-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- elisabethcordero on
- elisabeth cordero on Making Future Plans of a Social Network…
- elisabeth cordero on You have been poked!
- elisabeth cordero on Ex-Facebooker Dave Morin: You can’t be friends with everyone
- ek on 47% of Facebook Walls Contain Profanity
Archives
Frequent Topics
- Anonymity
- Audience
- behavior
- Blogs
- Boyd
- censorship
- culture
- Cyberbullying
- Distraction
- Face book
- Foursquare
- Friendster
- Goffman
- goverment
- high school
- hotels
- Josh Harris
- Marketing
- marriage
- monitoring
- Multitasking
- MySpace
- New Format
- police
- Privacy
- psychologist
- Publicity
- Public v. Private
- Relationships
- Reservations
- Skype
- Social Interaction
- Social Media
- Social Networking
- stalking
- Stereotypes
- Surveillance
- technology
- Texting
- tumblr
- We Live in Public
- Youtube
- Zuckerberg
Categories
Links
Meta
Author Archives: melissa.colas
Posts: 5 (archived below)
Comments: 5
You have the right to remain SILENT Officers!!
I came across this article in the New York Times about police officers and their social networking pages such as Facebook. Many of these officers are being reprimanded for the information they put on their pages that is work related. Some of these comments have given some police headquarters and police officials a bad reputation. Now it is easy to say that the officers first amendment right is being violated. However, their actions are compromising other individuals and not just themselves. I think that if this is in fact true in which people are seeing the kind of officers being hired then it makes precincts look bad and people will start to begin protesting against them. In some cases, officers post up photos of crime scenes or themselves posing with guns. There are also obscene comments from officers such as this one: “These people should have died when they were young, anyway, I’m just doing them a favor,”according to an officer speaking of a homeless man on the street. who was beaten by police. I think that the police department heads have every right to censor this information because one person makes a reflection on the whole precinct. Although people do not like to be censored, a job in police enforcement should allow every one to feel equally safe and protected by police officers. In these cases, it is easy to see that people are discriminated against and then society will take a look at who hired them. Every employer is liable to watch their backs when their reputation is at risk. As a waitress at Applebees, i have even had my employers tell us that we need to be respectful to people anywhere around the region because if they come in the restaurant they will recognize whether we did something bad or good around them if they remember us. Therefore, even in a place where people may think it is not that serious to watch your actions such as working in a restaurant it is. Law enforcement should have much more stricter rules as well because their duty is to be protective of its citizens. I would feel really uncomfortable finding out that an officer in my town would post such things on their Facebook because i would want to know how many more officers feel the same way or have done the same thing. The head officials are not telling officers to not post anything at all, but they are simply making sure they watch what they are putting out for public eyes to see. If the officers want to protect themselves, they should not allow people to know who they are employed by on Facebook or what goes on work related. In any case, they should become familiar with Facebook’s privacy settings and learn how to separate their work lives from their personal lives.
Book your next trip on Facebook!
The thought of booking your next trip on Facebook sounds like such a relief. You no longer have to keep searching endlessly on google for the best price out there. This is what hotels are coming around to doing in order to beat sites like Expedia and Travelocity. In this article in the New York Times, this is exactly what is going on around Facebook. Hotels want to get control back on their hotel deals. They are looking at what people click on for their “likes” in order to make sure their hotel provides exactly what each person wants out of their trip. Therefore, if someone like a certain type of pillow or special service, they will be provided with this on their next trip to that hotel. I think that this is a great idea because people will get exactly what they ask for. There will be much less disappointment in their trip and they would get what they pay for. As they say you always want to get your moneys worth and what better way to do this then have a hotel make you feel special with your needs.
Once people press the like button on Facebook, the hotel wants to contact them as soon as possible. The hotels want to make sure that they are the ones who are searching for you as opposed to the other way around. This in my opinion is great service, in a way it what they call “silent service” which is something everyone likes. The customers do not have to tell the hotel what they want or looking for, the hotel searches and finds out what the people like and want. According to the New York Times article, PhoCusWright, a travel research firm, has found that 13 percent of social-network users now shop for travel on those Web sites and 35 percent of mobile-phone users expect to book travel on their phones in the next year.The Trump Hotel Collection has been offering Facebook reservations for 6 months. The Facebook reservations would allow guests to put their complaints out on the companies page or enter sweepstakes to win a free hotel stay!
Age is nothing but a number!
After reading this article in the New York Times , I kind of chuckled. The fact that there is a class called Facebook 101 is funny yet useful. This article reminded me of how we have come a very long way with technology and very quickly. Only those who are born into this fast paced technological world can know how to keep up. But what about those who are older and want to monitor their children or grandchildren access on these sites? They should have the ability to learn how to use them as well. The New York public library in the Bronx helps those individuals who show concern about monitoring the young children in their lives. I think that this class is useful for older people to learn how to use if their children are venturing out to these social sites. We all know the dangers behind these types of websites. Even the article points out such tips for the older students to learn that is typically useful for a much younger crowd. Although many of these young children would not like to be monitored so closely by their parents or grandparents, I feel like it is a relief because many of these children do not know what they get themselves into joining these sites. Facebook does not really have any way of knowing the true age of some of its members since the site is now accessible to many people not just college students anymore. Therefore, if there is someone watching those who are really not supposed to have joined these networks then it would help lead to a safer environment for the younger community. Facebook is a growing trend and it is hard to stop these children from joining so the next best thing would be being able to monitor their behavior and photos at all times. This article provides insight into concerned parents and also shows the differences in age and technological use.
Warner Bros Meets Facebook!
In reading this article, I thought it was interesting to see how big businesses are using social network sites to their advantage. The idea of logging on to facebook and being able to rent a movie is actually clever to me. Millions of people spend a number of hours on facebook each day.. why not allow them to watch movies while they do it. Warner bros is taking a unique step forward in developing more business for their company. However, the fear of piracy can be a big deal. People will develop ways to make these movies free instead of the $3.00 rental fee or 30 credit requirement the company will offer on the site. But whos to say that Warner bros should not take the risk. There have been a lot of movies that I’ve come across being sold by bootleggers in the street so there wouldn’t be a difference putting these movies up on facebook. Not everyone on facebook will be looking to commit piracy, they will simply want to watch it. This idea will create even bigger business for Warner Bros by allowing 500 million people to take advantage of their service. This is especially true among people who don’t have cable or simply would like to watch a movie at a much cheaper rate without leaving their house to go to a redbox or waiting for netflix to deliver their movie to their home. This idea would also be very good for college students who are on breaks at school and on their laptops with a few hours to kill in between classes. Instead of having to bring a DVD to put into your computer, it would be better for them to do what they do best.. Log onto facebook!
Posted in Assignment 2
Tagged Facebook, Movie rentals, Warner Bros
Comments Off on Warner Bros Meets Facebook!
History of Tweets!
http://cac.ophony.org/2010/04/16/archiving-tweets/
I was brought about reading this article for my history class and thought it was very interesting because historians are thinking of archiving every single tweet that is put out for the public to see. Now some may say this sounds ridiculous because there are a number of things people say that are useless. However, if this goes through there will be a large library with tweets stating everyones thoughts,actions and feelings. Though I am not a member of the twitter community, I think that archiving these tweets may in fact some way serve its purpose, whether it be that people in the future can tap into our thoughts that will be history or that perhaps someone tweeting now is saying something that will make them famous when they are older or well after they have passed. With this developing idea there also comes a question of privacy. What happens to those who do not want their thoughts saved for people to see in the future? Does this in fact go against privacy policy? In my opinion I believe that once something on a public service site is opened by an individual it is no longer as private as one may think. You may be able to make it private but for that mili second, who knows your tweet could be saved. It is difficult to establish how people will react to this situation. It is not yet determined whether people have a choice or not whether they can have their tweets saved but we will just have to see when the uproar begins.