-
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
Meta
Monthly Archives: August 2012
Caddy/Wife Causes Husband Penalty
By F. Edwin Miller
The worst possible thing that could have happened to Pete Oakley, let alone any man, happened at the Senior Open Championship at Turnberry on Friday: his wife couldn’t find his ball.
(Gregory Shamus, Getty Images North America)
The job of 2004 Senior British Open winner’s wife and caddie, Jennifer, requires her to spot all of her husband’s tee shots. Yet, when Oakley struck the ball on the 13th hole during the second round of the tournament on Friday, Jennifer Oakley struggled to deliver in more ways than one. Her mistake charged Pete Oakley with an “undue delay” (known as ‘slow play’ or not keeping up with the pace of play as dictated by the committee) and a two-shot setback.
Jennifer Oakley claims a ball from another golfer on the 10th tee that landed near her husband’s sparked the mix up and successive penalty.
“I was looking at the wrong fairway” she explained about the slipup.
Oakley finished the round with an 83 after the two-shot penalty; however, he missed the cut by 16 making the final score irrelevant.
“I might not have been laughing so much about it if the two-shot penalty had seen me miss the cut,” Oakley said. Huh? Regardless if you make the cut or not, when your woman looks at another man’s fairway it is no laughing matter.
Comments Off on Caddy/Wife Causes Husband Penalty
“Fantastic Forehead”
Growing up there was this kid we use to play basketball with and he had a receding hairline and a large forehead. Everyone use to call him fantastic forehead, it wasn’t bullying or anything it was just one of those nicknames you get stuck with when you’re a kid. He would laugh about it and so would everyone else and of course everyone else had their own nickname to worry about. I think the title has passed on and is better suited for one NBA player.

I was planning on doing a summary of the U.S.A./Tunisia game but I decided not to, given the fact that there wasn’t much of a story. U.S.A. gave Tunisia a southern style beating, winning the game 110-63. And I thought France got it bad… After the game a player from Tunisia asked Kobe Bryant to autograph his sneaker, what a groupie…
Comments Off on “Fantastic Forehead”
The US Open: The Lone Keeper of the Fifth-Set Tiebreak
New Yorkers have always enjoyed being quick and efficient. Get in, get the information you need, and get out before the parking lot gets crazy.
It’s no different at the US Open in Queens.
In 1970, the US Open adopted what is known as the fifth-set tiebreak. No other Grand Slam tourney has ever included the controversial tiebreak. The fifth set represents the final set in a great match, the end of which results in the win. I say “great”because all of the Grand Slam tourneys have a ‘best three sets out of five’ policy – so you can be sure that a match which has gone to five sets has been a battle to the finish between two excellent players.
A VERY brief rundown of scoring in tennis.
- First person to win four points wins the game.
- It takes six games to win a set, (must win by two).
- If the game score reaches 6-6, the players play a tiebreak
- The tie break is out of twelve, (first player to seven points wins).
- The winner of the tiebreak wins the set.
Australia, London and France all use tiebreaks on any set prior to the fifth. Once a match has reached five sets, the tiebreak rule is abandoned and players continue as long as it takes to win the set. If you catch two hungry players, each with a fierce desire to win the match, you are going to be there for a long time. Every once in a while, you’ll be there for an EXTREMELY long time.
Perhaps the most famous example of this is what has become known as “The Endless Match,” which took place at Wimbledon in 2010. American John Isner faced off against Frenchman Paul-Henri Mathieu for an incredible 11+ hours over the course of three days. The fifth and final set, which went on sans tiebreak, lasted a remarkable 8+ hours and brought the total number of games to 138. Finally, Isner sent the ball out of bounds, and the historical match came to a close with a final score sounding like a basketball game: 70-68.
There are two sides to every coin, and the US side is which ever one is more valuable. Creators and supporters of the fifth-set tiebreak in the US swear that the tiebreak is much more satisfying, (some fans not being able to hold their focus for the hours it may take to win a open-ended set) and thrilling, (exciting to the fans who naw their fingernails to the bone). Any stroke can be the last.
US Open Director Bill Talbert told the New York Times in regards to the fifth-set tiebreaks, “Of course [the players] will be nervous, but the fans will love it. Did you ever know a player who bought a ticket?”
Not to mention, tiebreaks keep the matches short and the tourney on schedule, as opposed to the Isner/Mathieu match which pushed Maria Sharipova back a day, upsetting paying fans, broadcast stations, and players.
The traditionalists who scoff at the fifth-set tiebreaks usually have the same complaint: It just doesn’t seem right. Two players have just battled for five, long sets. They’ve proven themselves as incredible opponents, a fantastic matchup, and here we are, prepared to end it all with a first-to-seven. While the tension may be thicker in a tiebreak, the emotions poured onto the court during a traditional fifth set are inspiring, powerful, and historical.
Either way, if you have tickets to Arthur Ashe this month, don’t hold your breathe waiting for a Wimbledon ’08 Roger Federer/Rafael Nadal 9-7 finals set, or an epic battle like Isner/Mathieu. But you can probably count on keeping your day on schedule.
Posted in "The Endless Match", Bill Talbert, Events, FIfth-Set Tiebreaks, John Isner, New York TImes, Paul-Henri Mathieu, Rafael Nadal, Roger Federer, Rules, US Open, Wimbledon
Comments Off on The US Open: The Lone Keeper of the Fifth-Set Tiebreak
The US Open: The Lone Keeper of the Fifth-Set Tiebreak
New Yorkers have always enjoyed being quick and efficient. Get in, get the information you need, and get out before the parking lot gets crazy.
It’s no different at the US Open in Queens.
In 1970, the US Open adopted what is known as the fifth-set tiebreak. No other Grand Slam tourney has ever included the controversial tiebreak. The fifth set represents the final set in a great match, the end of which results in the win. I say “great”because all of the Grand Slam tourneys have a ‘best three sets out of five’ policy – so you can be sure that a match which has gone to five sets has been a battle to the finish between two excellent players.
A VERY brief rundown of scoring in tennis.
- First person to win four points wins the game.
- It takes six games to win a set, (must win by two).
- If the game score reaches 6-6, the players play a tiebreak
- The tie break is out of twelve, (first player to seven points wins).
- The winner of the tiebreak wins the set.
Australia, London and France all use tiebreaks on any set prior to the fifth. Once a match has reached five sets, the tiebreak rule is abandoned and players continue as long as it takes to win the set. If you catch two hungry players, each with a fierce desire to win the match, you are going to be there for a long time. Every once in a while, you’ll be there for an EXTREMELY long time.
Perhaps the most famous example of this is what has become known as “The Endless Match,” which took place at Wimbledon in 2010. American John Isner faced off against Frenchman Paul-Henri Mathieu for an incredible 11+ hours over the course of three days. The fifth and final set, which went on sans tiebreak, lasted a remarkable 8+ hours and brought the total number of games to 138. Finally, Isner sent the ball out of bounds, and the historical match came to a close with a final score sounding like a basketball game: 70-68.
There are two sides to every coin, and the US side is which ever one is more valuable. Creators and supporters of the fifth-set tiebreak in the US swear that the tiebreak is much more satisfying, (some fans not being able to hold their focus for the hours it may take to win a open-ended set) and thrilling, (exciting to the fans who naw their fingernails to the bone). Any stroke can be the last.
US Open Director Bill Talbert told the New York Times in regards to the fifth-set tiebreaks, “Of course [the players] will be nervous, but the fans will love it. Did you ever know a player who bought a ticket?”
Not to mention, tiebreaks keep the matches short and the tourney on schedule, as opposed to the Isner/Mathieu match which pushed Maria Sharipova back a day, upsetting paying fans, broadcast stations, and players.
The traditionalists who scoff at the fifth-set tiebreaks usually have the same complaint: It just doesn’t seem right. Two players have just battled for five, long sets. They’ve proven themselves as incredible opponents, a fantastic matchup, and here we are, prepared to end it all with a first-to-seven. While the tension may be thicker in a tiebreak, the emotions poured onto the court during a traditional fifth set are inspiring, powerful, and historical.
Either way, if you have tickets to Arthur Ashe this month, don’t hold your breathe waiting for a Wimbledon ’08 Roger Federer/Rafael Nadal 9-7 finals set, or an epic battle like Isner/Mathieu. But you can probably count on keeping your day on schedule.
Posted in "The Endless Match", Bill Talbert, Events, FIfth-Set Tiebreaks, John Isner, New York TImes, Paul-Henri Mathieu, Rafael Nadal, Roger Federer, Rules, US Open, Wimbledon
Comments Off on The US Open: The Lone Keeper of the Fifth-Set Tiebreak
Vicente Padilla has some words for you, Mark Teixeira
The Yankees/Red Sox rivalry has been notorious for many generations back. For the majority, the fussing and the hype has been kept on the field, or in the stands between the fans. Very rarely does the competition get in between the players’ personal lives. In fact, David Ortiz has notably always invited many current and previous Yankees to his golfing charity tournament, which he holds annually in Punta Cana, Dominican Republic benefiting his foundation the David Ortiz Children’s Fund. Although sometimes the fans forget that these guys are friends outside of their uniforms, the players never do.
However, Mark Teixeira and Red Sox reliever Vicente Padilla have added more fuel to their fire lately. During the time these two were teammates with the Texas Rangers from 2006-2007, Teixeira has expressed that he believed he was constantly getting hit by pitches from opposing teams as a retaliation to Padilla’s league-leading 26-hit-batters list.
On games the two rival teams have played within the past month, Padilla has taken it to the media to express his feelings for the Yankees first baseman. “I believe he does have a bit of a problem with Hispanic players, because it wasn’t just against me when we were teammates,” Padilla told Latino reporters for ESPN Deportes.
At the same game, Padilla continued with a quote to NESN.com stating, “The things Teixeira has done against the Latinos [on the Rangers] — he doesn’t open his mouth about. He once threatened me and said he was going to hit me with a bat, and that’s when we were playing on the same team.”
I have never seen Teixeira verbally or non-verbally express any sort of hatred towards Latino ball players. The Yankees are known for having a melting pot of cultures on the roster, from Alex Rodriguez to Ramiro Peña to Eduardo Nuñez, and when any one of the Latino players hits a homerun or does a nice field play, Teixeira is always seen congratulating them without any type of indifference shown. Who knows what anybody says or does behind closed doors, but all I’ve seen from him is team effort, skin color unaccounted for.
One of the things I despised, and lost respect for Padilla when he said it, was a comment in the sense that “Teixeira is better off playing a woman’s sport.” It was uncalled for, sexist, and just childish. Instead on concentrating so much on an opponent, he should be concerned with perfecting his craft.
“Completely erroneous,” is what Teixeira had to say about the racism accusations. “He doesn’t have a lot of friends in the game.”
The two teams face each other a couple of more times before the regular season ends, so we will see how this war of words concludes.
Posted in Boston Red Sox, Mark Teixeira, New York Yankees, Vicente Padilla
Comments Off on Vicente Padilla has some words for you, Mark Teixeira