Kristin(Kexin)’s Blog Post #4

The New Yorker article, “To Fight the Coronavirus, You Need an Army”, and the NPR Podcast “Hotel Corona” both offer outsiders a glimpse of how a city, one domestic and another thousands of miles away, handle the COVID-19 crisis. 

For Huston, TX, a medical city with ample spaces and medical supplies, the biggest challenge was a lack of trained nurses and respiratory therapists. With the practice of social distancing and mask-wearing, Texans were able to curb the disease from spreading gradually until July. Yet the positive trend ended July 4th, when large groups celebrated the holiday with relaxed safety measures. Moreover, Texas’ Governor, Greg Abbott, issued a reopening order in May, until a surge in cases forced the plan to end prematurely. While it seems that Texans do not have a consensus on what individuals responsibilities in this crisis entail, the medical community has been  working collectively to outrace the virus, improving their ability and capacity to offer better care for patients through staffing changes and treatment protocol optimization.  

As Albert Camus put it, “The only means of fighting a plague is “common decency.” Though healthcare professionals can help save lives through high quality care and politicians can slow the spread by issuing executive orders, the most fundamental and effective way to battle a highly infectious disease is for individuals to be good citizens and each do their part, both for the sake of themselves and for people around them. America is a country established on the basis of freedom and independence, and while it is true that efforts to fight COVID-19 should not be used as a pretext for repression, it is critical to acknowledge the civil responsibilities as an individual living in a society. Holding on to these two ideologies too tightly and ignoring the best practices supported by facts can lead to a downward spiral during a global crisis, when communal action is called for; this downward spiral may eventually end up eroding the premise of these ideologies: a safe, healthy, and functioning society. 

For any society marked with heterogeneity, clashes are almost inevitable, and the COVID-19 crisis certainly escalated tensions in the U.S., with each group holding onto their beliefs tighter than ever. Though this progression of situation was expected, Hotel Corona in Jerusalem, where Jewish and Arabic patients were housed under the same roof, offered us a possible alternative. Guests of the hotel ended up enjoying meals and stand-up comedy together, participating in Zumba classes, and learning about each other’s lives and traditions. Suffering from the same disease and being isolated in the same facility reduced the psychological and physical distance of the individuals, and reminded them of their common identity as humans. Hotel Corona was an unintentional social experiment that could shed light on ways to promote unity in heterogeneous societies during time of crisis: when reminded of shared experiences, emotions, and identities, people are more likely to view each other as another vulnerable human being rather than an enemy or alien; this change in perspective will, hopefully, induce compassionate empathy and common decency necessary to battle a pandemic.

4 thoughts on “Kristin(Kexin)’s Blog Post #4

  1. I understand it as a move always from the ego. Decency comes with understand of the the other side and inorder for that to happen, an individual’s ego must be removed before they enter the conversation. Its nice thinking, but if peace was so easy our History books would only be 10 pages long. However, Hotel Corona and Noam gave us a possible blueprint. Shared experiences and decency.

    • Thanks for commenting Mikael. I might be too naive in thinking, but I do believe people can show decency without having their ego hurt or removed, as decency does not require us to put others before ourselves or to sacrifice ourselves for others’ benefits; rather it means being respectful, honest, and have good manners. People with decency will have awareness for the impacts of their actions on others and thus act accordingly. When it comes to cultivating this character, a lots of factors come into play. And if you are interested, here is a podcast about how/why empathy is generated: https://www.npr.org/2019/07/22/744195502/you-2-0-the-empathy-gym. Though empathy and human decency are not the same thing, I do think there is some overlap so this might be an interesting listen:D. Have a good one!

  2. I really like the second body paragraph (the one about individuals acknowledging civil responsibilities). If only it was easy enough for people to recognize the severity of their actions and how they impact society. I hope that the change in perspective you discussed in the last paragraph reaches us here in America as well.

    • Hi Julianna, thanks for the comment! I totally agree that it is not easy for people to recognize the consequences of their actions and the impacts they have on society. And to be honest, I don’t think citizens of countries that did relatively well in this crisis, such as China and Singapore, obeyed social distancing or mask-wearing rules purely out of civil responsibilities or human decency. These cultures tend to be more collective, and the idea of ‘not to bring trouble to others’ is constantly reinforced throughout their lives, as such behavior is considered socially unacceptable and adults can be alienated if they exhibit these behavior. So I guess it’s a combination of good citizenship and fear of exclusion, coupled with strict regulations(and many more factors if we ask sociologists:)).

      I do think the U.S. would benefit if people can ‘give away’ some, or be a little bit more flexible about, liberty and independence under certain conditions for the purpose of the society and human kind. While it is true that most Americans are firm believers of
      constitutional rights (as they should be), some seem to act in certain ways just to display and signify their identitis and beliefs as members of a group/party, as well as to prove the other side wrong. Just some thoughts, thanks for reading :D.

Comments are closed.