-
Recent Posts
- Truthfulness, Transparency and Incentives: Making Financial Reporting More Honest
- What are affecting earnings quality
- HK opens doors to Chinese Accounting Standards
- Mind the GAAP
- SOX Section 404 - is it really effective ?
- Are Foreign Issuers Shunning the U.S.?
- Sarbanes-Oxley: A price worth paying?
- Value is in the Eye of the Beholder
- Sarbanes-Oxley: A Price Worth Paying? - Sumesh
- The Sarbanes-Oxley Act-Is it Worth Paying the Price?
-
Archives
-
Meta
Author Archives: vincent.yu
Posts: 1 (archived below)
Comments: 0
Lucy vs. Charlie Brown
Lucy sets the ball.
Charlie Brown goes to kick the ball.
Lucy snags the ball away.
“Oh, good grief!”
Does this remind us of Wall St. vs. Main St.?
As long as there is a “Lucy” to present an opportunity, there will always be a “Charlie Brown” to fall for it. Similarly, there will always be increasingly complex derivatives and people to invest in the derivatives. It’s only human nature.
Humans learn from time to time, however, just when we do, something new comes along to deceive us. Nowadays, investment banks are hiring lawyers for the sole purpose of drafting ever-complex financial derivatives.
What’s the problem? Well, how do you value a contract that the salesperson doesn’t even understand? And if the goal is profit, where’s the incentive to be truthful? This poses a tremendous problem when recording long-term assets. Sure more regulation would be nice, but how likely is this going to happen?
At least conservative buy-side analysts are on our side, right? Good grief.