Group A: Close Reading Post

Phosphorescent’s music video entitled Songs For Zula encaptures the experiences of love and heartbreak. They describe this seesaw of a relationship as “cage like;” something that is impossible to escape. The scene holds a meagerly dressed woman hostage in a setting that looks like one out of the stone age. At the same time, you can tell that this scene is filmed from a modern perspective but relates back in time.  This relationship is intended to show that these feelings of love and despair relate back to as far as we can imagine in time. “See the cage, it called. I said, come on in. I will not open myself up this way again.” This quote reflects the scene in totality. The woman is bound by chains and is trying to break through in ways a barbarian would only know; to smash them with stones. She is stuck, as if she is caged with no escape.

The second part of this lyric, “I will not open myself up this way again.” Is reflected in the same scene but uses the same activity for a different meaning. The woman is trying to break her shackles, but at a point you realize that she is not determined to completely break free. Once she breaks free she will have to open herself up again, and that is something she is unsure of. Although she feels as if this relationship of love and heartbreak is impossible to escape, she still has to decide. Will I break free or will I remain in this cage? The choice she ultimately makes is to break free. Not escaping this feeling, but starting anew.

Youtube Link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPxQYhGpdvg

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Group A: Close Reading Post

F1 Paper Assignment

F1- Paper

In this first assignment I ask you to think about how the literary can help us think through the real. Ultimately the assignment requires that you identify in (or infer from) Frankenstein some theory about youth, adolescence, growth, development, monstrosity, or a related theme. I then ask you to use (apply) this theory to help us think through a contemporary depiction of the monstrous adolescence. This assignment has two parts:

In this first part you will use specific parts of the novel in order to pose a theory about adolescence and monstrosity.

In order to pose a theory, you need specific textual evidence to show us how you are deducing this theory from the novel.   If you do not show where in the text your ideas are coming from, you cannot receive full credit.   The best papers will be very specific in their claims and in their use of textual evidence. This means that a good paper won’t just say that the novel purports that ambition in the young becomes monstrous (with general references to when Frankenstein is ambitious).   A good paper will look specifically at how the scenes in which Frankenstein’s ambitiousness seems monstrous and take note of how the narrative always includes some description of how Frankenstein has become disconnected with nature. The good paper will walk its readers through this pattern (with specific examples), and then the good paper will posit what it is that makes connection to nature so important (in the narrative—not just to the author of the paper). You might notice that the most important part of nature is the changing of the seasons (maybe someone else might think it’s the presence of sublime beauty).   The good paper will then argue that ambitions that isolate the developing youth from nature and it’s important shifts in seasons puts the developing youth at becoming monstrous. And the best paper will do all of this, but it will also offer some specific definition of what it means to be “monstrous.”

The second part of this paper requires that you use this theory to think through a contemporary (within your parents’ life time) depiction of a monstrous youth. For instance you might find an article about the Littleton shootings, which describes the youths as mostly into computers and video games and disconnected with exercise, the outdoors, or what was going on around them. You might highlight the way the same article connects this isolation from nature to the youth’s desire to pain their faces white and their nails black and to look monstrous. Your Frankenstein theory can help us take note of the fact that even though there is no solid causal connection between playing video games and painting one’s face white, the author of this article makes such a connection relying on the unspoken assumption about relationship between nature and healthy development that we can see interrogated in Frankenstein.

Important: For this part of the assignment you must choose a specific text, depicting a juvenile monster. You are not describing the event or applying the theory to prove anything about the event. What you are doing is using the theory to think about the way we think about and the way we imagine monstrous growth. Your text may be a news article, photograph, song, poem, video, etc. The only thing to keep in mind is that in the same way you had to use specific examples to derive the theory from Frankenstein, you must also use specific examples in this text to show how we can see that theory at work in this contemporary text.

Formatting: This paper should be double spaced, 1-inch margins and 12 point Times New Roman font with page numbers and your whole name listed in the footer. While there is no set rule, I imagine that you might spend 2-3 pages on establishing the theory in Frankenstein and 2-1 pages applying that theory to your reading of another contemporary text.

F1-Paper Grading Rubrics:

Argument Articulation

Do you clearly state what the theory is that you are deducing from the novel? Are you clear about how this theory helps us think through the contemporary text?

Engaging Texts

Did you use specific examples to articulate the theory you see emerging in the novel? Do you explain how those examples put together get us to the theory you see in the text? Did you use specific examples to show us how the theory applies in the contemporary text? Do you explain how we should read the quotes in a way that shows the theory at work in this contemporary text? Do you use proper citations?

Language

Do you use clear, complete, and active sentences? Do you adhere to rules of capitalization and correct punctuation? Do you spell words correctly?

Structure

Are your introduction and conclusion focused and doing more than warming up and cooling down. Do you present your points clearly and in a strong, productive order?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on F1 Paper Assignment

Comparative Blog Post Group C

Often times in society people become what we label them. Frankenstein’s monster was born without sin, an innately innocent being. His grotesque form is what the people around him see, and that is the only thing they choose to accept. He is chastised despite his inner feelings and slowly fits the mold created for him by society. Within him is this constant struggle of whether he should do the right thing, in his mind, or if he should succumb to the stereotypes of being a monster. There are points were the beast takes over, such as when he kills those around him, William Frankesnstein, and Elizabeth Lavenza.
The aspect I specifically want to talk about is how the Monster conformed to the stereotypes he was given. In this regard a comparable character would be Severus Snape, from Harry Potter. Since the time Snape was a child he was made fun of for his greasy hair, long nose, and dirty clothing. He was never given the opportunity to show the goodness within him. At school he was cast into the dark arts, drawn in by this sense of power they seemed to hold. A power that he had never had. It created the farce of respect from his peers when really it was fear. However, if it hadn’t been for the torment of the other children he never would of gone to the dark side. With his dying breath he shows Harry how all he ever cared about was his mother, Lily.
Both the Monster and Snape never have a fighting chance. They are cast in their roles and no one gives them the chance for their potential to come out. No one gives them the opportunity to show that they are not monsters, but human, just like those around them.

Shelley, Mary W, and Marilyn Butler. Frankenstein, Or, the Modern Prometheus: The 1818 Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994. Print.

Rowling, J.K.. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. New York: Scholastic, 2007. Print.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Group B – Comparative Post

Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein depicts  monstrous character that is created and represents the monstrous emotions that can develop in the humans: more specifically adolescence. The vile Frankenstein causes his creator, Victor’s death and tries to justify his actions. He goes into a long account of his mistreatment by all humans, despite his honorable intentions. It was extreme; all humans not only hated him, but they screamed in horror at his sight. They attacked him. If that was not enough, even when he saves a child, he not only isn’t that, he is attacked as gratification. He says:

“…Once I falsely hoped to meet with beings who, pardoning my outward form, would love me for the excellent qualities which I was capable of unfolding I was nourished with high thoughts of honour and devotion. But now crime has degraded me beneath the meanest animal.”(Page 165)

Victor’s creation can be thought to represent an adolescent in the extreme sense, that has been severely neglected, perhaps even oppressed or abused. In a related article about parental neglect and violence in boys, the author quotes:

‘One of the problems with studying neglect is that it is an act of omission, rather     than  one of commission. In other words, it is characterized as the absence of an  act,       rather than an actual act of mistreatment,” says William McGuigan, associate professor of human development and family studies at Penn State’

I believe this applies to the monster created by Victor. Victor, the “father” has clearly neglected the monster and never accepted him, nor does anyone else.  The monster, larger than a young boy, and much more hideous, is innocent and seeks love and acceptance like young people. He receives none of that. The monster puts greater emphasis by the neglect by the creator than that of strangers. The monster can be seen more as a violent teen who is acting unacceptably than that of an adult with a conscience. When Victor denies the monster a creation to parallel him, the monster becomes angry and destructive and does not care for the innocent people he attacks. The monster attributes all his actions to the neglect by people, but more so by his creator, which he places blame to which he returns with proportional havoc. This is similar to an adolescent who often feel neglected by the parents. The adolescent may not directly attack their parents, but will be violent to others.

“Society and Culture.” Futurity. Web 2015.

Neglected boys are more likely to be violent teens

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Comparitive Blog Group C

Much of Frankenstein tells a story of brooding angst in the years of adolescence. A loneliness is present within his own family. “I closed not my eyes that night. My internal being was in a state of insurrection and turmoil; I felt that order would thence arise, but i had no power to produce it,”(Shelley digital Chapter 4 p. 482). Victor is shown to have recurring unhappy thoughts that he himself cannot explain. While Victor creates an actual physical monster, he himself represents one that society would label as “monstrous” as he is pigeon holed in a social construct that prevents growth. Victor would appear to lead a perfect life, as his parents are both relatively happy and healthy as he is himself. However, Victor ‘ s hatred for his parents is deep rooted and complimented by his parent’s sharing a love that he feels omits him. This is a concept in which many teenagers feel, they feel as though they are an object of love as opposed to being an actual participant.

The suicide of Leelah Alcorn is one that is relevant to the arc of Victor’s story. Leelah was a Transgender teen (born Joshua Alcorn) living with Christian parents who were extremely critical of her lifestyle choices. She took her own life by stepping in front of a tractor trailer truck. In a way, Leelah’s uncontrollable feeling of being a “woman trapped in man’s body” was a discovery that made her quite happy. However, her parents wrote her off as going through a phase. This is quite similar to Victor’s ark, as Leelah is excluded from her parent’s love and understanding. As Lellah describes, her parents made no attempt to form an actual understanding of why or how she felt this way.

As such, her mother had only sent her to Christian therapists who would tell her she was wrong while ignoring her emotions. Because of her decision she was punished, in turn  illustrating a severe lack of understanding also present in Victor’s arc. Leelah stated that her reason for the suicide was that she felt a loneliness within her own family, a loneliness that allowed Victor to create the monster that eventually ended his life.

Source:

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2014/12/transgender-teen-commits-suicide-cites-christian-parents-in-blog/

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Comparative Post: Group C

Reading Frankenstein, the constant theme of monstrosity shows up throughout the novel. However reading the scene where William is murdered and Justine is accused of murdering him, brought about the thought that knowledge itself can be a monstrous thing and is also dangerous. A chain of cause and effects, it was the forbidden knowledge of bringing inanimate objects back to life which created this monster Frankenstein – which led to the death of his beloved brother and the death of Justine. However in Justine’s case, it was the knowledge of the locket in her possession which caused her to be tried. This knowledge which led to assumptions led to the unfortunate fate of Justine. It is also this knowledge of Justine possessing the locket which brought fear into her own “friends” and caused them to turn into monsters themselves. “Several witnesses were called who had known her for many years, and they spoke well of her; but fear and hatred of the crime of which they supposed her guilty rendered them timorous and unwilling to come forward.”

Although not recent, this entire scene/incident reminded me of the Salem witch trials. How many innocent people were accused due to the fear that were instilled into them from the knowledge of “witchcraft.” How friends easily turned their backs on one another due to assumptions, he said/she saids, and how the accused just MIGHT be guilty. This led to many innocent people being hanged and the hysteria of witches/witchcraft brought out the monsters in everyone.

http://www.history.com/topics/salem-witch-trials

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Comparative Post Group C: Rejection

Throughout Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein”, the element of monstrosity and rejection is clearly evident by the creation himself.

“I was seized by remorse and the sense of guilt, which hurried me away to a hell of intense tortures, such as no language can describe (Chapter 9, page 101).”

Due to the lack of social acceptance, Frankenstein inhibits a theme involving self-loathing.

Although we may fail to notice, society has an enormous impact on how we as individuals view others and especially ourselves. Up until recently, gay culture has been extremely frowned upon, especially in rural and religious areas. Traditional views failed to accept the concept of liking one of the same sex, making it even harder for those of the gay community to accept their internal differences.

Unable to feel comfortable in their own skin, many gays have faced hardships of being “rejected or ignored due to his age and body type. [They] saw [their] community, and [their] life, as a dark and empty place devoid of light and love.”

Through just two sentences, many gays can relate to individuals who endure self-loathing and social separation. How society judges a type of people can create these emotional and psychological scars which lead to self-harm and hate. Individuals begin to fear. Not only of judgment, but of others and even themselves, depicting themselves as monsters. Full of insecurity and shame, much like Frankenstein, they question why their existence was created, and fail to find happiness or purpose.

Frankenstein and gay communities both fail to achieve real acceptance from society, thus resulting in only hating themselves and promotion of violence, whether it is abuse from outsiders or self-harm.

 

“Healing the Gay Community.” Huffington Post. Web. 16 Feb 2015.<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joel-readence/healing-the-gay-community_b_4591782.html>.

Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft. Frankenstein. Charlottesville, Va.: U of Virginia Library, 1996. Print.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Comparative Post Group C- The Counterculture

“Cursed be the day, abhorred devil, in which you first saw light! Cursed (although I curse myself) be the hands that formed you! You have made me wretched beyond expression. You have left me no power to consider whether I am just to you or not. Begone! Relieve me from the sight of your detested form.’”

This quote from Frankenstein takes place during the scene when Victor Frankenstein sees the monster he created after the murder of his brother. He is equal parts horrified at his creation and horrified at the fact that it was he himself who has created such a monster.

The excerpt I chose reminded me of a documentary I once watched on PBS about the counterculture movement of the 1960’s. It described how the  the young adults participating in the movement were participating “the age of selfishness, anti-authority”. To me, this reaction is remarkably similar to Frankenstein’s horror at what he created in his monster. Parents of adolescents who were politically active in the 1960’s were horrified at what their children were becoming–wild, unrecognizable, uncontrollable and weird, it was a real-life Frankenstein situation. In that sense, it was a very real disgust over one’s “creations”, and it changed history.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75p0EOzowpw

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Comparative Post Group B – Conforming to Society’s Standards

Shelly’s “Frankenstein” brings up an important issue that many of us sadly may have succumbed to some point in our lives and that is the idea of wanting to be accepted by the majority. Whether it is among your peers in school, your coworkers, or even your family members, there has been some moment where we hide a part of our true character so that we are not ostracized. However what happens when you’re shut out just because your appearance does not conform to the majority’s standards? You’re not given the opportunity to prove yourself a capable member of society because you were judged too early. These are feelings that the monster in Shelly’s Frankenstein knows too well.

“As yet I looked upon crime as a distant evil, benevolence and generosity were ever present before me, inciting within me a desire to become an actor in the busy scene where so many admirable qualities were called forth and displayed (Shelly 132)”. The monster, in this point in time, yearns for becoming a normal member of society and that if given the opportunity to prove his gentle character than he may be accepted. Yet when he is rejected, he becomes angry and vengeful against Victor for creating him the way he is. This reminds me of the bullying cases that are common today where some kids and teenagers who are teased are pushed to commit heinous crimes. For example the Virginia Tech shooting that occurred in 2007.

“There was none among the myriads of men that existed who would pity or assist me; and should I feel kindness towards my enemies? No; from that moment I declared everlasting war against the species, and more than all, against him who had formed me and sent me forth to this insupportable misery (Shelly 142).” Just like the monster who turned his back against humanity for his rejection, it was said that the shooter of the Virginia Tech massacre, Cho, did the same after being bullied. Both faced the masses with defects that were utilized by others to criticize them and as a result it fueled their rage against humanity. The monster’s defect was his outer appearance and Cho’s may have been his unstable mentality, which led him to be perceived “as a near-silent loner who wrote gruesome poems, stories and plays (”Seung-Hui Cho”)”. Unlike the monster which exhibited to be in control of his emotions, enough so to demand from Victor a mate so that his days in solitude would end the same cannot be said for Cho. Sadly, Cho was pushed beyond the brink and committed a massacre that will remain forever in U.S. history.

 

“Seung-Hui Cho.” Bio. A&E Television Networks, 2015. Web. 15 Feb. 2015

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Comparative Blog Post Group C

In Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein,” one of the underlying themes is the element of monstrosity. When Victor first brings his ‘monster’ to life, it can be argued that it is not yet a monster, it is merely a creature, who appears physically different from everyone else. As he becomes alienated and ostracized from society, he then begins his descent into monstrosity as he starts to perform horrific acts. It can be argued that Frankenstein is only a monster because he is treated like one, and that if he was showered with the love and admiration he desired, perhaps he would not have terrorized society as he did. By the end of the novel, it is apparent that he views himself as a monster as well, when he says,
“I, the miserable and the abandoned, am an abortion, to be spurned at, and kicked, and trampled on.”

This reminded me of Tyrion Lannister, a character in George RR Martin’s acclaimed fantasy series, “Game of Thrones.” Tyrion is the son of one of the most prestigious families in the land, who was born an imp. Because of his grotesque disfiguration, he never receives the love and respect he longs for. His own father tells him how much he disgusts him, and Tyrion eventually begins to see himself as a monster. All of this hate and animosity eventually leads Tyrion to murder his own father.

There are many parallels that can be drawn between these two stories. Both characters started out with good intentions, but were drawn to act out in despicable ways when everyone treated them as if they were monsters. That led them to become exactly what everybody expected them to be. While Tyrion has the advantage of prestige and wealth on his side, that proves insufficient because all the money in the world cannot buy him his father’s love.

Martin, George R. R. A Game of Thrones. New York: Bantam, 1996. Print.

Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft. Frankenstein, Or, The Modern Prometheus. London: Penguin, 2003. Print.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment