Genesis and Gilgamesh comparison

There exist many similarities between “Genesis” and “The Epic of Gilgamesh”. One of those similarities is the use of a female figure as the cause of enlightenment between good and evil. This similarity is shown by the lines “The women, whom you gave by me, she gave me from the tree, and I ate” (A, 23) from “Genesis” and “Eat the food … as is the custom of the land” (A, 65) from “The Epic of Gilgamesh.”  In “Genesis”, Eve offered Adam the apple from the forbidden tree and Adam ate it. Eating the apple expose Adam and Eve to the good and evil that exists in the world. Similarly, the Harlot’s offering of the bread and wine eventually lead to Enkidu being “enlightened” of the good and evil that exists in the world, when previously, he had only the instinct to survive.

There is also a difference between the losses of paradise cause by a female figure. Eve was tricked into taking the apple from the forbidden tree by a snake. Her driving force in taking the apple and eating it was due to her curiosity to know whether God or the snake was right. The Harlot was sent by Gilgamesh for the purpose of “civilizing” Enkidu. The major factor in the Harlot’s success was her capability to take advantage of Enkidu’s sexual urges and using it to gain his trust.

Posted in Genesis - Gilgamesh | 77 Comments

Genesis vs Gilgamesh

The Epic of Gilgamesh discusses the story of how Gilgamesh and Enkidu became friends, going against what the Gods wanted, and then how Gilgamesh dealt with the death of his new friend.  Genesis is the story of how one God created mankind, along with everything else on Earth, and what punishments He put upon them when they acted wrongly. Although these stories seem very different they have many similarities within them. The most obvious comparison would be that in both stories there was a vast flood. In Gilgamesh this flood was created by the Gods because they were angry with the people. Only Utanapishtim was told to build a boat so he could save himself, other living beings, and the animals. The Epic states, “Tear down the house and build a boat! Abandon wealth and seek living beings! Spurn possessions and keep alive living beings! Make all living being go up into the boat.” (Gilgamesh, 91)
Likewise in Genesis a flood was created by the Lord because he felt “the evil of the human creature was great on earth.” The Lord advised Noah, whom he favored, to build an ark that would protect himself, his family, and the animals. In both cases the floods seem very alike, however they do differ in ways. When Utanapishtim loaded his boat for the flood he not only brought his family and the animals with him, he also brought the craftsmen that built the boat. This shows he wanted to preserve the knowledge and skills of mankind. In contrast, Noah did not bring his craftsmen. He brought only what the Lord told him to save, which was himself, his wife, his sons, their wives, and two of each animal. Another difference was the way the flood was brought to the land. The gods in Gilgamesh created a storm that made the river overflow and flood the land. This storm lasted for six days and seven nights. Where in Genesis it was a long period of rain that flooded the land. Genesis says, “’For in seven days’ time I will make it rain on the earth forty days and forty nights and I will wipe out from the face of the earth all existing things that I have made.” (Genesis, 35) There are other differences in these texts aside from the flood as well. In the Epic knowledge of the people is encouraged and appreciated. They have acquired the skills to build and grow food. “Go up the wall of Uruk and walk around, examine its foundation, inspect its brickwork thoroughly. Is not even the core of the brick structure made of kiln-fired brick, and did not the Seven Sages themselves lay out its plans?” (Gilgamesh, 59) This extract from the Epic shows how vast their knowledge is to build such a wall and how much it is appreciated. On the other hand, when the people in Genesis start to obtain the knowledge of crafting this angers the Lord. When He sees what they are doing he creates multiple languages so that they do not understand each other and scatters them over the land. The Lord does not see these skills as an advantage and He does not want them to have any knowledge. Another main difference in these tales is that they both have supernatural characters in them. The difference is that in the Epic of Gilgamesh there are multiple Gods being described, showing polytheism. In Genesis there is just one single God, the Lord, which resembles monotheism. This just shows some of the similarities and differences these stories share.

Posted in Genesis - Gilgamesh | 1 Comment

Gilgamesh#2

     When I was reading the article “James Bacon, Journalist and Celebrity Friend, Dies at 96” in The New York Times, I immediately found some connections that I could relate with the Epic of Gilgamesh. James Bacon an Associated Press reporter is very well known as the friend of many famous people including presidents and celebrities such as singers and actors. “Mr. Bacon had a knack for befriending A-list celebrities. He palled around with John Wayne, shared whiskey with Frank Sinatra, was a confidant of Marilyn Monroe and met eight United States presidents.” Similarly, Enkidu has a friend, Gilgamesh, the king of Uruk. Gilgamesh is well known because he goes for many adventurous journeys. “He who has seen everything…experienced all things” (A 59).
     Both of these characters not only have famous friends but are also loyal and trustworthy. For example, James Bacon is able to make friendships with people who can’t make relationships easily. “They just trusted him, Mr. Rosenfield said. If you look at the people he was friendly with — Sinatra, Elizabeth Taylor — these were people who didn’t always have friendly relationships with the press.” Similarly, Enkidu is a good friend of Gilgamesh. They both fight together against enemies and experience many adventures. As Gilgamesh says Enkidu is “a friend and advisor” (A 65). Gilgamesh can trust Enkidu and share everything with him. 
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/20/arts/20bacon.html

Posted in Gilgamesh | Comments Off on Gilgamesh#2

Gilgamesh#2

I found connections between the Epic of Gilgamesh and The New York Times article “The Best Two Women Could Do” written by Ariel Kaminer. The article is about a lesbian couple who faces many difficulties. However, they are highly motivated to solve problems together.

Both pieces of writings project very intimate relationships between two people. The Epic of Gilgamesh describes the friendship between Gilgamesh and Enkidu. They are introduced to each other in a fight; thus, it creates an extremely high connection between them. Gilgamesh’s mother says something interesting about Enkidu (while she is translating a dream) when she asserts that “the axe that you saw is a man, whom you love and embrace as a wife, but whom I have made compete with you” (A 65).  Also, Gilgamesh calls Enkidu a “friend and advisor” with a great respects (A 65). Similarly, “The Best Two Women Could Do” is about two ladies, Ms. Bacolas and Ms. Glazer, who are “introduced by a mutual friend outside a bar.” Then, they fall in love and spend every weekend together. In fact, they went to parties, they went dancing, and “in the mornings, Ms. Bacolas cooked them amazing breakfasts: scrambled eggs with truffle oil, feta and tomatoes on millet toast. After too many years in heavy, doomed relationships, they could not get over how easy it all was” which represents their strong relationship.

In both cases, they are looking to improve their lives which require them to travel. Gilgamesh and Enkidu travel to Cedar Forest to kill Humbaba and become famous for many generations. They know that death takes away bodies but immortality is to be memorable for others. In addition, it is necessary to “establish fame” (A 73). However, they also use their trips as a source of getting cedar wood which is expensive and desired material used for building walls. Similarly, Ms. Bacolas and Ms. Glazer have to travel outside of New York City to make their marriage dream come true. Also, marriage gave them an opportunity to “ protect themselves and their joint property, as they wanted to give Ms. Bacolas the right to make medical decisions on Ms. Glazer’s behalf,” which gave them comfort of sharing and improvement in their lives.

Last but not least, in both examples health condition of one partner seriously affects the other. For instance, Gilgamesh sees Enkidu slowly losing energy as “Enkidu lies down [the] first day, [the second] second day,…[until] Enkidu’s illness grew ever worse” and when he dies “Enkidu’s eyes do not move, as [Gilgamesh] touched his heart , but it beat no longer” and Gilgamesh doesn’t want to burn Enkidu’s body (A 82-83). Moreover, he becomes very upset and behaves in a wild manner. Therefore, he feels afraid of death and wants to find a way to becomes immortal. Similarly, Ms. Bacolas and Ms. Glazer are affected by unexpected cancer. “Ms. Glazer learned she had breast cancer. A double mastectomy followed, then five more operations, along with radiation and chemotherapy.” They face serious illness which can lead to death and separation of their love. So, they don’t postpone important decisions anymore. They also have great opportunity to see the strength of their feelings and fight against the cancer together.

Posted in Gilgamesh | Comments Off on Gilgamesh#2

Connection of the Epic.

In the Epic of Gilgamesh, the people of Uruk are in a very tensed about the deeds of Gilgamesh. He is the king of the city, Uruk, so he has extreme power to do what ever he likes. He takes away the daughters from parents, wives from husbands and sons to put them in the army of the country. The people are very worried and concerned about themselves, so they call the gods and ask them to help them and release them from the suffering. . “ You made him, O Aruru, now create his equal; let it be as like him has his own reflection, his second self, stormy heart for stormy heart. Let them contend together and leave Uruk in quiet.” (1:13) They tell them what their problems are and why they need to be helped away from Gilgamesh.
Similarly in the article, the people of Haiti are writing to help them from the very dire straits that they are living in.“We don’t want to die of hunger and also we want to send our children to school. I give glory to God that I am still alive — but I would like to stay that way!” They recently suffered a very big disaster in the country and now the country is suffering even worst situations. It is very common to the people of Uruk, who are suffering under the rule of Gilgamesh. Gilgamesh can be compared to the poverty that Haitian people are suffering. But in Haiti, the people are writing their pleas and dropping of in the collection box, they are writing their suffering and helplessness in the letter. But in the Epic, the people summon the gods for help. Therefore, I think that the these two text resembles.

Posted in Gilgamesh | Comments Off on Connection of the Epic.

Gilgamesh vs Nadal

There are many stories in real life that can compare to the Epic of Gilgamesh. One article is “Nadal Savors His Latest Role: All-Courts Player” from September 15ths New York Times.

In the Epic, Gilgamesh is victorious. Along with his best friend Enkidu, he takes down the mighty Humbaba on his quest to the Cedar Forest, and kills the Bull of the Heavens when it tries to go after him. Rafael Nadal is just as victorious. This past week, he won the United States Open, a very competitive tennis tournament.

There is no one as strong and triumphant in Uruk than Gilgamesh and Enkidu. The Epic states,

“We grappled with and killed the Bull of Heaven,

we destroyed Humbaba who lived in the Cedar Forest,

we slew lions in the mountain passes!” (p87, lines 47-49)

The same is for the world of tennis. Nadal, along with Andre Agassi are “… the only men to have won the four majors, the Davis Cup, and the Olympics.” (B16) There is no one else like these two tennis players.

Posted in Gilgamesh | Comments Off on Gilgamesh vs Nadal

Gilgamesh related to Nadal

During class, I thought to myself, how the story of Gilgamesh can relate to anything in the sports section. When the first group presented their argument, it made so much sense to me.

Nadal is winner. He is well-driven and committed in being the best. Nadal wants to be known around the world. Everything that he accomplishes is added to his legacy. Only 24 years old, he has already reached the top. Recently, he won the US OPEN. It started off very easy for him. There was nobody that gave him a real challenge. It was not until he met Djokovic that he actually broke a “sweat.”

Like the story of Gilgamesh’s journey for Humbaba, everything was fairly easy until he met Humbaba. Gilgamesh had to overcome a new obstacle that he has never really seen before. In Nadal’s case, he never had to worry about losing a set.

One can say that both are winners, kings, and definitely the best. No matter what goes in their way, they are both committed in making sure that they finish at the top.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Gilgamesh related to Nadal

Gilgamesh

A recent article about a proposed ban on smoking in outdoor public location has some similarity to themes in “The Epic of Gilgamesh.” Mayor Bloomberg proposes the idea of passing a bill that makes smoking on beaches, parks and boardwalks illegal. This proposal can be a seen as a continuation of his “journey” to end second hand smoking. Gilgamesh went on a long journey to kill Humbaba.  Both of their “journeys” are tough to complete. Gilgamesh has to kill a fierce some beast. The extent of the danger is shown by the line “In order to keep the Cidar safe, Enlil assigned him as a terror to human beings.”(A, 68) Bloomberg has to gain the support of both smokers and non-smokers while still showing that he isn’t encroaching on their civil rights. Bloomberg is also facing the challenge of disgruntle smokers after the recent tax on cigarettes.

As leaders, both Bloomberg’s and Gilgamesh’s journey has benefits for their society. The killing of Humbaba would allow the citizen’s of Gilgamesh’s kingdom to access the cider trees that Humbaba was guarding. The ban on smoking in outdoor public places further protect children from second hand smoking as  well as allow people to get a fresh air at places that were once filled with smokers. 

“Mayor’s Next Target for a Smoking Ban: Parks and Beaches” (Sept 16, 2010 A26)

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/16/nyregion/16smoking.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=mayor’s%20new%20target%20for%20a%20smoking%20ban&st=cse

Posted in Gilgamesh | Comments Off on Gilgamesh

Gilgamesh 2

The Epic of Gilgamesh directly intertwines with an article in the New York Times called “U.S Debates Karzai’s Place in Fighting Corruption.” In this article, the U.S attempts to remain cordial with Prime Minister to unite against the more dangerous enemy – the terrorists. The U.S resemble the Gods in the Epic. The U.S is concerned of a problem, and immediately react. In the Epic, the Gods saw how Gilgamesh was abusing his power, and sent Enkidu to stop him. Enkidu and the U.S both feel the same way about themselves; “I am the mighty one!” (A. 63) Also, Enkidu and Gilgamesh united after their conflict to fight the bigger enemy, the bull. The U.S has the same goal; to unite with the Prime Minister to defeat the sworn enemy- the Taliban. “Such a change would represent a significant shift in strategy for an administration that once pinned much of the blame for Afghan corruption on Mr. Karzai, but is now worried that escalating tensions between Kabul and Washington could alienate Mr. Karzai and sabotage the broader campaign to battle the Taliban.” The article and the epic hold many of the same parallels.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Gilgamesh 2

Gilgamesh 2

The Epic of Gilgamesh correlates to an article in the New York Times called “U.S Debates Karzai’s Place in Fighting Corruption.” This article states that the US wants to keep Karzai in power, but the risk of this may add on. Karzai’s previous acts are the debate on whether or not he should take a major part in rooting out corruption. US want to restrain Karzai from too much given power, but at the same time, want to battle the Taliban with him. In the Epic, Gilgamesh is the most powerful and he oppresses all the citizens. The Gods want Gilgamesh to remain in power, but there is a major issue if they continue letting him do so. Therefore, Enkidu is sent to prevent Gilgamesh from his wrong-doings and together they take on a journey to fight Humbaba and even kill the Bull of Heaven. This is very much alike the article in the New York Times, even though there is a suspicion of corruption, US and Karzai are still working together to fight Taliban. “The discussion on corruption, in essence, is really a discussion about our relationship with Karzai,” said one senior Obama administration official. With this being said, Karzai is basically Gilgamesh who is oppressing the citizens of Uruk. Both Karzai and Gilgamesh comes close with others to defeat one main enemy.

Posted in Gilgamesh | Comments Off on Gilgamesh 2