-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
Categories
Meta
Author Archives: wlam
Posts: 11 (archived below)
Comments: 0
Final Question
King Lear is one of the greatest written tragedies. Both the most vile and virtuous characters in the play die. Does the play seem to suggest that justice will ultimately triumph or is justice only an optimistic concept in a world filled with despair?
Posted in Uncategorized
Comments Off on Final Question
The Prince
Niccolo Machiavelli’s letter from his book The Prince resembles a New York Times article about Republican stance on making the economy better. Both the book and the article stress the importance of appearance. In Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince, Niccolo presents his perspective on how to gain and/or maintain power. In his perspective, Niccolo stresses the importance of maintaining a good public appearance. Niccolo mentions how maintaining a good public appearance does not require a person to have any substance in his quote “it is not necessary, then for a prince to have of the qualities mentioned above, but it is certainly necessary that he appear to have them.” (C, 237)
(double indent function) everyone sees what you appear to be, few touch what you are; and those few do not dare oppose the opinions of the many who have the majesty of the state defending them; and with regard to the actions of all men, and especially with princes where there is no court of appeal, we must look at the final result (C, 237)
In this quote by Machiavelli, he explains how important appearance is because majority of the people only see and judge solely on appearance. As a result, this majority will make the minority who actually knows whether or not a person has substance seem unnoticeable.
The New York Times article relates to Machiavelli because Republicans have successfully created an image of being more capable of dealing with the economy. However, the main idea of the article is that Republicans have currently done little to fix economy. The article states how a policy document provided by the House Republicans called “Pledge to America” was criticized for providing little direction on how to deal with the economy due to its vagueness. In a statement by Phillip L. Swagel, an assistant Treasury secretary policy during President Bush’s presidency, he says “even if the next two years do not result in legislative compromises on taxes or entitlement reform or other issues, we will see a vigorous and open debate in Congress about economic policy – a huge change from the Obama administration’s closed-minded and self-righteous approach” (B3) shows strong relation to Machiavelli because Phillip L. Swagel clearly states it only matters that Republicans appear to be doing something rather than actually accomplishing a task. On the other hand, The Prince and the article are different because Machiavelli explains the importance of creating a good appearance for an individual or group, but the quote by Phillip L. Swagel in the article goes further by showing how damaging the appearance of the opposition can also be important.
Posted in Uncategorized
1 Comment
Throne of Blood
In a New York Times article, Charles Isherwood apparently found Ping Chong’s “Throne of Blood” to be “as boring to look at as it is to listen to” (C3). Accoring to Charles Isherwood, the only pleasing aspect of the play were the outfits and as a result, Isherwood did not enjoy the play. However, i found the play to be quite entertaining. Ping Chong was very creative in his use of lights. For example, he used lights to create a door, and used lights to show blood scatter. I also thought the actors performed really well because i noticed that the play used recordings from the movie, but the actors were synchronized with their roles and made the recordings seem natural.
Overall, Charles Isherwood seems to be unreasonably critical of the play. The play was well performed, and a great experience. I only found the humid atmosphere in the theater to be slightly uncomfortable.
http://theater.nytimes.com/2010/11/12/theater/reviews/12throne.html?scp=1&sq=Charles%20Isherwood%20Throne&st=cse
Posted in Uncategorized
1 Comment
“The Thousand and One Nights”
The reading of “The Thousand and One Nights” is almost identical to a situation occuring in a recent New York Times article called “Diana’s Ring Seals Prince William’s Marriage Plans. Both woman in their respective stories are educated. For example, Shahrazad “[is] intelligent, knowledgeable, wise and refined. She ha[s] read and learned” (B, 414) and Kate Middleton “would be the first queen in British history to have a college degree, or indeed, to have any college education at all” (A, 14). Both Shahrazad and Kate Middleton are courageous enough to step forward and put their lives at risk. Shahrazad is courageous because the King, who she desires to be with has a custom of “tak[ing] every night the daughter of a merchant or a commener, spend[ing] the night with her, then have her put to death the next morning. He continued to do this until all the girls perished…” (B, 414). By spending the night with the King, Shahrazad takes on a risk of being killed by the king’s vizier who is her father. Kate Middleton is courageous because she has the ring that Prince William’s father gave to his mother. The ring could possibly foreshadow a tragic death for Kate that has already occured to the previous owner of the ring. Although both woman put themselves in a situation where their death may be imminent, the reason they decide to do so are vastly different. The disparity lies in the fact that Shahrazad desire to be with the King is to stop his tyranical ways and Kate’s desire to be with Prince William is for love and happiness.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/17/world/europe/17royal.html?ref=todayspaper
Posted in Uncategorized
1 Comment
Asian Literature and Afghan women
Sei Shonagon is a Japanese lady who is famous for The Pillowbook. The Pillowbook is most known for the diaries written by Sei Shonagon in which she freely expresses her thoughts. However, when The Pillowbook was written, women were not granted the freedom of expression and as such, Sei Shonagon did not want her writing to be known to the public because she states “[She] wrote these notes at home, when [she] had a good deal of time to [herself] and thought no one would notice what [she] was doing…[she] was careful to keep [her] book hidden” (B, 258). By writing The Pillowbook, she found an escape from the oppression that banned her from expressing herself. The Pillowbook gave Sei Shonagon freedom that wouldn’t have been available otherwise to the extent that Sei Shonagon often criticize others in a way that “it might appear malicious and even harmful to other people” (B, 258).
In a New York Times article called “For Afghan Wives, a Desperate, Fiery Way Out”, we see a parallel with The Pillowbook. The Afghan women are constantly being opressed and are severely limited in what they can do. “Their family is their fate. Their is little chance for education, little choice about whom a woman marries, no choice at all about her role in her own house. Her primary role is to serve her husband’s family” (A1). The opression is so great that one Afghan woman, Farzana had beatings that “went on for four years” (A1) however, Farzana discovered a way to escape from the opression and in her mind, free herself by litting herself on fire. By litting herself on fire, Farzana expresses all the sadness and pain she has felt and endured from the oppresion.
Farzana’s attempt to end her own life by burning herself is similar to Sei Shonagon’s secret attempt to write the Pillowbook. Both women discover a way to express their thoughts in a society that condemns it. However, a noticeable difference is that Sei Shonagon’s method of expressing her thoughts is suppose to be private whereas Farzana’s method of expressing herself is suppose to be public such that everyone can see how she is being opressed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/08/world/asia/08burn.html?_r=1
Posted in Uncategorized
1 Comment
Thoughts on possible midterm questions
1) How does Genesis and the Odyssey show that incurring the wrath of Gods is dangerous?
2) How is the power of a higher deity in the Book of Job and Gilgamesh different? How is it similar?
3) In The Epic of Gilgamesh and the Genesis, how is the theme of doubles prevalent?
Posted in Uncategorized
Comments Off on Thoughts on possible midterm questions
The Odyssey
An article in the New York Time called “Germany, Unscathed, Remains a Hub of Terrorism Scare” shows a resemblance to the Odyssey. In the article, Germany is basically showing how great of a nation it is and downplaying the negative things in the country. For example, the article states “This wealthy port city advertises its bustling canals and bridges and its towering 19th century churches to draw visitors from around the world. It is less interested in drawing more attention to Al Quds Mosque, where the Sept. 11 hijacker Mohamed Atta prayed and which has become a destination for jihadi tourism.” Germany makes it seem as if the area is a great place to reside, however, they downplay the potential danger the area has. In the Odyssey a similar situation occurs, when Odysseus is leading a group of crew members and they are placed in a difficult situation. Odysseus leads them towards Scylla a six-headed monster instead of Charybdis, a giant whirlpool and is shown when Odysseus shouts
‘You helmsman, here’s your order- burn it in your mind- the steering oar of our rolling ship is in your hands. Keep her clear of that smoke and surging breakers, head for those crags or she’ll catch you off guard, she’ll yaw over there- you’ll plunge us all in ruin!’ So [He] shout[s].” (A, 405-406)
Odysseus order shows how he downplays the path towards Scylla by not mentioning how dangerous Scylla is and only mentions how dangerous Charydbis is. The article and the Odyssey show how in both scenario, leaders deceive the ones they lead because the leaders believe it would cause more harm. The leader in the article would be Germany leading its citizens and the leader in the Odyssey is Odysseus leading his crew members.
Slackman, Michael. “Germany, Unscathed, Remains a Hub of the Terrorism Scare.” New York Times. 13 Oct 2010.
Link:
Posted in Uncategorized
39 Comments
The Book of Job
The Book of Job strongly relates to a recent New York Times article called “Suicides Put Light on Pressures of Gay Teenagers” where the protagonists are in a dilemma. As a result, the protagonists Job and Seth Walsh are both suffering. In addition, both of them are the characters or persons being attacked by an attacker who is the opposing force. Job is being attacked by God who places several obstacles before Job by basically cursing his fortune he has. Job is cursed in several ways, for example, “the fire of god fell from heaven and burned up the sheep and the servants, and consumed them” (126) in which the fire god annihilated Job’s sheep and servants as a result of God’s curse. In the New York Times article, Seth Walsh is being abused for being gay, “Seth went into the backyard of his home in the desert town of Tehachapi, Calif., and hanged himself, apparently unable to bear a relentless barrage of taunting, bullying and other abuses at the hands of his peers.” They are both in a sense, helpless because Job is a mortal, and Seth Walsh is only part of a small community.
Although there are similarities between Job’s story and the New York Times article, there are also differences. In Job’s case God’s curse on Job can not be comprehended by mortals. In Seth Walsh case, he was abused because the teens wanted to taunt and bully him out of pure enjoyment. Secondly, the end result of both stories is different because although Job and Seth Walsh cursed their lives, Job did not commit suicide, but Seth did. Lastly, Job was actually rewarded by God after the trials he faced, but Seth doesn’t seem be even remotely rewarded.
McKinley, Jesse. “Suicides Put Light on Pressures of Gay Teenagers.” New York Times 4 Oct. 2010, New York ed.: A9. Print.
Posted in Uncategorized
Comments Off on The Book of Job
Relation between the “Epic of Gilgamesh” and “Genesis”
The readings of the “Epic of Gilgamesh” and “Genesis” both present a common theme of human lives under the control of a higher being. In the “Epic of Gilgamesh”, one of the gods, Enlil almost annihilated the entire human population. In the “Genesis”, God also almost annihilated the entire human population. Although both stories present the common theme of a higher being controlling the lives of human, there are differences. One difference between the “Epic of Gilgamesh” and the “Genesis” is the reason of the annihilation. Enlil decided to destroy humankind at his whim because “The gods may come to the incense offering, but Enlil may not come to the incense offering, because without considering he brought about the Flood and consigned my people to annihilation (A, 94). God in the “Genesis” desired to destroy humankind entirely because God wanted to punish humans for being evil and regretted creating humans. “And the LORD saw that the evil of human creature was great on the earth and that every scheme of his heart’s devising was only perpetually evil…. ‘I will wipe out the human race I created from the face of the earth, from human to cattle to crawling thing to the fowl of the heavens, for I regret that I have made them’” (A, 34). Another difference between the two stories is that in the “Epic of Gilgamesh”, there are several gods who conflict with each other and even among the gods; there are gods that are superior while in the “Genesis”, there is only one all-powerful God who is undisputed.
Posted in Uncategorized
4 Comments
Epic of Gilgamesh #2
A major theme in the Epic of Gilgamesh is also shown in a New York Times article called “Young Greeks Seek Options Elsewhere.” In the Epic of Gilgamesh, the King has a strong desire to leave his home. Gilgamesh desires economic prosperity and believes he can achieve prosperity by going on a journey to Cedar Forest to obtain Cedar trees which represents economic fortune. Gilgamesh’s desire is shown when he declared “If I kill Humbaba and cut off his Cedar let there be rejoicing all over the land” (Gilgamesh, 69) to Ninsun, the Great Queen, who is supposedly wise. In the New York Times article, Alexandra Mallosi, a woman that resides in Athens desires to leave. She resembles Gilgamesh because she desires to leave for an economic reason. Alexandra Mallosi is going on a journey to Abu Dhabi to work as a hotel sales manager. She believes her journey to Abu Dhabi would give her economic fortune because according to her “In other countries, young people are encouraged. In Greece, they are held back.” (B1) Lastly, Gilgamesh and Alexandra Mallosi are going on a journey that present an obstacle. They both are traveling to an area they are not particularly familiar of.
Kitsantonis, Niki. “Young Greeks Seek Options Elsewhere.” New York Times 15 September 2010, New York ed.: B1. Print.
Link:
Posted in Uncategorized
Comments Off on Epic of Gilgamesh #2