The overall goal of the MVP was to gauge what demographics found the most value in my product Campus Connection Service, and receive any feedback toward improving my venture. But before I sent out my ads on snapchat and facebook, I knew I wanted to make the changes that were suggested by my classmates. I changed my landing page to fit a cleaner, simpler feel for the audience. I fixed the sponsor typo, I reduced the images from four to one, I gave the landing page a simpler background, I eliminated the “about us” tab and fit it onto the landing page, I added the word experience to our tagline, and finally, I changed my service name from ScoopU to the Campus Connection. I felt that the new name change gave the business a new identity, one that is more geared toward taking a serious stance toward helping non traditional students.
I am glad that I did keep some extra tabs on the landing page, (I was suggested to make it fit all on one page” because it helped determine Campus Connections interest through its bounce rate by seeing if users were interested enough they would click on other pages to learn more about the site. As for my metrics for my ads, I used very similar categories to determine if Campus Connection sparked the interest I thought would entice certain demographics. The age range I selected for both platforms was 17-24 years old, Interests in “college, university, volunteer/service, freshman (both did not have a category for transfer students), international students, and high school students”. I confined both geographical areas to mainly the United States, and targeted toward both genders. My Snapchat goal was for Swipe-ups (S/U) and for facebook was traffic.
My Predictions:
My hypothesis from snapchat were pretty general theories that i would receive heavy amounts of traffic and a smaller percentage of clicks primarily from late teens i.e 18 or 19 years olds, that were females and international students. I thought that my Campus Connection service would be saturated in main metropolitan areas due to the fact that commuter schools are usually associated with more options, resources, and fast paced living which would require the need for sponsors to ease some of the stresses that could resolve that high level of saturation that come with city colleges.
What I got wrong:
I was surprised by some of the results I received from both platforms. First off, Males were the predominant gender interested in the promotion. Secondly, my prediction of high traffic coming from populated cities was incorrect. Most of my traffic came from Georgia and Texas. What this means is that perhaps more research on my part needs to be done to ascertain why these geographic areas demand this service more than metropolitan areas. Perhaps I need to test hypotheses surrounded around certain Universities with larger spread out campuses and emphasises on specialization around college sport teams or unique majors.
What I got right:
My predictions on Campus Connections age range being geared toward a younger demographic and focused on high schoolers that were incoming freshman, was spot on.
What I would have done differently:
Although I feel pretty secure about CC value for high school students entering college for the first time, I didn’t get much information from incoming students and transfer students. The transfer students demographic was neglected mostly because the category “transfer student” was not a category on either platform. However, for the category section, I could have added “Collegiates” and more family orientated sectors such as “moms”, “dads”, “moms of students”, “dads of students”, “Parents”, and related categories. This was actually an idea brought to me during a conversation I had with a snapchat representative from their California headquarters. For more information on the advice I had from talking to her, click here. I also would have made separate ads, one targeted to international students and for transfer students. For international students, I would have increased my geographic reach to further than just the U.S, especially considering that I restricted both snapchat and facebook to just the U.S, and I received small indications of interest in India and Ireland.
Conclusion:
Overall I still think that Campus Connection still holds a lot of value for its customers, but I would need to definitely need to segment and realize my value proposition to better analyze results from the metrics I get from different platforms. I will admit that although i found this particular assignment one of the most intimidating so far, I believe that in all of my academic career, I have found it the most rewarding. The ability to gauge a venture or idea by using ad manager platforms, is something that is accessible to everyone and yet not many people I know who are business majors know about it. As an associate starting a new position in Ad Sales and marketing in July, I would have felt at a huge disadvantage if I did not know about the advantages provided by these platforms. I want to learn more about these marketing capabilities to see how constructive they have been for former small businesses that have become well known successes today.
Snapchat Ad Experience and Metrics
I ran the ad attached below on ad.snapchat.com
I used Canva.com and used one of their preset snapchat templates to modify my original ad to fit the parameters that best suit a snapchat vertical ad. I ran the ad for 5 days starting on April 20th, ending on April 25th, with a total budget of $30 thus allowing $6 a day of promotion. Snap chat provides three categories of results 1) Paid impressions 2) Swipe Ups and 3) amount spent. For the purposes of this project, I am omitting the amount spent as I feel its not relevant for the purpose of this project
Overall, I found a lot of enjoyment using the snapchat ad manager platform, and was really surprised to see how user friendly it was to someone trying this platform out for the first time, the level of intricacy it gives the user to promote content as well as the excellent feedback results it provides the user.
Snapchat Ad Manager
Paid impressions
Total paid impressions 21,520
Age 13-17
Males: 13,841 paid impressions (64.3%)
Females: 7,679 paid impressions (35.7%)
Top interests
- Sports fans 21,211 99%
- High Schoolers 20,930 97%
- Basketball fans 18,410 86%
Fails:
<1% for parents and family focused,
14% for collegiates,
Top devices
IOS 14,484 paid impressions 67.3%
Android 7,046 paid impressions 32.7%
Top locations
- Texas 3,183 15%
- Georgia 1,825 8%
- Florida 1,783 8%
- New York 1,120 5%
Swipe ups
Total Swipe ups 97
Age 13-17
Males: 60 S/U (61.9%)
Females: 37 S/U (38.1%)
Top interests
- High Schoolers 94, 97%
- Sports Fan 94, 97%
- American Football Fans 83, 86%
Fails:
1% for parents and family focused,
13% for collegiates,
Top devices
IOS 72 S/U 74.2%
Android 25 S/U 25.8%
Top locations
- Georgia 9, 9%
- North Carolina 9, 9%
- Florida 8, 8%
10) New York 5, 5%
Lowest
Kansas, Maryland, Connecticut
Top Metros
- New York 2,245 10%
- Atlanta 2,099 10%
- Houston 1,652 8%
Lowest
Colorado, Arkansas, Washington
Top Metros
- Austin 17, 18%
- Washington 11 11%
- Charlotte 11 11%
Facebook Ad Experience and Metrics
I think that the Facebook Ad manager requires a few more steps and verification process. Due to some recent problems with my facebook account, I was restricted from promoting any ads. So luckily, I had the help of my fellow Classmate Jaqueline to promote my ad through her facebook ad manager account. I ran the ad for five days from April 20-April 25, for a total budget of 30$. I promoted the ad with the goal of “website clicks”.
Facebook ad Manager
Paid impressions
Total reach 7,168
Total link clicks 36
Post Engagement: 39
Post Reaction: 3
Age 13-17
Males: (64.3%)
Females: (35.7%)
Age 18-24
- Males: (64.3%)
- Females: (35.7%)
Interest:
University, Volunteering, International Student, College, Student, Student Exchange program, Freshman or international studies and education level: College grad
Placements:
- Mobile app news feed 2278
- Marketplace mobile 1588
- Instagram stories 1392
Locations:
- Texas: 800
- California:508
- Florida: 370
14) New York 198
Lowest: Vermont, Washington DC, Wyoming
Website Analytics: Wix.com offered alot of great and easy to comprehend metrics. It allows the user to read the metrics information in multiple different ways, such as maps, line graphs or bar graphs. Its reports are very detailed and provide columns of data. Below, I breakdown a simple report summary of the metrics provided by Wix.com.
Total Site Sessions: 32
Unique Visitors: 30 Average Session duration: 01M 10S
Top referring sites:
- Facebook.com 10
- Direct 9
- Snapchat.com 9
- N/A 2
- Nage.wix.com 2
Page visits:
Home page: 29 total (19 mobile 10 desktop)
About us: 4
Become a sponsor: 1
Sponsors: 1
Locations: Page views
Countries:
United States:41
Ireland: 3
India: 3
Top 3: NY, NJ, CA
Lowest 3: AL, AR, NC
Bounce Rate: 84%