Author Archives: edit.bak

Posts: 8 (archived below)
Comments: 8

Security once again

Sexual Predators Share Disturbing Images on Facebook

With Privacy Tips

MYFOXNY.COM – Hidden behind the happy images on Facebook is a disturbing reality. Child predators are using the site to trade illegal pictures of young children in sexual poses.

“Thousands of them are doing it every day around the world,” says Raymond Bechard, who says he stumbled up on this while researching a book on human trafficking called “The Berlin Turnpike.”

Here is how it works: child predators create fake profiles to conceal their real identities and then they “friend” one another to trade video and pictures.

“Ben Little, Ben Small, Ben Young, anything that could sound like a name [that] pertains to someone being a little, small child” is usually an indicator, Bechard says.

A Fox 5 investigation found their “likes” to be similar as well. For example, “liking” the book “Lolita,” about a man who has an inappropriate relationship with a young girl, or “liking” Justin Bieber can both be signs.

FBI officials describe illegal photo sharing on social networks as “rampant.” Nickolas Savage, assistant security chief of the FBI’s cyber division, says pedophiles exchanging pictures on social networks can feed a vicious cycle.

“They can meet other people like themselves, and go off and validate their behavior,” Savage says. “When they trade with others there’s always a sense they need more material.”

Child predators even steal innocent pictures of children that could come from their parent’s Facebook profiles and unlocked photo albums.

Stolen or illegal images can be reported to Facebook right on the site. The company removes them. But Bechard thinks the company should do more.

They shut somebody out, but they don’t lock the door,” he says. “They just come back right in as another profile, putting up the same images and trading the same information with other pedophiles.”

That is exactly what Jerry Cannon, a Kentucky pastor, did. He pleaded guilty in April to charges of posting child pornography on Facebook. Police say he used 13 different false profiles to post more than 600 images. Bechard says he reported Cannon to authorities, which is a job he thinks Facebook should be doing.

In response to an enquiry from Fox 5, Facebook offered this statement in an email: “Facebook takes down illegal content as soon as it is reported to us. In the rare case where we believe the content may constitute child exploitative material, we take it down immediately, use our innovative system to block any further sharing of that content, and actually pull it back from any person’s page that it was shared with. More importantly, we share the content with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and then report the person that shared it to law enforcement.”

Law enforcement welcomes tips from the public. You can report illegal images at cybertipline.com or by calling 1-800-843-5678.

Experts recommend that if you post pictures of your children on Facebook, be sure that your privacy settings are set to share with only the people you trust.

SOCIAL NETWORK PRIVACY TIPS

Two settings you need to worry about: the first is for photos and video you post on Facebook in the future and the second is for the photos and videos you’ve already posted on Facebook. You must adjust the settings in two different places to protect your Facebook photos from being shared with the whole world.

1. Log onto your Facebook account.

2. Click on “account” located on the upper right hand side of your computer screen.

3. In the drop-down menu select “privacy settings.”

4. In the middle lower third of the screen click on “customize settings.”

5. Next to “posts by me” click on the drop-down menu and select “customize” this will bring up the custom privacy window.

6. In the custom privacy window, click on the “these people” drop-down menu.

7. You can now select “friends only.” This will share your content with your Facebook friends. Or you can share with an even smaller group by selecting “specific people.” The “specific people” selection allows you to type in the specific people that you want to have see your posts and photos. This setting also allows you to “hide this from” by inputting specific names that you do not want to have see your content.

For photos and albums you’ve already posted you need to adjust these privacy settings as well:

1. Click on “account” located on the upper right hand side of your computer screen.

2. In the drop-down menu select “privacy settings.”

3. In the “things I share” section, click on: “edit privacy settings for existing photo albums and videos.” This will bring up all your albums and photos with a drop down menu beneath each one.

4. You need to now select and set the privacy setting in the drop down menu under each and every album and video.

Remember: The best way to keep pictures totally private is by not posting them on a social network at all.

We cannot talk enough about privacy while social networking. This article clearly shows that we always have to be careful and alert who wants to be our friend. Reading articles like that makes me cautious. I already checked my privacy setting, because I do  put up many many pictures and occasionally videos from my children. I don’t want to stop posting things, however, I want to protect my information.

Last week we talked in class about that how we can prevent that somebody stills our information. It was in my mind and I was thinking about a lot. The hundred percent secure way is  if we don’t put pictures and videos up on the net. Moreover, if we don’t participate in any social network side. However, we live in the 21st century and we have this great technology that we can take advantage of so, why wouldn’t we? I mean how much is the chance our information can be stollen? How paranoid should we be and how much should we protect ourselves? I don’t want to be the victim of some sick people and close myself out of others. I feel when we read so many bad things about the net we easily can become paranoid. Speaking about myself, I will be keep posting and make sure I secure every little bit of my information.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Facebook the crime stopper?

CARTERSVILLE, Ga. (KABC) — A University of Georgia student is crediting Facebook with helping him stop an armed robbery in progress at his family’s home.

Nitesh Bhakta was inside his room on his laptop when he heard his grandmother scream. The robbers had tied up his grandmother and 17-year-old sister at gunpoint.

When he opened his bedroom door, Bhakta saw several hooded men at the front door. He shut the door and climbed into the attic. Bhakta didn’t have his cell phone so he logged onto his computer.

“I just took it out, opened it up, and got on Facebook and started posting,” said Bhakta. “Facebook was the only thing where I knew I could reach someone instantly that was on chat.”

The student’s best friend alerted police who quickly arrived at the house. One of the suspects was captured. Police were still searching for at least two others.

There are many people who do not think that the internet is useful. Moreover, they think that pages like Facebook is damaging young people’s identity, causing depression and taking too much attention from them. This article proves them wrong.                                 A 17 years old boy helped to catch some people who were going to robbed his home. He climbed up to the attic with his computer, then he went on Facebook and contact one of his friends who called the police. I am so surprised what a young person capable to do. After seeing his family members suffering he had enough courage to call for help. He must loved his computer to have with him, and what a great idea going on Facebook. I don’t know what I would have done in the same situation, but I think asking help on Facebook wouldn’t have been among my options.                                                                      It is interesting how Facebook became the part of people’s lives. Ten years ago people barely had internet at home, and owning a computer was a luxury. Now, I don’t know anybody who does not have a computer and a Facebook account. I have friends who are singed in on Facebook 24/7 and share everything what they do. I often think that they are addicted to Facebook, however, reading this article I have to admit that being on Facebook can be very useful. We always talk about that we have to be careful what we share with others or how much time we should spend online. What about if people feel safe if they are online? They always have somebody whom they can talk to; never feel alone. The boy in the article was sure he could reach somebody who would help him. Facebook saved their lives. Who knew what Facebook is good for.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Spying on your kids correction

Somehow the article does not appear with my comment. Here is the article:

MYFOXNY.COM – Imagine being able to record and monitor every digital move your teen makes from text messages to emails. High-tech surveillance software turns parents into cyber sleuths, giving them the ability to digitally see it all. But does new surveillance software empower concerned parents or turn them into intrusive cyber spies?

A mobile app called eBlaster mobile can secretly be installed on a child’s phone and send Mom and Dad copies of every text sent and received, including digital pictures. The app is available for either Blackberry or Android phones. Once installed on the mobile device a parent wants to monitor, the program goes into “stealth mode” and is practically undetectable to the teen who is using their cell phone.

It’s digital eavesdropping technology that would expose a teenager’s formerly private digital world to parents prying eyes. And while most teens will dread this technology, many parents will be drawn to it.

SpectorSoft created the app, and the company has similar spyware designed for computers. Parents can install SpectorPro without a child knowing it and use the software to monitor online chats and web surfing. The software records hundreds of digital snapshots of the computer screen and compiles them into a visual log that parents can scroll through to see what a teen has been up to on the computer. The program also has a built-in dictionary that searches for and deciphers acronyms or codes kids use in chats. For example, if a parent comes across a word like ASL in recorded chats, the program will reveal the letters stand for: Age, Sex, Location.

The company claims the program can decipher hundreds of acronyms and cryptic codes:

GNOC = GET NAKED ON CAM
RUH = ARE YOU HORNY?
420 = marijuana

Dr. Jeff Gardere, Fox 5 News contributing psychologist, has some concerns about spying on your kids.

“When do you draw the line when you go from being concerned parent to being a stalker of your kids,” Dr. Gardere says. He thinks parents who want to use this type of software need to be honest with their kids if they plan on installing it on their computer or cell phone.

Otherwise, Dr. Gardere says if a child finds out his or her parent has secretly been spying on them it could have serious repercussions.

“They will feel betrayed and feel major issues of trust from that point on between you and that child,” he says.

Both the eBlaster mobile app and SpectorPro computer monitoring software can be found here:

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Spying on Your Kids

Spying on Your Kids

MYFOXNY.COM – Imagine being able to record and monitor every digital move your teen makes from text messages to emails. High-tech surveillance software turns parents into cyber sleuths, giving them the ability to digitally see it all. But does new surveillance software empower concerned parents or turn them into intrusive cyber spies?

A mobile app called eBlaster mobile can secretly be installed on a child’s phone and send Mom and Dad copies of every text sent and received, including digital pictures. The app is available for either Blackberry or Android phones. Once installed on the mobile device a parent wants to monitor, the program goes into “stealth mode” and is practically undetectable to the teen who is using their cell phone.

It’s digital eavesdropping technology that would expose a teenager’s formerly private digital world to parents prying eyes. And while most teens will dread this technology, many parents will be drawn to it.

SpectorSoft created the app, and the company has similar spyware designed for computers. Parents can install SpectorPro without a child knowing it and use the software to monitor online chats and web surfing. The software records hundreds of digital snapshots of the computer screen and compiles them into a visual log that parents can scroll through to see what a teen has been up to on the computer. The program also has a built-in dictionary that searches for and deciphers acronyms or codes kids use in chats. For example, if a parent comes across a word like ASL in recorded chats, the program will reveal the letters stand for: Age, Sex, Location.

The company claims the program can decipher hundreds of acronyms and cryptic codes:

GNOC = GET NAKED ON CAM
RUH = ARE YOU HORNY?
420 = marijuana

Dr. Jeff Gardere, Fox 5 News contributing psychologist, has some concerns about spying on your kids.

“When do you draw the line when you go from being concerned parent to being a stalker of your kids,” Dr. Gardere says. He thinks parents who want to use this type of software need to be honest with their kids if they plan on installing it on their computer or cell phone.

Otherwise, Dr. Gardere says if a child finds out his or her parent has secretly been spying on them it could have serious repercussions.

“They will feel betrayed and feel major issues of trust from that point on between you and that child,” he says.

Both the eBlaster mobile app and SpectorPro computer monitoring software can be found here:


Well, I haven’t decided yet what is the right move in this case. I am a mom and I want to know what my children do, but my children are little (3.5 years and 5 months old). I am so protective and I want to save them from everything that is out there in the “big world”. However, I am not sure when they get about 15 or 16  years old I still would love to know about everything what they do. I feel that as children grow we have to let them do their own things; we have to give them a certain amount of privacy. How much is a certain amount of privacy? I don’t know. I guess it is different with every child. Some kids are so naive and  they need protection even from themselves, others are  mature enough to handle any situation.

Seeing a report like that I am wondering what kind of relationship  parents have with their children if they want to spy on them? Buying an app and install on their kids’ phones without telling them, then follow every text or e-mail?  Shouldn’t we build a trusty relationship with our children by a certain age?  If this is the way to protect a child there must be some serious issues in that family. Blocking certain websites on the computer might be OK, but secretly monitoring them is a creepy idea. As the psychologist said in the report if a parent would do this with a child, that child would never trust that parent.

Is selling an app like eBlaster a good business? Marketers come up with the weirdest ideas just to take money out of people’s pockets. I would like to know who buys this app and actually how much profit it makes. Probably a spy app will not be the best selling product on the market. I think this is an example how we should not use the “amazing technology”.


Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Confession

UK Teen Busted for Confessing to Library Vandalism on Facebook

(NewsCore) – A British teenager was facing a jail term Friday after he was caught confessing on Facebook to flooding a library, causing £150,000 ($248,000) damage.

The 16-year-old boy — who cannot be named for legal reasons — faced Portsmouth Magistrates’ Court in southern England on Thursday and confessed to blocking sinks in the library’s bathroom, then turning on the taps, local newspaper The News reported.

The youth initially denied the charge, but changed his plea to guilty after he was confronted with a transcript of a Facebook conversation in which he told a friend he was responsible for the flooding at the library.

Asked on Facebook if he had caused the damage on Aug. 18 last year, the youth replied, “Kind of, yeah. I’ve kept it to myself, a few mates know.”

Irreplaceable books were destroyed in the flooding. The library was closed for five months while repairs were carried out, including re-carpeting, the replacement of computers and electrical work.

The teenager will return to court on May 11 for sentencing.

We talked about privacy on Facebook in class. We all agreed that once the information is put up there it is not ours anymore. We all want to believe that we have control over our accounts, however it is not the case. Whatever we publish it goes out and it can be turned against or testify against us. In this case, although, the 16 years old denied that he flooded the library, in a  previous conversation he confessed he did it.                                                   My question is that if somebody does something culpable why he tells to anybody? Especially why he talks about it on a social network side?? I have to think that these teenagers are looking for attention and Facebook seems the perfect place to get it.  Unfortunately, they don’t think about the legal consequences of their actions.                     Reading this article through another thing comes to my mind. If this boy confessed his action to one of his friend I would like to know how much responsibility a friend has to report him. What if somebody posts even something worse on Facebook? How much responsibility we, who are his or her friends, have to report that action? Do we have to report if we read something illegal? Signing up for Facebook I don’t remember I read anything regarded to legal actions.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Show your friends I tell you who you are?

Priest Befriends Brothel On Facebook

Updated: Tuesday, 05 Apr 2011, 9:14 PM EDT
Published : Tuesday, 05 Apr 2011, 9:14 PM EDT

(NewsCore) – VIENNA — A Catholic priest admitted making an embarrassing blunder when he accidentally agreed to be friends with a brothel on Facebook, Austria’s Osterreich newspaper reported Tuesday.

Anton Faber, the high-profile head of the St. Stephen’s parish in Vienna, Austria’s capital, thought nothing was amiss when a friendship request appeared on his page from Laufhaus Rachel.

“I was unaware. Rachel is a beautiful biblical name,” he said, adding that he thought it could also have been the name of a sports facility.

Unfortunately for Faber, Laufhaus Rachel turned out to be a far raunchier type of venue. The clergyman had just agreed to be ‘friends’ with the home-page of a well-known Viennese brothel.

Faber unlisted Laufhaus Rachel after he realized his mistake, Osterreich said.

He promised to be more careful when accepting friends in future but vowed to continue using the social networking site as useful tool to communicate with worshipers.

That story could be so funny, and we could laugh well while reading it if the media wouldn’t have put enough attention on sex and the Catholic church. Recently, we heard a lot about priests who sexually abused their churchgoers. Sex should be the last thing that has a connection with priests. Religion is innocent, pure and beyond guiltily, dirty, evil pleasures. Priests, who are the medium between God and the followers, should embodied all what is virtues.                                                                                                                             It could be also questioned, why a priest is using Facebook. Well, it is a social network side and priests have to socialize with members of their churches. I guess Sunday services are not enough to maintain relationships. I believe there are members who need to ask their priest’s opinion about everything. What can be a better place than a social network side? Also, to be honest churches are not for profit organizations and they need to maintain good relationships with their members in order to get the decent amount of donations.                                                                                                                                        So, nothing is wrong if a priest is using Facebook, however, he has to be cautious whom he clicks as his friend. What can be more terrifying when a priest accidentally accepts a friend request from a brothel? All of the sudden he becomes a man whom obviously have guiltily, dirty, evil thoughts.  Well, there is one advice to take here for all of us. Next time  have to watch more carefully whom we accept as our friends. First impression does not work anymore, we need to dig deeper if we want to save our good reputation.


Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Show your friends I tell you who you are?

Growing business

Facebook launches deals program, rivals Groupon

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

NEW YORK — What happens when you cross the world’s largest social network with one of the hottest business models in e-commerce? Facebook wants to find out.

Facebook is launching a deals program Tuesday in five U.S.

cities, following on the popularity of Groupon and other services that offer deep discounts – for example: $50 worth of food at a local eatery for $25.

By allowing small businesses to leverage the Internet while helping consumers score great deals, these group-couponing services have become some of the fastest-growing businesses in the world.

Facebook now wants a part of that. It hopes to exploit its existing networks of friends and family when it begins testing offers in San Diego, San Francisco, Atlanta, Dallas and Austin, Texas.

Many deals sites have a social component. For instance, if you get three friends to buy a LivingSocial voucher, yours is free.

Groupon’s offers become valid only after a certain number of people purchase them.

But the deals are circulated to users through email, and the community aspect is secondary.

Facebook is hoping to change that.

“We’re building a product that is social from the ground up,” says Emily White, director of local for Facebook. “All of these deals are things you want to do with friends, so no teeth whitening, but yes to river rafting.”

Starting Tuesday, when Facebook users in the five test markets log into the site, they will see a deals insignia at the bottom of the page.

Clicking on it brings up a list of currently available offers. A user can buy one, click the “like” button to recommend it to others or share the offer with friends through Facebook’s private messaging system. When users purchase or “like” a deal, it shows up in their friends’ news feed.

That means “the discovery of the product can happen in lots of different places,” White says.

To get the program started, Facebook has enlisted 11 companies that already supply deals elsewhere. Restaurant reservation service OpenTable will broadcast offers for local eateries, while online ticket seller Viagogo will market events.

Not all offers involve discounts. Some are experiences people may not otherwise have access to, such as a backstage pass to Austin City Limits concerts, a tour of the Dallas Cowboys’ new stadium, or a children’s sleepover at the California Academy of Sciences in San Francisco with live-snake demos.

In some cases, you’ll get a “friend bonus” – an additional discount – if at least one other person in your social network buys a deal.

Leveraging social tools and direct sharing among friends will be “a key to success for daily deal companies” going forward, says Lou Kerner, social media analyst at Wedbush.

This is not the first time a social network has made a foray into disseminating deals. Twitter launched its own daily deal program called Earlybird Offers last year but canceled it after just two months. Last November Facebook launched a product called Check-in Deals that allowed users to “check in” via their mobile phones when they visit certain businesses and in turn receive discounts and other special offers. Location-based social network Foursquare has a similar program.

Offers through Facebook can last anywhere from a day to a week.

The social network won’t disclose how much commission it takes.

(With Groupon and others, the deal site typically takes up to half the revenue.) There are hundreds of Groupon copycats willing to accept lower commissions, but many small businesses prefer to partner with larger companies such as Groupon and LivingSocial because they reach more potential customers.

Facebook will bring deals to even more people. While Groupon has 70 million members and LivingSocial has 28 million, Facebook has 500 million people worldwide.

Add to that the fact that many small businesses already have a Facebook presence, and the social network becomes a good fit for daily deals, says Greg Sterling, senior analyst for Opus Research.

As a share of overall Web surfing, visits to group-buying sites grew ten-fold over the past year, according to research firm Experian. LivingSocial had 7 million unique visitors in March, up 27 percent from February, making it one of the 10 fastest-growing websites in the U.S., according to ComScore.

“Groupon and LivingSocial have shown how much demand there is out there,” Sterling says. “Facebook, if they do this right, can have a big hit on their hands.”

Well, another way how Facebook wants to extend its business. I have to admit that I never heard Groupon  and  LivingSocial before reading this article. Now, I know them. I went on Google and found out what these two names covered. Websites that sell coupons and offer deals to make the every day life and living cheaper. I don’t know how other people feel about coupons and online deals, I don’t use them although I should, however, I think it is a really good business. I know these coupons offer huge savings, and I have friends who shop only if they can find a good deal online.                                                           I saw a report on Nightline, where the reporter went shopping with two “crazy” coupon collectors and they showed that how a 200 dollars shopping spree could cost 20 dollars or even less with coupons.                                                                                                                 As the article mentioned that Facebook has over 500 million users; teaming up with Groupon and LivingSocial seems a very good idea. People who use Facebook now can get their coupons and deals without leaving their favorite sides. Everything in one place. The ice on the cake is that people can have their own little businesses too. Telling about great products just to a few of their friends would make a big difference at the next shopping. Facebook do have the chance to make big money selling these coupons. This service will start, or already started last week, in five big cities, but I wouldn’t be surprise to hear that Facebook extended it nationwide.

 


Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Facebook censorship for business?

Today’s a big day for Facebook. President Obama will be doing some kind of town hall function at the Facebook headquarters as he seeks to reach into the pockets of the rich through more taxes. That in itself should be fun to watch since he is in the land of billionaires but what is getting more attention is a quote from a Wall Street Journal article from Facebook lobbyist Adam Conner as the social media giant looks to expand in areas where free speech is not the norm (China folks, it’s China).

Conner’s curious statement was

“Maybe we will block content in some countries, but not others,” Adam Conner, a Facebook lobbyist, told the Journal. “We are occasionally held in uncomfortable positions because now we’re allowing too much, maybe, free speech in countries that haven’t experienced it before,” he said.

(UPDATE: No new news but I wondered if anyone else finds it more than a little ironic that Facebook’s lobbyist’s name is Con-ner. Get it?)

Hold on there big fella! Isn’t Facebook the defender of the free world having been the linchpin of the revolt in Egypt? Isn’t Facebook all about information for everyone all the time? Isn’t Facebook for the people, by the people etc etc?

Apparently not when so much money is on the line in a huge market like China. Where Google said it wouldn’t comply with China’s censorship policies and effectively left the market, Facebook is playing softball with free speech, at least according to their lobbyist in the nation’s capital.

The Journal spoke with some power brokers about what Facebook faces if it decides to play intermediary for what’s free speech and what isn’t in other parts of the world.

Facebook’s plans may not sit well with congressional leaders already incensed with the company for sidestepping congressional inquiries on its China plans. Last spring, Sen. Dick Durbin, the Illinois Democrat who heads the Senate Judiciary Committee’s panel on human rights, rebuked Facebook for refusing to appear at a Capitol Hill hearing on “global Internet freedom.”

The company hasn’t joined the Global Network Initiative, a group that includes information-technology companies like Google and Microsoft and human-rights groups that have agreed to common principles of conduct in nations such as China, which restrict speech and expression.

What’s interesting is that while the press has played up Facebook’s role in the fight for freedom around the world the company itself has stayed relatively mum on the subject.

Neither Facebook nor its founder, Mark Zuckerberg, have said much publicly about Facebook’s role as a tool for pro-democracy activists in Tunisia or Egypt. In Tunisia, where Facebook took technical steps to counter government efforts to steal users’ Facebook passwords, the company said its efforts were driven by a safety and security breach—not politics.

So now with China looming on the horizon as a possible market to conquer (likely through a partnership in the country) it seems awful convenient that Facebook throws open its headquarters doors to the leader of the free world for some campaign work (oh, let’s be real, that’s what it is). By cuddling up to the Whitehouse does Facebook expect that Washington will turn a blind eye to activities it pursues in other parts of the world that are all about the benjamins and less about the freedoms?

If this quote is any indication it looks like a risky play to say the least.

“Blocking content in some countries—but not others—would deeply damage Facebook’s brand and raise troubling questions about its commitment to human rights and Internet freedom,” said Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, the top-ranking Republican on the Senate’s human- rights panel.

So while all of this political yow-yowing and posturing is business as usual for the Beltway set what about you? If it were discovered that Facebook was engaging in content censorship so they could do business in countries that represent big dollars but have horrible human rights records, would you be upset with Facebook?

If your answer is no let us know why and if it’s yes let us know why as well. Would you be upset enough to stop using the service? Would how Facebook maneuvers politically around the world impact how you use the service in the future?

I get that these are not marketing questions per se but the lines have blurred so much in the world because of the amount of information that is available to people today. As marketers what would happen if there was a huge investment of time, money and energy into Facebook marketing campaigns only to see end users walk away from the service in protest? Or is the idea that people would actually take a stand against Facebook and give up their online ‘friends’ as an act of protest just pollyannish because in reality no body cares enough to actually do anything about it?

So many questions. Do you have any answers?

SIMILAR STORIES IN: SOCIAL | FORWARD: EMAIL THIS POST

 

According to the article Facebook is looking for business in China, where free speech is not the norm as in the United States. A Facebook lobbyist person said to the Wall Street Journal, maybe Facebook will block some content in certain countries among them in China. However, it is questioned that what is free speech in one country and what is it in another one. Many argue that, blocking some information will damage Facebook’s prestige and would be against human rights. Others question that wether it is right to censor the information in order to have a billion dollar business.

The author at the and of the article asks some questions, that I will like to answer:

I wouldn’t be upset if I found out Facebook were censoring the information on its sites. I would still use Facebook without any bad feelings. I grew up in a country where free speech was not allowed, or at least people couldn’t say whatever and wherever they wanted to. I think everybody should be careful what put up on the net. There are information that should not be shared on Facebook. There are different channels for that. I think Facebook should be a page to entertain ourselves, meet friends, have fun. It is not the place to talk about politics or business.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Facebook censorship for business?