DanielKNewMedia

https://soundcloud.com/user-621648856/audio-remix-daniel-k

The documentary named “RIP: A Remix Manifesto” directed by Brett Gaylor, a Canadian filmmaker, primarily made it’s focus clear around the word culture. During the rise of the internet copyright infringement rose right beside it, and although people began to collect large amounts of new data, those who attempted to recycle any of began to receive backlash with the law. The documentary, mostly focusing on earlier Hip-hop DJ’s who sampled different sounds and later made a hobby and living out of it, describes how some people dealt with the problems of copyright. The “manifesto” that is stated in the title is shortly summarized in four key points. Firstly, “culture always builds on the past.” Second, “the past always tries to control the future.” Third, “our future is becoming less free.” And lastly, “to build free societies you must limit the control of the past.”

As the film stated, while artists began to acquire the knowledge and works that came from the internet, the law saw it as a huge market – easy money that can come from people who infringe upon the laws set in place. In my point of view, the manifesto described in the film answers all the questions that a person might have in regards to the culture of sampling and DJing.  As a huge source of information, the internet, with all of its uses, should not be limited to people who use it in their own artwork. Although the latter is difficult to specify, it is not hard to realize that in order to preserve, recycle, and learn from historic and cultural works people need to have the permission to do so without being in a constant state of fear of paying the fines. It is vital to add that the process of recycling someone else’s work and coming up with your own original work is the only way to give respect to the previous works and use it to your own advantage and original ideas.

In response to the third idea of the manifesto, “Our future is becoming less free”, it’s backbone still stands today. While net neutrality under our former president was made to make all internet traffic shared and used equally, it seems to be coming to an end with internet service providers being able to legally start charging people for their services. There is a strong connection to the third idea of the manifesto and today’s appeal process of net neutrality.

 

As the most difficult reading assigned in this class this semester, I chose a more specifc subject that Benjamin wrote about that I seemed to understand. In the 20th century, the author explains the difference that process reproduction and mechanical reproduction had in the visual world. Process reproduction, for example, was able to capture things that were not clear to the eye but only clear to the lens of a camera. What was missing was something that mechanical reproduction, or something man-made, was not able to reproduce. Although the author writes a lot about process reproduction, he goes in to say how big of an impact mechanical reproduction has had even in our modernized age. Where mass consumption was the leading factor in changing the way we perceive visual art, mechanical reproduction led to the loss of “aura”, as Benjamin explains. I find it interesting that during the time that the author’s work was published, it became so relatable in today’s world. The aura that he speaks of refers to the originality or “loss of authority” in the works of today’s artists. Because we are fed so much visual inspiration it had led us to become decepted in the way we perceive new works of art. In my opinion, if an individual takes a look at a piece of work made by a person living in today’s time, that individual will be able to pinpoint (hypotheticaly speaking) the thousands of different ways that the artist gathered this visual aid from. Adding on, the author’s comment of ritual and originality in the way of challenging mechanical reproduction was interesting. He comments on the fact that ritual, or where the story was made in regards to the work of art, is what truly holds its originality no matter how well it was reproduced. This helps us understand that no matter if the aura is lost due to the loss of originality, we find a different world where we give a different type of perception or meaning when we take a photograph. I think the essay is really important in today’s world due to the fact that we seem to lack originality because of all of the inspiration that we are surrounded by.

 

The last paragraph on page 63 left me wondering how accurate the author’s description of today’s world was. The feeling of setting your energy into one place and closely acquiring information is long gone. Personally, I blame not only myself for recognizing information mostly through pattern recognition, but also the frightening internet culture that has immersed us into thinking that information comes in such a spacial manner. No longer can people dwell on the information that had been given to them before they are handed another piece of information, still not getting to the bottom of the former.

Thank you for using Blogs@Baruch!

This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start publishing.

You are using a new WordPress theme that places widgets such as “Recent Posts,” “Recent Comments” and “Archives” in the footer, leaving you maximum space for publishing in this central area. If you prefer to have widgets on the right side of this page, these can be added by going to “Widgets” under the “Appearance” tab in your Dashboard. You can also choose from more than 100 other themes from the “Themes” menu in the Dashboard.