Monthly Archives: May 2011

Paid Protection, Reputation.com

I was listening to NPR and during a break in the show one of the Advertisements was for a company that took care of the reputation you have online, the company was Reputation, so I pulled over and Googled it.

There it was, Reputation.com,  a website that in basic terms is in the business of providing protection to your good name online.  They say “[t]he growth of the Internet has made managing your online reputation online a necessity” and they will do it for a premium.  The company provides all kinds of online protection from keeping bad press of you away from the top of search engine results, such as bad reviews on blogs and review sites. They also keeping your personal information off numerous websites. Anything that can keep your information away from spammers, identity theives, or “bad” information from future employers, investors, colleagues, etc.  Reputation is there to help you with.

There is not much specifics on what type of websites of what websites they keep your information off, but they’re prices to provide their entry level of services varies from about 4 dollars a month all the way to $700 a month. If your rep has been really destroyed by the internet they have custom plans that go into deeper protection for executives and businesses, but require a call for details.

The Internet brings the age of never forgetting, but Reputation.com is trying to make it harder to remember. My guess is that they will not be the only one’s providing this service in a few years. With information that can’t be deleted on websites like Facebook it leaves room for people to buy back that information or get it off there databases.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Paid Protection, Reputation.com

Raising a child with the internet

 In the New York Times, the article Devoting Attention to a Child and a Phone, All at Once caught my eye. This article talks about a new Iphone app that helps parents keep track of children’s play dates and also helps track their growth, health and emotional welfare.

Okay, this does seem like a useful app for new parents but whatever happened to doing things the old fashion way, or at least devoting more physical time to your children. Parents, put down the phones and interact with your children face to face. I have seen countless instances where parents have been with their children and have had a smart phone attached to their hand as well, or a family sitting at a table for dinner with their baby or young child being distracted by an Ipad. I understand that the internet has useful information about being a new parent but save that research for when the baby is asleep and don’t relay on a new app to help you keep track of your child’s growth.

This also connects to the way in which children will then use the internet. If new parents are being sucked into the world of Iphones and Ipads then what kind of impact will that have on their children? This all connects back to the discussion we were having about the ability to monitor the use of your child on the internet, and how it may be harder then we think. If a child grows up seeing their parents constantly connected to a blackberry or an Iphone then they will soon do the same. This involvement with the internet will soon lead to the issue that children do not know how to navigate the internet as responsibly as adults. Also, the constant contact that children have with the internet will then lead to children of younger and younger ages being able to navigate the internet. This will never lead to anything good, as children have a hard time seeing the division between public and private and also the fact that the internet has plenty of mature information not meant for children to see.

With the internet already surrounding children’s lives I think that it would be useful for parents to help in slowing down the process, not make it worse.

Posted in Assignment 4 | 3 Comments

True or False?

As Professor McKinney mentioned in class today, the news that Osama Bin Laden had been shot dead was all over Twitter before the mainstream media or President Obama made any official annoucement.  Although the news did not come from the White House directly, it has been reported that the information came from reputable sources associated with the White House with former ties to the US government.

Professor McKinney also commented on how quickly the information spread and that even the President has no control over the spread of official information.  This reminded of the kid’s game Telephone and how the Internet is just a giant version of this game. In my opinion, modern technologies and the type of communication they allow for is less fact-based and more about hear-say. There is no real control of the type of information posted anywhere on the Internet.  As a result, people are free to post the truth and its corresponding lies. They can also make up anything about everything. Or they may simply misunderstand the information they receive online.

This leads me to wonder: what, then, is the purpose of the Internet if there is no security and confidence in the information we receive? Personally, the vast amounts of information available on the Internet and anonymity of the people posting this information makes me paranoid about the whole situation. If there are so many false accounts of information out in the world, who’s to say that we won’t eventually forget the truth?

(This is somewhat unrelated, but this Tumblr post shows how information and images can be easy altered to deliver a message or  convey a feeling.)

Posted in Assignment 3 | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Confession

UK Teen Busted for Confessing to Library Vandalism on Facebook

(NewsCore) – A British teenager was facing a jail term Friday after he was caught confessing on Facebook to flooding a library, causing £150,000 ($248,000) damage.

The 16-year-old boy — who cannot be named for legal reasons — faced Portsmouth Magistrates’ Court in southern England on Thursday and confessed to blocking sinks in the library’s bathroom, then turning on the taps, local newspaper The News reported.

The youth initially denied the charge, but changed his plea to guilty after he was confronted with a transcript of a Facebook conversation in which he told a friend he was responsible for the flooding at the library.

Asked on Facebook if he had caused the damage on Aug. 18 last year, the youth replied, “Kind of, yeah. I’ve kept it to myself, a few mates know.”

Irreplaceable books were destroyed in the flooding. The library was closed for five months while repairs were carried out, including re-carpeting, the replacement of computers and electrical work.

The teenager will return to court on May 11 for sentencing.

We talked about privacy on Facebook in class. We all agreed that once the information is put up there it is not ours anymore. We all want to believe that we have control over our accounts, however it is not the case. Whatever we publish it goes out and it can be turned against or testify against us. In this case, although, the 16 years old denied that he flooded the library, in a  previous conversation he confessed he did it.                                                   My question is that if somebody does something culpable why he tells to anybody? Especially why he talks about it on a social network side?? I have to think that these teenagers are looking for attention and Facebook seems the perfect place to get it.  Unfortunately, they don’t think about the legal consequences of their actions.                     Reading this article through another thing comes to my mind. If this boy confessed his action to one of his friend I would like to know how much responsibility a friend has to report him. What if somebody posts even something worse on Facebook? How much responsibility we, who are his or her friends, have to report that action? Do we have to report if we read something illegal? Signing up for Facebook I don’t remember I read anything regarded to legal actions.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Show your friends I tell you who you are?

Priest Befriends Brothel On Facebook

Updated: Tuesday, 05 Apr 2011, 9:14 PM EDT
Published : Tuesday, 05 Apr 2011, 9:14 PM EDT

(NewsCore) – VIENNA — A Catholic priest admitted making an embarrassing blunder when he accidentally agreed to be friends with a brothel on Facebook, Austria’s Osterreich newspaper reported Tuesday.

Anton Faber, the high-profile head of the St. Stephen’s parish in Vienna, Austria’s capital, thought nothing was amiss when a friendship request appeared on his page from Laufhaus Rachel.

“I was unaware. Rachel is a beautiful biblical name,” he said, adding that he thought it could also have been the name of a sports facility.

Unfortunately for Faber, Laufhaus Rachel turned out to be a far raunchier type of venue. The clergyman had just agreed to be ‘friends’ with the home-page of a well-known Viennese brothel.

Faber unlisted Laufhaus Rachel after he realized his mistake, Osterreich said.

He promised to be more careful when accepting friends in future but vowed to continue using the social networking site as useful tool to communicate with worshipers.

That story could be so funny, and we could laugh well while reading it if the media wouldn’t have put enough attention on sex and the Catholic church. Recently, we heard a lot about priests who sexually abused their churchgoers. Sex should be the last thing that has a connection with priests. Religion is innocent, pure and beyond guiltily, dirty, evil pleasures. Priests, who are the medium between God and the followers, should embodied all what is virtues.                                                                                                                             It could be also questioned, why a priest is using Facebook. Well, it is a social network side and priests have to socialize with members of their churches. I guess Sunday services are not enough to maintain relationships. I believe there are members who need to ask their priest’s opinion about everything. What can be a better place than a social network side? Also, to be honest churches are not for profit organizations and they need to maintain good relationships with their members in order to get the decent amount of donations.                                                                                                                                        So, nothing is wrong if a priest is using Facebook, however, he has to be cautious whom he clicks as his friend. What can be more terrifying when a priest accidentally accepts a friend request from a brothel? All of the sudden he becomes a man whom obviously have guiltily, dirty, evil thoughts.  Well, there is one advice to take here for all of us. Next time  have to watch more carefully whom we accept as our friends. First impression does not work anymore, we need to dig deeper if we want to save our good reputation.


Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Show your friends I tell you who you are?

Growing business

Facebook launches deals program, rivals Groupon

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

NEW YORK — What happens when you cross the world’s largest social network with one of the hottest business models in e-commerce? Facebook wants to find out.

Facebook is launching a deals program Tuesday in five U.S.

cities, following on the popularity of Groupon and other services that offer deep discounts – for example: $50 worth of food at a local eatery for $25.

By allowing small businesses to leverage the Internet while helping consumers score great deals, these group-couponing services have become some of the fastest-growing businesses in the world.

Facebook now wants a part of that. It hopes to exploit its existing networks of friends and family when it begins testing offers in San Diego, San Francisco, Atlanta, Dallas and Austin, Texas.

Many deals sites have a social component. For instance, if you get three friends to buy a LivingSocial voucher, yours is free.

Groupon’s offers become valid only after a certain number of people purchase them.

But the deals are circulated to users through email, and the community aspect is secondary.

Facebook is hoping to change that.

“We’re building a product that is social from the ground up,” says Emily White, director of local for Facebook. “All of these deals are things you want to do with friends, so no teeth whitening, but yes to river rafting.”

Starting Tuesday, when Facebook users in the five test markets log into the site, they will see a deals insignia at the bottom of the page.

Clicking on it brings up a list of currently available offers. A user can buy one, click the “like” button to recommend it to others or share the offer with friends through Facebook’s private messaging system. When users purchase or “like” a deal, it shows up in their friends’ news feed.

That means “the discovery of the product can happen in lots of different places,” White says.

To get the program started, Facebook has enlisted 11 companies that already supply deals elsewhere. Restaurant reservation service OpenTable will broadcast offers for local eateries, while online ticket seller Viagogo will market events.

Not all offers involve discounts. Some are experiences people may not otherwise have access to, such as a backstage pass to Austin City Limits concerts, a tour of the Dallas Cowboys’ new stadium, or a children’s sleepover at the California Academy of Sciences in San Francisco with live-snake demos.

In some cases, you’ll get a “friend bonus” – an additional discount – if at least one other person in your social network buys a deal.

Leveraging social tools and direct sharing among friends will be “a key to success for daily deal companies” going forward, says Lou Kerner, social media analyst at Wedbush.

This is not the first time a social network has made a foray into disseminating deals. Twitter launched its own daily deal program called Earlybird Offers last year but canceled it after just two months. Last November Facebook launched a product called Check-in Deals that allowed users to “check in” via their mobile phones when they visit certain businesses and in turn receive discounts and other special offers. Location-based social network Foursquare has a similar program.

Offers through Facebook can last anywhere from a day to a week.

The social network won’t disclose how much commission it takes.

(With Groupon and others, the deal site typically takes up to half the revenue.) There are hundreds of Groupon copycats willing to accept lower commissions, but many small businesses prefer to partner with larger companies such as Groupon and LivingSocial because they reach more potential customers.

Facebook will bring deals to even more people. While Groupon has 70 million members and LivingSocial has 28 million, Facebook has 500 million people worldwide.

Add to that the fact that many small businesses already have a Facebook presence, and the social network becomes a good fit for daily deals, says Greg Sterling, senior analyst for Opus Research.

As a share of overall Web surfing, visits to group-buying sites grew ten-fold over the past year, according to research firm Experian. LivingSocial had 7 million unique visitors in March, up 27 percent from February, making it one of the 10 fastest-growing websites in the U.S., according to ComScore.

“Groupon and LivingSocial have shown how much demand there is out there,” Sterling says. “Facebook, if they do this right, can have a big hit on their hands.”

Well, another way how Facebook wants to extend its business. I have to admit that I never heard Groupon  and  LivingSocial before reading this article. Now, I know them. I went on Google and found out what these two names covered. Websites that sell coupons and offer deals to make the every day life and living cheaper. I don’t know how other people feel about coupons and online deals, I don’t use them although I should, however, I think it is a really good business. I know these coupons offer huge savings, and I have friends who shop only if they can find a good deal online.                                                           I saw a report on Nightline, where the reporter went shopping with two “crazy” coupon collectors and they showed that how a 200 dollars shopping spree could cost 20 dollars or even less with coupons.                                                                                                                 As the article mentioned that Facebook has over 500 million users; teaming up with Groupon and LivingSocial seems a very good idea. People who use Facebook now can get their coupons and deals without leaving their favorite sides. Everything in one place. The ice on the cake is that people can have their own little businesses too. Telling about great products just to a few of their friends would make a big difference at the next shopping. Facebook do have the chance to make big money selling these coupons. This service will start, or already started last week, in five big cities, but I wouldn’t be surprise to hear that Facebook extended it nationwide.

 


Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment