
Since May 1, Factiva has made some changes and improvements. Information is also found on the News Pages, in What’s new on Factiva.com, listed under Editor’s Links.
The availability of news in Arabic is one of the changes.
Report that Prof. Carmichael’s students need
Accounting students of Prof. Carmichael need the Missal Final Report regarding the New Century Financial Bankruptcy Investigation. The report, more than 500 pages, is posted on the website of the law firm in which Missal is a partner. I located it with a Google search, missal final report new century. There are articles on ABI/Inform, Business Source Complete and Factiva relating to the report and its impact.
New Century Financial restated some financial statements, filed for bankruptcy and emerged from it. Audit Analytics has some information and the SEC filings may be located on the SEC website. (Some databases remove filings of bankrupt companies and also remove the original filing after a restatement.)
Definitions of terms used in Edgar Online I-Metrix
I asked Edgar Online I-Metrix what “cross calculated” meant in their financials of companies, and this is what I learned:
a. Original – This is as the word says original data for the period.
b. Amended – Company updated the financials of a recently filed period by filing a 10Q/A or 10K/A
c. Preliminary – Data coming from 8K
d. Restated – This is flagged when a company updated financials for a historical period in a more recent filing.
e. Cross Calculated – More than one document is used to generate a particular period number. This is mostly the case with Cash flow statements for the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Qtrs as companies only report YTD numbers.
I hope this is helpful. Rita
Green Consumerism -new book and proposed new FTC guidelines
Tuesday night the Robert Zicklin Center for Corporate Integrity hosted the third panel discussion of the year of the Sustainability Practice Network. It was taped so it will be added to the digital collection.
It was a most interesting discussion, moderated by Jacquelyn A. Ottman, who also signed copies of her new book: The New Rules of Green Marketing: Strategies, Tools and Inspiration for Sustainable Branding. A copy of the book was donated to the library, and it will be added to the collection. Ms. Ottman has written extensively and consulted on “green marketing.” (We have her first book, from 1993.)
The panelists agreed that it is often difficult to know what questions one should ask about “green” goods. There are more than 400 separate certifications as to different products and goods. One panelist, a lawyer, works with the Better Business Bureau’s Advertising Review and Monitoring Services, which was a new service to me.
Also, I learned that the Federal Trade Commission has proposed new green guidelines.
Many Baruch students attended the program.
Interesting 9th Circuit ruling re trademark infringement lawsuit involving Internet keywords
Findlaw.com has a recent finding by the 9th Circuit court regarding a case in which a company purchased keywords including a competitor’s trademark for Internet searches. Here’s a summary, based on the information found on Findlaw.com
“Network Automation (“Network”) and Advanced Systems Concepts (“Systems”) are both in the business of selling job scheduling and management software, and both advertise on the Internet. Network sells its software under the mark AutoMate, while Systems’ product is sold under the registered trademark ActiveBatch. Network decided to advertise its product by purchasing certain keywords, such as “ActiveBatch,” which when keyed into various search engines, most prominently Google and Microsoft Bing, produce a results page showing “www.NetworkAutomation.com” as a sponsored link. Systems’ objection to Network’s use of its trademark to interest viewers in Network’s website gave rise to this trademark infringement action.”
“The district court was confronted with the question whether Network’s use of ActiveBatch to advertise its products was a clever and legitimate use of readily available technology, such as Google’s AdWords, or a likely violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114. The court found a likelihood of initial interest confusion by applying the eight factors established more than three decades ago in AMF Inc. v. Sleekcraft Boats, 599 F.2d 341 (9th Cir.1979), and reasoning that the three most important factors in “cases involving the Internet” are (1) the similarity of the marks; (2) the relatedness of the goods; and (3) the marketing channel used. The court therefore issued a preliminary injunction against Network’s use of the mark ActiveBatch.
Mindful that the sine qua non of trademark infringement is consumer confusion, and that the Sleekcraft factors are but a nonexhaustive list of factors relevant to determining the likelihood of consumer confusion, the 9th Circuit “concludes that Systems’ showing of a likelihood of confusion was insufficient to support injunctive relief. ” Therefore, the 9th Circuit vacated the injunction and reverse and remand (sent it back to the lower court.)