-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Union Carbide’s Responses & Actions – Union Carbide Gas Leak in Bhopal, India on Union Carbide Immediate Response Blog
- erin.donahue on Company Response
- Racheal Du on economic recovery for Union carbide
- Racheal Du on 25 years later …the area affected by the gas leak
- Racheal Du on here are some images of the plant and protesting people + bbc video
Archives
Categories
Meta
Author Archives: erin.donahue
Posts: 11 (archived below)
Comments: 2
Union Carbide Immediate Response Blog
Upon researching Union Carbide’s response to the Bhopal Disaster I find it peculiar how the company conducted itself when the crisis occurred and after. First of all, even though the focus of this is geared towards the tragedy when it actually occurred (1984) it is the company’s stance then and now that is relevant. The company has the same stance and maintains they are not responsible for the tragedy. To rehash Union Carbide’s stance – even 28 years later they said
“The 1984 gas leak in Bhopal was a terrible tragedy that understandably continues to evoke strong emotions even 28 years later. In the wake of the gas release, Union Carbide Corporation, and then chairman Warren Anderson, worked diligently to provide aid to the victims and set up a process to resolve their claims. All claims arising out of the release were settled 21 years ago at the explicit direction of and with the approval of the Supreme Court of India.The Bhopal plant was owned and operated by Union Carbide India, Limited (UCIL), an Indian company in which Union Carbide Corporation held just over half the stock. The other stockholders included Indian financial institutions and thousands of private investors in India. Union Carbide India Limited designed, built and managed the plant using Indian consultants and workers. In 1994, Union Carbide sold its entire stake in UCIL to Mcleod Russel India Limited of Calcutta, and UCIL was renamed Eveready Industries India Limited (Eveready Industries). As a result of the sale of its shares in UCIL, Union Carbide retained no interest in – or liability for – the Bhopal site. The proceeds of the UCIL sale were placed in a trust and exclusively used to fund a hospital in Bhopal, which now provides specialist care to victims of the tragedy.After the disaster, plant owner UCIL obtained permission from the government to conduct clean-up work at the site and did so under the direction of Indian central and state government authorities. Eveready Industries continued this remediation effort until 1998. That year, the Madhya Pradesh State Government, which owns and had been leasing the property to Eveready, took over the facility and assumed all accountability for the site, including the completion of any additional remediation. What additional clean-up work, if any, has been undertaken since that time is unclear.Shortly after the gas release, Union Carbide launched an aggressive effort to identify the cause. Engineering consulting firm, Arthur D. Little, Inc., conducted a thorough investigation. Its conclusion: The gas leak could only have been caused by deliberate sabotage. Someone purposely put water in the gas storage tank, and this caused a massive chemical reaction. Process safety systems had been put in place that would have kept the water from entering into the tank by accident.Union Carbide, together with the rest of the chemical industry, has worked to develop and globally implement Responsible Care to help prevent such an event in the future by improving community awareness, emergency preparedness and process safety standards.” (bhopal.com/union-carbide-statements).
While Union Carbide feels sympathetic and started to become more diligent following the crisis it’s their attitude that should be noted. – Which is the fact they were indeed negligent but don’t believe they should take responsibility.
- Former CEO Warren Anderson’s face in a Bhopal Protest
Also, I want to rehash the CEO’s actions following the crisis.
“Union Carbide CEO, Warren Anderson felt it was important for him personally to go to Bhopal to demonstrate the commitment the company had to the rescue effort and to the investigation. Most of his executives, and the U.S. State Department (p. 114) advised against his going. Corporate attorneys for Union Carbide were adamant that Anderson’s presence in Bhopal would only serve to tighten the connection between Union Carbide and the Bhopal tragedy.They and several senior executives continued to advise that, seeing how the Bhopal Plant was actually operated by a subsidiary of Union Carbide (Union Carbide India Limited) (Shrivastava, 1987, p. 51) and that the U.S. based corporation only owned about half the publicly traded stock in the Indian operation, the best strategy would be to distance Union Carbide’ leadership in the U.S. from the events in Bhopal. This might serve to limit future liability as the inevitable flood of lawsuits started to roll in and protect the corporation’s stock price.Warren Anderson rejected this advice (Kurzman, 1987, p. 115). He felt the scope of the tragedy was so significant and already connected in the mind of the public with Union Carbide that efforts to distance the Company from the tragedy were futile. Anderson traveled to India and was promptly arrested by Indian authorities upon arrival (Kurzman, p.108).The Company also experienced severe difficulties in getting accurate information from the plant in India regarding the specifics of the incident (Kurzman, p.89) Phone lines were scarce and already packed with calls. The Indian Government was not forthcoming with information, as they intended to shift blame away from themselves to Union Carbide (Shrivastava, p.97). As a result, the company’s first formal release regarding the Bhopal incident came one week after the tragedy (Smith, p. 154)”
(ou.edu/deptcomm/dodjcc/groups/02C2/Union%20Carbide.htm)
So what this article is saying that Warren Anderson, CEO in charge at the time of the tragedy, went over to the site because he wanted to show both the home and especially the host country that he and the company he was running were sympathetic towards the tragedy that occurred. These efforts were futile though and didn’t seem sincere enough to the people affected because after all Warren Anderson was able to go home at the end of the day where as many others who perished would no longer be able to. It’s crazy to read about how much chaos ensued after the crisis. While I can appreciate the CEO showing a bit of effort, the fact he did not influence the company’s lawyers or advisers to do something to help makes it seem like “it’s all talk but no action”
Posted in Uncategorized, Union Carbide
1 Comment
Union Carbide’s CEO Response/Actions
I found this information from a case study analyzing Union Carbide’s response after the crisis. Interesting because it says the CEO seems to be very sympathetic towards the tragedy at Bhopal. He even went when his company’s attorneys were against it.
“Union Carbide CEO, Warren Anderson felt it was important for him personally to go to Bhopal to demonstrate the commitment the company had to the rescue effort and to the investigation. Most of his executives, and the U.S. State Department (p. 114) advised against his going. Corporate attorneys for Union Carbide were adamant that Anderson’s presence in Bhopal would only serve to tighten the connection between Union Carbide and the Bhopal tragedy.
They and several senior executives continued to advise that, seeing how the Bhopal Plant was actually operated by a subsidiary of Union Carbide (Union Carbide India Limited) (Shrivastava, 1987, p. 51) and that the U.S. based corporation only owned about half the publicly traded stock in the Indian operation, the best strategy would be to distance Union Carbide’ leadership in the U.S. from the events in Bhopal. This might serve to limit future liability as the inevitable flood of lawsuits started to roll in and protect the corporation’s stock price.
Warren Anderson rejected this advice (Kurzman, 1987, p. 115). He felt the scope of the tragedy was so significant and already connected in the mind of the public with Union Carbide that efforts to distance the Company from the tragedy were futile. Anderson traveled to India and was promptly arrested by Indian authorities upon arrival (Kurzman, p.108).
The Company also experienced severe difficulties in getting accurate information from the plant in India regarding the specifics of the incident (Kurzman, p.89) Phone lines were scarce and already packed with calls. The Indian Government was not forthcoming with information, as they intended to shift blame away from themselves to Union Carbide (Shrivastava, p.97). As a result, the company’s first formal release regarding the Bhopal incident came one week after the tragedy (Smith, p. 154)
http://www.ou.edu/deptcomm/dodjcc/groups/02C2/Union%20Carbide.htm
Posted in Uncategorized
Comments Off on Union Carbide’s CEO Response/Actions
Corporate Response: Actual Statement
Found Union Carbide’s company response following the crisis.. more to come in regards to what their stance was/is + beyond
“The 1984 gas leak in Bhopal was a terrible tragedy that understandably continues to evoke strong emotions even 28 years later. In the wake of the gas release, Union Carbide Corporation, and then chairman Warren Anderson, worked diligently to provide aid to the victims and set up a process to resolve their claims. All claims arising out of the release were settled 21 years ago at the explicit direction of and with the approval of the Supreme Court of India.The Bhopal plant was owned and operated by Union Carbide India, Limited (UCIL), an Indian company in which Union Carbide Corporation held just over half the stock. The other stockholders included Indian financial institutions and thousands of private investors in India. Union Carbide India Limited designed, built and managed the plant using Indian consultants and workers. In 1994, Union Carbide sold its entire stake in UCIL to Mcleod Russel India Limited of Calcutta, and UCIL was renamed Eveready Industries India Limited (Eveready Industries). As a result of the sale of its shares in UCIL, Union Carbide retained no interest in – or liability for – the Bhopal site. The proceeds of the UCIL sale were placed in a trust and exclusively used to fund a hospital in Bhopal, which now provides specialist care to victims of the tragedy.
After the disaster, plant owner UCIL obtained permission from the government to conduct clean-up work at the site and did so under the direction of Indian central and state government authorities. Eveready Industries continued this remediation effort until 1998. That year, the Madhya Pradesh State Government, which owns and had been leasing the property to Eveready, took over the facility and assumed all accountability for the site, including the completion of any additional remediation. What additional clean-up work, if any, has been undertaken since that time is unclear. Shortly after the gas release, Union Carbide launched an aggressive effort to identify the cause. Engineering consulting firm, Arthur D. Little, Inc., conducted a thorough investigation. Its conclusion: The gas leak could only have been caused by deliberate sabotage. Someone purposely put water in the gas storage tank, and this caused a massive chemical reaction. Process safety systems had been put in place that would have kept the water from entering into the tank by accident. Union Carbide, together with the rest of the chemical industry, has worked to develop and globally implement Responsible Care to help prevent such an event in the future by improving community awareness, emergency preparedness and process safety standards.” http://www.bhopal.com/union-carbide-statements |
Posted in Uncategorized
Comments Off on Corporate Response: Actual Statement
MNE Profile – Union Carbide
For our Management 4880 MNE profile we will be covering the company Union Carbide. Union Carbide landed itself as a company dealing with crisis from the notorious “Bhpoal Tragedy”. Union Carbide is a “wholly owned subsidiary of The Dow Chemical Company. “Dow”, often refers generically to The Dow Chemical Company and its consolidated subsidiaries” (unioncarbide.com). Union Carbide is a company producing products in the chemical manufacturing industry. Many of its products are used in our daily lives. Some of the products they sell include: “ethylene glycol and hundreds of solvents, alcohols, surfactants, amines and other specialty products” Union Carbide primarily produces chemicals and polymers that undergo one or more further conversions by customers before reaching consumers. Some of these materials are high-volume commodities, while others are specialty products meeting the needs of smaller market niches. The end-uses served include paints and coatings, packaging, wire and cable, household products, personal care, pharmaceuticals, automotive, textiles, agriculture and oil and gas. (unioncarbide.com).
The Bhopal Tragedy is considered to be the worst industrial accident for any company up to this day. The incident occurred in 1984 at a pesticide plant in Bopal, Madyaha Pradesh. There was a gas leak at the plant and there were over 3000 immediate deaths after the gas leaked with thousands more in the following weeks as well as over 500,000 injuries (http://www.bhopal.net /oldsite/death-toll.html). That being said, the actual number is unknown even 27 years later because of the extensive reach the gas leak had. What is even more unfortunate after this disaster occurred is the fact that decades later this incident legally points out that Union Carbide is not liable for what happened to the people who passed away or got injured from the gas leak. “The summary judgement record certainly indicates that UCIL consulted with UCC about its waste disposal plans and on non-environmental business matter like its strategic plan. However, nothing in the evidence suggests the necessity of UCC’s approval for the actions about which plaintiffs complain,” the court said in its order… Moreover, there is no evidence in this extensive record indicating that UCIL manufactured pesticides on UCC’s behalf, entered into contracts or other business dealings on UCC’s behalf, or otherwise acted in UCC’s name,” it said.(news.outlookindia.com).
Since Union Carbide is a company that manufactures chemicals it needs to have locations that can provide ample space when producing the chemicals. According to the Bureau Labor of Statistics “The Chemical Manufacturing subsector is based on the transformation of organic and inorganic raw materials by a chemical process and the formulation of products. This subsector distinguishes the production of basic chemicals that comprise the first industry group from the production of intermediate and end products produced by further processing of basic chemicals that make up the remaining industry groups.” Even though the focus of this assignment is more towards the company’s international strategy, to make the industry easier to understand, guidelines on what chemicals are classified as are included. Again, according to the BLS “The chemical manufacturing subsector consists of these industry groups:
- Basic Chemical Manufacturing: NAICS 3251
- Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and Artificial Synthetic Fibers and Filaments Manufacturing: NAICS 3252
- Pesticide, Fertilizer, and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing: NAICS 3253
- Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing: NAICS 3254
- Paint, Coating, and Adhesive Manufacturing: NAICS 3255
- Soap, Cleaning Compound, and Toilet Preparation Manufacturing: NAICS 3256
- Other Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturing: NAICS 3259″
Due to the fact this industry deals with heavy toxins that can weaken or even destroy life, where a plant that produces these chemicals needs to be placed in locations that can limit impact on the general population. Even though we do not think about it, a lot of the materials we use in our daily lives consists of these heavy toxins companies such as Union Carbide produces. Since we use chemicals such as gas, soap, antifreeze etc. (all end products Union Carbide produces) we are able to keep many companies in the chemical manufacturing sector alive and thriving. Our consumerism is what determines the success of the chemical manufacturing industry. Even if we decided to take a more “green approach” and used less harsh chemicals the industry will still do well because chemicals/chemistry is a basic element we need to survive.
Union Carbide is a big company it has over 2,400 employees and possesses some of the industry’s most advanced process and catalyst technologies, and operates some of the most cost-efficient, large-scale production facilities in the world (unioncarbide.com). Its top competitors consist of BASF SE, Exxon Mobile Chemical Company, Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP. All of these companies are privately owned and therefore are not subject to sharing its company information with the public if it does not want to. That being said we want to continue the focus of Union Carbide. From 1981 to 1984, earnings per share rose steadily and Union Carbide is in good financial standings according to their annual reports. By 1985, the company’s market value dropped by 2/3 to less than $3 billion. Union Carbide’s debt stood at 63% of capital, and its equity was cut to a quarter of its former value. Income rose to 78% in 1987 to $232 million, but high debt service made it hard for the company to develop and introduce new products. In 1988, Union Carbide reduced its debt by more than $400 million and increase equity by almost $600 million.
Even though Union Carbide drew up a five year plan in 1979, it was intended that sales and earnings in 1983 should be respectively $14bn and $940m. In 1980 the group’s figures were $10bn and $673m. To reach its five-year goal, the group estimated that annual capital expenditure of $1.2bn would be required. It now expects actual capital expenditure to be running at $1.3bn-$1.4bn a year by 1983. Past five year plans is profiled here because it shows the company’s ambitions. It is safe to say that currently Union Carbide has similar ambitions of growth, if not more than what it had in the past. Recent activities have been characterized by a series of divestments. But now the group has a number of projects for expansion in hand. These include the building of a carbon fibers plant in California, consideration of a carbon fibers project in France, construction of a silicones plant in Italy, and expansion of battery operations in Europe.
When looking at a company it is always important to take a look at a “SWOT analysis”. For Union Carbide the breakdown of the analysis is as stated below:
Strengths:
- Technology leadership and innovation – advanced process technologies have given them a leadership position in their large Basic Chemicals and Polymers businesses. They produce their product very quickly because of their knowledge of technology. (global.factiva.com)
- Cost efficiency. Union Carbide Corporation “operates some of the largest, most cost-efficient chemical plants in the world.” Union Carbide Corporation operates two business segments. Specialties & Intermediates converts basic chemicals into a diverse portfolio of chemicals and polymers for industrial customers. The Basic Chemicals & Polymers segment produces chemicals for use by both the Specialties & Intermediates segment and third party customers. Because Union Carbide Corporation does not further process chemicals into specific consumer products, their operations are of bulk scale and allow for planning and timing of production to maintain high efficiency goals. (global.factiva.com)
- Joint ventures. Union Carbide Corporation has built a number of joint ventures with foreign corporations. These joint ventures have increased the amount of potential customers in foreign markets, and introducing Union Carbide Corporation to many new international markets. Union Carbide Corporation has formed joint ventures with Petrochemical Industries Company of Kuwait to produce chemicals primarily for Asian markets. They have also formed a joint venture with Enichem of Italy, named Polimeri Europa, which “is poised to become Europe’s lowest-cost polyethylene producer.” These and other strategic investments and alliances have promoted profitable growth globally.
- Managerial strategy – “The new human resources policies now reflect shared responsibility with employees for Union Carbide’s success.” Union Carbide Corporation has trimmed its middle level management and implemented “Teams” in every department to facilitate these new policies. Each team member has a voice and is educated in his specific field such that the teams can collaborate on any issues and develop solutions without a Manager. Only decisions that are not supported in existing policies must be further approved. This grants employees a great amount of empowerment and “spares some of the red tape” formerly involved in addressing day to day issues within the chemical plants. “Given more responsibility and encouraged to redesign the way they work, our people slash plant downtime and overtime costs, sharply reduce costly inventories of products and raw materials, simplify organizational structures, eliminate bottlenecks and reduce paperwork.” “Carbide Lays Out Its Strategy through 1983,” Chemical Week, September 19, 1979, p. 49.
In regards to the company’s market penetration strategy a New Business Development Department was formed in 1970 to coordinate the three areas outside of chemicals and plastics that Wilson didn’t sell: Biomedical Systems, Marine Foods, and Agricultural Systems. Another key organizational change was the disbanding of the Consumer & Related Products Division, which had contributed 22 percent of UCC’s annual revenues. The Eveready business was split off into a Battery Products Division, while Glad and Prestone were coordinated in a division with the production of their raw materials. Despite the fragmentation of the Consumer Products Division, there is hope that consumer products would contribute 50 percent of UCC’s revenues in the future. It was recognized that these relatively stable, high-margin product lines sustained Union Carbide through economic downturns (referenceforbusiness.com/history/ Ul-Vi/Union-Carbide-Corporation.html).
Weakness: As mentioned many times previously, Union Carbide’s weaknesses stem from products it produces. All the chemicals it manufacturers most definitely has some sort of detriment to the people who work with these chemicals and also to the environment around it.
Opportunities: While the company (and other companies in the industry) will most likely always produce harmful chemicals that will pollute the environment, there is an opportunity to be able to produce chemicals that could be less harmful than what is being released into the environment now.
Threats: Threats for Union Carbide certainly have heavy impacts. The chemical manufacturing industry is heavily competitive, especially with other huge conglomerate companies producing similar products. Not only that, the threat of potentially causing disasters similar to the Bhopal Tragedy always looms.
Producing its products on a domestic front vs. and international front has both pros and cons and it is understandable why a company such as Union Carbide would want to offshore/outsource its product development in other areas outside of the United States. With the creation of the EPA here, there is now more regulation and observation towards companies such as Union Carbide. Such “police dog” institutions don’t exist in other countries that might house a plant of the company’s. That being said, besides the recent news in 2012 rejecting Union Carbide as the liable source for the tragedy in Bhopal, this company has been continue to do what it does and produce the end user products we continue to buy today.
Posted in MNE profile final
Comments Off on MNE Profile – Union Carbide
Dow Acquiring Union Carbide
Article on why this information is important – huge milestone for the company’s prospects, even though it’s from 1999.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
http://money.cnn.com/1999/08/04/deals/dowchemical/
Posted in Uncategorized
Comments Off on Dow Acquiring Union Carbide
Company Perspectives
Top Competitors: BASF SE, Exxon Mobile Chemical Company, Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP (Source: Google Finance/Hoovers.com)
Union Carbide Corporation is a chemical and polymers company with over 3,800 employees. The company possesses some of the industry’s most advanced process and catalyst technologies, and operates some of the most cost-efficient, large-scale production facilities in the world. Union Carbide primarily produces chemicals and polymers that undergo one or more further conversions by customers before reaching consumers. Some of these materials are high-volume commodities, while others are specialty products meeting the needs of smaller market niches. The end-uses served include paints and coatings, packaging, wire and cable, household products, personal care, pharmaceuticals, automotive, textiles, agriculture and oil and gas.
(Answers.com got it’s source information from The Gale Group, Inc.)
Posted in Uncategorized
1 Comment
Chronology of Union Carbide
In detail timeline of Union Carbide’s history till current day occurances
http://www.endgame.org/carbide-history.html
Posted in Uncategorized
Comments Off on Chronology of Union Carbide
Chemical Manufacturing Industry Overview
Since Union Carbide is in the chemical manufacturing industry it is important for us to have information on the industry itself so that we are knowledgeable at every angle involving Union Carbide.
“The chemical manufacturing subsector is part of the manufacturing sector.
The Chemical Manufacturing subsector is based on the transformation of organic and inorganic raw materials by a chemical process and the formulation of products. This subsector distinguishes the production of basic chemicals that comprise the first industry group from the production of intermediate and end products produced by further processing of basic chemicals that make up the remaining industry groups.
North American Industry Classification System
The chemical manufacturing subsector consists of these industry groups:
- Basic Chemical Manufacturing: NAICS 3251
- Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and Artificial Synthetic Fibers and Filaments Manufacturing: NAICS 3252
- Pesticide, Fertilizer, and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing: NAICS 3253
- Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing: NAICS 3254
- Paint, Coating, and Adhesive Manufacturing: NAICS 3255
- Soap, Cleaning Compound, and Toilet Preparation Manufacturing: NAICS 3256
- Other Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturing: NAICS 3259″
http://www.bls.gov/iag/tgs/iag325.htm
Posted in Uncategorized
Comments Off on Chemical Manufacturing Industry Overview
Union Carbide Not Liable for Bhopal Tragedy
Since Union Carbide is most notable for the Bhopal Tragedy this article is definitely important to note.
“In a setback to the victims of the Bhopal gas tragedy, a US court has held that neither Union Carbide nor its former chairman Warren Anderson were liable for environmental remediation or pollution-related claims emanating from the world’s worst industrial accident.
US District Judge John Keena in Manhattan dismissed a lawsuit accusing the company of causing soil and water pollution around the Bhopal plant due to the disaster, and ruled that Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) and Anderson were not liable for remediation or pollution-related claims.
The court ruled that it was Union Carbide India Ltd, and not its parent company UCC that was responsible for the generation and disposal of the waste that polluted drinking water, and the liability rests with the state government.
Plaintiffs Janki Bai Sahu and others had alleged that “toxic substances seeped into a ground aquifer, polluting the soil and drinking water supply in residential communities surrounding the former Bhopal Plant site”.
They alleged that exposure to soil and drinking water polluted by hazardous waste produced Union Carbine India Ltd caused injuries.
“The summary judgement record certainly indicates that UCIL consulted with UCC about its waste disposal plans and on non-environmental business matter like its strategic plan. However, nothing in the evidence suggests the necessity of UCC’s approval for the actions about which plaintiffs complain,” the court said in its order.
“Moreover, there is no evidence in this extensive record indicating that UCIL manufactured pesticides on UCC’s behalf, entered into contracts or other business dealings on UCC’s behalf, or otherwise acted in UCC’s name,” it said.
In his written opinion, Judge Keenan concluded that – even when viewing the evidence in the most favourable light for the plaintiffs – UCC is not directly liable, nor liable as an agent of UCIL, nor liable under a veil-piercing analysis.
The world’s worst industrial accident led to the leak of poisonous methyl isocyanate, claiming thousands of lives in the Madhya Pradesh capital.
Over 3,000 people are believed to have died due to the immediate after effects of the tragedy. According to independent estimates, several thousands have subsequently died over the years due to ill-effects of the toxic waste in the environment.
Citing a 1998 court verdict in a case involving KFC, the court said that legally the mere assertion that a corporate parent is or was involved in the decision-making process of its subsidiary, or that it controlled the legitimate policies of its subsidiary, will not shift liabilities among distinct corporate entities.
“Moreover, there is no evidence to suggest that UCC’s approval power extended beyond the strategic plan to other areas of UCIL’s operations,” the court said.
The court observed that after the 1984 catastrophic gas leak claimed thousands of lives, the Government of India closed the Bhopal Plant.
In 1994, UCC sold its stake in Union Carbide India Ltd, after which time UCIL changed its name to Eveready Industries India Ltd (EIIL). In 1998, EIIL terminated its lease of the Bhopal Plant site and surrendered the property to the state government of Madhya Pradesh.
“As discussed in connection with the direct liability, the expanded summary judgement record demonstrates that UCC played a minimal role, if any, with respect to the decision to back-integrate the Bhopal Plant, the design of the plant’s waste disposal system, the choice and development of process technology used at the plant, and the burial of waste in a landfill.
“There is no need to pierce the corporate veil to prevent fraud or injustice because, even if there were evidence that UCC dominated UCIL, there is no allegation or evidence that UCC did so to commit a fraud or wrong that harmed Plaintiffs,” it said.
A statement from UCC following the verdict said: “In summary, yesterday’s court decision not only dismisses plaintiffs’ claims against UCC, but also clarifies that UCC has no liability related to the plant site and further acknowledges the matter of site ownership and liability as being the responsibility of the State Government of Madhya Pradesh”.”
http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=767127
Posted in Uncategorized
1 Comment
Union Carbide Products
Thought this would be necessary information to have on hand especially for the environmental portion of the profile since a lot of these products are used in peoples everyday lives.
“Union Carbide both produces and purchases ethylene, a basic building-block chemical, from components of crude oil and natural gas. We convert ethylene to polyethylene or react it with oxygen to produce ethylene oxide, the precursor to many of the products we sell: ethylene glycol and hundreds of solvents, alcohols, surfactants, amines and specialty products.
Some of the chemicals we make go directly into products used every day: polyethylene and polypropylene into food containers or toys; ethylene glycol into automotive antifreeze, and isopropanol into rubbing alcohol. Others are used in manufacturing processes to enhance quality and performance: ethyleneamines for wet-strength in paper towels; biocides as bacteria-growth inhibitors in cosmetics, and surfactants for soil removal in industrial cleaning. Other essential products include: deicing and anti-icing fluids to remove or prevent ice buildup on airplanes; amines for removing impurities in oil and gas refining processes; solution vinyl resins for industrial coatings to prevent corrosion, and polyethylene glycols to make tablets and pills easier to swallow
Whether they are adding strength to stretch wrap, or smoothness to paint, removing static from laundry or simply making a teddy bear more cuddly, the products of Union Carbide make great chemistry a part of daily life.”
http://www.unioncarbide.com/products
Posted in Uncategorized
Comments Off on Union Carbide Products