Gilgamesh 2

The Epic of Gilgamesh and a recent article “U.S. Debates Karzai’s Place in Fighting Corruption”, taken from the New York Times, have many parallels with each other.

First of all, the main character of the Epic, Gilgamesh, is a king of Uruk whom the Gods made very strong and powerful, whom they “granted … the totality of knowledge of all” (Damrosch, p. 59). Even though it is provided by the Gods, Gilgamesh misuses his power and oppresses his own people: “[he] does not leave a son to his father, … [he] does not leave a girl to her betrothed” (Damrosch, p. 60). So, exploited and anxious, people seek help from the Gods. Similarly in the article, the Afghan government, originally empowered by “the billions of dollars in [the US] government money that flows into Afghanistan each year”, “abuses ordinary Afghans”, and due to its wrongdoings “fuels anger among Afghans and drives many into the ranks of the insurgency” (Mazzetti, Nordland, 2010).

Despite of all misdeeds however, the Gods don’t want to simply eliminate Gilgamesh all together. On the contrary, they still prefer him to remain in power. Therefore, to restrain Gilgamesh the Gods send Enkidu who is “equal to Gilgamesh’s stormy heart”; thus, they can “be a match for each other so that Uruk may find peace” (Damrosch, p.61). In the same way, the US need “to maintain ties with the Afghan government” (Mazzetti, Nordland, 2010); hence, Karzai is assisted to become a president of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, so he can follow the advises of “the Gods” (meaning the US) and “root the corruption in its own government”.

Even though both “Gilgamesh-Enkidu” and “Afghan Government-Karzai” relations are destined to be those of foes, the parts still manage to become friends at the end, joining their enormous powers to fight other enemies, such as Humbaba and the Taliban.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/15/world/asia/15corruption.html?scp=1&sq=us%20debates%20afghan&st=cse

Posted in Gilgamesh | Comments Off on Gilgamesh 2

Gilgamesh 2

In the Epic, Gilgamesh is a king who is two-thirds God and one-third human, making him a very powerful being. Although he may not be liked by all the people of Uruk, he is unquestionably respected by them. As a result of this respect Gilgamesh has a certain responsibility to the people. He must accomplish victory in his quest to destroy the evil monster Humbaba who occupies a forbidden forest and is said to be undefeated. The fact that no one is known to leave this forest alive makes it more difficult for Gilgamesh to achieve what he sets out to do. When he finally slays the mighty monster, who is said to be “undefeated”, the victory is a great one. Overpowering someone weak doesn’t have the same feeling of success as defeating someone extremely strong. Gilgamesh takes great pride in destroying Humbaba and accomplishing his duty to the people of Uruk.

In a New York Times article titled Nadal savors his career grand slam is a story about a man who also overcomes obstacles in the quest of sheer victory. As the winner of the United States Open, Rafael Nadal is certainly basking in the glory of being king of the tennis court. Just like Gilgamesh who was a powerful king, Nadal had a few problems standing in the way of his quest to win such an important championship.  “Everybody has obstacles, but Rafa’s had his knees and his personal problems and physical problems of last year. I think all that only makes this sweeter for him.” (NYT)Through all his troubles Rafael Nadal won the US Open and just like the people of Uruk were proud of Gilgamesh, Nadal’s fans were surely pleased.

Posted in Gilgamesh | Comments Off on Gilgamesh 2

Gilgamesh

Nadal is champion of the tennis world; he is the youngest player to win all three majors in the same year. On the other hand Gilgamesh is the king of Uruk who wants to build an empire that will last forever. Nadal also wants to win the US open championship because it was the only title that he had not won also by wining he would be in an elite club which not a lot people can reach.

To accomplish their goal both Nadal and Gilgamesh have a remarkable victory. Nadal’s victory came this past Monday over Novak Djokovic in the US open final. During the two weeks of competition Nadal’s effort was noticeable because he won his previous matches very easily. It was not until the last match that he lost a set, but he was able to rebound and finally won his long dreamed US open singles title. Similarly, in the Epic, Gilgamesh travels long distances to fight an enemy named Humbaba. As a result, Gilgamesh is able to cut down the cedar trees and bring them to his kingdom.

They also have to overcome their weaknesses.  Gilgamesh’s weakness is his fear of Hunbaba. While in the forest Gilgamesh has dreams that a monster is attacking him, but his friend keeps telling him that his dreams are positive and that they will come up victorious.  Nadal had his own problems; for example his knee injury which kept him for limited competitions throughout last year. Also, he had some personal problems where he could not completely concentrate on the competition.

At the end both of them have a sense of pride about what they have accomplished. In the New York Times article Nadal states, “But I feel clearly much more at home in New York than in 2001.”  (The New York Times Wednesday, September 15, 2010, B16) Gilgamesh has a sense of pride when he says to the boatman

“Go, Urshanabi, onto the wall of Uruk and walk around.

Examine its foundation, inspect its brickwork thoroughly—

Is not even the core of the brick structure of Kiln-fired brick,

And did not the Seven Sages themselves lay out its plan?

One league city, one league palm gardens,

One league lowlands, the open area of the Ishtar Temple,

Three leagues and the open area of Uruk the wall encloses.” (A, 97)

These lines above show us how proud Gilgamesh is of his kingdom, and he  offers his realm to the boatman by saying this is my city, my place.

New York Times:

Posted in Gilgamesh | Comments Off on Gilgamesh

Gilgamesh 2

The Epic of Gilgamesh can in many ways be compared to a recent article from the New York Times entitled, Gates to Meet with Russian Defense Minister.  In the epic, Gilgamesh and Enkidu’s relationship starts off rocky to say the least. Enkidu feels he must teach Gilgamesh a lesson for the way he treats his people. They proceed to battle, however in the end become the best of friends and wind up having a unique and brother-like relationship. This is a great comparison to the enemy-like relationship between the United States and Russia during the cold war. However as acknowledged in the article, Defense secretary Robert Gates of the U.S. and Anatoly E. Serdyukov of Russia are working together to combat a similar burden.  The article states, “…they are expected to find common ground on a topic that would have been unimaginable during the cold war.” (NY Times) Gilgamesh is a king with much experience on the battle field and who knows how to handle his armies of men as stated in the epic, “He walks out in front, the leader, and walks at the rear, trusted by his companions” (A60) Enkidu on the other hand was bred from the wild and therefore has never been able to gain experience of the sort. Robert Gates of the U.S. has had many years of familiarity with military business and knows has had experience of his own. The New York Times reveals that Mr. Serdyukov of Russia has no knowledge in the necessary field, in this case the military, and therefore he is left with little or no experience similar to Enkidu. These are just a few of the many comparisons that can be used in discussing both the Epic of Gilgamesh and this recent article of the New York Times.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/15/world/europe/15military.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=gates%20and%20russian%20counterpart&st=cse

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Gilgamesh 2

Epic of Gilgamesh #2

A major theme in the Epic of Gilgamesh is also shown in a New York Times article called “Young Greeks Seek Options Elsewhere.” In the Epic of Gilgamesh, the King has a strong desire to leave his home. Gilgamesh desires economic prosperity and believes he can achieve prosperity by going on a journey to Cedar Forest to obtain Cedar trees which represents economic fortune. Gilgamesh’s desire is shown when he declared “If I kill Humbaba and cut off his Cedar let there be rejoicing all over the land” (Gilgamesh, 69) to Ninsun, the Great Queen, who is supposedly wise. In the New York Times article, Alexandra Mallosi, a woman that resides in Athens desires to leave. She resembles Gilgamesh because she desires to leave for an economic reason. Alexandra Mallosi is going on a journey to Abu Dhabi to work as a hotel sales manager. She believes her journey to Abu Dhabi would give her economic fortune because according to her  “In other countries, young people are encouraged. In Greece, they are held back.” (B1) Lastly, Gilgamesh and Alexandra Mallosi are going on a journey that present an obstacle. They both are traveling to an area they are not particularly familiar of.
Kitsantonis, Niki. “Young Greeks Seek Options Elsewhere.” New York Times 15 September 2010, New York ed.: B1. Print.
Link:
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Epic of Gilgamesh #2

Blog 2

Laura Wronowski

 “In Military Cutbacks, Gates and His Russian Counterpart Share Common Ground”

This article resembles The Epic of Gilgamesh in many ways. The first is regarding the unfamiliarity Mr. Serdyukov had with their military and the unfamiliarity Enkidu had with being humanlike. The New York Times stated that “…Mr. Serdyukov… had more experience in the furniture industry than with the military…” The Epic of Gilgamesh said “Enkidu knew nothing about eating bread for food, and of drinking beer he had not been taught.” (A97)

Also, both Serdyukov and Enkidu face powerful opponents almost all alone. The article mentions how only Serdyukov is against the entire Russian Military for cutbacks in spending.  “That which Serdyukov is doing is a challenge to the Russian military culture as a whole, the culture that is based upon the idea of a mass-mobilization army starting with Peter the Great.”  (NY Times) In The Epic of Gilgamesh Enkidu killed the Bull of Heaven and stands up for Gilgamesh because Ishtar was upset that Gilgamesh slandered her. Enkidu is faced alone with the powerful Ishtar and said “If I could only get at you I would do the same to you! I would drape his innards over your arms!” (A110)

Works Cited

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/15/world/europe/15military.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper

Schwirtz, Michael; Shanker Thom. “In Military Cutbacks, Gates and His Russian Counterpart Share Common Ground”. New York Times 15 September 2010, New York ed.: The New York Times International A13. Print.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Blog 2

WATUP GILGAMESH X2

The article in the Gates to Meet With Russian Defense Minister written in The New York Times, is about how the U.S Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, will meet with Russian Anatoly E. Serdyukov.  This article can be closely related to the Epic of Gilgamesh, because the characters of Gilgamesh and Enkidu can be compared with that of the U.S and Russia.  As we all know, the United States and Russia were not the best of allies.  The Cold War was proof of this, and now we see that Gates and Serdyukoy was working together to reduce military spending.  This compares to Gilgamesh and Enkidu who were at first enemies, and later were slaying bulls and going on wild adventures.  When it comes to the military, Serdyukov has little experience in the military just as Enkidu does.  Enkidu came from the jungle so his military skills were similar to that of an animal.  Serdyukoy had more experience in the furniture industry than with the military.  Russia and the U.S also share a common goal and that is reducing the size and spending of the defense department.  This goal can be compared to Enkidu and Gilgamesh slaying Humbaba as they both shared a common enemy.
Peace and Love

-Sajjad Ali

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/15/world/europe/15military.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=gates%20and%20russian%20counterpart&st=cse

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on WATUP GILGAMESH X2

Gilgamesh

           In the epic, Gilgamesh had to conquer many hardships. He first had to overcome physical obstacles such as when he set out to destroy Humbaba the Terrible and killed the Bull of Heaven sent from the goddess Ishtar to punish him. In addition, he had to overcome an emotional struggle when his friend Enkidu died. Gilgameshs’ long journey to Utanapishtim also seemed to take a toll on him. We see this when Utanapishtim asks “why are your cheeks emaciated, your expression so desolate? Why is your heart so wretched, your features so haggard?” (pg 89, line 129). Even though Gilgamesh was a king and was meant to be an all powerful force, he still had some difficulties and it showed.

           In the New York Times’ article “Nadal savors latest role: A player for all courts” by Christopher Clarey, we can compare Rafael Nadal‘s obstacles to Gilgameshs’. He had to overcome physical pain, caused by a knee injury, which adversely affected his ability to play tennis. He also had some emotional pain because of his parents divorced. In the end he won the U.S. Open and is the seventh man to win all four Grand Slams singles title, which is a huge highlight in his career.  Nadal’s coach and uncle said “People see the victories, they don’t see the obstacles”, which is true about both Nadal and Gilgamesh.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Gilgamesh

Gilgamesh #2

The Epic of Gilgamesh can be compared to an article in the New York Times, Gates to Meet With Russian Defense Minister Serdyukov, by Gates representing Gilgamesh and Serdyukov as Enkidu. During the Cold War Gates and Serdyukov were adversaries, now they are finally beginning to see eye to eye. This relationship is similar to the one between Gilgamesh and Enkidu, they start out as enemies and eventually become friends. The Epic of Gilgamesh says, “They grappled with each other at the entry to the marital chamber, in the street they attacked each other, the public square of the land. The doorsteps trembled and the wall shook. … They kissed each other and became friends.” (66-67) This shows how the relationship between Gilgamesh and Enkidu quickly changes from foes to friends. Another comparison would be how Serdyukov does not have a lot of experience in the military, just as Enkidu came from the wild and did not have much experience with slaying. The New York Time states that Serdyukov “had more experience in the furniture industry than with the military,” likewise Enkidu lived with the animals before he met Gilgamesh and ventured out to slay Humbaba and the Bull of Heaven. Also, Enkidu slaying Humbaba resembles Serdyukov’s goal of reducing the size of his military and changing to a streamline command structure. In both of these situations both, Enkidu and Serdyukov, are doing, or have done, something that differs from what they would have done in the past. Lastly, the New York Times states, “’The entire military hates him, and that is not an overstatement,’ said Aleksandr Golts, an independent military analyst in Moscow. ‘That which Serdyukov is doing is a challenge to the Russian military culture as a whole, the culture that is based upon the idea of a mass-mobilization army starting with Peter the Great,’” this shows that Serdyukov’s military does not agree with his new plan to alter the Russian army. Which is similar to how the God’s felt about Enkidu after he killed Humbaba and the Bull of Heaven. Enkidu was created to stand up to Gilgamesh not befriend him, this happening angered the God’s. These comparisons show how similar the situation between Gates and Serdyukov is to Gilgamesh and Enkidu in the Epic.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/15/world/europe/15military.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=gates%20and%20russian%20counterpart&st=cse

Posted in Gilgamesh | Comments Off on Gilgamesh #2

Epic of Gilgamesh

The Epic of Gilgamesh is a poem of a friendship between Enkidu and Gilgamesh, who are both “two-third god and one-third human.” (60)   Before Enkidu arrives, Gilgamesh terrorized the people of Uruk.  One day Anu, the sky god, tells the goddess of creation to make someone equal to Gilgamesh after the people called for help.   Aruru, goddess of creation, created Enkidu out of the wild animals.  He became a man when the harlot was sent to seduce him.  After a brief brawl, the two become great friends.

Everyone knows that death is an inevitable part of the human life.  Gilgamesh is upset because only the gods can live forever.  After the death of Enkidu, Gilgamesh is terrified about the day when his life comes to an end.  So his quest to Utnapishtim was for him to become immoral.  Even though both Enkidu and Gilgamesh learned that the only thing that last is fame or how a person affect others whether in a positive or negative way.  In Tablet VIII, Gilgamesh says to Enkidu “the paths going up to and down from the forest cedars all mourn you; the weeping does not end day or night.” (83)  As Enkidu is laying on his deathbed, Gilgamesh is pouring his heart out to his “brother”.  He is letting him know that people would not forget about him and will mourn his death forever.  The people will never forget the changes Enkidu brought onto them.

It’s been nine years since our country was attacked by terrorist.  September 11, 2001 will never be forgotten, and the people who lost their lives will never be forgotten as well.   And every year since the attack, there ahs been a memorial ceremony honoring the innocent who died as well as the brave who died trying to save their fellow American.  In the New York Times article “On Sept. 11 Anniversary Rifts Amid Mourning,” Michelle Obama was quoted from her speech giving in Shanksville, Pa., “We are here to celebrate the bravery of the passengers.”  The police officers and fire fighters were the bravest of them all.  They risked their lives for others.  At the end of the day,  it is what you do that people will remember you.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/12/nyregion/12sept11.html?_r=1&scp=4&sq=9/11%20anniversary&st=cse

Posted in Gilgamesh | Comments Off on Epic of Gilgamesh